Summary of Conference Call on China's Real Estate Policy Industry Overview - The focus is on the **Chinese real estate market** and its policies, particularly in the context of liquidity challenges and inventory reduction strategies [1][5][10]. Key Points and Arguments 1. **Shift in Policy Focus**: Current policies emphasize demand-side control but need to transition to supply-side support, including corporate financing and liquidity assistance [1][4]. 2. **International Experience**: Historical data indicates that stimulating demand alone does not resolve market downturns; restoring industry liquidity and stabilizing assets are crucial [1][8]. 3. **U.S. Financing Structure**: The U.S. real estate loan balance has grown at an average annual compound rate of approximately 7% from 2000 to 2024, with a significant shift from bank-led financing to direct financing [11]. 4. **Innovative Financial Tools**: The U.S. has successfully injected liquidity into its real estate market through financial innovations like Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) and private equity funds [12][13]. 5. **Challenges in China**: The Chinese real estate market faces significant challenges, including insufficient liquidity and the beginning of inventory reduction, compounded by a tightening monetary environment [5][10]. 6. **Need for Asset Management**: China should develop bad asset disposal businesses and enhance capital market activities, focusing on mergers and acquisitions to revitalize local assets [1][18]. 7. **Market Trends**: The Chinese real estate market is expected to experience a downward trend through 2025, with significant declines in transaction volumes and prices observed in recent months [3][10]. 8. **Comparison with U.S. Market**: The U.S. real estate market is at historical highs, while China's market is at historical lows, necessitating different strategies for recovery [19][20]. 9. **Liquidity Supply Mechanism**: Effective strategies should focus on supply-side support, particularly in corporate financing and liquidity to alleviate monetary resource constraints [7][9]. 10. **Moral Hazard in Financing**: Addressing moral hazard in corporate financing requires ensuring clean management records and balancing high-risk scenarios within the economic framework [2][24]. Additional Important Insights - **Historical Context**: The real estate adjustments post-1980s have shown significant price volatility, leading to increased asset restructuring needs [6]. - **Future Challenges**: The U.S. market may face challenges due to a potential shift in interest rates, which could affect asset price adjustments and the overall market structure [21][22]. - **Differences in Market Dynamics**: The dynamics of the Chinese real estate market differ significantly from the U.S., with unique challenges related to leverage and asset ownership structures [23]. This summary encapsulates the critical insights from the conference call regarding the current state and future outlook of the Chinese real estate market, emphasizing the need for strategic shifts in policy and financing mechanisms.

"无论是银行还是消费金融，个贷不良的压力还在持续，尤其是股份制银行的不良资产转让额度更大， 无论是经营贷还是信用卡的不良率都在上升。"有银行人士对智通财经记者表示。 上海金融与发展实验室首席专家、主任曾刚表示，过去几年，资产转让成为零售不良资产处置的主要模 式。"与对公业务的不良贷款不同，零售不良资产的特殊性在于其债务人主要为自然人，借款金额小、 分散度高，传统的催收追偿手段效率低下，诉讼追偿受限于司法资源，难以规模化开展。同时，虽然通 过呆账核销可以对不良资产进行快速处置，但对银行利润侵蚀较大，也难以大规模应用。" 智通财经5月17日讯 （记者 曹韵仪）今年一季度，银行不良贷款转让成交规模同比激增，二季度同样延 续了趋势。据智通财经记者不完全统计，截至5月17日，5月已有超15家机构挂牌超50笔不良资产转让项 目。 但在转让规模和挂牌速度增长同时，另一方面却是平均本金回收率下降。以5月16日，浦发银行发布两 期不良资产转让公告为例，未偿本息总额为14.86亿元，竞拍起始价为3千9百万元，跌破1折。有报告指 出，部分阶段挂牌的信用卡不良贷款批量转让项目起拍价格仅相当于本金的5.71%。 业内人士对智通财经记者 ...

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a loss of $0.54 per share for the first quarter of 2025, attributed to a provision expense of $5.8 million from the sale of $70 million worth of loans due to credit deterioration [23][24] - Total provision for the quarter was $14.5 million, with net interest income before provision at $22.2 million, an increase from $21.9 million in the same quarter last year [25][24] - Noninterest income increased to $2.4 million from $2.3 million year-over-year, while noninterest expense decreased to $18 million from $18.9 million [25][24] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The management team is focusing on addressing nonperforming assets, which are concentrated in six major loans totaling approximately $105.3 million [24] - The strategy includes reducing risk-weighted assets and improving capital ratios, with the risk-weighted capital ratio improving to 12.74% as of March 2025, up from 11.28% in June 2024 [28] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company has reduced construction lending commitments and is working towards a 300% concentration of commercial real estate to total capital [28] - There has been a dramatic increase in on-balance sheet liquidity, which is crucial for the bank's operations [29] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company has implemented a change in business strategy since July 2024, focusing on reducing risk and improving capital ratios [27][28] - Cost reduction measures have achieved approximately $12 million in annualized savings compared to last year [30] - The management team is committed to addressing nonperforming assets aggressively and improving overall financial health [30][31] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - The management team acknowledges the challenges faced in 2024 but expresses confidence in overcoming these issues and improving results by the end of 2025 [8][31] - The CEO emphasized the importance of direction and continuous improvement, stating that the company must not drift but actively work towards its goals [31][32] Other Important Information - The company has reduced its common stock dividend to increase capital at the bank level, reflecting a shift towards strengthening the bank's financial position [28] - The management team has fewer staff but believes they have the right personnel to move forward effectively [30] Q&A Session Summary Question: Are there any questions from virtual attendees? - There were no questions submitted by virtual attendees during the session [34] Question: Are there any questions from the room? - No questions were raised from the attendees present in the room [35]

21世纪经济报道记者 郭聪聪 北京报道 公告显示，意向参选机构需满足以下核心条件：首先，必须在破产重整案件中担任过信托服务机构；其 次，累计受托规模（按信托抵债规模或信托资产价值计算）不低于500亿元；第三，至少具备一例涉及 房地产企业或项目的重整案件受托经验。据悉，受托人遴选评审会曾暂定于2025年4月7日以现场会议形 式召开。 金科推进战略转型，将进军不良资产处置领域 引入破产服务信托，千亿金科迎来重整 金科股份重整计划堪称房地产行业迄今为止规模最大的司法重整案，其涉及债务规模高达1470亿元，债 权人数量超8400家。这一重整计划自启动以来，便备受市场关注。 金科股份的重整计划始于2024年4月22日，当日，金科股份及全资子公司重庆金科（重庆金科房地产开 发有限公司）收到法院的重整申请裁定。依据《上市规则》相关规定，公司股票自2024年4月22日开市 起被实施退市风险警示。一旦重整失败，或者公司净资产转为负值，金科股份股票就可能面临终止上市 的风险。 在重整过程中，金科股份成功引入了上海品器联合体、中国长城资产和四川发展证券基金等多名战略投 资者，形成"优质资本+央企AMC+地方国企"的多元化产业投资人 ...

Core Insights - The overall asset quality of city commercial banks in A-shares has improved, with a notable decrease in non-performing loan (NPL) ratios, particularly in the southeastern coastal region compared to the central and western regions [2][3][6] - Despite the overall decline in NPL ratios, there is a significant increase in personal loan NPL ratios, indicating a shift in the quality of loan portfolios [2][6][8] - The pressure on net interest margins is expected to increase in 2025, leading to greater provisioning pressures for city commercial banks [2][9] Summary by Category Asset Quality - As of the end of 2024, the NPL ratio for A-share listed city commercial banks was reported at 1.7% or higher for three banks, namely Lanzhou Bank and Zhengzhou Bank, which exceeded the national average NPL ratio of 1.76% [3][4] - A total of 11 out of 17 listed city commercial banks reported a decrease in NPL ratios, while three banks saw their ratios remain stable and three experienced increases [4][6] Regional Differences - City commercial banks in the southeastern coastal regions generally reported lower NPL ratios, with most banks maintaining ratios below 1% [5][6] - In contrast, banks in the western regions, such as Lanzhou Bank and Zhengzhou Bank, reported higher NPL ratios, indicating a stark contrast in asset quality between regions [3][5] Loan Types - The NPL ratio for corporate loans has generally decreased across the majority of city commercial banks, with significant reductions noted for Chongqing Bank and Qilu Bank [7][8] - Conversely, personal loan NPL ratios have increased for most banks, with several banks reporting ratios of 2% or higher, highlighting a growing concern in this segment [8][9] Asset Disposal Challenges - The methods employed by banks for disposing of non-performing assets include collection, restructuring, write-offs, and asset transfers, with retail loans posing higher costs for collection due to their smaller, more dispersed nature [9] - The current environment suggests that city commercial banks will face significant provisioning pressures due to the high costs associated with disposing of personal non-performing loans and the immature state of bulk disposal methods for retail loans [9]

01 利息收入"以量换价"，监管罚款超2000万 元 文/曹萌 在资产质量方面，截至2024年末，徽商银行的不良贷款率降至了1%以下，但零售业务不良贷款金 额却增加明显，提升了后续处置不良资产的成本及难度，加之该行贷款仍存在质量下迁风险且收购的 原包商银行资产处置工作尚未完成，未来徽商银行很难再出现不良贷款率大幅下降的情况。 日前，作为第二家赴港上市的内地城商行，徽商银行披露了2024年财报。虽然在2024年，徽商银行 的资产规模依旧保持了两位数增长，但在以扩大信贷规模对冲净息差收窄的操作中，该行违规行为也 随之增多。 财报显示 ，截至2024年末，徽商银行的资产总额为20137.53亿元，较年初增加2076.09亿元，增 长11.49%，目前该资产规模位于我国上市城商行的第 七位。 具体来看，徽商银行资产规模的进一步提升，离不开该行信贷业务的不断扩张。数据显示，截至 2024年末，徽商银行的客户贷款及垫款总额为10021.66亿元，较年初增加1279.43亿元，增长 14.64%，而这一信贷规模增速不仅高出2023年0.28个百分点，更明显高于徽商银行2024年整体资 产规模的增速。 通过梳理以往财报数据获 ...

齐鲁晚报·齐鲁壹点 王赟 作为一家最早进行股改的商业银行，华夏银行曾一度是国内股份行的"领头羊"。 这个春天，华夏银行一直延续着去年不断收罚单的节奏，这个4月，罚单与年报齐至。 涉"贷款管理不到位"又被罚 上周，国家金融监督管理总局江西监管局出具的一则行政处罚信息公开表显示，因贷款管理不到位，江西监管局对华夏银行南昌分行罚款80万 元。 今年初，1月27日，即2025年春节前最后一个工作日，华夏银行发布公告称，李民吉因个人原因，辞去本行董事长、执行董事及董事会专门委员 会相关职务，李民吉的辞职自2025年1月24日起生效。 值得注意的是，2024年12月，华夏银行召开董事会，李民吉被选举为第九届董事会董事长，本次突然辞职距离其连任董事长仅一个多月。 李民吉已任职董事长7年。2017年，李民吉正式加入华夏银行并被选举为董事，同年4月14日，其董事及董事长职位获核准。 董事长"闪辞"后不久，2月份，国家金管局核准杨宏担任该行首席合规官、刘小莉担任首席风险官的任职资格获批。 去年，华夏银行经历了频繁的人事变动，副董事长、董事、行长、副行长、监事会主席、监事均轮番离任。 不良资产处置背后的困境 2003年9月华夏银行 ...

单家消费金融公司的数据同样印证了整体趋势。 以4月为例，消费金融公司的不良资产处置动作较为密集。4月14日，招联消费金融披露了两期个人不良 贷款(个人消费贷款)转让项目公告，这两期项目涉及的不良贷款规模巨大，未偿本息总额分别高达6.79 亿元和10.7亿元，加权平均逾期天数分别为1072.73天和1269.72天。 4月以来，还有5家消费金融公司挂牌转让不良资产项目。捷信消费金融、南银法巴消费金融、幸福消费 金融、平安消费金融、金美信消费金融总计挂牌7期不良资产转让项目。 众多消费金融公司挂牌转让的不良资产价格普遍处于低折扣区间，部分项目的起拍价甚至不到账面价值 的1折。 例如，金美信消费金融转让的不良资产包未偿本息总额为1.8亿元，起拍价仅仅为479.1万元，折扣约为 0.26折。 在当前金融市场环境下，消费金融领域的不良资产处置动态备受关注。 近日，招联消费金融、捷信消费金融等多家消费金融公司密集挂牌转让不良资产包，且转让价格低于一 折。 4月15日，银登中心发布《2025年一季度不良贷款转让业务统计》报告。从不良贷款转让业务参与主体 结构来看，消费金融公司是机构中的一大"主力"。 2025年一季度，银登 ...

董希淼认为，长期以来，金融资产管理公司主要服务全国性金融机构，对中小金融机构重视不够、服务 不足。金融资产管理公司应转变理念、提升服务能力，加大对中小银行、消费金融公司等中小金融机构 不良资产收购、管理和处置力度，助力拓宽中小金融机构不良资产处置渠道，为一体推进中小金融机构 风险化解和转型发展提供更多支持。 近年来，作为国有金融资产管理公司之一的中国中信金融资产管理股份有限公司，不断加快深耕不良资 产经营、金融服务业务以及资产管理和投资业务。近3年来，该公司收购不良资产债权超5000亿元，位 居同业前列。中信金融资产相关负责人介绍，中信金融资产切实加强对重点领域和薄弱环节的金融服 务，巩固实体经济发展基础。2024年，该公司积极参与24省市中小金融机构风险化解，收购不良资产包 债权规模同比增长约54%，有效维护区域金融环境稳定。2022年以来，通过房企纾困保障商品房按期交 付6.6万套，支付上游材料供应商欠款超113亿元，带动其他金融机构613亿元存量项目风险化解，推动 超2240亿元货值的项目复工复产。 董希淼认为，金融资产管理公司应以《指导意见》的出台为契机，更好地助力金融机构盘活存量资产， 加快处置不良 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent guidelines issued by the Financial Regulatory Bureau aim to enhance the regulation of financial asset management companies, promoting their high-quality development through 16 specific measures focusing on governance, risk management, and operational efficiency [1][11]. Group 1: Focus on Core Responsibilities - Financial asset management companies are urged to concentrate on their primary functions, particularly in the acquisition and disposal of non-performing assets, to address the increasing demand for asset resolution [3][4]. - The guidelines emphasize the importance of financial asset management companies in mitigating risks for small and medium-sized financial institutions and the real estate sector, thereby reinforcing their role in the economy [4][5]. Group 2: Risk Management and Internal Controls - Continuous enhancement of risk management and internal control mechanisms is mandated, with a focus on managing existing risk assets and controlling new business risks [7][8]. - The guidelines advocate for a balanced approach to asset-liability and liquidity management, discouraging reckless expansion driven by liabilities [8]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework and Compliance - The guidelines call for the improvement of the regulatory system, emphasizing the need for robust supervision and enforcement against illegal activities within the sector [9][10]. - A multi-layered and differentiated regulatory framework will be developed to adapt to the unique characteristics of financial asset management companies [9]. Group 4: Support for Small and Medium-sized Financial Institutions - Financial asset management companies are encouraged to enhance their service capabilities towards small and medium-sized financial institutions, facilitating the acquisition and management of their non-performing assets [5][6]. - The guidelines highlight the necessity for collaboration between financial asset management companies and local asset management firms to create a more effective ecosystem for asset resolution [5].