Workflow
言论自由
icon
Search documents
俞敏洪深夜发全员信回应争议,呼吁员工慎发极端言论
3 6 Ke· 2025-11-23 16:53
此外,俞敏洪还表示尽管被叫"老登",自己还是要说几句: 【#俞敏洪回应被叫老登#:发表到自媒体上的极端言论,最好慎重一下】#俞敏洪称用员工血汗钱旅游 说法不妥# 据白鹿视频报道,11月22日深夜,@俞敏洪 再发全员全员信再向员工道歉,并详细解释了自己写信的 缘由和初衷。对于"用员工的血汗钱旅游"的说法,俞敏洪认为这样的表达不妥,你在努力工作的同时, 老板们也在拼命努力,并承担更大的风险,确保公司的正常发展。 尽管有些人骂我老登,但有关工作和成长的事情,我还是要啰嗦几句。如果你在新东方工作,并且没有 放弃这份工作,我觉得你就有责任维护新东方的发展和形象。如果工作中遇到不公平的待遇或者受到欺 负,要尽量通过内部渠道解决,也欢迎大家随时给我邮箱写信。公司也欢迎大家公开吐槽,这是新东方 的传统,我也一直鼓励。但那种发表到自媒体上的极端言论,最好慎重一下。新东方一直鼓励言论自 由,但只有在公司正常发展的前提下,大家才会有一份安心的工作。 ...
深度|马斯克独家访谈:6万亿参数Grok 5冲击AGI,Neuralink、Tesla及xAI的人类存续与宇宙探索使命
Z Potentials· 2025-11-23 02:06
Group 1 - Neuralink has made significant progress with over 10 patients implanted with brain-machine interface devices, enabling them to communicate at near-normal speeds despite previous disabilities [3][4][6] - The technology aims to create bionic limbs for individuals with mobility impairments, potentially allowing them to run faster than average humans [6][4] - Elon Musk emphasizes the importance of real-time data and advanced AI capabilities, claiming Grok 5 has a 10% chance of achieving AGI, which is a notable improvement [5][23][20] Group 2 - The acquisition of Twitter, now X, was initially criticized but has since transformed into a valuable data asset, with a significant increase in perceived value [7][10][12] - Musk's vision for X includes creating a platform that promotes free speech and serves as a public square for diverse opinions, countering perceived biases in social media [14][15] - The investment in xAI is driven by the need for a counterbalance to major tech companies, focusing on open-source principles and ensuring human-centric AI development [16][18] Group 3 - Tesla's manufacturing efficiency has improved dramatically, with the goal of producing a car every 5 seconds, which would revolutionize automotive production [30][31] - The company is focused on integrating AI into its manufacturing processes, treating factories as giant chips to enhance efficiency [33][34] - Full self-driving (FSD) technology is reported to be four times safer than manual driving, with plans to further enhance safety features [42][40] Group 4 - Musk's long-term vision includes exploring the universe and understanding extraterrestrial life, driven by a curiosity about the cosmos [48][49] - The development of Grok 5 aims to create a comprehensive knowledge repository, akin to a modern-day Library of Alexandria, to preserve human knowledge [24][25] - The company is committed to advancing AI capabilities while ensuring ethical considerations are at the forefront of its initiatives [17][19]
YouTube偷偷删了,“真没骨气”
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-11-06 09:03
这些视频账号分别属于"Al-Haq"、"Al Mezan人权中心"和"巴勒斯坦人权中心"等巴勒斯坦人权组织。今 年9月,美国政府以这些组织"与国际刑事法院合作调查以色列官员"为由,对其实施制裁。 据介绍,巴勒斯坦人权组织曾通过YouTube频道发布数小时的影像资料,记录了以色列政府在加沙地带 和约旦河西岸涉嫌违反国际法的行为,包括杀害巴勒斯坦平民的事件。 YouTube母公司谷歌向该媒体证实,在经过审查后,其根据美国国务院针对相关组织的制裁,直接删除 了相应账号。YouTube发言人宣称,"YouTube致力于遵守适用的制裁与贸易合规法律。" "我相当震惊,YouTube居然表现得如此缺乏骨气。"阿拉伯世界民主促进组织DAWN的执行主任萨拉·利 娅·惠特森表示,"很难想象会有任何严肃的理由认为,分享这些巴勒斯坦人权组织的信息会违反制裁。 屈服于这种武断的认定去审查他们,既令人失望,也相当令人惊讶。" 当地时间4日,美国独立调查网站"拦截"报道称,今年10月,YouTube网站秘密删除了多个巴勒斯坦人 权组织的账号,以及这些账号发布的700多条有关巴勒斯坦人权惨状的视频,以配合美国政府对"追究以 色列战争罪行" ...
“不要国王”:美国多地爆发反特朗普政府抗议集会
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-10-19 22:43
Core Viewpoint - Large-scale protests erupted in multiple U.S. cities against President Trump's policies, highlighting public dissatisfaction with his administration's stance on free speech and immigration [1] Group 1: Protests and Public Sentiment - A significant number of American citizens participated in protests, holding signs with messages such as "No Kings" and "Democracy Not Monarchy" to express their discontent with the Trump administration [1] - The protests were specifically aimed at opposing the government's perceived suppression of free speech and its immigration policies [1] Group 2: Political Reactions - President Trump, in an interview, responded to the protests by stating, "They call me a king, I am not a king," indicating his rejection of the title and the associated criticisms [1] - Louisiana House Speaker Mike Johnson referred to the protests as a "march of hatred against America," reflecting a contrasting political perspective on the demonstrations [1]
韩国总理:仇外示威是“自残行为”,韩政府将依法严正应对
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-10-15 22:53
Core Points - The South Korean Prime Minister Kim Min-seok condemned anti-China demonstrations as "self-destructive behavior" and emphasized the government's commitment to respond legally to such actions [1][3] - The Prime Minister highlighted the importance of creating a safe environment for foreign citizens in South Korea, especially in light of the upcoming APEC leaders' informal meeting [3] Group 1 - The government will take strong measures against anti-foreign demonstrations, which are seen as damaging to the country's image and affecting local businesses [3] - Discrimination and insults towards foreigners in daily life or workplaces must be eradicated to maintain national reputation [3] - Freedom of speech is important, but it should not infringe on the rights and safety of others, a principle that citizens in a democratic society should understand [3] Group 2 - The rise of far-right groups conducting anti-China protests near the Chinese embassy in Seoul has led to conflicts with local businesses [3] - President Yoon Suk-yeol criticized these gatherings as disruptive and beyond the scope of free speech [3]
麻省理工学院拒绝特朗普政府“签协议换拨款”提议
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-10-10 23:28
Core Points - The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) publicly rejected a proposal from the Trump administration that required universities to sign agreements with specific terms in exchange for priority access to federal funding [1] - MIT's president, Sally Kornbluth, stated that the proposed agreement included values and principles that the institution does not agree with, such as limiting freedom of speech and institutional independence [1] - The agreement's premise fundamentally contradicts MIT's core beliefs, emphasizing that scientific funding should be based solely on research value [1] Summary by Sections MIT's Rejection of the Proposal - MIT is the first university to reject the Trump administration's "sign agreement for funding" proposal [1] - The proposal was sent to nine universities, including the University of Arizona, Brown University, Dartmouth College, the University of Pennsylvania, and the University of Southern California [1] Specific Terms of the Proposal - The agreement included specific terms such as limiting the enrollment of international undergraduate students, freezing tuition for five years, prohibiting consideration of race and gender in hiring and admissions, and banning any actions that "disparage" conservative views [1] Responses from Other Universities - The Trump administration requested these universities to respond by October 20 [1] - The mayor and city council of Tucson, where the University of Arizona is located, opposed the university signing the agreement, while the leadership of the University of Virginia found certain terms of the agreement "extremely unacceptable" [1] Broader Context of Government Actions - Since Trump's return to the White House in January, the U.S. government has threatened to investigate dozens of universities on charges of "anti-Semitism" and has threatened to cut or reduce federal funding [2] - Some universities, like Columbia University, have reached settlement agreements with the Trump administration, while others, such as Harvard University, have chosen to continue legal battles [2]
多地房协认为:称房子降价,属于“不当言论”!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-05 08:39
Core Viewpoint - Recent actions by various cities to curb "bearish" sentiments in the real estate market have sparked widespread public attention, indicating a growing trend to restrict negative commentary on the housing market [1][3][4] Group 1: Government and Industry Responses - The Beijing Real Estate Brokerage Industry Association issued a statement on September 30, urging members to refrain from "bearish" market commentary and to prohibit malicious price reductions [1] - On September 9, the Harbin Real Estate Brokerage Industry Association criticized a self-media outlet for its negative statements about the local housing market, labeling them as "inappropriate remarks" [1] - These actions reflect a broader effort by local governments and industry associations to maintain market stability and prevent panic among potential buyers [4][5] Group 2: Public Sentiment and Debate - There is a divide in public opinion regarding the restriction of "bearish" commentary, with supporters arguing that such measures are necessary to maintain confidence in a market heavily reliant on public sentiment [5][7] - Critics question whether these negative statements truly constitute "inappropriate remarks" or if they are valid analyses based on market data, suggesting that limiting discourse may obscure the real state of the housing market [7][9] - The discussion surrounding housing prices is crucial for many households, and it should not be treated as a taboo subject; a transparent market environment is essential for the long-term health of the real estate sector [9]
从莫斯科返英,遭盘问4小时,英前议员被询问“对中俄看法”
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-09-29 22:46
Core Points - George Galloway and his wife were detained for nearly 9 hours at Gatwick Airport by UK police, who questioned them about their views on Russia and China [1][2] - Galloway criticized the police's actions as baseless and politically motivated, claiming it reflects a decline in the tradition of free speech in the UK [2] - The police stated that the questioning was conducted under the UK's 2019 Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act, which allows for such actions at ports and borders [2] Group 1 - Galloway, a former Labour MP and current leader of the British Workers Party, was questioned for 4 hours, while his wife was questioned for 5 hours regarding her painted nails in the colors of the Palestinian flag [1][2] - The London Metropolitan Police confirmed that neither Galloway nor his wife was arrested and they were allowed to continue their journey [3] - Galloway was in London to attend an event expected to be attended by the Chinese ambassador [3]
美国民主已成“僵尸”?
Hu Xiu· 2025-09-28 06:58
Core Points - The article discusses the transformation of American democracy into a "zombie democracy," where the external structures of democracy remain, but the internal mechanisms have been hollowed out by power, apathy, and technology [2][3][5] - It highlights the intertwining of political authoritarianism and technological dominance, suggesting that democracy is no longer a shield against tyranny but may become a tool for maintaining control [4][5][6] Group 1 - The article describes the superficial continuation of civil society in the U.S., which is likened to a "zombie" existence, making the erosion of freedom difficult to detect [3][6] - It emphasizes the role of artificial intelligence in reshaping information access and understanding, potentially further diminishing independent thought and public engagement [4][6] - The piece warns that the combination of political and technological authoritarianism poses a significant threat to democratic values and individual freedoms [5][6] Group 2 - The article reflects on the historical context of authoritarianism, noting that modern forms differ from past examples, as they often maintain the facade of democratic institutions while eroding their effectiveness [9][10] - It discusses how the erosion of democracy is characterized by the loss of independent institutions, where loyalty to leaders supersedes professional competence [11][12] - The narrative suggests that the current political climate in the U.S. is marked by a lack of meaningful checks on power, leading to a situation where leaders can act with impunity [18][19] Group 3 - The article points out the dangers of societal polarization and the manipulation of public discourse through social media and algorithms, which contribute to a climate of distrust and disengagement [17][28] - It highlights the role of education in fostering democratic values and the need for active public participation to counter authoritarian tendencies [36][37] - The piece concludes with a call for individuals to resist the encroachment of both political and technological authoritarianism, emphasizing the importance of maintaining human agency and critical thinking [39][40]
遭美撤销签证 哥伦比亚总统回应称“我不需要”
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-09-27 13:30
Core Points - Colombian President Petro responded to the U.S. revocation of his visa, emphasizing that freedom of speech should not be criminalized and calling for global attention to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza [1] - The U.S. State Department announced the visa revocation due to Petro's "reckless and incendiary" behavior during a pro-Palestinian protest in New York [1] - Petro urged U.S. soldiers to disobey orders from Trump and follow commands of humanity, highlighting his stance against U.S. foreign policy [1]