Market Overview - The city commercial bank sector increased by 0.26% on January 5, with Hangzhou Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4023.42, up by 1.38%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13828.63, up by 2.24% [1] Individual Bank Performance - Hangzhou Bank (600926) closed at 15.45, with a rise of 1.11% and a trading volume of 580,400 shares, amounting to a transaction value of 893 million yuan [1] - Chengdu Bank (601838) closed at 16.24, up by 0.74%, with a trading volume of 278,200 shares and a transaction value of 450 million yuan [1] - Beijing Bank (601169) closed at 5.52, increasing by 0.73%, with a trading volume of 1,428,800 shares and a transaction value of 787 million yuan [1] - Guizhou Bank (601997) closed at 5.91, up by 0.68%, with a trading volume of 255,700 shares and a transaction value of 151 million yuan [1] - Qindao Bank (002948) closed at 4.51, increasing by 0.67%, with a trading volume of 419,600 shares and a transaction value of 188 million yuan [1] - Jiangsu Bank (616009) closed at 10.46, up by 0.58%, with a trading volume of 1,271,800 shares and a transaction value of 1.331 billion yuan [1] - Xian Bank (600928) closed at 3.72, increasing by 0.54%, with a trading volume of 198,300 shares and a transaction value of 73.3 million yuan [1] - Zhengzhou Bank (002936) closed at 1.94, up by 0.52%, with a trading volume of 723,100 shares and a transaction value of 140 million yuan [1] - Lanzhou Bank (001227) closed at 2.33, increasing by 0.43%, with a trading volume of 290,200 shares and a transaction value of 67.5 million yuan [1] - Ningbo Bank (002142) closed at 28.15, up by 0.21%, with a trading volume of 271,700 shares and a transaction value of 764 million yuan [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector saw a net inflow of 380 million yuan from main funds, while retail funds experienced a net outflow of 134 million yuan [2] - The main funds' net inflow and outflow for individual banks include: - Jiangsu Bank (600919) had a net inflow of 10.4 million yuan, with a 7.78% share of main funds [3] - Shanghai Bank (601229) had a net inflow of 87.04 million yuan, with a 13.64% share of main funds [3] - Hangzhou Bank (600926) had a net inflow of 79.04 million yuan, with an 8.86% share of main funds [3] - Nanjing Bank (600000) had a net inflow of 67.86 million yuan, with a 9.68% share of main funds [3] - Ningbo Bank (002142) had a net inflow of 58.14 million yuan, with a 7.61% share of main funds [3] - Qilu Bank (601665) had a net inflow of 57.72 million yuan, with a 14.60% share of main funds [3] - Qingdao Bank (002948) had a net inflow of 22.18 million yuan, with an 11.82% share of main funds [3] - Suzhou Bank (002966) had a net inflow of 6.29 million yuan, with a 2.71% share of main funds [3] - Xiamen Bank (601187) had a net inflow of 520,450 yuan, with a 5.25% share of main funds [3] - Xian Bank (600928) had a net inflow of 287,550 yuan, with a 3.92% share of main funds [3]

I. 法定/註冊股本變動 | 1. 股份分類 | 普通股 | 股份類別 | H | | | 於香港聯交所上市 (註1) | | 是 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 證券代號 (如上市) | 03866 | 說明 | | | | | | | | | | | 法定/註冊股份數目 | | | 面值 | | | 法定/註冊股本 | | | 上月底結存 | | | 2,291,945,474 | RMB | | | 1 RMB | | 2,291,945,474 | | 增加 / 減少 (-) | | | | | | | RMB | | | | 本月底結存 | | | 2,291,945,474 | RMB | | | 1 RMB | | 2,291,945,474 | 截至月份: 2025年12月31日 狀態: 新提交 致：香港交易及結算所有限公司 公司名稱: 青島銀行股份有限公司 FF301 股份發行人及根據《上市規則》第十九B章上市的香港預託證券發行人的證券變動月報表 呈交日期: 2026年1月5日 | 2. ...

Core Viewpoint - The National Financial Supervision Administration has imposed fines on Qingdao Bank's Rizhao branch for imprudent operations in its bill business, highlighting regulatory scrutiny in the banking sector [1]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Rizhao branch of Qingdao Bank was fined 300,000 yuan for engaging in imprudent practices related to its bill business [1]. - Gai Hongyu, the assistant president of Qingdao Bank's Rizhao branch at the time, was fined 50,000 yuan for his role in the violations [1].

证 券 研 究 报 告 【策略月报】 股息率年关盘点 ——多行业联合红利资产 12 月报 策略研究 策略月报 2026 年 01 月 04 日 华创证券研究所 证券分析师：姚佩 邮箱：yaopei@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360522120004 证券分析师：吴一凡 邮箱：wuyifan@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360516090002 证券分析师：徐康 电话：021-20572556 邮箱：xukang@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360518060005 证券分析师：欧阳予 邮箱：ouyangyu@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360520070001 证券分析师：韩星雨 邮箱：hanxingyu@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360525050001 证券分析师：单戈 邮箱：shange@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360522110001 证券分析师：马野 邮箱：maye@hcyjs.com 执业编号：S0360523040003 相关研究报告 《【华创策略】杠杆&ETF 资金分化趋势逆转—— 流动性&交易拥挤度&投资者温度计周报》 2025-12-01 《【华 ...

Core Viewpoint - Qingdao Bank (002948) announced the cessation of safe deposit box services at its Zhejiang Road branch effective February 1, 2026, due to adjustments in its safe deposit box business [1] Group 1 - From February 1, 2026, the Zhejiang Road branch will no longer accept new safe deposit box rentals or renewals of existing contracts [1] - Customers with expiring contracts must complete the return process by July 31, 2026, bringing valid identification and keys to the branch [1] - If customers fail to return the safe deposit boxes by the deadline, the bank will attempt to notify them through various means, and boxes will be sealed for storage after August 1, 2026 [1] Group 2 - During the storage period, customers can still apply for the return of their safe deposit boxes, which will be stored for one year [2] - After the storage period, unreturned boxes will be relocated under the supervision of a notary public [2] - Customers wishing to continue using safe deposit box services can do so at the bank's main branch, where services will be offered at published rates [2] Group 3 - Contact information for the Zhejiang Road branch is provided, including the address and phone numbers for customer inquiries [3]

Core Viewpoint - The A-share banking sector experienced a year of volatility in 2025, with an overall increase of 7%, which is significantly lower than the 34.39% gain in 2024, yet many individual bank stocks reached historical highs [1][3]. Group 1: Market Performance - By the end of 2025, 35 out of 42 bank stocks in the sector recorded gains, with 20 banks hitting historical highs and 21 banks increasing by over 10%, while 6 banks saw gains exceeding 20% [1][6]. - Agricultural Bank of China saw a remarkable stock price increase of over 52% during the year, briefly surpassing Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) in market capitalization [1][3]. - ICBC maintained its position as the "king of stocks" with a market capitalization of 2.63 trillion yuan and a stock price increase of 21.54% [1][3]. Group 2: IPO Market - The A-share IPO market for banks remained stagnant in 2025, with no new listings, as several banks, including Guangzhou Bank, withdrew their applications [2][11]. - The only banks still in the IPO queue are Dongguan Bank, Huzhou Bank, Hubei Bank, Jiangsu Kunshan Rural Commercial Bank, and Guangdong Nanhai Rural Commercial Bank [11]. Group 3: Investment Trends - Long-term funds, particularly insurance capital, have been actively purchasing bank stocks, with insurance companies holding 382.5 million shares valued at 37.976 billion yuan by the end of Q3 2025 [8]. - The "stock accumulation for dividends" strategy has gained popularity among investors, with 28 out of 42 listed banks offering dividend yields above 4% [7][8]. Group 4: Capital Support - In 2025, state-owned banks received significant capital injections, with a total of approximately 520 billion yuan raised through targeted placements to enhance their capital structure [10]. - Meanwhile, smaller banks attracted investments from foreign and local state-owned enterprises, although the IPO process remains challenging for most [10][11].

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the given content Core Viewpoints of the Report - In 2025, convertible bonds performed excellently, with equity characteristics contributing the main revenue. The convertible bond market's performance was the third - highest in terms of revenue since 2010 and the best since 2021. The contribution ratio of the underlying stocks and valuation to the rise and fall was about 7:4, similar to 2021. Compared with mainstream stock indices, the convertible bond index showed the property of "attack when the market rises and defend when the market falls", with Sharpe ratio and Calmar ratio second only to micro - cap stocks [2][6]. - In 2025, the supply of convertible bonds was in the ascendant. Over 230 billion yuan of convertible bonds were delisted, reaching the highest scale since 2018, with banks having the largest delisting scale. The primary market issuance process accelerated in the second half of the year, but the issuance of large - scale convertible bonds remained cautious. Listed companies were more inclined to issue private placements [2]. - In 2025, the demand for convertible bonds was differentiated, and the ETF share reached a new high. The logic of the "fixed - income asset shortage" continued, and the demand structure of institutions for convertible bonds changed significantly. The direct holding scale of convertible bonds by institutions such as insurance and annuities was at a historically low level, while the holding scale of convertible bonds by funds, especially ETFs, reached a historical high [2]. - In 2025, the game of convertible bond terms was characterized by "high return and high risk". The probabilities of downward revision and non - call of convertible bonds were at historically low levels, but the number of times of triggering call/downward revision was relatively high since 2019, indicating an increase in the intensity of the game. The odds of the downward revision game were at a historical high, with photovoltaic convertible bonds and near - maturity convertible bonds being the highlights of the whole year. The profit - loss ratio of the call game deteriorated compared with the previous year but was still at a historical high [2]. - In 2025, the risks of convertible bonds were better than expected, and the impact of ratings decreased. Only Zhongzhuangzhuan 2 in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets triggered the substantial default risk, and the risk performance was better than investors' expectations. Although there were still many convertible bonds with rating adjustments, the impact on pricing was significantly weakened, and the market was generally "desensitized" to ratings [2]. Summary According to the Directory 2025, How Did the Convertible Bond Market Perform? 2021 - 2025: The Best - Performing Year Since 2021, with Equity Income as the Main Contributor - Vertically, the convertible bond holding experience in 2025 could rank among the top four years since 2010. As of December 30, 2025, the CSI Convertible Bond Index closed at 491.83 points, up 18.6% from the end of 2024. It was the third - highest revenue - earning year since 2010 and the best since 2021. The maximum drawdown was about 6%, the annualized volatility was less than 10%, and the Sharpe ratio was 1.92, the Calmar ratio was 3.01, achieving high returns with low drawdown and medium - low volatility [6]. - In terms of revenue decomposition, the contribution ratio of the underlying stocks and valuation to the rise and fall in 2025 was about 7:4. The change in the underlying stocks contributed 14 percentage points to the index return, and the change in valuation contributed about 8 percentage points, similar to 2021 [9]. - Horizontally, the return performance of the convertible bond index was slightly weaker, but the cost - performance was prominent. Compared with the stock indices in the same period, its return was only stronger than that of the Shanghai Composite Index, Juchao Large - cap Index, and Guozheng Value Index, but significantly weaker than that of the micro - cap and ChiNext Index. However, in terms of Sharpe ratio and Calmar ratio, it was only slightly weaker than the Wind Micro - cap Index, showing the property of "attack when the market rises and defend when the market falls" [13]. The Convertible Bond Market Rose Volatility Throughout the Year, and the Year - End Increase Converged - **First stage (Early 2025 - March 2025)**: Driven by the spring rally and supported by AI + robot innovation and low initial valuations, the convertible bond market had a dual - wheel - driven market of valuation and the underlying stocks, with a maximum index increase of 6.15% by the end of February. Low - price convertible bonds performed strongly, and the concern about credit risk events was reversed [19]. - **Second stage (March 2025 - Early April 2025)**: After the Two Sessions, the spring rally ended, and the market returned to the trading of annual report expectations. Market sentiment cooled down, and the convertible bond valuation peaked and declined. The intensification of Sino - US trade disputes led to a stock market correction on the first trading day after the Tomb - Sweeping Festival, and the CSI Convertible Bond Index fell 4.05%, with the automotive, communication, and computer industries leading the decline [19]. - **Third stage (Early April 2025 - Mid - June 2025)**: After the market correction on April 7, state funds such as Central Huijin entered the market, providing liquidity support. The Sino - US tariff issue was in a "tug - of - war", and the market expectation improved. The valuations of the overseas and export sectors rebounded, but concerns about the ratings of the photovoltaic and other sectors with weak performance emerged [20]. - **Fourth stage (End of June 2025 - End of August 2025)**: After the release of all rating results at the end of June, institutional funds increased their allocation of convertible bonds, and the convertible bond ETF share increased significantly. The anti - involution policy in the photovoltaic industry was implemented, and the photovoltaic convertible bonds rebounded. The A - share market was booming, driving the convertible bond market to its main uptrend. The convertible bond price and valuation reached new highs, and the market capacity decreased [20]. - **Fifth stage (End of August 2025 - Present)**: At the end of August, institutions' profit - taking demand led to a decline in the convertible bond market. The positions of insurance and annuity institutions in convertible bonds decreased significantly. The supply of convertible bonds improved in September, but it was difficult to offset the shrinkage caused by conversion. The convertible bond valuation stabilized and rebounded after the adjustment at the end of August and reached a high level again in December [21][22]. In 2025, the Supply of the Convertible Bond Market was in the Ascendant The Market Capacity Declined to Around 500 Billion Yuan, and the Delisting Scale Reached a Historical High - In 2025, the number of delisted convertible bonds reached a historical high, and the market capacity decreased rapidly. By December 30, 2025, a total of 163 convertible bonds were delisted, with a total delisting scale of over 230 billion yuan, the peak since 2018. The banking industry had the largest delisting scale of 101.323 billion yuan, followed by non - ferrous metals, basic chemicals, and power equipment and new energy [23]. The Primary Issuance Had Mixed Results, with Small - Ticket Issuance Accelerating and Large - Ticket Issuance Still Difficult - The good aspect was that the primary market issuance process accelerated in the second half of 2025. In the fourth quarter of 2025, the average time from the announcement of the convertible bond plan to listing was about 320 days, the lowest since 2023 [25]. - The regulatory authorities were still relatively cautious about the issuance of medium - and large - scale convertible bonds. As of now, no convertible bonds with a scale of over 2 billion yuan announced in 2025 have been listed, while 8 convertible bonds with a scale of less than 2 billion yuan have been listed [28]. Subjectively, the Trend of Listed Companies Preferring Private Placements was More Prominent - The ratio of the number of convertible bond plans to private placement plans has been declining sharply since the refinancing new regulations in 2023. In 2025, 53 listed companies announced private placement plans, while only 9 announced convertible bond plans, with a ratio of 16.98%, far lower than the average level before 2023 [29]. In 2025, the Demand for Convertible Bonds was Differentiated, and the ETF Share Reached a New High - In 2025, the logic of the "fixed - income asset shortage" continued, but the demand structure of institutions for convertible bonds changed significantly. As of November 2025, the direct holding of convertible bonds by insurance and annuity institutions was at a historically low level since 2021, while the holding of convertible bonds by funds, especially ETFs, reached a historical high [32]. In 2025, the Game of Convertible Bond Terms was Characterized by "High Return and High Risk" The Overall Probability of Downward Revision and Non - call of Convertible Bonds in 2025 was at a Historical Low - In 2025, it was a "big year" for call, and the call probability increased. There were 131 call announcements and 149 non - call announcements, and the call: non - call ratio was 88%, the highest since 2020. - The intensity of the downward revision of convertible bonds in 2025 was second only to 2024, but the downward revision probability decreased. There were 68 downward revision proposal announcements and 510 non - downward revision announcements, and the downward revision: non - downward revision ratio was 13%, at a historically low level [36]. Downward Revision: There were Odds, and Photovoltaic Convertible Bonds and Near - Maturity Convertible Bonds were the Highlights of the Whole Year - In terms of odds, the return performance of the convertible bond downward revision game in 2025 was at a relatively high level in history. The average return after a downward revision proposal was 2.02%, the best since 2023, and the average return after an actual downward revision was 0.63%, at a relatively high level since 2019 [41]. - In terms of influencing factors, the downward revision probability of near - maturity convertible bonds was significantly higher. The downward revision probability was highly correlated with the remaining term, showing obvious monotonicity. The new energy industry had the most downward revisions, and although some convertible bonds did not succeed in conversion by the end of 2025, they achieved good returns, and the downward revision increased the possibility of future call [42]. Call: The Profit - Loss Ratio of the Game Deteriorated Compared with the Previous Year but was Still at a Historical High - In 2025, the call game fluctuated greatly, and the non - call return was higher than the historical average. The average return on the first day after the non - call announcement of convertible bonds was 2.29%, higher than the historical average since 2019. The average return on the first day after the call announcement was - 2.54%, and the profit - loss ratio was about 0.9, which deteriorated significantly compared with 2024 but was still at a historical high [48]. In 2025, the Risks of Convertible Bonds were Better than Expected, and the Impact of Ratings Decreased - In 2025, there were no serious default events in the convertible bond market, which was significantly better than investors' expectations. Although Zhongzhuangzhuan 2 triggered default risk in the fourth quarter, its underlying stock had been ST before the restructuring, and its convertible bond rating had also fallen below the investment grade [48]. - In terms of ratings, although there were still many convertible bonds with rating adjustments, the impact on pricing decreased significantly. By December 30, 2025, 42 convertible bonds had their ratings downgraded and 40 were put on the rating watch list. However, the average decline of convertible bonds on the first trading day after the rating downgrade was only 0.01%, indicating that the market was generally "desensitized" to rating changes and the pricing was smoother [51].

Market Overview - The city commercial bank sector experienced a decline of 0.33% on December 31, with Xiamen Bank leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3968.84, up 0.09%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13525.02, down 0.58% [1] Individual Bank Performance - Qilu Bank closed at 5.74, up 1.77% with a trading volume of 848,200 shares and a transaction value of 485 million [1] - Suzhou Bank closed at 8.29, up 0.24% with a trading volume of 263,500 shares and a transaction value of 219 million [1] - Xiamen Bank closed at 7.34, down 1.08% with a trading volume of 133,200 shares and a transaction value of 97.8 million [2] - Nanjing Bank closed at 11.43, down 0.78% with a trading volume of 235,600 shares and a transaction value of 270 million [2] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector saw a net inflow of 201 million from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 9.56 million [2] - The capital flow for individual banks shows that Shanghai Bank had a net inflow of 48.9 million from institutional investors, while Hangzhou Bank had a net outflow of 50.55 million [3] - Suzhou Bank recorded a net inflow of 30.66 million from institutional investors, while retail investors had a net outflow of 27.1 million [3]

在利率持续走低、市场波动加剧的资管新生态中，"稳健增值" 成为投资者的核心诉求。青银理财360天 最低持有期"固收+"产品表现尤为亮眼，成立以来年化收益率达5.17%（数据统计区间：2025/8/20- 2025/12/25），在同期普通固收类理财产品中展现出较强的市场竞争力。这份优异的成绩单，恰似 "博 观而约取，厚积而薄发" 的生动注解，并非偶然的市场红利，而是青银理财面对行业变革，以投资者需 求为锚点，在产品创新、投研深耕、风险管控等维度进行系统性布局的必然结果。 市场变局催生需求重构，"固收+" 成理财新蓝海 2025年以来，资管市场正经历深刻的结构性调整。一方面，1年期定期存款挂牌利率跌破 1%，债市告 别单边牛市进入震荡回调期，传统固收类产品收益承压；另一方面，权益市场结构性机会凸显，投资者 风险偏好呈现分化态势——银行业理财登记中心数据显示，截至三季度末，全市场理财投资者数量增至 1.39亿，上半年高风险偏好投资者占比显著上升，低风险偏好群体占比回落。这种 "收益诉求不减、风 险容忍度分化" 的市场特征，让 "固收打底、权益增强" 的 "固收+" 产品成为连接供需两端的关键纽 带。 "智者顺势而 ...

证券日报网讯 12月30日，青岛银行发布公告称，青岛银行第九届董事会第二十四次会议书面传签表 决，审议通过《关于的议案》。 （文章来源：证券日报） ...