Group 1 - The willingness of listed companies to distribute dividends has significantly increased, with the total cash dividends in the A-share market reaching a historical high of 2.56 trillion yuan by December 15, exceeding the total for the entire year of 2024 [1] - Traditional "dividend giants" have increased their cash return efforts, with over 80% of the 36 companies that distributed more than 10 billion yuan in cash dividends in 2025 showing an increase compared to last year [2] - Companies such as China Construction Bank and Bank of China reported cash dividend increases of over 45% compared to last year, while Zijin Mining, BYD, and Hikvision each surpassed 10 billion yuan in cash distributions for the first time [2] Group 2 - A total of 38 companies have announced shareholder return plans for the next three years (2026-2028), with a majority committing to distribute at least 10% of their distributable profits in cash annually [3] - Specific companies like Qibin Group and China Merchants Shekou have set even higher cash distribution targets, with Qibin Group aiming for over 50% and China Merchants Shekou for at least 40% of their net profits [3][4] - The average stock price increase for the 38 companies that announced return plans is nearly 4%, outperforming the average increase of the CSI 300 index [5] Group 3 - Companies such as Wangzi New Materials and Aibisen have seen significant stock price increases following their announcements of cash distribution plans, with Wangzi New Materials' stock rising over 50% since March 29 [5][6] - 17 out of the 38 companies received extensive institutional research, with some like Baiwei Storage and Shiji Information attracting over 200 institutional inquiries [6][7] - Baiwei Storage has achieved core supplier qualifications from major server manufacturers and internet companies, committing to distribute at least 10% of its distributable profits in cash [6]

Core Insights - The collaboration between Yunzhihui Technology and Absen marks a significant step in integrating "LED + AI" technologies to promote smart, visual, and low-carbon manufacturing upgrades [1][3] - The partnership aims to leverage Yunzhihui's 30 years of 3C manufacturing experience and AIoT service capabilities alongside Absen's global leadership in Micro LED display and smart interaction technologies [1] Group 1 - The collaboration will focus on three core capabilities: an AI algorithm-based LED display quality optimization system that reduces energy consumption by 30% while enhancing visual experience [1] - The integration of voice recognition and natural language processing technology in a virtual digital assistant, "Xiao Ai," will facilitate real-time interaction and command execution in production line inspections and equipment maintenance [1] - The partnership has already seen successful projects in Taiwan with companies like Hongbai Technology, Dingpu Factory, and McDonald's [1] Group 2 - Absen is transitioning from a display hardware manufacturer to a leader in AI intelligent light display ecosystems, with this collaboration accelerating that process [3] - The integration of Absen's latest Absenicon X series wide screens with Yunzhihui's MES system allows for real-time presentation of equipment operation data, energy consumption metrics, and production dynamics [3] - The partnership represents a milestone in the evolution of China's smart factory ecosystem, moving from isolated breakthroughs to systemic innovation [3]

Group 1 - The core issue regarding the chairman's salary dissatisfaction is a superficial reason, with deeper concerns related to the company's governance structure, profit distribution mechanism, and salary allocation system [2] - Recently, Abison announced that the first meeting of the sixth board of directors approved several proposals, but the actual controller and chairman, Ding Yanhui, voted against the election of the chairman, citing dissatisfaction with the salary [3] - According to Abison's 2024 annual report, Ding Yanhui received a pre-tax total compensation of 4.3556 million yuan in 2024, which includes 1.7399 million yuan from the employee stock ownership plan, representing an increase of nearly 1.5 million yuan compared to 2.8845 million yuan in 2023 [4] Group 2 - Abison's main business involves the research, development, production, sales, and service of LED application products, facing competition from companies such as LianYard, Zhouming Technology, Aoto Electronics, and Lehman Optoelectronics [4]

Core Viewpoint - The chairman of the company addressed concerns regarding his annual salary of 4.35 million yuan, suggesting that if the public believes he should receive only 50,000 yuan, he is open to that adjustment [1] Group 1 - The chairman's current salary is 4.35 million yuan, which has raised questions among stakeholders [1] - The chairman expressed willingness to reform his salary based on public opinion, indicating a responsive leadership style [1]

Core Viewpoint - The unusual voting scenario during the board meeting of Absen (300389.SZ) highlighted internal governance issues, with the chairman, Ding Yanhui, voting against his own re-election to signal the need for reform in the company's governance and compensation structure [2][3]. Group 1: Governance and Shareholding Structure - Ding Yanhui's dissenting vote was motivated by a desire to address the company's governance structure, which he believes is hindered by concentrated shareholding and unequal distribution of interests [3][5]. - The three founding shareholders, including Ding Yanhui, hold a significant portion of the company's shares: Ding holds 33.78%, while the other two founders hold 16.61% and 14.23%, respectively, leading to limited market participation from institutional investors [3][4]. - The concentrated ownership structure has resulted in decision-making inefficiencies, with major decisions potentially blocked by dissent from any of the three major shareholders [5]. Group 2: Compensation and Incentive Mechanisms - Ding Yanhui expressed dissatisfaction with the current compensation system, describing it as "unscientific and unreasonable," which has led to internal inequities in pay among employees [12][13]. - The company reported a significant increase in employee compensation, with total payable employee salaries reaching 156 million yuan, a 27.80% increase year-on-year, aligning with a 30.84% increase in net profit [10]. - Despite the increase in compensation, Ding Yanhui noted that the distribution mechanism has not kept pace with the company's growth, indicating a need for a more balanced approach to value creation among shareholders, the company, and employee incentives [10][11]. Group 3: Future Directions and Challenges - Ding Yanhui aims to establish a more modern and transparent board decision-making mechanism, emphasizing the importance of optimizing the shareholding structure as part of the reform process [6][11]. - The company is taking steps to address governance issues by hiring younger, highly educated professionals for key positions and engaging third-party consultants to revamp the compensation system [13]. - The internal conflict and governance challenges at Absen reflect broader issues faced by private enterprises in China as they transition towards modern governance practices [13].

Group 1 - The company Absen (300389) responded to investor inquiries on December 4, indicating that shareholders should pay attention to the company's upcoming periodic reports for information on shareholder numbers [1] - The company emphasized its commitment to fulfilling information disclosure obligations in accordance with relevant regulations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The chairman of Absen, Ding Yanhui, voted against his own re-election due to dissatisfaction with his salary of 4.35 million yuan for 2024, raising questions about internal governance and the effectiveness of the company's compensation committee [2][3] Group 1: Internal Governance Issues - The public disclosure of internal governance conflicts raises concerns about compliance with information disclosure norms, as significant disagreements and reform proposals should ideally be discussed within the board and transparently communicated to all shareholders [3] - Ding Yanhui's choice to vote against his re-election may force reforms but raises questions about whether this approach aligns with the fairness and regulatory requirements of information disclosure for listed companies [3] Group 2: Public Relations and Narrative - There is suspicion of a "public relations narrative" where some entrepreneurs create a "celebrity" image, framing internal conflicts as a public transformation, which could be a strategic move to break negotiation deadlocks [3] - The internal power dynamics at Absen, particularly the influence of its three founding shareholders, complicate the situation and prompt scrutiny of whether the public opposition is a calculated strategy [3] Group 3: Potential for Real Change - The critical question remains whether the public discourse will lead to genuine institutional changes, such as a review and optimization of the compensation committee's response and decision-making processes [3] - The outcome of the compensation reform plan will determine if it is a compromise or a scientifically structured system linked to long-term performance and risk-sharing [3]

Core Viewpoint - The dramatic scene at the board meeting of Aibison, where Chairman Ding Yanhui voted against his own reappointment due to dissatisfaction with his salary, highlights deeper internal conflicts regarding governance and reform within the company [1][2] Group 1: Governance and Internal Conflicts - Chairman Ding Yanhui's rejection of his own reappointment was initially perceived as a personal grievance over his salary of 4.35 million, which has increased more than threefold since 2021 [1] - The company clarified that Ding's dissatisfaction was a "surface reason," indicating that he aimed to address significant issues related to governance structure, profit distribution, and compensation mechanisms [1] - Ding expressed that he faced substantial resistance in pushing for internal reforms, as the founding team remains influential, with any dissent from one of the three major shareholders halting major decisions [1] Group 2: Company Performance and Market Position - Despite the internal governance issues, Aibison's operational performance is strong, particularly in the LED display sector, with over 70% of revenue coming from overseas markets, establishing the company as an "export champion" in the industry [2] - Ding suggested that major shareholders consider reducing their stakes to improve the company's equity structure, although he acknowledged the significant obstacles to such changes [2] - The rejection of Ding's reappointment, while seemingly a minor issue regarding salary, reflects a broader challenge to the company's governance and long-term reform efforts [2]

Core Viewpoint - The recent board meeting of Aibisen revealed significant internal governance issues, highlighted by Chairman Ding Yanhui's dissenting vote against his own re-election due to dissatisfaction with salary, which he claims is a facade for deeper systemic problems within the company [2][3]. Group 1: Governance Issues - Ding Yanhui's dissenting vote was a strategic move to draw attention to the company's governance and compensation distribution mechanisms, indicating a need for reform [2][3]. - The company faces challenges in decision-making efficiency due to the influence of major shareholders, which Ding believes hinders necessary reforms [3]. Group 2: Internal Structure and Management - The current human resources system is described as arbitrary, with older employees retaining high salaries despite underperformance compared to younger staff [3]. - The internal conflicts and management issues reflect a broader challenge faced by many companies in transitioning from startup success to sustainable operations, often leading to stagnation and potential decline [4][5]. Group 3: Need for Reform - Aibisen must address these governance and compensation issues promptly to avoid further discontent among employees and investors, indicating a critical need for a comprehensive reform plan [4]. - The situation underscores the importance of proactive governance and adaptability in maintaining a company's competitive edge and operational effectiveness [5].

Group 1 - The only opposing vote in the recent board election came from Ding Yanhui, who expressed dissatisfaction with the chairman's compensation, which is 4.3556 million yuan, an increase of 1.4711 million yuan from the previous year [1][4] - Ding Yanhui clarified that his opposition was not solely about salary but rather dissatisfaction with the company's incentive mechanism and concentrated shareholding structure, which he believes hinders corporate governance [1][2] - The company, Abison, was founded in 2001 and is a leading provider of LED display applications and services globally, reporting revenue of 2.872 billion yuan and a net profit of 185 million yuan for the first three quarters of 2025 [3]