【#2025全国平均气温再创历史新高#】#2025全国平均气温11℃#据国家气候中心报道，2025年，全国平 均气温11.0℃，较常年（9.9℃）偏高1.1℃，打破2024年10.9℃纪录，再次创1961年以来历史新高。全国 大部地区气温偏高超过0.5℃。新疆、辽宁、河北、江西、湖北、山东、天津、西藏、湖南、河南、吉 林、上海、陕西、安徽、浙江、江苏等16个省（市、区）气温均为1961年以来历史最高。2024/2025年 冬季（2024年12月至2025年2月），全国平均气温-2.7℃，较常年同期偏高0.4℃；春季（3-5月），全国 平均气温11.8℃，较常年同期偏高0.9℃，为1961年以来历史同期第四高；夏季（6-8月），全国平均气 温22.3℃，较常年同期偏高1.1℃，与2024年夏季并列为1961年以来历史同期最高；秋季（9-11月），全 国平均气温11.1℃，较常年同期偏高0.8℃，为1961年以来历史同期第五高。 2025年全国平均高温日数 历史最多，为16.5天，较常年偏多7.4天。江西、湖北、河南、山东、陕西、山西6省高温日数均创新 高。重庆巫溪（39天）、浙江杭州（37天）、上海徐家汇（27 ...

发言人指出，欧方无视历史排放责任、国家发展阶段和技术水平，打着防止"碳泄漏"的气候幌 子推行新的贸易保护主义，将自身碳标准强加于发展中国家，造成气候与贸易治理规则冲突， 抬升发展中国家气候行动成本，严重损害国际社会互信，与各方合作应对气候变化、推进可持 续发展的努力背道而驰。希望欧方遵守气候和贸易相关国际规则，摒弃单边主义、保护主义， 保持市场开放，本着公平、科学、非歧视的原则，促进绿色领域贸易投资自由化便利化。中方 愿与欧方相向而行，合作应对全球气候变化挑战，但将坚决采取一切必要措施，回应任何不公 平的贸易限制，维护自身发展利益、中国企业合法权益和全球产业链供应链的稳定。 les & FR 点击下载中国基金报客户端 ■ 中国基金报内容矩阵 ■ 巅峰对话 投资热点说 ETF风向标 IPO情报站 fe o 1 ■ a a - 444 and 4 4 CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND 开盘速递 港股日报 全球早班车 数说人物 √ � [ 8 a 4 a g a d 4 4 4 CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND ●微信搜一搜 ...

Core Viewpoint - The European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will be implemented starting January 1, 2026, which China views as unfair and discriminatory towards its products due to high default carbon emission intensity values set by the EU [1][2] Group 1: CBAM Implementation and Concerns - The EU has released legislative proposals and implementation details for CBAM, including setting high default carbon emission intensity values and plans to expand product coverage [1] - China argues that the EU's approach violates World Trade Organization principles and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, as it imposes unfair treatment on Chinese products [1][2] Group 2: Expansion of CBAM and Trade Protectionism - The EU plans to expand CBAM to include approximately 180 steel and aluminum-intensive downstream products, such as machinery, automobiles, and household appliances starting in 2028 [1] - This expansion is seen as a move beyond climate change response, reflecting unilateralism and trade protectionism, which China strongly opposes [1] Group 3: Double Standards and International Cooperation - The EU has relaxed its green regulations for internal markets while promoting protectionist measures externally, showcasing a double standard in its climate policies [2] - China emphasizes the need for the EU to adhere to international climate and trade rules, advocating for open markets and fair principles in green trade and investment [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), asserting that it will take all necessary measures to respond to any unfair trade restrictions, while emphasizing the importance of maintaining the stability of global supply chains and the legitimate rights of Chinese enterprises [1][3]. Group 1: EU's CBAM Implementation - The EU's CBAM is set to be officially implemented on January 1, 2026, with proposals that include setting default values for carbon emissions intensity and plans to expand the range of covered products [1]. - The EU's approach is criticized for ignoring China's achievements in green and low-carbon development, as it sets significantly high default values for carbon emissions intensity for Chinese products, which are expected to increase annually over the next three years [1]. Group 2: Expansion of CBAM Scope - The EU plans to expand the CBAM to include approximately 180 types of steel and aluminum-intensive downstream products, such as machinery, automobiles, and household appliances, starting in 2028 [2]. - This legislative proposal is viewed as exceeding the scope of climate change response and exhibiting clear unilateralism and trade protectionism, raising serious concerns from the Chinese side [2]. Group 3: Criticism of EU's Double Standards - The EU's recent modification of the 2035 ban on new fuel vehicles, which relaxes green regulations internally while promoting protectionism externally, is highlighted as a contradiction and a typical example of double standards [2]. - The EU is accused of imposing its carbon standards on developing countries under the guise of preventing "carbon leakage," which raises the costs of climate action for these nations and undermines international cooperation on climate change [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses serious concerns and strong opposition to the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which is seen as unfair trade restrictions that do not align with China's actual carbon emission levels and development trends [1][2]. Group 1: EU's CBAM Implementation - The EU's CBAM will officially be implemented on January 1, 2026, with recent legislative proposals and implementation details being released [1]. - The EU has set a significantly high default carbon emission intensity value for Chinese products, which will increase annually over the next three years, contradicting China's achievements in green and low-carbon development [1]. Group 2: Expansion of CBAM Scope - Starting in 2028, the EU plans to expand the CBAM to include approximately 180 downstream products that are intensive in steel and aluminum, such as machinery, automobiles, and household appliances [1]. - The design of these rules is viewed as exceeding the scope of climate change response and exhibiting clear unilateralism and trade protectionism [1]. Group 3: Double Standards and Trade Protectionism - The EU has relaxed its green regulations for internal markets while promoting protectionism externally under the guise of climate action, showcasing a double standard [2]. - The EU's approach is criticized for ignoring historical emissions responsibilities and the development stages of countries, imposing its carbon standards on developing nations, which raises the costs of climate action for them [2]. Group 4: Call for Fair Trade Practices - The Chinese government urges the EU to adhere to international climate and trade regulations, reject unilateralism and protectionism, and maintain an open market based on fairness, science, and non-discrimination [2]. - China is willing to cooperate with the EU to address global climate change challenges but will take necessary measures to respond to any unfair trade restrictions, protecting its development interests and the stability of global supply chains [2].

Core Viewpoint - China expresses willingness to cooperate with the EU in addressing global climate change challenges while firmly opposing any unfair trade restrictions that threaten its development interests and the stability of global supply chains [1][2]. Group 1: EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) - The EU's CBAM will officially be implemented on January 1, 2026, with recent legislative proposals setting high default carbon emission intensity values for Chinese products, which do not reflect China's actual levels and future development trends [1]. - The EU plans to expand the CBAM to include approximately 180 steel and aluminum-intensive downstream products, such as machinery, automobiles, and household appliances, starting in 2028, which is seen as a unilateral and protectionist measure [1]. Group 2: Double Standards and Trade Protectionism - The EU has modified its 2035 ban on new fuel vehicles, relaxing green regulations internally while promoting protectionism externally under the guise of climate action, highlighting a contradiction in its approach [2]. - The EU's actions are perceived as imposing its carbon standards on developing countries, increasing their climate action costs, and undermining international cooperation on climate change and sustainable development [2].

Group 1 - In 2025, the world experienced significant climate-related disasters, including devastating wildfires in Los Angeles and South Korea, resulting in numerous casualties and widespread destruction [4][5][6] - The year marked the first instance of global average temperatures exceeding 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, leading to the declaration of the first climate tipping point by scientists [4][11] - The occurrence of compound disaster events, where multiple types of disasters happen simultaneously or in close succession, was highlighted as a new trend in climate-related events [5][6] Group 2 - The 2025 global carbon budget report indicated a 1.1% increase in fossil fuel emissions, reaching a historical high, while renewable energy sources surpassed coal for the first time as the largest source of electricity [14] - The Montreal Protocol's success in phasing out ozone-depleting substances was noted, with the ozone layer expected to recover by the mid-21st century, reducing risks associated with UV exposure [14] - The impact of climate change on biodiversity was emphasized, with coral reefs facing mass mortality, which could lead to significant ecological consequences [11][15]

Core Insights - The delayed blooming of osmanthus in Shanghai in 2025, occurring approximately three weeks later than previous years, signals the impact of climate change on plant life cycles and ecological systems [1][2]. Group 1: Phenological Anomalies and Climate Impact - The flowering of plants like osmanthus is controlled by an intricate balance between internal biological clocks and external environmental signals, with temperature playing a crucial role in breaking dormancy [2]. - In 2025, Shanghai experienced an extended summer with high temperatures, causing the flowering process of osmanthus to be delayed until a significant drop in temperature was observed in late October [2]. - Research indicates that climate warming has led to earlier spring phenology, affecting the timing of plant growth and carbon absorption [2][3]. Group 2: Tree Growth and Carbon Dynamics - Observations in a forest on Chongming Island revealed that while trees begin to leaf out earlier due to warming, their radial growth lags behind, indicating a disconnect between carbon absorption and storage under climate stress [3][4]. - The phenomenon of "source-sink decoupling" suggests that despite prolonged growth periods, actual carbon storage may not increase proportionately, complicating assessments of forest carbon functions [4]. Group 3: Resilience and Ecological Strategies - Diverse plant communities exhibit lower sensitivity to climate warming, suggesting that biodiversity can buffer against the impacts of climate change on phenology [5]. - Urban areas, experiencing the "urban heat island" effect, face unique challenges in plant species composition and phenological responses, necessitating careful selection of tree species for urban greening [5][6]. - The need for real-time monitoring and advanced ecological sensing technologies is emphasized to protect urban vegetation and ecosystems under climate change [6][7]. Group 4: Future Directions and Knowledge Integration - The integration of new knowledge regarding biodiversity, carbon cycling, and climate stress mechanisms into future Earth system models is crucial for accurately simulating urban ecological changes [7]. - Long-term observations and research are vital for understanding ecological changes and guiding effective management practices for urban vegetation [7].

0:00 来源：人民网-人民视频 中国海洋大学副教授刘福凯团队致力于解析海洋在气候变化中的核心作用。他们通过数值模拟，揭示海 洋环流如何输送全球90%的额外热量，并发现区域人类活动可远程扰动大西洋关键环流。从基础研究到 系统突破，将科研探索与国家需求紧密结合，以"顶天立地"的精神培养新生力量，在向海图强的征程 中，发出了与深蓝对话的科学召唤。 ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the personal journey of a young Chinese explorer who has transitioned from mountain climbing to scientific exploration, emphasizing the impact of climate change on glaciers and the environment [1][4]. Group 1: Personal Journey and Exploration - The explorer began climbing at a young age, with significant achievements including summiting multiple peaks and participating in scientific research related to glaciers [2][3]. - The experience of climbing Mount Everest three times marked different life stages, evolving from personal ambition to collective scientific goals [2][3]. Group 2: Climate Change Awareness - The melting of glaciers is presented as a pressing issue that affects billions of lives, particularly in coastal cities, highlighting the urgency of climate action [4]. - Personal experiences, such as nearly drowning in a glacier lake, have deepened the explorer's understanding of climate change and its immediate dangers [3][4]. Group 3: Call to Action - The explorer advocates for a shift in how young people engage with nature, suggesting that travel should be about connecting with the environment rather than mere consumption [5]. - The narrative encourages more youth to witness the effects of climate change firsthand, framing it as an essential educational experience [5].