Core Viewpoint - The ongoing lawsuit against Silver River Technology Co., Ltd. (ST Silver River) for securities false statements is gaining attention, with lawyers representing affected investors submitting additional lawsuits this week [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau found that Silver River Technology failed to disclose non-operating fund occupation by related parties and had false records in its 2023 annual report and 2024 semi-annual report [1][4]. - The company also did not disclose related guarantees, with significant omissions in annual reports from 2018 to 2023, and had false records in financial reports from 2021 to the third quarter of 2023 [1][4]. - The auditing firm Zhongxinghua Certified Public Accountants and its signing accountants were warned and fined for not performing due diligence in the audits of the 2021 and 2022 annual financial statements [2][4]. Group 2: Investor Compensation - According to the Supreme People's Court's judicial interpretation on false statements, investors can sue for compensation for losses incurred due to the company's false statements, including investment loss, commission, and stamp duty losses [2][4]. - Investors who purchased ST Silver River shares between April 19, 2019, and April 29, 2024, and still held them at the close on April 29, 2024, are eligible to seek compensation, subject to court verification [2][4]. - To file for compensation, investors must provide their securities account information, stock reconciliation statements from April 1, 2019, to the end of December 2024, and contact information [2][4].

Core Viewpoint - ST Yinjian's new chairman, Yao Chengling, has invested over 100 million yuan in the company just two weeks after taking office, indicating strong confidence in the company's future prospects [1][2]. Group 1: Shareholding Changes - Yinjian Technology Group auctioned 29 million shares of ST Yinjian, accounting for 3.65% of the total share capital, from January 19 to 20, with intense bidding activity [1]. - Shandong Baoze Industrial Investment Co., Ltd. won all five auction rounds, spending a total of 112 million yuan, with an average transaction price of approximately 3.85 yuan per share [1]. - Following the auction, Yinjian Technology Group's shareholding in ST Yinjian decreased from 81.883 million shares (10.30%) to 52.883 million shares (6.65%), while Shandong Baoze became the second-largest shareholder, surpassing Zhejiang Merchants Securities Asset Management [3]. Group 2: Leadership Background - Yao Chengling, born in 1978 and holding a master's degree, was elected as the chairman of ST Yinjian on January 6, 2024, and has a background in engineering and various leadership roles in business associations [2]. - Prior to his election, Yao Chengling and his investment company, Baoju Investment, were not listed among the top ten shareholders of ST Yinjian [2]. Group 3: Investment Focus - Yao Chengling focuses on platform operations, industry cultivation, and investments in artificial intelligence and regenerative medicine [3]. - Baoju Investment has invested in over ten companies, including Shandong Chaoxing Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Mohe Technology, indicating a diverse investment portfolio [3].

证券代码：300020 证券简称：ST 银江 公告编号：2026-004 银江技术股份有限公司 关于公司股东部分股份被司法拍卖的进展公告 1.本次拍卖标的物为公司控股股东银江科技集团有限公司 29,000,000 股股 票，占其持有公司股份的 35.42%，占公司总股本的 3.65%。 2.截至本公告披露日，本次司法拍卖网拍阶段已经结束，本次司法拍卖股票 竞买成交 29,000,000 股，占银江科技集团有限公司总数的 35.42%，占公司总股 本的 3.65%。拍卖标的最终成交以杭州市上城区人民法院出具的拍卖成交裁定为 准。后续仍涉及缴纳竞拍余款、法院执行法定程序、股权变更过户等环节，最终 结果存在一定的不确定性，敬请广大投资者注意投资风险。 3.本次拍卖完成股权司法划转过户后，银江科技集团持有的公司股份将由 81,883,007 股减少至 52,883,007 股（占公司总股本比例将由 10.30%降至 6.65%）。 本次股份被司法拍卖事项不会导致控股股东及实际控制人发生变更。 银江技术股份有限公司（以下简称"银江技术"或"公司"）于 2025 年 12 月 23 日在巨潮资讯网上披露了《关于股东所持部 ...

Core Viewpoint - The regulatory scrutiny on accounting firms has intensified, with 13 firms receiving regulatory letters from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and exchanges for failing to perform due diligence in auditing financial statements, particularly in the case of Hongxiang Co., which reported inflated revenues and profits [1][2][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - 13 accounting firms have received regulatory letters due to inadequate diligence in auditing, with over half issuing unqualified audit reports for problematic financial statements [3]. - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange disclosed that two firms, Rongcheng and Zhicheng, were criticized for their audit reports on Hongxiang Co. for the years 2017-2021, which contained false records [1][2]. - The CSRC imposed a fine of 25.13 million yuan on Hongxiang Co. for inflated revenues of 1 billion yuan and profits of 392 million yuan over six years [2]. Group 2: Penalties and Fines - A total of 1,643,000 yuan in fines and confiscated income was imposed on three accounting firms and related certified public accountants for failing to meet diligence standards [4]. - Zhongxinghua Accounting Firm faced the highest penalties, totaling 1.11 million yuan, for issuing false audit reports for Yinjiang Technology [4]. - Lianda Accounting Firm was fined 60,000 yuan and had 32,550 yuan of audit income confiscated for inadequate auditing of Jiangping Biological's financial statements [4]. Group 3: Increased Regulatory Oversight - Regulatory bodies have significantly increased penalties and the frequency of sanctions against accounting firms, indicating a trend of stricter oversight in the industry [5]. - Accounting firms engaged in securities services are subject to dual regulation by both the CSRC and the Ministry of Finance, which can lead to double penalties for misconduct [5]. - Beijing Yatai International Accounting Firm was warned and fined for serious quality issues in multiple audits, highlighting ongoing regulatory challenges in the sector [6].

银江技术股份有限公司 证券代码：300020 证券简称：ST 银江 公告编号：2026-003 1.案件所处的诉讼阶段：一审判决后原告提出上诉； 2.上市公司所处的当事人地位：被上诉人； 3.涉案的金额：上诉人（原审原告）诉求金额 220,450,529.71 元；一审判 决被上诉人（原审被告）支付金额 3,518,243 元； 4.对上市公司损益产生的影响：本案一审已判决；二审尚未开庭审理，因此 对公司本期利润或期后利润的影响尚存在不确定性。 一、本次诉讼前期一审基本情况 银江技术股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"银江技术"）于 2024 年 4 月 26 日收到浙江省杭州市拱墅区人民法院（以下简称"拱墅区法院"）出具的 《民事起诉状》（（2024）浙 0105 民诉前调 5715 号），具体内容详见《关于收 到民事起诉状的公告》（公告编号：2024-025）。上诉人浙江浙商证券资产管理 有限公司（以下简称"浙商资管"）一审诉讼请求如下： 关于收到民事上诉状暨诉讼进展的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚 假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 重要内容提示： 3.驳回原告浙江浙商 ...

Core Viewpoint - The administrative penalty against Zhongxinghua Accounting Firm highlights significant failures in auditing practices, leading to severe financial misstatements at Yinjian Technology, raising concerns about the integrity of financial reporting in the industry [1][2][3]. Group 1: Penalties and Violations - Zhongxinghua Accounting Firm was fined 11.13 million yuan for issuing false audit reports related to Yinjian Technology, marking it as the most penalized accounting firm at the start of 2026 [1][2]. - The firm had previously received a reprimand for audit fraud in the financial reports of Taiantang for the years 2018-2020, indicating a pattern of regulatory scrutiny [2]. Group 2: Audit Failures - The audit failures stemmed from Zhongxinghua's work on Yinjian Technology's financial statements for 2021 and 2022, where it failed to identify significant revenue inflation totaling 68.17 million yuan and profit inflation of 25.65 million yuan [3][4]. - Specific issues included the misclassification of project revenues and the failure to detect changes in contract terms, leading to inflated financial results [4]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The audit failures at Zhongxinghua are indicative of deeper financial irregularities at Yinjian Technology, which has faced significant operational and compliance challenges, including a 76.01% drop in revenue year-over-year [6][8]. - Yinjian Technology's governance issues have resulted in substantial financial losses and legal troubles, with over 1.1 billion yuan in funds misappropriated by its controlling shareholder [7][9]. Group 4: Regulatory Environment - The regulatory landscape is tightening, with multiple accounting firms facing penalties for similar audit deficiencies, reflecting a broader crackdown on financial misconduct in the industry [11][12]. - The recent actions by regulatory bodies emphasize the importance of accountability for third-party auditors in financial reporting, aiming to restore trust in the auditing profession [13].

Group 1 - The stock price of ST Yinjian (300020) closed at 3.94 yuan on January 14, 2026, with an increase of 0.77% and a turnover rate of 3.04% [1] - The trading volume was 233,000 hands, with a total transaction amount of 92.1568 million yuan [1] - On January 14, the net outflow of main funds was 1.7125 million yuan, while retail investors had a net inflow of 597,800 yuan [2] Group 2 - On January 13, ST Yinjian disclosed that certain individuals, including Gao Minjian and representatives from Zhongxinghua Accounting Firm, were penalized by the Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau for violations related to information disclosure [1][2]

Core Viewpoint - The Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau has imposed administrative penalties on Zhongxinghua Accounting Firm for issuing false audit reports for Yinjian Technology's financial statements for 2021 and 2022, leading to potential legal actions from investors [1][5]. Group 1: Violations by Zhongxinghua Accounting Firm - Zhongxinghua Accounting Firm's audit reports for Yinjian Technology for the years 2021 and 2022 contained false records [1][5]. - The firm failed to exercise due diligence during the audit of Yinjian Technology's financial statements for 2021 and 2022 [1][5]. Group 2: Violations by Yinjian Technology - Yinjian Technology did not disclose related party non-operating fund occupation as required, resulting in false records in the 2023 annual report and the 2024 semi-annual report [5][6]. - The company failed to disclose related guarantees, leading to significant omissions in annual reports from 2018 to 2023 [6]. - Financial reports from 2021 to the third quarter of 2023 contained false records: - In 2021, due to delays in a photovoltaic project, Yinjian Technology inflated its operating income by 16.4571 million and total profit by 16.2102 million, accounting for 0.82% and 15.08% of the reported amounts, respectively [7]. - In 2022, the company inflated its operating income by 57.2741 million and total profit by 14.9252 million, representing 3.55% and 19.97% of the reported amounts, respectively [7]. - From January to September 2023, Yinjian Technology inflated its operating income and total profit through fictitious project businesses and income [7]. Group 3: Legal Actions and Investor Claims - Attorney Xu Feng from Shanghai Jiucheng Law Firm is representing investors in claims against Yinjian Technology and plans to include Zhongxinghua Accounting Firm as a co-defendant, seeking joint liability for compensation [1][5]. - Investors who purchased Yinjian Technology stock between April 19, 2019, and April 30, 2024, and sold or continued to hold the stock after April 30, 2024, may initiate claims [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau has issued an administrative penalty against Zhongxinghua Accounting Firm and its signing auditors for failing to perform due diligence in the audit of Silver River Technology's financial statements for 2021 and 2022, resulting in false records in the audit reports [1][4][9]. Group 1: Audit Findings - Zhongxinghua's audit reports for Silver River Technology for 2021 and 2022 contained false records, including significant overstatements of revenue and profit due to improper accounting practices [4][9]. - In 2022, Silver River Technology overstated its revenue by 51.71 million yuan and profit by 9.44 million yuan, which represented 3.21% and 12.63% of the reported amounts, respectively [4]. - In 2021, the company overstated its revenue by 16.46 million yuan and profit by 16.21 million yuan, accounting for 0.82% and 15.08% of the reported amounts, respectively [4]. Group 2: Audit Procedures - The audit procedures for 2022 were inadequate, as Zhongxinghua failed to maintain reasonable professional skepticism despite identifying significant fraud risks related to contract revenue [5][9]. - In 2021, the firm did not adequately question abnormal situations regarding revenue recognition, failing to execute further audit procedures despite recognizing significant fraud risks [6][9]. - The audit of related guarantees in 2021 and 2022 was insufficient, as Zhongxinghua only obtained scanned copies of property certificates without verifying original documents or checking mortgage records [8][9]. Group 3: Penalties Imposed - Zhongxinghua was ordered to correct its practices, with a total of 5,566,037.74 yuan in business income confiscated and an equal amount in fines imposed [1][9]. - The signing auditors, Gao Minjian and Pang Yuwen, received warnings and fines of 300,000 yuan each for their roles in the violations [1][9].

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我 一、部分案件已开庭审理 上海沪紫律师事务所刘鹏律师团队近日再次递交20人案件至法院立案，此前部分案件已开庭，目前该案 还在诉讼时效内。（刘鹏律师专栏） 根据浙江证监局下发的《行政处罚决定书》，这家成立于1992年、2009年首批登陆创业板的企业，因多 项信息披露违法违规行为被处罚。 银江技术在2023年至2024年6月期间，通过往来款、员工借款、预付款等多种名目，累计向控股股东银 江科技集团及其关联方输送资金近11亿元，且未履行任何披露义务。 根据其违规事实，现符合以下任意区间的投资者可报名索赔：（*ST银江维权入口） （1）于2023年8月29日-2024年4月29日期间买入，并在2024年4月30日之后卖出或仍持有而亏损； （2）于2019年4月19日-2024年9月13日（含当日）期间买入，并在2024年9月14日之后卖出或仍持有而 亏损。 二、 ...