Workflow
财务造假
icon
Search documents
退市卓朗五年财务造假坐实,投资者向天津中院起诉索赔
Group 1 - Tianjin Zhuolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. (Delisted Zhuolang, stock code: 600225) has been penalized for false reporting in its annual reports from 2019 to 2023, failing to disclose external guarantees in a timely manner [1] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has issued an administrative penalty decision against the company for these false statements [1] - Key responsible individuals, including Zhang Kunyao and Dai Ying, have been identified for their roles in orchestrating and managing financial fraud during their tenure at the company [1] Group 2 - From 2019 to 2023, Zhuolang's subsidiary, Tianjin Zhuolang Technology Development Co., Ltd., fabricated sales of servers, software, and system integration services, leading to inflated revenue and profits [1] - The fraudulent transactions involved selling non-existent goods to related companies, creating a closed loop of funds without any real commercial substance [1] - The false sales activities resulted in significant misstatements in the annual reports of Delisted Zhuolang for the specified years [1] Group 3 - On March 27, 2025, Delisted Zhuolang announced two lawsuits filed by investors seeking compensation for losses, currently under review by the Tianjin First Intermediate People's Court [2] - Investors who purchased shares between September 21, 2019, and March 14, 2024, may be eligible to file claims for compensation, subject to court verification [2] - The company is providing support for investors through a dedicated financial consultation team to assist in recovering losses through legal channels [2]
坚定守护资本市场清风正气
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-06-23 21:59
Core Viewpoint - The recent case of financial fraud involving *ST Jiuyou highlights the persistent issue of financial misconduct in the capital market, which undermines fairness and transparency, making it difficult for investors to make informed decisions [2] Group 1: Financial Fraud Impact - Financial fraud severely disrupts the healthy development of capital markets, leading to misallocation of resources and hindering the growth of genuinely capable companies [2] - The prevalence of financial fraud increases risks for investors who rely on false financial data, likening their investment decisions to navigating in the dark [2] Group 2: Regulatory Measures - Recent tightening of regulatory policies and improvements in laws have provided a robust framework for combating financial fraud, with the new Securities Law significantly increasing penalties for such violations [3] - The regulatory authorities are enhancing collaboration with judicial departments to establish a comprehensive punishment and prevention system for financial fraud [3] - The issuance of the "Opinions on Strictly Implementing the Delisting System" in April 2024 aims to enforce stricter delisting standards, targeting companies with severe or long-term fraudulent activities [3] Group 3: Market Integrity and Future Outlook - Strict punishment for financial fraud is essential for maintaining the principles of openness, fairness, and justice in the market, thereby enhancing the vitality and resilience of the capital market [4] - A transparent and healthy market environment is expected to attract more investors and quality companies, fostering a virtuous cycle [4] - Continuous improvement of the regulatory system and maintaining a high-pressure stance against financial fraud are crucial for adapting to new fraudulent methods and hidden risks [4]
85%利润是假的!股价高点已跌超80%!昔日龙头企业1.12亿造假案曝光...股东人数仍近7万,下周何去何从
雪球· 2025-06-22 02:16
Core Viewpoint - The company Renzihang has been labeled as ST due to financial fraud, with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) imposing a fine of 5 million yuan and penalties on responsible individuals totaling 7 million yuan [1][3][12]. Summary by Sections Financial Misconduct - Renzihang was found to have inflated revenue by 112 million yuan over three consecutive years, leading to a fine of 5 million yuan and warnings to responsible individuals [1][8][12]. - The company’s subsidiary, Beijing Yahon, was identified as a key factor in the financial misconduct, with operations continuing independently post-acquisition [8][19]. Stock Market Impact - Starting June 24, 2025, Renzihang's stock will be traded under the name "ST Renzihang," with a trading suspension for one day [3][6][7]. - The stock's price fluctuation limit remains at 20%, which is significant for nearly 70,000 shareholders [6][24]. Historical Context - Renzihang was once a leading player in the cybersecurity sector, with its stock peaking at 102.85 yuan during the 2015 bull market, achieving a market capitalization exceeding 10 billion yuan [19][20]. - The company has faced declining performance, with a 35% drop in revenue from 2022 to 2024, and a net loss of 39.62 million yuan in 2024 [23].
连续多年财务造假,*ST锦港被终止上市,一季度末有近8万股东
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-21 03:47
Core Viewpoint - *ST Jinguang's stock will be delisted from the Shanghai Stock Exchange due to serious violations, including false financial reporting over multiple years [1][3]. Group 1: Company Announcement - On June 20, *ST Jinguang announced that it received a self-regulatory decision from the Shanghai Stock Exchange to terminate its stock listing [1]. - The delisting process will begin on June 30, with a trading period of 15 trading days, and the expected last trading date is July 18 [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The company was found to have inflated profits through false trading activities and misreported income in its annual reports from 2022 to 2024, leading to administrative penalties from the Liaoning Securities Regulatory Bureau [3]. - The company has faced continuous false reporting for four consecutive years from 2020 to 2023, which constitutes a major violation triggering mandatory delisting [3]. Group 3: Company Background - *ST Jinguang was established in 1993 and is recognized as the first port in China to implement a shareholding system separating government and enterprise operations [3]. - The company's main business includes oil products, grain, general cargo, and container operations [3]. Group 4: Shareholder Information - As of the end of the first quarter of this year, *ST Jinguang had a total of 78,800 shareholders, a decrease of 3,913 compared to the end of 2024 [4].
600190,退市!
中国基金报· 2025-06-21 00:23
露。 *ST锦港将成为A股"港口退市第一股"。 *ST锦港(600190)6月20日晚间公告, 公司今日收到上交所出具的自律监管决定书,因2020年至 2023年年度报告连续4年存在虚假记载,上海证券交易所决定终止公司股票上市。 公司将于6月30 日进入退市整理期,预计最后交易日为7月18日。公司股票终止上市后,将转入全国中小企业股份转 让系统进行股份转让。 5月29日,*ST锦港收到辽宁证监局的《行政处罚决定书》, 认定公司及相关责任人员存在多项违法 事实,公司股票已于5月30日起停牌。 《决定书》显示,2022至2024年,公司通过虚假贸易业务及跨期确认港口包干作业费收入等方式虚 增利润,《2022年年度报告》《2023年年度报告》《2024年第一季度报告》存在虚假记载。其 中,2022年虚增利润3610.45万元,占当期报告披露利润总额的22.46%;2023年虚增利润 6808.78万元,占当期报告披露利润总额的65.96%;2024年第一季度虚增利润1537.75万元,占当 期报告披露利润总额的62.05%。 此外,公司还存在未按期披露《2024年半年度报告》,未及时披露关联交易,《2022年年度报 ...
*ST锦港重大违法退市落锤 巨额罚款让违法者付出代价
本报讯 (记者毛艺融)6月20日盘后,锦州港股份有限公司(以下简称"*ST锦港")公告收到终止上市 决定。 根据行政处罚查实的财务造假事实,公司触及重大违法退市情形,交易所依规作出终止公司股票上市的 决定,按照规则公司股票将进入退市整理期交易15个交易日,供投资者交易退出。公司股票在退市整理 期结束后将摘牌。 市场人士认为,本案中,公司因严重财务造假被强制退市,有关责任人也被巨额罚款,这体现出监管机 构坚决落实新"国九条",对财务造假的"零容忍",对"害群之马"坚决出清。 5月29日,*ST锦港公告收到《行政处罚决定书》(〔2025〕3号),认定2022年至2024年,公司通过虚 假贸易业务及跨期确认港口包干作业费收入等方式虚增利润,《2022年年度报告》《2023年年度报告》 《2024年第一季度报告》存在虚假记载。 此前,2024年11月1日,公司披露收到中国证监会作出的《行政处罚决定书》(〔2024〕96号),认定 公司2018年至2021年年度报告虚假记载,并予以顶格处罚。根据行政处罚认定的事实,公司2020年至 2023年年度报告连续4年存在虚假记载,触及上交所《股票上市规则》第9.5.1条第(一) ...
财务造假,退市!
证券时报· 2025-06-20 14:10
*ST锦港(600190)6月20日晚间公告,公司今日收到上交所出具的自律监管决定书,因2020年至2023年年度报告连续4年存在虚假记载,上海证券交易所决定终 止公司股票上市。公司将于6月30日进入退市整理期,预计最后交易日为7月18日。公司股票终止上市后,将转入全国中小企业股份转让系统进行股份转让。 *ST锦港将成为A股"港口退市第一股"。 5月29日,*ST锦港收到辽宁证监局的《行政处罚决定书》,认定公司及相关责任人员存在多项违法事实,公司股票已于5月30日起停牌。 《决定书》显示,2022至2024年,公司通过虚假贸易业务及跨期确认港口包干作业费收入等方式虚增利润,《2022年年度报告》《2023年年度报告》《2024年第 一季度报告》存在虚假记载。其中,2022年虚增利润3610.45万元,占当期报告披露利润总额的22.46%;2023年虚增利润6808.78万元,占当期报告披露利润总额 的65.96%;2024年第一季度虚增利润1537.75万元,占当期报告披露利润总额的62.05%。 此外,公司还存在未按期披露《2024年半年度报告》,未及时披露关联交易,《2022年年度报告》《2023年年度报 ...
定了!这家公司进入退市整理期!
IPO日报· 2025-06-20 13:44
星标 ★ IPO日报 精彩文章第一时间推送 6月20日晚间,锦州港股份有限公司(600190.SH,下称"*ST锦港")公告称,公司于2025年6月20 日收到上海证券交易所出具的自律监管决定书,决定终止公司股票上市。终止上市的证券种类包括 人民币普通股(A股)和境内上市外资股(B股),证券简称为*ST锦港、*ST锦港B,证券代码为 600190、900952。 AI制图 为了满足银行贷款需求,公司做大了收入和利润。2018年—2021年,公司分别虚增收入约21.2亿 元、39.47亿元、24.82亿元、0.75亿元,虚增利润0.21亿元、0.39亿元、0.44亿元、0.75亿元。 上述四年间,公司累计虚增收入约86.24亿元,累计虚增利润约1.79亿元。 整体来看,2018年—2024年,*ST锦港连续7年均在财务造假。 据IPO日报不完全统计发现,2025年以来,A股市场已有13家公司完成退市。其中,五家公司触及 面值退市、三家公司为触及市值退市、两家公司为主动申请退市、两家公司是触及重大违法强制退 市、一家公司则是被吸收合并而退市。 END 公司股票进入退市整理期的起始日为2025年6月30日,预计最后 ...
股民需要更多的“顶格处罚”
Guo Ji Jin Rong Bao· 2025-06-20 01:57
Group 1 - The recent regulatory actions against companies like Guangdao Digital and Dongxu Optoelectronics signal a zero-tolerance approach towards financial fraud in the securities market [2][3] - Guangdao Digital was penalized for fabricating contracts and invoices, resulting in a revenue inflation of 1.465 billion yuan, which constituted over 85% of its reported revenue during the period from 2018 to mid-2024 [2] - Dongxu Optoelectronics was found to have fabricated business activities and misappropriated 9.595 billion yuan, leading to a penalty of 378 million yuan, which is only 5% of the raised funds [2][3] Group 2 - The current regulatory penalties are significantly harsher compared to previous years, where fines were typically in the range of 300,000 to 500,000 yuan, indicating a shift towards more stringent enforcement [3] - Despite the increased penalties, there are concerns that the current measures may not fully deter companies from engaging in financial fraud, as the penalties may still be perceived as insufficient relative to the harm caused to investors [3] - To restore investor confidence in the A-share market, it is crucial to enhance the transparency and authenticity of information provided by listed companies, alongside ensuring that investors' interests are adequately protected [4]
*ST恒立退市“甩锅”不成立,行政处罚揭示年报难产真相
Huan Qiu Wang· 2025-06-19 04:16
Core Viewpoint - *ST Hengli's delisting process has been finalized due to its failure to disclose the 2024 annual report within the statutory deadline, leading to a termination of listing decision by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange [1][4]. Group 1: Company Background - *ST Hengli was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 1996 and has undergone various business transformations, including air conditioning equipment and new energy batteries, but has faced significant decline in its main business since 2018 [4]. - The company shifted towards processing and trading, experiencing continuous pressure on profitability, with revenue dropping from 346 million yuan in 2021 to 111 million yuan in 2023, and further declining to approximately 70.06 million yuan in the first three quarters of 2024 [4]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Audit Issues - To avoid delisting, *ST Hengli attempted to acquire Xinyu Lithium Thought New Energy Co., and projected a revenue increase of over 200 million yuan in the fourth quarter, with an estimated 2024 revenue of 300 to 350 million yuan, but still anticipated a net loss of 33 to 43 million yuan [4][5]. - The company initially blamed its auditing firm, Xutai Accounting Firm, for the late delivery of the audit report, claiming it hindered internal review processes, and even filed a lawsuit against the firm for 38.27 million yuan [4][5]. - However, the administrative penalty notice revealed that the auditing firm had raised revenue adjustment issues as early as April 15, and provided a draft report indicating a revenue of 196 million yuan on April 19, which would have triggered delisting criteria if disclosed [4][5]. Group 3: Regulatory Actions and Consequences - *ST Hengli did not cooperate with the audit process, failing to provide necessary financial statements and supporting documents, which led to the issuance of an audit report based on incomplete information [5]. - The company faced an administrative penalty, including a fine of 3.5 million yuan and warnings to responsible individuals with fines ranging from 1 to 1.8 million yuan [5]. - The company is currently under investigation by the China Securities Regulatory Commission for suspected false disclosures in its financial data, which could lead to more severe legal consequences if financial fraud is confirmed [6].