Group 1 - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has officially released the "Self-Regulatory Guidelines for Listed Companies on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board No. 5 - Sci-Tech Growth Tier," enhancing the inclusiveness and adaptability of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board to better serve technological innovation and new productivity development [1][2] - The new policies are expected to guide capital towards national strategic needs, promoting a virtuous cycle of "technology-industry-finance" and solidifying the foundation for new productivity development [1][2] - The establishment of the Sci-Tech Growth Tier targets high-potential companies that have not yet reached profitability, providing them with a dedicated capital channel to accelerate core technology breakthroughs and industrialization processes [2][5] Group 2 - The reforms are anticipated to significantly enhance the attractiveness of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board for quality companies and long-term capital, providing more precise funding support and resource allocation for technological innovation enterprises [4] - The introduction of the "1+6" policy is seen as a major upgrade to the Sci-Tech Innovation Board's system, improving its inclusiveness for long-cycle, high-investment fields such as artificial intelligence and innovative pharmaceuticals [5] - Recent data indicates that nearly 86% of listed companies on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board have received support from private equity and venture capital, reflecting a shift in investment focus towards hard technology [5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Aibono Medical is implementing a differentiated dividend distribution plan for the year 2024, which excludes shares repurchased by the company from participating in profit distribution [1][4]. - The reason for the differentiated dividend is the company's decision to repurchase shares for employee stock ownership plans, which results in a total share capital of 193,403,175 shares, with 142,800 shares in the repurchase account, accounting for 0.074% of the total [1][2]. - The proposed cash dividend is 3.50 yuan (including tax) per 10 shares for all shareholders, with the total cash dividend distribution amounting to approximately 67.64 million yuan (including tax) [2][3]. Group 2 - The calculation basis for the differentiated dividend indicates that shares in the repurchase account do not have rights to profit distribution, leading to an adjusted total share capital of 193,260,375 shares for the dividend calculation [2][3]. - The ex-dividend reference price is calculated based on the last closing price of 68.85 yuan per share, resulting in an ex-dividend reference price of approximately 68.50 yuan per share [3][4]. - The impact of the differentiated dividend on the ex-dividend reference price is less than 1%, confirming compliance with relevant regulations and ensuring no harm to the interests of the company and its shareholders [4].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement by the China Interbank Market Dealers Association regarding the low underwriting fees for bond issuance has sparked market attention and initiated a self-regulatory investigation into the practices of the involved institutions [1][3]. Group 1: Underwriting Fees and Market Reactions - The underwriting fees for the bond issuance by Guangfa Bank were reported as low as 700 RMB, raising concerns about the sustainability of such pricing in the market [1][2]. - Previous instances of low underwriting fees have been noted, including a case in September 2022 where fees ranged from 0.000046% to 0.0002%, which was also considered unusually low [2]. - The low fees have led to discussions on social media, highlighting the potential implications for the industry and the ability of firms to cover costs [1][2]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - The Dealers Association has expressed ongoing concern about the phenomenon of low-price competition in the bond underwriting sector, prompting them to issue a notification aimed at strengthening the norms for bond issuance and underwriting [3][4]. - Specific requirements were outlined for issuers and underwriters, including the need to conduct business based on market principles and to avoid practices that distort market prices [4]. - The Association emphasized the importance of maintaining investor rights and ensuring that underwriting fees do not fall below cost, as well as the need for transparency in the bidding process [4][5].

Core Viewpoint - The recent self-discipline investigation by the trading association has highlighted the phenomenon of "floor pricing" in bond underwriting, particularly in the case of the underwriting fees for the 2025-2026 secondary capital bond project of Guangfa Bank, which has drawn significant market attention [1][3]. Group 1: Low Pricing Phenomenon - The occurrence of three-digit underwriting fees is rare and reflects a broader trend of low-price competition within the industry [3]. - In the competitive bidding process for Guangfa Bank's bond issuance, the total underwriting fee for the six selected institutions was only 63,448 yuan, with some institutions quoting as low as 700 yuan [3][4]. - Historically, underwriting fees for bond projects typically do not fall below 1 million yuan, but recent trends show that actual fees have significantly decreased due to intensified competition [4][6]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The underwriting fee rates for large state-owned and joint-stock banks can drop below 0.08%, primarily because these banks issue high-quality assets, making the issuance process simpler and less costly [7][8]. - Smaller banks often face higher costs for underwriting, with fees generally exceeding 1 million yuan, indicating a disparity in pricing strategies based on the size and quality of the issuing bank [8]. - The competitive landscape has led to a situation where institutions prioritize market share over profitability, resulting in a willingness to accept low fees to secure business [8][10]. Group 3: Regulatory Response - The trading association has issued guidelines to strengthen the norms for bond issuance and underwriting, emphasizing the need for market-based principles and fair treatment of all investors [10][11]. - There is a call for regulatory measures to establish minimum fee standards for bond issuance to prevent "involutionary" competition and ensure the quality of bond issuance [11][12]. - The industry is experiencing increased scrutiny from regulators, with a focus on compliance and the need for underwriting institutions to maintain a balance between cost control and regulatory adherence [11][12].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a positive investment rating for the non-banking sector, highlighting the potential for both beta and alpha resonance in the market due to upcoming mid-year performance catalysts [5]. Core Insights - The introduction of new regulations for insurance capital, promoting long-term investments, is expected to enhance the matching of assets and liabilities for insurance companies, thereby increasing their equity investment ratios and stabilizing profit margins [1]. - The performance of listed securities firms is anticipated to show robust growth in the first half of 2025, with several firms projecting significant year-on-year profit increases, driven by active market conditions and improved business operations [2]. - The China Securities Association's new self-regulatory management guidelines aim to enhance the quality of the securities industry, focusing on compliance and risk management, which is expected to support sustainable growth in the sector [3]. Summary by Sections Market Review - Major indices experienced gains, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising by 1.09% and the Shenzhen Component Index increasing by 1.78% during the week of July 7-11, 2025 [8]. Securities Sector - The total trading volume in the A-share market reached 8.80 trillion yuan, with a daily average trading amount of 1.47 trillion yuan, reflecting a 2.25% increase week-on-week and a 118.28% increase year-on-year [17]. - The IPO underwriting scale for the year reached 391.22 billion yuan, while refinancing underwriting amounted to 795.95 billion yuan as of July 11, 2025 [17]. Insurance Sector - The new regulations for insurance capital are expected to improve the long-term investment capabilities of insurance companies, enhancing their ability to provide stable returns and support economic growth [1]. Liquidity Tracking - The central bank conducted a reverse repurchase operation of 425.7 billion yuan, resulting in a net withdrawal of 226.5 billion yuan from the market, indicating tightening liquidity conditions [28]. Investment Recommendations - The report suggests focusing on leading insurance companies such as China Pacific Insurance, Sunshine Insurance, and China Life, as well as top securities firms like CITIC Securities and Huatai Securities, due to their strong market positions and growth potential [39][40].

Core Viewpoint - The direct financing ratio in China is relatively low, indicating significant growth potential and future upward space for direct financing in the country [2][3]. Group 1: Direct Financing and Support for Real Economy - Regulatory bodies have clearly defined the goal of high-quality development in capital markets, emphasizing the need to deepen reforms and increase the proportion of direct financing, particularly for technology innovation and small to medium enterprises [3]. - The company, including its subsidiaries, has a responsibility to promote direct financing and support the development of the real economy through various means, including investment banking, underwriting in primary and secondary markets, and mergers and acquisitions [3]. - Asset management can play a crucial role by directly investing in real enterprises through stocks and bonds, providing direct financing services via ABS and stock pledge businesses, and optimizing investment directions to drive innovation and support national strategic layouts [3]. Group 2: ESG and Social Impact - The company incorporates ESG and social benefit indicators into its investment decision-making process, aiming to balance economic and social benefits through systematic research and judgment [4]. Group 3: Global Strategy and Cross-Border Services - The company has established a global strategy that includes collaborative market research and a one-stop cross-border capital service platform to assist enterprises in expanding internationally [5]. - The goal is to support Chinese enterprises in their global endeavors, ensuring they can "go out, integrate in, and maintain stable development," thereby achieving a truly global financial service for the real economy [5].

Core Viewpoint - The bond underwriting service fee has reached an unprecedented low, raising concerns in the industry, prompting the Trading Dealers Association to initiate a self-regulatory investigation into the involved underwriters [2][12]. Group 1: Investigation and Findings - The Trading Dealers Association announced a self-regulatory investigation into six main underwriters after noticing the low service fees in the bond underwriting for Guangfa Bank's 2025-2026 secondary capital bonds [2][12]. - The selected underwriters for Guangfa Bank's bond issuance were China Galaxy Securities, Guangfa Securities, Industrial Bank, Guotai Junan Securities, CITIC Securities, and CITIC Jianan Securities, with total service fees amounting to only RMB 63,448 [2][4]. Group 2: Service Fee Details - The estimated service fees for the selected underwriters were as follows: China Galaxy Securities RMB 700, Guangfa Securities RMB 1,050, Industrial Bank RMB 700, Guotai Junan Securities RMB 4,998, CITIC Jianan Securities RMB 35,000, and CITIC Securities RMB 21,000 [4][5]. - The extremely low service fees, particularly the RMB 700 from China Galaxy Securities and Industrial Bank, have been described as "floor price" [8]. Group 3: Industry Context - The bond underwriting market is highly competitive, with firms often engaging in price wars to secure underwriting deals, leading to a significant drop in service fees [10]. - The industry typically sees underwriting fees ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of RMB, indicating that the current fees are significantly below the market norm [8][10]. Group 4: Regulatory Response - The Trading Dealers Association's investigation may impact the results of the current bidding process, as the association has previously expressed concerns over low-price competition in the bond underwriting sector [3][12]. - Regulatory bodies have issued multiple guidelines to curb the practice of underpricing in bond underwriting, emphasizing the need for fair competition and adherence to industry standards [11].

Core Viewpoint - The selection of underwriters for the 2025-2026 secondary capital bond issuance by Guangfa Bank has sparked market discussions, particularly due to the low underwriting fees proposed by some firms, leading to a self-regulatory investigation by the interbank market association [1][4][3]. Group 1: Selection of Underwriters - Guangfa Bank has publicly announced the selection results for the underwriting service providers for its 2025-2026 secondary capital bond issuance, with a maximum of six suppliers chosen [1][2]. - The selected underwriters include China Galaxy Securities, Guangfa Securities, Industrial Bank, Guotai Junan Securities, CITIC Securities, and CITIC Jianan Securities [4][2]. - The total underwriting service fee is set at RMB 63.48 million, with a 6% VAT invoice provided [2]. Group 2: Market Reactions and Investigations - The announcement of the low underwriting fees, particularly the "floor price" of RMB 700 quoted by some firms, has raised concerns in the market [4]. - Following the announcement, the interbank market association initiated a self-regulatory investigation into the six selected underwriters due to the market's reaction to the low fees [4][3]. - The association monitors compliance with self-regulatory rules and will take action if any violations are found during the investigation [4][5]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - In June, the interbank market association issued a notice to strengthen the regulation of bond issuance and underwriting practices, emphasizing market-based principles and fair treatment of investors [5][6]. - The notice prohibits underwriters from quoting below cost and mandates compliance with payment obligations [6]. - The association has increased scrutiny on non-market-based bond issuance practices and has reported disciplinary actions against multiple institutions for violations [8][7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the self-regulatory investigation initiated by the Trading Association against six main underwriters due to concerns over low underwriting fees in the bond issuance project for Guangfa Bank's 2025-2026 secondary capital bonds [1][6]. Group 1: Underwriting Fee Details - The total underwriting fee for the six selected financial institutions in the Guangfa Bank bond project is RMB 63,448, with the average income for each underwriter being just over RMB 10,000 [2][5]. - The individual underwriting fees for the six institutions are as follows: China Galaxy Securities RMB 700, Guangfa Securities RMB 1,050, Industrial Bank RMB 700, Guotai Junan Securities RMB 4,998, CITIC Jinshi RMB 35,000, and CITIC Securities RMB 21,000 [5]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Trading Association launched a self-regulatory investigation on July 11, following market concerns regarding the low underwriting fees, which may violate self-regulatory rules [6]. - The association's notification on June 16 emphasized the need for fair market practices, prohibiting underwriters from quoting below cost and ensuring compliance with payment obligations [6]. Group 3: Market Context - The bond underwriting market has become increasingly competitive as securities firms shift focus to bond financing due to a downturn in equity financing [7]. - As of July 11, 90 securities firms have underwritten a total of 24,844 bonds, amounting to RMB 80,435.08 billion, compared to 18,730 bonds and RMB 66,518.02 billion in the same period last year [7]. - The top ten firms in the bond underwriting ranking are all large securities firms, with the top six firms holding a combined market share of 55% [7].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement by the China Interbank Market Dealers Association regarding the low underwriting fees for bond issuance has raised significant market concerns, prompting a self-regulatory investigation into the involved institutions [1][2]. Group 1: Low Underwriting Fees - The underwriting fees for the recent bond issuance by Guangfa Bank were alarmingly low, with some institutions, such as China Galaxy and Industrial Bank, quoting fees as low as 700 RMB [1][2]. - This is not an isolated incident; previous bond issuances have also seen similarly low fees, with rates dropping below 0.0002% in past cases, leading to market astonishment [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - The Dealers Association has expressed ongoing concern over the phenomenon of low-price competition in the bond underwriting sector, which includes issues like low underwriting fees and potential market price distortion [3][4]. - Specific requirements have been set forth by the Association to ensure fair practices, including the prohibition of pre-agreed bond issuance rates and the necessity for underwriters to avoid quoting below cost [4]. Group 3: Self-Regulatory Measures - The Association will implement self-regulatory management and regularly monitor the bond issuance and underwriting business, with potential disciplinary actions for violations of self-regulatory rules [5]. - Violations that breach legal or administrative regulations will be referred to relevant authorities, and such incidents will be recorded in integrity archives for public disclosure [5].