Workflow
Breo(688793)
icon
Search documents
股市必读:倍轻松董事长马学军因涉嫌违反证券法律法规等违规行为被证监会立案调查
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2026-02-08 17:47
Key Points - The company Beike (688793) closed at 22.71 yuan on February 6, 2026, down 1.13% with a turnover rate of 2.09% and a trading volume of 18,000 hands, resulting in a transaction amount of 40.79 million yuan [1] - On February 6, the main funds experienced a net outflow of 4.36 million yuan, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 3.51 million yuan [2] - The chairman, Ma Xuejun, is under investigation by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for suspected violations of securities laws, specifically market manipulation [1][2] - The investigation pertains to Ma Xuejun personally and does not affect the company's normal operations, with the company stating that all business activities are proceeding as usual [1][2]
监管持续发威,一夜之间4家A股公司被立案或处罚
Di Yi Cai Jing Zi Xun· 2026-02-08 12:22
Core Viewpoint - The regulatory scrutiny on listed companies in China's A-share market has intensified, with multiple companies facing investigations and penalties for violations related to information disclosure and financial misconduct [2][10]. Group 1: Recent Investigations and Penalties - Two A-share companies, Tian Sheng New Materials and Yahui Long, were recently announced to be under investigation for suspected information disclosure violations [2][6]. - ST Funi was fined 6.5 million yuan for financial fraud involving collusion with a third-party company, which led to inflated profits of approximately 35.8 million yuan in 2020 [3][4]. - Rongbai Technology was fined 9.5 million yuan for misleading statements regarding a major contract, with the investigation concluding within a month [5][6]. Group 2: Overview of Violations - A total of eight A-share companies and four individuals have been investigated since the beginning of 2026, with the majority facing issues related to information disclosure violations [6][7]. - Specific cases include Baoxin Technology and its actual controller being investigated for information disclosure violations, and the independent director of *ST Dongjing being investigated for insider trading [7][8]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The regulatory environment has become increasingly stringent, with a significant number of companies being penalized for financial misconduct in 2025, particularly in the area of information disclosure violations [10][12]. - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has emphasized the need for a comprehensive system to combat financial fraud, indicating a shift towards proactive governance rather than reactive measures [12][13].
一夜之间4家A股公司被立案或处罚!监管持续发威,年初至今多家公司被查
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2026-02-08 10:44
Core Viewpoint - The regulatory scrutiny on A-share companies has intensified, with multiple companies being investigated and penalized for violations related to information disclosure and financial misconduct since 2026 [1][15]. Group 1: Recent Investigations and Penalties - Eight A-share companies and four related individuals have been investigated since 2026, with recent cases including Tian Sheng New Materials and Aihui Long, both facing allegations of information disclosure violations [1][9]. - ST Fuhua was fined 6.5 million yuan for financial fraud involving collusion with a third-party company, which led to inflated profits of approximately 35.8 million yuan in 2020 [3][4]. - Rongbai Technology was fined a total of 9.5 million yuan for misleading statements regarding a major contract with Ningde Times, which was deemed to lack accurate reflection of the actual terms [6][7]. Group 2: Specific Cases and Financial Impact - ST Fuhua's financial misconduct resulted in a reported revenue of 740 million yuan in 2020, a year-on-year increase of 169.36%, but the company still recorded a net loss when excluding the inflated profits [5][4]. - The inflated profits from ST Fuhua's subsidiary accounted for 120.18% of the total profit disclosed for that period, indicating severe discrepancies in financial reporting [4]. - The investigation into Rongbai Technology revealed that the announced sales figures were based on estimates and lacked contractual guarantees, leading to regulatory action [6][8]. Group 3: Broader Regulatory Trends - The regulatory environment has become increasingly stringent, with a notable increase in investigations into financial misconduct and information disclosure violations among A-share companies [15][19]. - In 2025, a total of 87 A-share companies were investigated, with over 40% being ST companies, highlighting a trend of heightened scrutiny in the market [16]. - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has emphasized a comprehensive approach to tackling financial fraud, involving collaboration with judicial authorities to enhance enforcement and accountability [18][19].
实控人两月内两度被立案,倍轻松“难轻松”
Xin Jing Bao· 2026-02-07 07:19
登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 新京报贝壳财经记者 阎侠 编辑 岳彩周 校对 赵琳 两个月不到,2月4日又一份《立案告知书》摆在了倍轻松实控人马学军的面前。 从涉嫌信披违规到涉嫌操纵市场,监管目光持续聚焦的背后,还有实控人此前资金占用往事。 2月6日,倍轻松的股价开盘即下跌,截至收盘,其股价为22.71元/股,跌幅为1.13%,公司总市值约 19.52亿元。自2021年上市即巅峰后,这家公司的市值已较高峰时跌去超80%。 此前,公司发布了一份2025年归母净利润盈转亏的业绩预告,预亏金额亿元左右。记者注意到倍轻松业 绩波动较大,2021年和2024年盈利,2022年和2023年亏损,2025年预亏。而其扣非净利润已连续四年亏 损。 从涉嫌信披违规到涉嫌操纵市场 倍轻松实控人马学军两个月内收到两份立案告知书 2月5日晚间,倍轻松发布公告称,公司于2026年2月4日收到中国证监会对实际控制人马学军下发的《立 案告知书》,因其涉嫌操纵证券市场,根据相关法律法规,中国证监会决定对其立案。 值得一提的是,这已经是马学军在两个月内被下发的第二份《立案告知书》。2025年12月25日,倍轻松 收到中国证监 ...
倍轻松实控人再被立案 涉嫌操纵证券市场
Jing Ji Guan Cha Wang· 2026-02-06 15:04
据经济观察报-经济观察网 2月5日,深圳市倍轻松(维权)科技股份有限公司发布公告称,公司实际控 制人马学军于2月4日收到中国证监会下发的《立案告知书》(编号:证监立案字0382026021号),因其 涉嫌操纵证券市场,根据《中华人民共和国证券法》《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》等法律法规,中国 证监会决定对其立案。这是马学军在2025年12月因涉嫌信息披露违法违规被立案后,短期内第二次接受 证监会调查。 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 ...
业绩亏、实控人再度被查,倍轻松“轻松”不再
Guo Ji Jin Rong Bao· 2026-02-06 10:57
2000年,倍轻松品牌正式创立,并推出首款眼部按摩器产品。2021年7月,倍轻松以"智能按摩设备 第一股"身份登陆科创板,上市首日开盘报160元/股,较发行价27.4元/股上涨484%,市值一度突破百亿 元。 然而,上市即成为公司股价高点,此后倍轻松股价步入长期下行通道,市值持续萎缩。目前约20亿 元的市值,较巅峰时期已蒸发超过80%。 值得关注的是,在前次被立案调查约一个月前,马学军刚刚完成一笔大规模减持。2025年11月21 日,倍轻松公告显示,马学军通过询价转让方式减持公司股份255.26万股,占总股本的2.97%,转让价 格25.35元/股,套现约6471万元。减持后,马学军及其一致行动人持股比例由52.35%降至49.38%。 减持背后,是倍轻松持续承压的业绩表现。财务数据显示,2021年上市当年,公司营收达11.9亿 元,归母净利润0.92亿元,创下业绩高峰,此后便进入下行期。自2022年起,公司归母净利润持续亏 损,尽管2024年短暂扭亏,2025年前三季度却又陷入营收与利润双双下滑的局面。 "智能按摩设备第一股"倍轻松实际控制人、董事长马学军再遭监管立案。 2月5日晚,倍轻松发布公告称,实际控 ...
倍轻松实控人马学军再遭证监会立案
Jing Ji Guan Cha Wang· 2026-02-06 10:51
Core Viewpoint - The actual controller of Shenzhen Beiliang Technology Co., Ltd., Ma Xuejun, is under investigation by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for suspected market manipulation, following a previous investigation for information disclosure violations, raising concerns about the company's governance and financial stability [2][3]. Group 1: Company Performance and Financial Outlook - Beiliang announced a significant expected loss for the fiscal year 2025, projecting a net profit attributable to shareholders of between -105 million and -84 million yuan, contrasting sharply with a profit of 10.25 million yuan in the same period last year [2][3]. - The company attributes this drastic change in performance to a transitional period in its business strategy, leading to revenue decline and unmet expectations regarding sales expenses, alongside fixed costs not being reduced accordingly [3]. Group 2: Governance and Regulatory Issues - The focus has shifted from individual events to a systemic risk assessment of the company's governance structure, as Ma Xuejun holds multiple key positions (Chairman and General Manager), leading to concerns about decision-making transparency and internal control failures [3]. - The CSRC's investigations have progressed from issues of information disclosure compliance to potential personal misconduct affecting market fairness, indicating a deeper scrutiny of Ma Xuejun's actions [3][4]. Group 3: Market Reactions and Investor Sentiment - Following Ma Xuejun's share reduction of approximately 6.47 million yuan shortly before the investigations, there are strong market suspicions regarding the timing and implications of this transaction, particularly whether it involved undisclosed information [5]. - The company is also facing a patent infringement lawsuit with a claim of 10 million yuan, adding to the negative perception and compounded crisis image, which challenges the management's ability to maintain investor confidence [6].
倍轻松实控人一个多月两遭立案 三季度末宝盈基金持股
Zhong Guo Jing Ji Wang· 2026-02-06 09:35
Core Viewpoint - The company Beilingsong (688793.SH) disclosed that its actual controller, Ma Xuejun, received a notice of investigation from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for suspected market manipulation, which is not expected to significantly impact the company's daily operations [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation and Regulatory Actions - On February 4, 2026, Beilingsong received a notice from the CSRC regarding Ma Xuejun's investigation for suspected market manipulation [1]. - Previously, on December 25, 2025, the company and Ma Xuejun were also notified by the CSRC for suspected violations of information disclosure laws [2]. Group 2: Shareholding Structure - As of November 20, 2025, the major shareholders of Beilingsong include Ma Xuejun with a 37.51% stake, followed by Ningbo Heting Investment Co., Ltd. with 7.49%, and Wang Naiqing with 5.6% [3]. - The sixth largest shareholder is China Bank Co., Ltd. - Baoying Core Advantage Flexible Allocation Mixed Securities Investment Fund, holding 1.98% [2][3]. Group 3: Financial Information - Beilingsong raised a total of 422 million yuan during its IPO, with a net amount of 359 million yuan after deducting issuance costs, which was 138 million yuan less than the originally planned net fundraising amount [4]. - The company initially intended to raise 497 million yuan for projects including marketing network construction, R&D center upgrades, and operational capital [4]. Group 4: Company Background - Beilingsong, established in 2000 and located in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, primarily engages in the rubber and plastic products industry, with a registered capital of approximately 859.45 million yuan [5].
证监会重拳出击,每6天1家上市公司被立案调查
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-06 08:46
Regulatory Environment - The capital market is experiencing a wave of intensive and strict regulatory actions, establishing a rapid response chain from investigation to punishment [1][16] - As of February 5, 2026, at least six listed companies or key individuals have been investigated, averaging one case every six days, with 13 companies receiving administrative penalty notices, averaging less than three days between each [1][10] Investigation and Penalties - Companies such as Qingyue Technology and Yuandao Communication have had their accounts frozen due to suspected information disclosure violations, with Qingyue's frozen accounts totaling approximately 134 million yuan and Yuandao's around 9.04 million yuan [2][17] - The investigation into these companies is ongoing, with significant risks of forced delisting if found guilty of major violations [5][19] Financial Performance - Qingyue Technology anticipates a net loss of between 74 million and 110 million yuan for the year 2025, attributed to intensified competition and price pressures in the electronic paper module market [3][18] - Yuandao Communication expects a substantial decline in net profit for 2025, projected to drop by 64.59% to 76.39% year-on-year [4][19] Types of Violations - The reasons for recent investigations have diversified beyond typical information disclosure violations, including market manipulation and misleading statements [6][21] - Specific cases highlight the regulatory focus on misleading statements and significant omissions, indicating a more granular approach to enforcement [8][23] Frequency of Penalties - Since the beginning of 2026, 10 listed or delisted companies have received administrative penalties, with an additional three receiving notices of intended penalties, indicating a high frequency of enforcement actions [10][24] - The issues identified among these companies include systemic financial fraud and misuse of company funds, which have been a focus of regulatory scrutiny [11][25] Long-term Regulatory Mechanisms - The regulatory framework aims to establish a long-term mechanism that discourages violations through comprehensive accountability and technological empowerment [13][28] - The integration of big data and AI in regulatory practices enhances the precision and effectiveness of oversight, targeting deeper issues within corporate governance [14][28]
证监会重拳出击,每6天1家上市公司被立案调查
21世纪经济报道· 2026-02-06 08:42
Core Viewpoint - The recent regulatory actions in the capital market indicate a "zero tolerance" approach, establishing a new normal for comprehensive supervision that aims to enhance the quality of listed companies and purify the market ecosystem [1][15]. Regulatory Actions - Since the beginning of 2026, at least six listed companies or key individuals have been investigated, averaging one case every six days, with 13 companies receiving administrative penalty notices or prior notifications, averaging less than three days between each [1][11]. - The regulatory focus has shifted from merely punishing companies to targeting the entire ecosystem involved in fraudulent activities, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive response chain from investigation to punishment [1][14]. Types of Violations - The reasons for investigations have diversified, including market manipulation, information disclosure violations, misleading statements, and significant omissions [8][9]. - Specific cases highlight the increasing granularity of regulatory scrutiny, with investigations targeting misleading statements and significant omissions in disclosures [9]. Financial Penalties - As of February 5, 2026, ten listed companies or delisted companies have received administrative penalties, with three others receiving prior notifications, indicating a high frequency of enforcement actions [11]. - Serious cases of systemic financial fraud, such as *ST Changyao, have led to severe penalties, including forced delisting and substantial fines [11]. Impact on Companies - Companies like Qingyue Technology and Yuandao Communication face significant operational pressures alongside regulatory scrutiny, with projected losses and substantial declines in net profits [4][5][6]. - The regulatory environment has prompted a reduction in the misuse of company funds, with many previously problematic shareholders returning misappropriated funds [12]. Long-term Mechanism - The regulatory framework aims to establish a long-term mechanism that discourages violations through strict enforcement and technological empowerment, ensuring that companies adhere to compliance standards [13][15]. - The integration of advanced technologies like big data and AI into regulatory practices enhances the precision and effectiveness of oversight, targeting deeper and more complex fraudulent behaviors [14].