Group 1 - The "Qiao Dajie" common prosperity workshop has been providing handmade hats and slippers to elderly residents, helping over 300 women achieve employment and income growth in the community [1] - The workshop model emphasizes both material and spiritual prosperity, with a focus on expanding the middle class and uplifting the lower class, resulting in the establishment of 17 workshops that have helped over 600 individuals achieve local employment with an average monthly income increase of nearly 2000 yuan [1] Group 2 - The "Shangcheng Youpin" common prosperity workshop has developed a business model that connects party organizations, enterprises, farmers, and live-streaming hosts, generating over 700,000 yuan in revenue through online sales of local products [2] - The "Fuyuan Qizhi" workshop provides rehabilitation training and skills development for special groups, helping participants earn nearly 600 yuan per month through the sale of handmade products, while also aiding their social reintegration [2] - The "Xiangxin Shouwang" workshop collaborates with over 30 party-building units to provide support for disabled and elderly individuals, creating job opportunities and promoting social integration through various initiatives [3] Group 3 - The establishment of eight common prosperity workshops specifically for special groups has resulted in 223 individuals achieving supportive employment, demonstrating the effectiveness of the multi-party collaboration model [3] - The ongoing efforts focus on low-income groups, unemployed women, and special populations, aiming to enhance material wealth and social integration through resource mobilization and collaborative mechanisms [3]

Core Viewpoint - Zhengzhou is leveraging party building to drive high-quality development of private enterprises, creating a unique path for economic growth [2][3] Group 1: Economic Growth and Environment - The private economy in Zhengzhou has experienced "phenomenal" growth, supported by an optimized business environment [3] - In 2024, Zhengzhou plans to add 30 new initiatives for efficient business processing, with project approval times reduced to under 41 days [3] - The "Zheng Huiqi" platform has disbursed 9.32 billion yuan in funds to support enterprises [3] Group 2: Government and Business Relations - Zhengzhou has established a "ten thousand people help ten thousand enterprises" mechanism, with city leaders addressing issues like financing and labor for key enterprises [4] - The city has created 5,531 research and development platforms, with private sector innovation accounting for 64.3% of technological advancements [4] Group 3: Financial Support and Services - Zhengzhou's aviation port area has set up a "financial gathering hall," establishing 49 funds with a total investment scale of nearly 20 billion yuan to provide comprehensive financial services to private enterprises [4] - The city is developing a "full-cycle" service system, including a business cessation registration system and "sandbox regulation" models [5] Group 4: Economic Contributions - By the end of 2024, the private economy in Zhengzhou is expected to contribute over 60% of GDP, 77.6% of tax revenue, and 65.4% of total imports and exports [4]

党的二十届三中全会提出"推动重要流域构建上下游贯通一体的生态环境治理体系"。作为河湖治理的重 要制度创新，河长制自2016年全面推行以来成效显著。当前，河长制已进入深化发展阶段，需要从突击 整治转向长效治理，从关注工程建设转向更加注重精细管理。在这一过程中，充分发挥民间河长的补充 作用具有重要意义。笔者结合各地实践经验，就如何完善民间河长机制提出建议。 四是完善制度保障。民间河长多为兼职，有可能缺乏必备的业务素质及持久的投入动力，参与巡河或其 他治水公益活动的时间及频次也难以保障。为确保民间河长持续有效参与，需要建立完善的制度体系。 要制定民间河长管理办法，规范准入、培训和考核机制，引导其认真履职，提升专业性，增强责任感； 建立行政河长与民间河长的定期沟通机制，交流心得体会，分享经验教训；完善问题处理反馈机制，提 升民间河长的参与效能；建立健全激励表彰机制，通过物质奖励和精神鼓励相结合的方式，增强民间河 长的获得感和荣誉感。通过一系列制度安排，为民间河长参与治水提供有力保障。 作者单位：中国矿业大学 一是健全组织体系。随着生态文明建设深入推进，公众参与生态环境保护的意愿日益增强。水环境质量 与民生息息相关，更 ...

Core Viewpoint - The "Three Governance Integration" system under the leadership of the Party is essential for grassroots governance, combining self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance to address the evolving social contradictions and modernize the national governance system [1][6][7]. Historical Context of "Three Governance Integration" - The concepts of self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance have historically played significant roles in Chinese social governance, with their integration facing challenges due to the tension between official and unofficial governance [2][3]. - The historical roots of these governance ideas can be traced back to ancient Chinese philosophies, which emphasized the importance of self-governance, legal governance, and moral governance [2][3]. Development of the "Three Governance Integration" System - Since the establishment of the People's Republic of China, self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance have continued to play crucial roles in grassroots governance, with significant legal frameworks established to support these systems [3][4]. - The integration of these governance methods is seen as a response to the changing social landscape and the need for a more effective governance model that addresses the complexities of modern society [6][7]. Theoretical Implications of "Three Governance Integration" - The integration emphasizes the complementary strengths of self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance, aiming to create a more effective grassroots governance framework [7][8]. - The Party's leadership is crucial in guiding this integration, ensuring that governance is responsive to community needs while maintaining order and promoting moral values [8][12]. Practical Innovations in "Three Governance Integration" - Various local practices have emerged, such as the "One Agreement, Two Meetings, Three Groups" model and the village contract management model, showcasing the adaptability and effectiveness of the "Three Governance Integration" approach [15][16]. - The establishment of community discussion halls has also been a significant innovation, enhancing residents' participation in governance and decision-making processes [16]. Challenges and Conditions for Implementation - Despite the progress, challenges remain, including limited depth and breadth of self-governance, insufficient legal governance capabilities, and declining moral constraints within communities [18][19]. - The successful implementation of the "Three Governance Integration" system requires a robust framework that encourages public participation, strengthens legal governance, and revitalizes moral education [20][21].