RT Bloomberg Live (@BloombergLive).@Ford’s @BobHolycross talks about alternate use cases for their EVs, "These vehicles are mobile generators..longer term opportunity to use these energy storage devices to help improve grid resiliency,"#BloombergGreen @aaronrutkoff⏯️ https://t.co/ApZaC2fw70 https://t.co/VFSkwDg31A ...

Competitive Strategy - Ford's Bob Holycross emphasizes the importance of understanding competitor vehicles, particularly in the EV space with competition from China [1] - Ford believes that if its engineers are not actively learning from competitors, it indicates a significant problem [1]

Columbus, OH, July 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Tim Lamb Group, the largest auto dealership sales and acquisitions firm in North America, is pleased to announce the sale of Bob Chapman Ford in Marysville, Ohio to Coughlin Automotive. The dealership will now operate as Coughlin Ford of Marysville under the leadership of Al Coughlin (President). Located at 1255 Columbus Avenue, in Marysville, Ohio, the dealership spans 28,000 square feet on 6 acres, offering 24 service bays and a Ford Quick Lane Tire & A ...

Welcome back. After months of auto tariffs, has the industry seen some major production changes. Our Phil Leau is looking into that this morning and joins us now.Hey, Phil. Hey, Carl. I wouldn't call them major changes, but it's clear that the automakers, if they've had excess capacity here in the US, they've tried to use it or at least shift some production there.Look at these numbers from JD Power. In the first quarter, 51% of what was sold in the US was built in the US. You saw it go up to 54 in April.a ...

Core Insights - The upcoming Q2 2025 earnings reports for Ford and General Motors are highly anticipated by investors to assess which stock is better positioned [1] - General Motors is set to report earnings on the upcoming Tuesday, while Ford will follow on July 30 [1] Earnings Estimates - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for GM's Q2 earnings is $2.44 per share with revenues of $45.34 billion, having surpassed EPS estimates in the last four quarters with an average surprise of 10.16% [2] - Ford's consensus estimates are $0.30 for EPS and $41.5 billion for sales, with a less favorable earnings surprise history, beating estimates twice and missing once in the last four quarters [3] Earnings Surprise Potential - General Motors has a Zacks Rank of 3 and an Earnings ESP of -4.05%, while Ford has a Zacks Rank of 2 and an Earnings ESP of -36.59% [4] Vehicle Deliveries - Ford sold 612,095 vehicles in Q2 2025, a 14.2% increase year-over-year, driven by strong demand for trucks and hybrids [5] - General Motors sold 746,588 units, up 7.3% year-over-year, with significant growth across all brands, particularly Buick, which saw a 19.3% increase in Q2 [6] Electrification Efforts - General Motors has accelerated its electric vehicle sales, with EV sales up 111% to 46,280 units in Q2, driven by a diverse lineup [7][8] - Ford's EV sales, however, dropped 31% in Q2, but the company is focusing on hybrid strategies and operational scaling for long-term growth [9] Tariff Impact - Ford anticipates a $1.5 billion impact from tariffs, while General Motors expects a profit impact of $4-$5 billion due to tariffs on imports [10] Dividend Comparison - Ford offers a high dividend yield of over 5%, significantly higher than GM's 1.13% and the industry average of 0.3% [11] - Ford aims to distribute 40-50% of free cash flow going forward, indicating a commitment to shareholder returns [12] Earnings Outlook - The Zacks Consensus Estimate indicates a year-over-year decline in EPS for GM and Ford of 12.3% and 40%, respectively, but Ford's 2026 EPS is projected to grow by 13.4% [13] - Recent estimate revisions suggest Ford is better positioned than GM, with Ford's 2025 EPS estimate remaining stable at $1.11 [14] Stock Performance & Valuation - Year-to-date, Ford's shares have risen 20%, while GM's stock price has remained flat [15] - GM's stock trades at 5.65X forward earnings, while Ford's is at 9.94X, both below the auto sector's average of 25.82X [18] Conclusion - Ford appears better positioned heading into Q2 earnings due to its hybrid momentum, shareholder-friendly policies, and solid stock performance, despite GM's strength in EV sales [19]

Group 1 - The European Commission has proposed a retaliatory tariff list against U.S. goods valued at €72 billion (approximately $84 billion), including Boeing aircraft, automobiles, bourbon whiskey, and various industrial and agricultural products [1] - The proposed tariffs are a response to U.S. President Trump's threat to raise tariffs on EU goods to 30% starting August 1, which could significantly impact transatlantic trade relations [1] - The tariff list focuses on industrial products, with over €65 billion in value, including nearly €11 billion in aircraft-related products, over €9.4 billion in machinery, €8 billion in automobiles, and €6 billion in agricultural products [1] Group 2 - Affected automotive manufacturers include major U.S. and European companies such as General Motors, Ford, Stellantis, Tesla, Volkswagen, and Toyota, with concerns that tariffs will increase costs, reduce sales, and potentially lead to layoffs [2] - The automotive industry is one of the most severely impacted sectors, with European manufacturers like Volkswagen and BMW facing potential losses in sales amounting to billions of euros due to tariffs [2] - The scale and scope of the tariff measures highlight the escalation of trade tensions between the U.S. and EU, with the EU emphasizing compliance with World Trade Organization rules while warning of the deep economic impacts of a tit-for-tat tariff war [2] Group 3 - The World Trade Organization (WTO) has warned that U.S. tariff policies may lead to a decline in global trade volumes, negatively affecting the global economy [3] - WTO Director-General Iweala stated that U.S. tariff policies violate core WTO principles and are detrimental to the global economy [3]

Core Insights - Ford Motor is facing significant scrutiny regarding vehicle quality and safety standards, leading the U.S. auto industry in safety recalls, with 88 recalls in the first half of 2025, over four times that of the next manufacturer [2] - The company reported a major recall involving 850,000 pickup trucks and SUVs due to potential fuel pump failures, which could lead to engine stalling [2] - Ford's stock has declined approximately 15% over the past 12 months, contrasting with an 11% gain in the S&P 500, indicating investor concerns about operational and reputational challenges [2] Recall Impact - The rising number of recalls is expected to incur substantial costs for Ford, including expenses for parts, labor, and logistics [3] - Ongoing safety concerns may undermine consumer trust and Ford's reputation for reliability, risking market share to competitors perceived as more reliable [3] - CEO Jim Farley acknowledged that Ford is lagging behind Chinese automakers in the electric vehicle market [3] Financial Performance - Warranty costs have increased by 22% to $6 billion in 2024, primarily due to recall-related repairs, putting pressure on margins and complicating profitability [4] - Ford anticipates a loss of between $5 billion and $5.4 billion in its electric vehicle segment this year [4] Quality Improvement Efforts - To address quality and cost challenges, Ford is enhancing internal testing and product validation, with a focus on identifying defects earlier in the development phase [5] - The company has indicated that it may take up to 18 months for these changes to result in reduced warranty claims and improved product reliability [5] Sales Performance - Ford reported a year-over-year sales increase of 14.2% in the U.S. during Q2 2025, reaching 612,095 units, driven by strong demand for pickups [6] - F-Series sales grew by 11.5% to 222,459 units, marking the best Q2 since 2019 [6] - The Maverick recorded a record quarter with 48,041 units sold, with nearly 60% of buyers being new to the Ford brand [7] Market Context - The EV market is experiencing a slowdown, with Tesla seeing a nearly 14% drop in deliveries during Q2, potentially providing Ford with more time to generate revenue from gas-powered vehicles [7]

Investment Rating - The report indicates a shift in investment ratings for the EV and solar industries, with a more favorable outlook for energy storage systems (ESS) and critical minerals compared to solar and wind [16]. Core Insights - The "One Big Beautiful Bill" accelerates the phaseout of EV subsidies, expiring on September 30, 2025, compared to December 31, 2032, under the original IRA [16]. - The report highlights stricter restrictions on foreign entities, particularly from China, affecting the eligibility for investment tax credits (ITC) and advanced manufacturing production credits (AMPC) [16][17]. - There is a notable increase in domestic content requirements to qualify for additional credits, which may impact the cost structure for manufacturers [16][17]. Summary by Sections Part 1: EV Consumer Tax Credits - The final assembly of EVs must occur in North America to qualify for tax credits, with a maximum credit of $7,500 [6]. - Key requirements include MSRP limits of $80,000 for SUVs and $50,000 for other vehicles, with critical minerals and battery component restrictions starting in 2024 and 2025 respectively [6][7]. Part 2: Residential Clean Energy Credit - The residential clean energy credit remains at 30% for expenditures through December 2032, decreasing to 26% in 2033 and 22% in 2034 [10]. - No credits will be available for expenditures made after December 31, 2034 [10]. Part 3: ITC - The business tax credit for investment in zero-emission power and energy storage property is set at 30% of capital expenditures, with additional bonuses for domestic content [12]. - The credit rate will phase out based on the date of construction start, with specific thresholds for solar and energy storage systems [12]. Part 4: Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit - The AMPC will phase out for eligible components produced and sold, with a stricter non-PFE threshold compared to the Senate draft [13]. - The report emphasizes that projects with "effective control" by prohibited foreign entities will not receive credits, impacting U.S. battery production using Chinese components [16][17]. Key Changes vs. IRA - The report outlines significant changes from the original IRA, including the introduction of PFE restrictions and a more stringent domestic content requirement for tax credits [16]. - The overall stance on China has become tougher, with implications for U.S. manufacturers relying on foreign supply chains [16].

It’s been a while since investors have been able to buy off the discount rack, but the sudden reversal in U.S. markets over the last quarter has left analysts scrambling to update their earnings projections and year-end index targets. While the usual tech sector suspects have led the rally, the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ Composite have both made new all-time highs this month, and surges in speculative assets like Bitcoin indicate that risk-takers are once again whetting their appetites. However, the macroeconom ...

瑞银：将福特汽车(F.N)目标价从9美元上调至11美元。 ...