Core Viewpoint - The company is currently not involved in the 6G field and does not have any 6G-related products, as the industry is still in the research and exploration phase for 6G communication technology [1]. Group 1 - The company has stated that the 6G communication technology is still in the experimental stage and will take a long time before commercial and large-scale deployment [1]. - The company is considering investments in related companies from the perspective of strategic positioning and resilience in the industry chain [1]. - There is no current involvement or product application related to 6G technology by the company [1]. Group 2 - An investor inquired about the company's previous statements regarding accelerating 6G technology research and whether there are any stage results or product timelines [3]. - The investor also asked if the company's core products, such as base station antennas and IoT terminals, have any technical plans for adapting to 6G or satellite communication [3]. - The investor sought clarification on the synergy between the company's investment in Ningbo Chip Speed's silicon photonics module business and its 6G layout [3].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the 6G communication technology is still in the research and exploration phase, transitioning from laboratory to real-world applications, and significant time is needed before commercialization and large-scale deployment [1] - The company has not yet engaged in the 6G field and does not have any related products or applications [1]

Market Overview - The communication services sector experienced a decline of 0.91% on November 27, with Yitong Century leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3875.26, up 0.29%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 12875.19, down 0.25% [1] Stock Performance - Notable gainers in the communication services sector included: - Zhongfutong (300560) with a closing price of 18.10, up 4.20% and a trading volume of 374,600 shares [1] - Chaoxun Communication (603322) closed at 48.50, up 1.83% with a trading volume of 174,200 shares [1] - Zongheng Communication (603602) closed at 14.85, up 1.02% with a trading volume of 40,800 shares [1] - Conversely, significant decliners included: - Guantong Century (300310) down 3.78% to 6.36 with a trading volume of 606,500 shares [2] - Online and Offline (300959) down 3.32% to 124.80 with a trading volume of 52,000 shares [2] - Aofei Data (300738) down 3.19% to 19.14 with a trading volume of 387,400 shares [2] Capital Flow - The communication services sector saw a net outflow of 927 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors contributed a net inflow of 629 million yuan [2] - The sector's capital flow indicates a mixed sentiment, with institutional investors withdrawing funds while retail investors increased their positions [2] Individual Stock Capital Flow - Key stocks with significant capital flow include: - Hengxin Oriental (300081) with a net inflow of 45.23 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - Guoan Co. (000839) saw a net inflow of 17.21 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - China Mobile (600941) had a net inflow of 4.72 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - Notably, some stocks like Zongheng Communication (603602) and Jida Communication (300597) experienced net outflows from both institutional and retail investors [3]

Group 1 - The company Yitong Century reported that as of September 30, 2025, the number of shareholders reached 57,315 [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing legal battles faced by Yitong Century (宜通世纪) following its acquisition of Beitai Health, highlighting recent developments in both criminal and civil cases related to the acquisition fraud, and the company's current state of having no controlling shareholder. Group 1: Legal Developments - Yitong Century has been pursuing legal action for seven years after acquiring Beitai Health for 1 billion yuan, which led to significant financial losses due to fraud [1][3]. - Recent updates include a criminal judgment against a co-defendant, who was sentenced to five years in prison and ordered to return 40 million yuan to Yitong Century [3][4]. - The civil case seeking 580 million yuan in damages has been sent back for retrial and accepted by the court, marking a procedural win for Yitong Century [6][7]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The total potential value of Yitong Century's claims, including criminal and civil cases, amounts to approximately 1.39 billion yuan [1]. - Despite the criminal ruling, the execution of the compensation remains uncertain due to the defendant's financial issues, with previous attempts to recover funds yielding minimal results [6][10]. - Yitong Century's financial performance has been declining, with a reported revenue of 2.502 billion yuan in 2024, down 5.93% year-on-year, and a net loss of approximately 30.35 million yuan [10][11]. Group 3: Corporate Governance - Yitong Century recently announced the dissolution of the agreement among its three controlling shareholders, resulting in a state of having no controlling shareholder [8]. - This change in governance occurs amidst the ongoing fallout from the acquisition fraud, leaving the company in a vulnerable position [8][16]. - The company has been focusing on its core business areas, such as telecommunications and IoT, after divesting Beitai Health in 2019 [8][11].

Core Viewpoint - Yitong Century announced that the company and its subsidiaries have no external guarantees, no overdue guarantees, and no amounts related to guarantees involved in litigation or losses due to adverse judgments [2] Summary by Categories - **Company Guarantees** - The company confirmed that it and its subsidiaries do not have any external guarantees [2] - There are no overdue guarantees reported [2] - **Litigation and Financial Liabilities** - The company stated that there are no amounts related to guarantees involved in any litigation [2] - There are no losses that the company needs to bear due to adverse judgments related to guarantees [2]

关于涉及诉讼事项的进展公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 重要内容提示： 1、案件所处的诉讼阶段：已收到案件重审的《受理案件通知书》 2、上市公司所处的当事人地位：案件重审原告 证券代码：300310 证券简称：宜通世纪 公告编号:2025-048 宜通世纪科技股份有限公司 3、是否对上市公司损益产生的影响：因重审尚未开庭，暂无法判断对公司 损益的影响。 宜通世纪科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"宜通世纪"）于 2025 年 11 月 20 日收到广东省广州市中级人民法院出具的案件重审的《受理案件通知书》。 根据《深圳证券交易所创业板股票上市规则》关于信息披露的相关规定，现将涉 及的诉讼进展事项公告如下： 一、诉讼事项的基本情况 因深圳市倍泰健康测量分析技术有限公司（以下简称"倍泰健康"）原法定代 表人、实际控制人方炎林在宜通世纪并购倍泰健康过程中对公司实施合同诈骗， 为维护公司和全体股东的合法权益，公司依法向广州市中级人民法院提起诉讼， 请求法院撤销公司在并购倍泰健康时与交易对方签署的资产购买协议及补充协 议，判令各交易对方返还其因该购 ...

证券代码：300310 证券简称：宜通世纪 公告编号：2025-049 宜通世纪科技股份有限公司 关于为控股子公司提供担保的进展公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、担保情况概述 宜通世纪科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2025 年 3 月 28 日分别召 开了第五届董事会第十一次（2024 年度）会议以及第五届监事会第九次（2024 年度）会议，会议审议通过了《关于为控股子公司提供担保的议案》，同意公司 为广东众益鼎新能源技术有限公司（以下简称"众益鼎"）及其下属项目公司向银 行或其他金融机构申请项目贷款担保，总额不超过人民币 8,000 万元连带责任担 保，担保的期限自公司董事会审议通过之日起的 12 个月内有效，最终担保金额 和期限以担保方和金融机构签署的担保协议为准。具体内容详见公司于 2025 年 4 月 1 日在巨潮资讯网披露的《关于为控股子公司提供担保的公告》（公告编号： 2025-013）。 2025 年 6 月 12 日，众益鼎全资子公司广州海枢新能源有限公司（以下简称 "海枢新能源"）因生产经营的需要，与兴业银行 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent court ruling against Xu Mouqun in the financial fraud case related to the acquisition of Beitai Health by Yitong Century Technology Co., Ltd. highlights the increasing judicial efforts to combat financial fraud in China, emphasizing both the principal offenders and accomplices in such schemes [1][4]. Group 1: Case Background - Yitong Century initiated a major asset restructuring in 2016, acquiring 100% of Beitai Health for a total consideration of 1 billion yuan, with a commitment from the sellers to achieve a cumulative net profit of no less than 311 million yuan from 2016 to 2019 [2]. - In 2017, Beitai Health, under the direction of its original controllers, fabricated orders leading to financial misstatements in Yitong Century's 2017 annual report, resulting in administrative penalties from the China Securities Regulatory Commission [2][3]. Group 2: Judicial Outcomes - Xu Mouqun was sentenced to five years in prison and fined 500,000 yuan for his role in the fraud, which included providing funds and assisting in the financial deception that caused significant economic losses to Yitong Century [1][3]. - The court ordered the recovery of 40 million yuan from Xu's illegal gains to be returned to Yitong Century, with additional compensation required if the recovered amount was insufficient [1]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The case reflects a broader trend in China's regulatory environment, where the China Securities Regulatory Commission has begun to hold accomplices accountable alongside primary offenders in financial fraud cases, reinforcing a multi-faceted accountability system [4][6]. - Recent cases indicate a shift towards more stringent penalties for both the main perpetrators and those who assist in financial fraud, aiming to dismantle the ecosystem that supports such illegal activities [7][8].

Core Viewpoint - Yitong Century Technology Co., Ltd. has received a criminal judgment from the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court regarding a long-standing merger and acquisition financial fraud case, marking a significant step in judicial accountability against financial fraud in China [1][2]. Group 1: Case Background - In 2016, Yitong Century initiated a major asset restructuring, acquiring 100% of Shenzhen Beitai Health Measurement Analysis Technology Co., Ltd. for a total consideration of 1 billion yuan, with a commitment from the sellers to achieve a cumulative net profit of no less than 311 million yuan from 2016 to 2019 [2]. - The fraud involved the fabrication of orders by Beitai Health, leading to financial misstatements in Yitong Century's 2017 annual report, resulting in administrative penalties from the China Securities Regulatory Commission [2]. Group 2: Judicial Outcomes - The court sentenced Xu Mouqun to five years in prison and imposed a fine of 500,000 yuan for his role in the fraud, which included providing funds and assisting in financial deception, causing significant economic losses to Yitong Century [1][3]. - The court also ordered the recovery of 40 million yuan in illegal gains from Xu, with provisions for further compensation if the recovery was insufficient [1]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The case reflects a broader trend in China's regulatory environment, emphasizing a dual approach of targeting both the principal offenders and accomplices in financial fraud cases, thereby enhancing market integrity and protecting investors' rights [1][4]. - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has reinforced its stance on punishing accomplices in financial fraud, indicating a shift towards a more comprehensive accountability framework [4][6]. Group 4: Industry Implications - The increasing severity of penalties for financial fraud, including criminal charges against accomplices, aims to deter potential fraudsters and purify the market environment [8][9]. - The establishment of a multi-dimensional accountability system is intended to create clear behavioral boundaries for market participants, thereby safeguarding investors' legitimate rights and interests [8][9].