Disney(DIS)
Search documents
携程宣布承担迪士尼邮轮延期客户机酒损失
Cai Jing Wang· 2025-09-17 10:39
Core Viewpoint - Ctrip will bear the losses related to flight and hotel bookings due to the postponement of Disney's cruise operations, providing free rescheduling or full refund services for affected customers [1][2] Group 1: Company Actions - Ctrip announced a guarantee plan for customers affected by the postponement of Disney's cruise, applicable to bookings made for travel dates between December 15, 2025, and March 12, 2026 [1][2] - The company will cover the costs for affected customers who book round-trip flights to Singapore and local hotel reservations within 7 days before or after their original travel dates [1][2] - Ctrip is collaborating with Disney Cruise Line to expedite the refund process, which is expected to begin implementation within the week [1][2]
好莱坞三巨头,起诉MiniMax海螺AI侵权
虎嗅APP· 2025-09-17 10:02
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a lawsuit filed by major Hollywood studios against the Chinese AI startup MiniMax for alleged copyright infringement through its video generation service "Hailuo AI" [5][6]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Disney, Universal Pictures, and Warner Bros. have accused MiniMax of using their well-known IP characters to promote its services, directly challenging Hollywood's core assets [5][6]. - The lawsuit claims that MiniMax has failed to take reasonable measures to avoid infringement, unlike other AI services [13]. - The studios emphasize the importance of responsible AI innovation and their commitment to pursuing those who violate copyright laws [13]. Group 2: MiniMax Overview - MiniMax, founded four years ago, has quickly risen to a valuation of $4 billion, showcasing strong technical capabilities and impressive performance in overseas markets [5][21]. - The company has developed various AI applications, including video and music models, and has seen significant revenue growth, with over $70 million in annual revenue, primarily from its overseas AI application Talkie [19][21]. - MiniMax's products have gained international recognition, with over 157 million users across more than 200 countries, indicating a successful internationalization strategy [21]. Group 3: Industry Context - The article outlines a trend of lawsuits against AI model developers, with no clear judgments in previous cases, highlighting the ongoing legal challenges in the AI industry [16][17]. - MiniMax is categorized among the "six small tigers" of the generative AI wave, all valued over $1 billion, indicating a competitive landscape in the AI sector [17].
迪士尼和环球影业对一家中企提起版权诉讼?外交部回应
财联社· 2025-09-17 08:49
Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes its commitment to intellectual property protection and adherence to international obligations in response to a lawsuit from major Hollywood studios against a Chinese AI company for alleged copyright infringement [1]. Group 1 - Major Hollywood studios, including Disney and Universal Pictures, have filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. against a Chinese AI company, accusing it of large-scale copyright infringement [1]. - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, stated a lack of specific knowledge regarding the case but reiterated China's focus on intellectual property rights [1]. - The spokesperson encouraged inquiries about specific issues to be directed to the relevant Chinese authorities [1].
迪士尼和环球影业对一家中企提起版权诉讼?外交部回应
第一财经· 2025-09-17 08:01
林剑表示,我不了解你提到的具体情况。中国一贯高度重视知识产权保护,我们也依法依规履行我们应 当承担的国际义务。有关的具体问题你可以向中方的主管部门了解。 据北京日报,9月17日,外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。 法新社记者提问,包括迪士尼和环球影业在内的多家好莱坞大型制片厂周一在美国对中国一家人工智能 公司提起联邦诉讼,指控其大规模侵犯版权。请问外交部对此有何评论? ...
AIGC再引争议,迪士尼、华纳、环球联手起诉中国AI公司MiniMax
Feng Huang Wang· 2025-09-17 07:54
Core Viewpoint - The copyright battle between Hollywood and the AI sector has intensified, with major film studios suing a Chinese AI company, MiniMax, for unauthorized use of iconic intellectual properties in AI model training and commercial services [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Disney, Universal Pictures, and Warner Bros. have filed a lawsuit against MiniMax and its image and video generation service "Hai Luo AI" in a California federal court [1]. - The lawsuit accuses MiniMax of "brazenly" using well-known copyrighted characters, such as Darth Vader from "Star Wars," Minions from "Despicable Me," and Wonder Woman, to promote its AI services [1][2]. - The studios claim that users can generate and download images and videos featuring these characters on "Hai Luo AI" with simple text prompts, which MiniMax markets as a "Hollywood studio in your pocket" [1]. Group 2: Legal and Industry Implications - Prior to the lawsuit, the studios requested MiniMax to take reasonable measures to avoid infringement, but received no response [2]. - The studios emphasize the importance of a responsible approach to AI innovation and their commitment to pursuing accountability for infringers, regardless of their location [2]. - The lawsuit seeks a permanent injunction to prevent MiniMax from offering "Hai Luo AI" services without proper copyright protection [2]. - This case is part of a broader trend of legal disputes between Hollywood and AI generation tools, following similar lawsuits against Midjourney by Disney and Universal in June, with Warner Bros. joining the fray earlier this month [2]. - MiniMax claims to have served over 157 million individual users and thousands of enterprises globally, and is seeking a valuation exceeding $4 billion, aiming to be one of the first publicly listed AI companies in China [2].
好莱坞三巨头,起诉MiniMax海螺AI侵权
Hu Xiu· 2025-09-17 07:23
Core Viewpoint - Major Hollywood studios, including Disney, Universal Pictures, and Warner Bros. Discovery, have filed a lawsuit against Chinese AI startup MiniMax, accusing it of large-scale copyright infringement through its video generation service "Hailuo AI" [1][2][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that MiniMax audaciously uses well-known IP characters, such as Darth Vader from "Star Wars," Minions from "Despicable Me," and Wonder Woman, to promote its "Pocket Hollywood" concept, directly challenging Hollywood's core assets [2][5]. - The studios argue that "Hailuo AI" generates high-quality videos and images by training on a large amount of unauthorized copyrighted content, allowing users to create content that closely resembles classic characters from Disney, Universal, and Warner Bros. [4][10]. - MiniMax is accused of failing to take reasonable measures to avoid infringement, unlike other AI services, and is seen as disregarding U.S. copyright law [10][11]. Group 2: Company Background and Performance - MiniMax, founded just four years ago, has reached a valuation of $4 billion and has shown strong performance in overseas markets, making it a target for major studios following Midjourney [3][23]. - The company reported annual revenue exceeding $70 million in 2024, with over 70% of its income coming from its overseas consumer AI application, Talkie [17][22]. - MiniMax has rapidly expanded its product offerings, launching various models, including video and music models, and has gained significant international user traction, with over 157 million users across more than 200 countries [22][21]. Group 3: Market Position and Future Prospects - MiniMax's success in technology and business has positioned it as a significant player in the AI market, potentially making it a primary target for Hollywood after Midjourney [23]. - The company is considering a potential listing on the Hong Kong stock market, with a valuation of approximately $3 billion as of June [21]. - In September, MiniMax's "Hailuo AI" achieved the highest ranking in independent tests for video generation quality, with a remarkable 867% increase in website traffic [19][20].
迪士尼等好莱坞巨头起诉MiniMax侵权,涉及超50个IP
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-09-17 06:14
Core Viewpoint - The copyright battle between Hollywood and AI has escalated, with major studios suing the domestic company MiniMax for copyright infringement related to its AI product "Hai Luo AI" [2] Group 1: Legal Action and Allegations - Disney, Universal Pictures, and Warner Bros. have jointly filed a lawsuit against MiniMax, claiming that "Hai Luo AI" unlawfully reproduces and displays copyrighted works without authorization [2] - The lawsuit accuses MiniMax of not only direct infringement but also of aiding infringement, thus holding it liable for joint responsibility [2] - The plaintiffs include major Hollywood entities such as Marvel, Disney, 20th Century Fox, DC Comics, and DreamWorks, while the defendants include MiniMax's parent company Shanghai Xiyu Technology and its international operations company Nanonoble Pte Ltd [2] Group 2: MiniMax Overview and Product Details - MiniMax, founded in 2021 by former SenseTime vice president Yan Junjie, is one of the "six little dragons" of domestic AI startups, focusing on international expansion [4] - The company claims its self-developed multimodal models and AI applications cover over 200 countries and regions, with 157 million individual users [4] - "Hai Luo AI" specializes in generating images and videos from text prompts, and it gained significant traction in the U.S. AI application market, ranking among the top ten downloads in the first half of 2024 [4] Group 3: Allegations of Inaction and Evidence - The plaintiffs argue that MiniMax had the capability to prevent copyright infringement but chose not to, despite having systems in place to filter out violent and explicit content [6] - A letter from the plaintiffs' lawyers listed around 50 infringing characters, including Iron Man and Spider-Man, but MiniMax did not respond or take down the content [6] - MiniMax has been using copyrighted characters in promotional videos on social media platforms, with specific posts cited as evidence in the lawsuit [7] Group 4: Financial Implications and Demands - MiniMax is currently in its C-round of investment, having previously received funding from major investors like Alibaba, Tencent, and Sequoia China, with an estimated valuation of approximately $4 billion [7] - The lawsuit seeks compensation for actual damages or statutory damages, which could total up to $7.5 million based on the 50 works mentioned [8] - The plaintiffs also request a court injunction to prevent MiniMax from continuing to infringe on copyrighted works and to implement appropriate copyright protection mechanisms in "Hai Luo AI" [8]
迪士尼游轮延期,游客机酒损失谁来承担?在线旅游平台回应
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-09-17 03:23
Core Viewpoint - The recent postponement of certain voyages of the Disney Wonder cruise has significantly impacted travelers, leading to concerns over who will bear the associated costs [1] Group 1: Impact on Travelers - The postponement has resulted in financial losses for some travelers due to changes in flight and hotel bookings [1] - Affected travelers have reported issues with their travel arrangements, prompting responses from online travel agencies (OTAs) [1] Group 2: OTA Response - Ctrip Cruise announced a special guarantee plan on September 16, offering free rescheduling or full refunds for eligible flight and hotel bookings affected by the cruise delay [1] - The guarantee applies to Ctrip Cruise customers whose travel dates fall between December 15, 2025, and March 12, 2026 [1] - Ctrip will contact affected customers by September 30, 2025, to provide solutions and will refund any additional losses incurred during the rescheduling process [1] Group 3: Disney Wonder Specifications - The Disney Wonder has a gross tonnage of 208,000 tons and can accommodate 6,700 passengers and 2,500 crew members [1]
迪士尼探险号游轮首航延期,携程表态
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-09-17 02:05
Core Viewpoint - Disney's cruise ship, the Disney Adventure, has postponed some voyages, prompting Ctrip to offer free rescheduling or full refunds for affected customers [1] Group 1: Impact on Customers - Ctrip announced a guarantee plan for customers affected by the postponement of the Disney Adventure cruise, covering flights and hotel bookings [1] - The guarantee applies to Ctrip cruise customers whose travel dates fall between December 15, 2025, and March 12, 2026 [1] - Ctrip will assist affected customers in booking round-trip flights to Singapore and local hotel reservations within 7 days before or after the original travel dates [1] Group 2: Collaboration and Implementation - Ctrip is working with Disney Cruise Line to facilitate the refund process for affected customers [1] - The implementation of the refund process is expected to begin within the week [1]
迪士尼探险号游轮首航延期,携程表态
第一财经· 2025-09-17 01:26
Core Viewpoint - Disney's Adventure Cruise has postponed some voyages, prompting Ctrip to offer free rescheduling or full refunds for affected customers [1] Group 1: Impact on Customers - Ctrip announced a guarantee plan for customers affected by the postponement of Disney's Adventure Cruise, applicable for travel dates from December 15, 2025, to March 12, 2026 [1] - The guarantee includes support for round-trip flights to Singapore and local hotel bookings made through Ctrip within 7 days before or after the original travel dates [1] - Ctrip is collaborating with Disney Cruise Line to expedite the refund process, which is expected to begin implementation within the week [1]