Core Points - The announcement of the "Internet Platform Pricing Behavior Rules (Draft for Public Comment)" aims to guide operators in lawful pricing practices and enhance market regulation [1][2][3] - The rules focus on four main areas: guiding lawful pricing, clarifying pricing display requirements, regulating pricing competition, and establishing a collaborative governance mechanism [1][4] Group 1: Background and Purpose - The rapid development of the platform economy in China has necessitated clearer regulations to protect consumer interests and ensure fair pricing practices [3] - Existing laws provide general guidelines, but specific regulations for the platform economy are needed to create a transparent and predictable pricing supervision mechanism [3][4] Group 2: Key Provisions of the Rules - The rules emphasize the importance of operators' rights to set prices independently and prohibit unreasonable restrictions on pricing behavior by platform operators [7][10] - Clear requirements for price marking are established, including the necessity for transparent promotional rules and clear communication of subsidies [8][9] - The rules aim to prevent unfair pricing practices such as predatory pricing, price discrimination, and misleading pricing information [10][11] Group 3: Collaborative Governance Mechanism - A collaborative governance framework is proposed, involving government departments, industry associations, and platform operators to ensure compliance and self-regulation [12] - The rules call for enhanced regulatory cooperation among relevant government bodies to monitor pricing behavior effectively [12] - Industry associations are encouraged to promote self-discipline among operators to protect the rights of smaller merchants [12] Group 4: Implementation Timeline - The public comment period for the draft rules is set for one month, after which feedback will be reviewed and incorporated into the final document [13] - The implementation will include a necessary adjustment period for operators to align their internal management systems with the new regulations [13]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is the introduction of the "Internet Platform Pricing Behavior Rules (Draft for Comments)" aimed at promoting healthy development in the platform economy and ensuring compliance with pricing regulations [1][2]. Group 2 - The background for the establishment of the "Behavior Rules" includes the rapid development of the platform economy in China, which has positively impacted the real economy and consumer needs, necessitating more detailed regulatory requirements [2]. - The overall approach to formulating the "Behavior Rules" emphasizes a balance between promoting development and regulatory compliance, focusing on standardizing pricing behavior and enhancing transparency [3][4]. Group 3 - The "Behavior Rules" apply to platform operators and platform internal operators, defining them as entities providing online business venues and those selling goods or services through these platforms [5]. Group 4 - The "Behavior Rules" guide operators in exercising their right to set prices autonomously, requiring platform operators to establish reasonable charging standards and protect the pricing rights of internal operators [6]. Group 5 - The "Behavior Rules" specify requirements for clear pricing display, including the need for explicit price marking, clear promotional rules, and transparent subsidy information [7][8]. Group 6 - The "Behavior Rules" aim to regulate pricing competition behaviors, detailing standards for identifying unfair pricing practices such as predatory pricing and price collusion [9][10][11]. Group 7 - The "Behavior Rules" propose a collaborative governance mechanism, emphasizing the roles of various departments, platform compliance management, and industry self-regulation to maintain fair competition in the market [12][13]. Group 8 - The "Behavior Rules" are currently in a public consultation phase lasting one month, after which feedback will be analyzed and incorporated before the final implementation [14].

Group 1 - The recent increase in prices of maternal and infant products such as milk powder, diapers, and complementary foods has raised concerns among parents, especially following the announcement of government childcare subsidy policies [1] - Many brands have denied the price hikes, attributing them to the end of promotional events or differences in platform activities, yet consumers are experiencing actual price increases [2] - The phenomenon of rising prices in childcare products has been referred to as "child-rearing inflation," indicating that government subsidies often do not keep pace with rising consumer prices [1][2] Group 2 - The current situation requires careful analysis, as while some companies claim prices have not increased, the reality is that consumers are facing higher prices across various brands and products [2] - The maternal and infant product market is experiencing a price correction after a period of price wars, and the sensitivity of consumers to price changes in essential goods must be considered [2] - There is a need for improved price monitoring mechanisms and regulatory actions to address potential price gouging behaviors by businesses taking advantage of subsidy policies [2][3] Group 3 - Long-term, the maternal and infant industry requires a more standardized pricing system, with companies needing to ensure price transparency and uniformity across channels [3] - The integrity of welfare policies must be maintained, ensuring that beneficiaries can effectively utilize the subsidies intended for them [3] - Businesses attempting to exploit subsidy policies risk damaging their reputation and should adhere to ethical pricing practices [3]

Group 1 - Recent policies aimed at reducing childcare burdens, such as childcare subsidies and free preschool education, have been implemented to alleviate family financial pressures [1] - Some retailers have taken advantage of these policies by raising prices on essential baby products like formula, diapers, and baby food, effectively negating the benefits of the subsidies [1] - The increase in prices for baby products has been reported by many parents on social media, with price hikes ranging from several to tens of yuan [1] Group 2 - There is an urgent need for comprehensive regulation of the maternal and infant market to ensure that policies genuinely benefit families [2] - A price monitoring mechanism should be established to track price dynamics and investigate any abnormal price increases, with legal consequences for those who disrupt market order [2] - Efforts should be made to standardize the pricing system in the maternal and infant industry and promote price transparency across online and offline sales channels [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Guizhou Provincial Market Supervision Administration has called for a meeting with major travel platforms to enforce compliance with pricing laws and regulations, aiming to eliminate price irregularities and maintain a fair market environment [1][4]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The meeting involved major travel platforms such as Ctrip, Tongcheng, Douyin, Meituan, and Fliggy, addressing issues like "choose one from two," price manipulation, and price fraud [1][4]. - The administration emphasized the need for these platforms to adhere strictly to laws like the Price Law and the Anti-Monopoly Law, and to enhance self-regulation and compliance [4][5]. Group 2: Compliance Requirements - Platforms are required to conduct comprehensive self-inspections and rectify any violations, including price fraud, price collusion, and abuse of market dominance [4][5]. - Specific guidelines were issued regarding accommodation pricing, including timely adjustments of prices, prohibition of additional charges after booking, and restrictions on unilateral contract cancellations [5]. Group 3: Market Conditions - The Guizhou Provincial Market Supervision Administration has noted a surge in tourism interest in the region, prompting reminders for accommodation providers to set reasonable prices and maintain market order [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Guizhou Provincial Market Supervision Administration has conducted a meeting with five travel platform companies, including Ctrip, Tongcheng, Douyin, Meituan, and Fliggy, to enforce compliance with pricing laws and regulations, aiming to eliminate price irregularities and maintain a fair market environment [1] Regulatory Compliance - The meeting emphasized the need for strict adherence to the Price Law of the People's Republic of China, the Anti-Monopoly Law, and regulations against price fraud [1] - Companies were urged to strengthen self-discipline and compliance measures, and to conduct comprehensive self-inspections to prevent price fraud, price gouging, and collusion [1] Market Monitoring - The Guizhou Provincial Market Supervision Administration will closely monitor the competitive dynamics of the involved platform companies [1] - Companies that violate regulations or fail to rectify issues will face strict legal consequences, including public exposure of typical cases to deter non-compliance [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Guizhou Provincial Market Supervision Administration has conducted a meeting with five travel platform companies, including Fliggy, to enforce compliance with laws and regulations regarding pricing and anti-monopoly practices, aiming to maintain a fair and orderly market environment [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The meeting addressed potential issues such as "choose one from two" practices, interference in merchant pricing through technical means, contract breaches, price fraud, and price gouging [1] - Companies are required to strictly adhere to relevant laws and regulations, enhance self-discipline, and conduct comprehensive self-inspections to prevent illegal activities [1] Group 2: Future Monitoring and Enforcement - The Guizhou Provincial Market Supervision Administration will closely monitor the competitive landscape of the involved platform companies [1] - Companies that violate regulations or fail to rectify issues will face strict legal consequences, including public exposure of typical cases to deter further violations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Guizhou Provincial Market Supervision Administration has conducted a meeting with major travel platforms to address pricing irregularities and enforce compliance with relevant laws and regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The meeting involved companies such as Ctrip, Tongcheng, Douyin, Meituan, and Fliggy, emphasizing the need to adhere to the Price Law, Anti-Monopoly Law, and regulations against price fraud [1]. - The administration highlighted issues such as "choose one from two," manipulation of merchant pricing through technology, contract breaches, price fraud, and price gouging [1]. Group 2: Specific Incidents - Ctrip has faced criticism for requiring hotels to use a tool called "Price Adjustment Assistant," which allegedly allows the platform to modify room prices without merchant consent, impacting their profits [1]. - This action has raised concerns about Ctrip potentially abusing its market dominance and infringing on merchants' pricing autonomy [1]. Group 3: Future Oversight - The Guizhou Provincial Market Supervision Administration plans to closely monitor the competitive landscape of these platforms and will take strict legal action against those that violate regulations or fail to rectify issues [2]. - Additionally, a meeting was held to encourage travel associations to enhance compliance and self-regulation in pricing practices within the tourism industry [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Guizhou market regulatory authority is taking action against price irregularities in the tourism sector, emphasizing compliance with relevant laws and regulations to maintain a fair market environment [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Guizhou's market supervision department has conducted administrative talks with major travel platforms including Ctrip, Tongcheng, Douyin, Meituan, and Fliggy to address pricing issues [1] - The authority has highlighted potential violations such as "choose one from two," price manipulation through technology, contract breaches, price fraud, and price gouging [1] - Companies are required to conduct self-inspections and rectify any illegal practices, ensuring compliance with laws to maintain fair competition [1] Group 2: Price Behavior Guidelines - A reminder was issued to the accommodation industry to adhere to pricing laws and regulations, ensuring reasonable pricing and honest operations [2] - Clear and accurate pricing must be displayed prominently on promotional pages and in physical locations, with any price changes communicated to consumers promptly [3][4] - It is prohibited to impose additional charges beyond the advertised price or to cancel bookings without valid reasons [5][6] Group 3: Prohibited Practices - Third-party platforms are not allowed to unilaterally change the prices set by accommodation providers [7] - Misleading practices such as fabricating original prices, false discounts, and vague pricing are strictly forbidden [8] - Price gouging and collusion among operators to manipulate room prices are also prohibited [9][10]

约谈会上，贵州省市场监管局针对相关平台企业可能存在的实施"二选一"、利用技术手段干预商家定 价、订单生效后毁约或加价、价格欺诈、哄抬价格等问题进行了通报，进一步提示了违法风险；要求相 关平台企业严格遵守相关法律法规，积极履行平台主体责任，切实加强自律和合规建设；立即开展全面 自查自纠，禁止价格欺诈、哄抬价格、价格串通、滥用市场支配地位等违法行为，切实维护公平竞争的 市场秩序。 据"贵州市场监管"公众号消息，8月5日下午，贵州省市场监督管理局集中约谈携程、同程、抖音、美 团、飞猪等五家涉旅平台企业，要求相关平台企业严格遵守《中华人民共和国价格法》《中华人民共和 国反垄断法》《明码标价和禁止价格欺诈规定》等法律法规规章，坚决制止价格乱象，维护公平、有 序、诚信的市场环境。 责任编辑：王翔 截至发稿，各平台尚无官方回应。 ...