留下的大约500万元遗产无人认领 由于阿婆生前没有订立遗嘱 也没有配偶和子女 这笔巨额遗产的继承人是谁呢？ 根据顾阿婆生前的自述，她是被收养的。虽然没有配偶和子女，但有一个哥哥（同样系收养）和一个姐姐（养父母亲生），且两人成婚留有子女，因此老 人的遗产无法被算作无主财产，也无法被收归国有。若找不到继承人，这笔钱可能长期悬置。 每经编辑｜何小桃 上个月，媒体发布一则 "上海孤老去世，留下500万遗产 全网寻找继承人"的消息 引发关注 孤老顾梅娣阿婆 今年2月去世后 如今，事件有了最新进展 顾梅娣老人的继承人 ——其姐姐的女儿已经找到 遗产归属尘埃落定 而顾梅娣的哥哥、姐姐 在顾梅娣去世之前都已去世 一名自称是顾梅娣老人外甥女的顾女士来到了普陀公证处。她表示，自己在看到新闻后，一下子就认出了顾梅娣老人："那个一看就是我阿姨！" 顾女士说："我们一直想照顾她，动迁后就到处找，可就是没消息。"她表示，她的母亲和阿姨一直居住在宝山路地区，但7年前，阿姨在房子动迁后，就 与他们失去了联系。顾梅娣老人的老邻居潘阿姨也证实，顾梅娣性格要强，不爱麻烦人，动迁搬家后，就没有向家人透露过新住址，她这个老邻居也不知 道她的下落。 普 ...

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that heirs who have lived together and have taken on significant caregiving responsibilities can claim a larger share of the inheritance, reflecting the legal recognition of their contributions to the deceased's life [1][2]. Group 1: Case Background - The case involves a dispute over the inheritance of a deceased individual, Xiao Lan, who had no will or children, leading to a legal examination of the relationships between the heirs [1]. - Xiao Lan was born in 1973, and her biological father, Zhong, remarried and had two other children, while her mother, Lan, cohabited with Wang and later married him in 2015 [1]. - Upon Xiao Lan's death in 2022, her estate included a house, a motorcycle, and over 160,000 yuan in bank savings [1]. Group 2: Court's Findings - The court determined that Wang had been the primary caregiver for Xiao Lan, providing emotional and financial support, while Zhong had not contributed to her upbringing [2]. - The court ruled that Wang would inherit 60% of Xiao Lan's estate, while Zhong would inherit 40%, which would be passed on to his surviving family members after his death [2]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The ruling emphasizes the importance of caregiving relationships in inheritance disputes, allowing for a more equitable distribution of assets based on actual contributions rather than mere legal relationships [3]. - The court's decision reflects a broader legal principle that recognizes the emotional and practical support provided by caregivers, encouraging them to fulfill their responsibilities [3].

北京的张女士（化名）因病离世留下100多万元财产和一套房产无人继承，张女士多位亲戚 诉至法庭要求分割全部遗产，法院判定100多万元归亲戚，房产则收归国有。无独有偶，上 海一位老人意外猝死后留下430万元和一套房产无人继承，最后法院判定分给老人堂弟130 万元，其余遗产也收归国有。 如果老人无儿无女，去世后遗产到底该归谁？能不能尽可能由旁系亲属继承？为何房产会收 归国有？近期，相关话题引发网友热议。 据北京日报8月4日报道，记者了解到，北京和上海均有过类似判例，被继承人去世后，由 于没有继承人，也没有留下遗嘱，部分遗产收归国有，由当地民政局作为遗产管理人。 发生在市民张女士身后的案例就很有代表性。张女士因病去世，留下包括存款、保险、房产 在内的数百万元遗产。由于张女士未婚未育，其父母也均已去世，其生前也未设立遗嘱，遗 △北京日报报道北京张女士离世被亲戚分割遗产。 产的归属成了难题。 对此，京都律师事务所律师刘铭持否定态度，在他看来，"旁系亲属相对来说比较庞杂，如 果纳入法定继承范围，会令继承变得无序。"而且，如果扩大继承人范围，可能造成旁系亲 属对被继承人未履行任何义务却享有财产继承权的情形。 张女士父母双方多 ...

每经编辑｜程鹏 北京的张女士（化名）因病离世留下100多万元财产和一套房产无人继承，张女士多位亲戚诉至法庭要求分割全部遗产，法院判定100多万元归亲戚，房产 则收归国有。无独有偶，上海一位老人意外猝死后留下430万元和一套房产无人继承，最后法院判定分给老人堂弟130万元，其余遗产也收归国有。 如果老人无儿无女，去世后遗产到底该归谁？能不能尽可能由旁系亲属继承？为何房产会收归国有？近期，相关话题引发网友热议。 据北京日报8月4日报道，记者了解到，北京和上海均有过类似判例，被继承人去世后，由于没有继承人，也没有留下遗嘱，部分遗产收归国有，由当地民 政局作为遗产管理人。 最终，法院根据多名亲戚各自对张女士生前的帮扶情况，判决100余万元现金由亲戚共同继承，帮扶较多的那位亲戚继承20%份额，其余亲属分别继承 10%。房产则收归国家所有，由区民政局管理。 法官表示，平时走亲戚的行为，不能当然地视为对张女士的扶养行为，而需要看他们具体对张女士的生活做过什么样的贡献，是否属于"扶养"行为，只有 符合条件，才能参与到遗产的分配当中。因此，根据各亲戚的扶养时间长短、付出多少等因素，法院酌情裁定遗产分配份额。 在上述案件中，无儿 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent developments in the inheritance dispute involving the late founder of Wahaha Group, Zong Qinghou, and his children, focusing on the court's decision to restrict the current chairman, Zong Fuli, from accessing certain assets in a HSBC bank account until the legal proceedings in Hangzhou are resolved [2][4]. Group 1: Court Ruling and Legal Proceedings - The Hong Kong High Court issued a non-judicial injunction preventing Zong Fuli from withdrawing or transferring any assets from the HSBC account of Jian Hao Ventures Limited until the outcome of the litigation in Hangzhou [2][4]. - The court ordered Zong Fuli to disclose the current balance and transaction details of the HSBC account, which held approximately $1.799 billion (around HKD 141 billion) as of May 31, 2024 [3][4]. Group 2: Background of the Dispute - The dispute arises from Zong Qinghou's two families, with the plaintiffs being his children from his relationship with Du Jianying, and the defendant being Zong Fuli, his daughter from another relationship [7][9]. - Zong Qinghou passed away on February 25, 2024, leaving behind two wills that did not name the plaintiffs as beneficiaries, which has led to the current legal conflict over the inheritance [12][26]. Group 3: Financial Details and Allegations - Jian Hao Ventures Limited's HSBC account primarily consists of bonds, fixed-income assets, and some cash and time deposits [3][11]. - The plaintiffs allege unauthorized withdrawals by Zong Fuli from the HSBC account, totaling approximately $5.244 million and $1.085 million, which they claim were not for the purpose of establishing the offshore trusts as per Zong Qinghou's instructions [34][35][46]. Group 4: Trust Establishment Issues - The plaintiffs argue that Zong Fuli has failed to establish the offshore trusts as outlined in the agreements and has not provided necessary documentation for the trust setup [36][54]. - Zong Fuli contends that the establishment of the trusts is contingent upon the valuation of the assets in the HSBC account, which she claims has not reached the expected amount of $2.1 billion [32][32][33].

中经记者 孙吉正 北京报道 8月1日，娃哈哈创始人宗庆后的三位子女宗继昌、宗婕莉、宗继盛状告宗庆后长女宗馥莉的诉讼于香港 高等法院开庭。 根据香港高等法院披露的诉讼文件显示，三名原告为Jacky Zong（宗继昌）、Jessie Jiele Zong（宗婕 莉）、Jerry Jisheng Zong（宗继盛），被告方中第一被告人为Kelly Fuli Zong（宗馥莉），第二被告人 为Jian Hao Ventures Limited（建浩创投有限公司）。 根据香港高等法院的诉讼书显示，确认建浩创投有限公司名下在香港上海汇丰银行有限公司（以下简 称"香港汇丰"）的银行账户中的资产，是宗继昌、宗婕莉、宗继盛三位原告享有受益权的信托财产，法 官下令被告宗馥莉不得从相关账户中提款或转账任何资产，禁制令持续有效至杭州市中级人民法院及浙 江省高级人民法院的诉讼有最终裁决为止。 根据三位原告宗继昌、宗婕莉、宗继盛提供的证据文件，2024年1月，宗庆后亲手手写指示给郭虹（音 译，代理律师），指示内容为上述三位原告于香港汇丰办理每人7亿美元的信托，并请香港公证处公 证。 宗庆后的"手写指示" 同时，原告出示的证据还包括一份委 ...

香港高等法院官网披露的案件信息。 | 4 | JACKY ZONG (宗继昌) | 1st Plaintiff | I | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | JESSIE JIELI ZONG (宗婕莉) | 2nd Plaintiff | | | 1 | JERRY JISHENG ZONG (宗继盛) | 3rd Plaintiff | | | K | and | | K | | L | KELLY FULI ZONG (宗馥莉) | Ist Defendant | HL | | M | JIAN HAO VENTURES LIMITED | 2nd Defendant | M | | N | | | N | | 0 public) | Before: Deputy High Court Judge Gary CC Lam in Chambers (Open to | | 0 | | P | Date of Hearing: 11 July 2025 Date of Decision: 1 August 2025 | | P | | 0 | | | 0 | | R | DECIS ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complexities and implications of trust funds in the context of inheritance, using the recent family dispute of Wahaha founder Zong Qinghou as a case study. It emphasizes how trusts can transform inheritance into a different financial structure, potentially avoiding legal disputes over estate division. Group 1: Trusts and Inheritance - Trusts can prevent wealth from being classified as "inheritance," thus avoiding traditional inheritance disputes [9][18] - The essence of a trust is the separation of ownership, control, and income rights, allowing for a more secure transfer of wealth [20][22] - Trusts provide three layers of risk isolation: protecting the grantor's assets from personal liabilities, shielding beneficiaries from their own financial issues, and ensuring that the trust's assets are independent of the trustee's financial status [31][36][37] Group 2: Potential Issues with Trusts - Trusts can fail due to human factors, such as improper establishment or excessive control retained by the grantor, which can lead to legal challenges [39][44] - The legitimacy of a trust can be questioned if it is established with questionable funds or without proper consent from all parties involved [40][41] - The article raises doubts about the validity of the trust in the Zong family case, suggesting it may not have been legally established, as indicated by the lack of action against the trust institution [50][55] Group 3: Broader Implications - The article highlights the fragility of verbal agreements and the importance of clear legal definitions in financial arrangements to prevent disputes [59] - It points out the destructive nature of information asymmetry in business systems, emphasizing the need for transparency [60] - The blurring of personal and corporate assets can undermine the legitimacy of financial arrangements, making it crucial to maintain clear boundaries [61]

Group 1 - The inheritance dispute over Wahaha's assets is intensifying, with Zong Fuli's changing identities drawing public attention [1][2] - A notarized will indicates that Zong Fuli applied for inheritance rights to Zong Qinghou's estate on March 1, 2024 [1] - Zong Fuli currently holds Hong Kong identity, while her siblings, who are suing her, possess U.S. citizenship [2][3] Group 2 - The plaintiffs are seeking to freeze approximately $1.8 billion in assets held in a Hong Kong HSBC account and claim $2.1 billion in trust rights [2][3] - The trust was established with a total of $2.1 billion, intended for Zong Qinghou's three non-marital children, but only partially funded due to insufficient initial capital [3] - The current balance in the HSBC account is approximately $1.8 billion, which is expected to be supplemented by dividends from Wahaha Group [3] Group 3 - There are concerns regarding the legality of the $1.8 billion trust fund's transfer out of China, given strict foreign exchange controls [4][5] - The legitimacy of the trust could be challenged if the fund's transfer does not comply with regulations [5] - Wahaha Group is not solely a private enterprise, as it has significant stakes held by state-owned entities [5] Group 4 - The Zong family also possesses overseas properties, including a property in Hong Kong purchased before Zong Fuli renounced her U.S. citizenship [6][7] - Zong Fuli's property in Hong Kong was sold for $2.6 million after being acquired for $1.11 million [6][7] - The family has a history of real estate investments in the U.S., including a mansion in San Marino, Los Angeles [7]

Core Viewpoint - The inheritance of the Wahaha equity by Zong Fuli is confirmed through a notarized document, indicating her current Hong Kong identity and the marital status of her parents at the time of Zong Qinghou's death [1][2]. Summary by Sections - The notarized inheritance document from Hangzhou Oriental Notary Office reveals that Zong Fuli holds a key will notarization that allows her to inherit the Wahaha equity previously held by Zong Qinghou [1]. - On March 1, 2024, Zong Fuli applied for the inheritance notarization of Zong Qinghou's estate, providing 12 pieces of evidence, including her identification, Zong Qinghou's death and cremation certificates, the marriage certificate between Zong Qinghou and Shi Youzhen, and her own "Only Child Honor Certificate" [1].