北京市金杜律师事务所 关于莲花控股股份有限公司 2024 年股票期权与限制性股票激励计划 注销部分股票期权和回购注销部分限制性股票事项的 法律意见书 致：莲花控股股份有限公司 北京市金杜律师事务所（以下简称"金杜"）受莲花控股股份有限公司（以 下简称"公司"）委托，作为公司 2024 年股票期权与限制性股票激励计划（以下 简称"本激励计划"）的专项法律顾问，根据《中华人民共和国公司法》（以下 简 称"《 公 司 法 》"） 、 《 中 华 人 民 共 和 国 证 券 法 》 （ 以 下 简 称"《 证 券 法》"）、《上市公司股权激励管理办法（2025 修正）》1（以下简称"《管理办 法》"）等法律、行政法规、部门规章及规范性文件（以下简称"法律法规"）和 《莲花控股股份有限公司章程》（以下简称"《公司章程》"）及《莲花控股股 份有限公司 2024 年股票期权与限制性股票激励计划》（以下简称"《激励计 划》"）的有关规定，按照律师行业公认的业务标准、道德规范和勤勉尽责精 神，就公司注销部分股票期权（以下简称"本次注销"）、回购注销部分限制 性股票（以下简称"本次回购注销"）所涉及的相关事宜，出具本法律意见书。 ...

南财智讯10月30日电，莲花控股发布三季度报告，第三季度公司实现营业收入8.70亿元，同比增长 21.99%；归属于上市公司股东的净利润9145.73万元，同比增长42.23%。前三季度公司实现营业收入 24.91亿元，同比增长28.74%；前三季度归属于上市公司股东的净利润2.53亿元，同比增长53.09%。 ...

莲花控股股份有限公司 2025 年第三季度报告 证券代码：600186 证券简称：莲花控股 莲花控股股份有限公司 2025 年第三季度报告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者 重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 公司董事会及董事、高级管理人员保证季度报告内容的真实、准确、完整，不存在虚假记载、误 导性陈述或重大遗漏，并承担个别和连带的法律责任。 公司负责人、主管会计工作负责人及会计机构负责人（会计主管人员）保证季度报告中财务信息 的真实、准确、完整。 第三季度财务报表是否经审计 □是 √否 一、主要财务数据 （一） 主要会计数据和财务指标 单位：元 币种：人民币 | | | 本报告期比 | | 年初至报告期 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 项目 | 本报告期 | 上年同期增 | 年初至报告期末 | 末比上年同期 | | | | 减变动幅度 | | 增减变动幅度 | | | | (%) | | (%) | | 营业收入 | 869,755,795.80 | 21.99 | 2,490,513,55 ...

证券代码：600186 证券简称：莲花控股 公告编号：2025-082 莲花控股股份有限公司 2025年前三季度经营数据的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 根据《上海证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第 3 号——行业信息披露》之 《第十四号——食品制造》第十四条相关规定，现将莲花控股股份有限公司 2025 年前三季度主要经营数据（未经审计）公告如下： 一、2025 年前三季度主要经营数据 单位：元 币种：人民币 产品收入 2025 年前三季度 2024 年前三季度 同比变动（%） 味精等氨基酸调味品 1,625,500,520.49 1,418,433,501.17 14.60 鸡精等复合调味品 343,407,774.83 248,607,985.85 38.13 算力服务 97,667,393.10 55,707,100.00 75.32 面粉和面制品 150,745,806.94 87,299,930.24 72.68 有机肥和水溶肥 29,597,392.45 26,624,709.30 11.17 ...

证券代码：600186 证券简称：莲花控股 公告编号：2025-086 莲花控股股份有限公司 关于转型算力业务相关进展情况的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 莲花控股股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2023 年 11 月 29 日收到中国 证券监督管理委员会河南监管局（以下简称"河南证监局"）《关于对莲花健康产 业集团股份有限公司采取出具警示函及责令公开说明措施的决定》（行政监管措 施决定书〔2023〕65 号）（以下简称"《决定书》"）。现根据《决定书》的要 求对公司本月算力业务相关进展情况说明如下： | 序 | 合同签订 | 客户 | 合同内容 | | 合同期限 | | 合同金额 | 交付情 | 累计回 款情况 | 变化 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 号 | 时间 | | | | | | （万元） | 况 | （万元） | 情况 | | 1 | 2025.10.22 | EⅧ公司 | 1 ...

莲花控股公告，第三季度营收为8.7亿元，同比增长21.99%；净利润为9145.73万元，同比增长42.23%。 前三季度营收为24.91亿元，同比增长28.74%；净利润为2.53亿元，同比增长53.09%。 ...

Core Insights - A total of 490 stocks in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets have experienced net outflows of main funds for five consecutive days or more as of October 29 [1] - The stock with the longest continuous net outflow is Zhongju Gaoxin, with 31 days of outflows, followed by Hengshen New Materials with 21 days [1] - The largest total net outflow amount is from China Merchants Bank, with a cumulative outflow of 3.093 billion yuan over 12 days [1] Group 1: Stocks with Longest Net Outflows - Zhongju Gaoxin has seen net outflows for 31 days, with a total outflow of 559 million yuan and a cumulative decline of 6.91% [1] - Hengshen New Materials has recorded net outflows for 21 days, totaling 197 million yuan, with a decline of 9.80% [3] - China Merchants Bank has the highest net outflow amount of 3.093 billion yuan over 12 days, with a net outflow ratio of 6.98% and a cumulative increase of 1.65% [1] Group 2: Other Notable Stocks - Guotai Junan has experienced net outflows for 10 days, amounting to 1.877 billion yuan, with a net outflow ratio of 7.89% and a cumulative increase of 2.70% [1] - Shengbang Co. has seen net outflows for 12 days, totaling 1.826 billion yuan, with a net outflow ratio of 9.52% and a cumulative decline of 10.65% [1] - Huajian Group has recorded net outflows for 6 days, with a total outflow of 1.713 billion yuan and a significant decline of 40.29% [1] Group 3: Stocks with Significant Outflow Ratios - Jianan Intelligent has the highest net outflow ratio at 14.74%, with a decline of 2.98% over the past 5 days [1] - Other notable stocks with high outflow ratios include Huayi Development at 11.91% and Pianzaihuang at 11.84% [1] - The overall trend indicates a significant outflow of funds from various sectors, reflecting investor sentiment and market conditions [1]

Core Viewpoint - Hainan Huatie's 3.7 billion yuan computing power order was abruptly terminated, raising three major questions regarding the company's disclosure practices, the rationale behind the contract termination, and its financial capacity to undertake significant capital expenditures [1][3][5] Group 1: Contract Termination - The computing power business is a cross-industry venture for Hainan Huatie, which primarily operates in construction equipment leasing [3] - The company announced a computing power service agreement worth approximately 3.69 billion yuan on March 5, 2023, expecting an annual revenue of about 700 million yuan from this contract [5] - The abrupt termination of the contract was disclosed on September 30, 2023, citing significant changes in market conditions and the lack of any procurement orders since the agreement was signed [5][6] Group 2: Disclosure Practices - There are concerns regarding whether the company provided timely disclosures about the contract's status, as it is required to continuously report on major contracts in its periodic reports [7] - The company had not performed any obligations under the contract and only disclosed the termination a month after its interim report, raising questions about the potential foreknowledge of issues with the contract [8][9] Group 3: Financial Capacity and Implications - The company faces significant financial pressure, with a reported short-term debt of 4.95 billion yuan against a broad monetary fund of 960 million yuan, indicating a substantial funding gap [10] - The capital expenditure related to the computing power contract was projected to exceed 2 billion yuan, which is over 33% of the company's net assets as of the end of Q3 2024 [5][10] - The company's interest expenses accounted for over 100% of its net profit during the reporting period, raising doubts about its ability to fulfill future contractual obligations under such financial strain [10]

Core Viewpoint - Hainan Huatie and Lianhua Holdings have established computing power companies in collaboration with external shareholders, with former Tom Cat chairman Wang Jian being a significant figure behind these shareholders. The companies have experienced a series of events including cross-industry transformation, major contract cancellations, and stock price surges, raising questions about potential capital arbitrage and whether they are being targeted [1][3][13]. Group 1: Company Transformations - Hainan Huatie's computing power business is a cross-industry venture, originally focused on equipment leasing for construction and maintenance services. The sudden shift to computing power raises questions about the rationale behind this transformation and the abrupt termination of significant contracts [3][15]. - Lianhua Holdings has also ventured into the computing power sector through Zhejiang Lianhua Zixing Technology Co., with Wang Jian's company, Xinglin Technology, directly participating in this transition [6][9]. Group 2: Contract Cancellations and Investigations - Hainan Huatie announced the cancellation of a 3.7 billion yuan computing power contract, leading to a significant drop in stock price, which fell nearly 30% following the announcement [1][3]. - Lianhua Holdings similarly faced contract terminations, citing macroeconomic policy impacts and changes in market conditions as reasons for the cancellations [11][12]. Group 3: Stock Price Movements and Investor Behavior - The computing power contracts have catalyzed stock price increases for both companies, with Lianhua Holdings experiencing a notable surge in stock price following the announcement of computing power contracts [18][19]. - Mysterious individuals have entered and exited as major shareholders around the times of stock price surges, suggesting potential insider trading or capital arbitrage activities [21][23]. Group 4: Wang Jian's Involvement - Wang Jian is identified as a key player in both companies' transitions to computing power, with his connections to various companies involved in the contracts raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest and capital manipulation [3][27]. - Wang Jian's past involvement in insider trading and regulatory scrutiny adds to the complexity of the situation, as his actions in the market have previously led to significant financial penalties [24].

Market Overview - The seasoning and fermentation sector experienced a decline of 0.16% on October 24, with Zhu Laoliu leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3950.31, up 0.71%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13289.18, up 2.02% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Daytime stock performance in the seasoning and fermentation sector showed mixed results, with notable gainers and losers: - Richen Co. (603755) increased by 3.56% to 32.60 [1] - ST Jiajia (002650) rose by 1.85% to 7.17 [1] - Haitian Flavoring (603288) decreased slightly by 0.08% to 38.60 [1] - Other notable declines included: - Zhu Laoliu (920726) down 2.02% to 18.40 [2] - Hengshun Vinegar (600305) down 1.47% to 8.03 [2] Trading Volume and Capital Flow - The seasoning and fermentation sector saw a net outflow of 26.48 million yuan from main funds, while retail funds experienced a net inflow of 33.99 million yuan [2] - The total trading volume for the sector was significant, with individual stocks showing varied capital flows [3] Capital Flow Analysis - Key capital flow data for selected stocks: - Angel Yeast (600298) had a main fund net inflow of 32.74 million yuan, but a net outflow from retail investors of 28.43 million yuan [3] - Richen Co. (603755) saw a minor net inflow from main funds of 4.56 million yuan, with retail investors showing a slight net inflow [3] - ST Jiajia (002650) had a net inflow from main funds of 1.23 million yuan, while retail investors experienced a net outflow [3]