Core Insights - The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine has lost all external power today, marking the ninth occurrence during military conflict and the first since the end of 2023 [1] - The nuclear plant is currently relying on emergency diesel generators for power, highlighting an extremely unstable nuclear safety situation [1] Summary by Categories - **Nuclear Safety** - The loss of external power at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant raises significant concerns regarding nuclear safety during ongoing military conflicts [1] - The reliance on emergency diesel generators indicates a precarious situation for the plant's operational stability [1] - **Military Conflict Impact** - This incident is the ninth time the plant has lost external power amid military conflict, underscoring the ongoing risks associated with the war [1] - The frequency of such occurrences suggests a deteriorating security environment for critical infrastructure in conflict zones [1]

Core Viewpoint - The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that Iran's nuclear research and power reactors were not attacked, and there was no radioactive impact on personnel and the environment in neighboring countries [1] Group 1 - The IAEA issued a statement on June 24, indicating the safety of the surrounding regions in relation to Iran's nuclear activities [1] - The agency reassured that there were no adverse effects from Iran's nuclear facilities on neighboring countries [1]

Core Viewpoint - The UAE Nuclear Regulatory Authority stated that the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have no impact on the country [1] Group 1 - The UAE Nuclear Regulatory Authority's assessment indicates a stable nuclear environment in the region despite external military actions [1]

Core Viewpoint - The President of the European Council, Costa, calls for all parties to exercise restraint, respect international law, and ensure nuclear safety [1] Group 1 - Emphasis on the need for restraint among involved parties to prevent escalation [1] - Highlighting the importance of adhering to international law in ongoing situations [1] - Stressing the critical nature of nuclear safety in current geopolitical contexts [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian nuclear agency reported that there were no signs of contamination following the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, indicating that residents living near the targeted sites are not in danger [1] Group 1 - The U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities did not result in any detected pollution [1] - Residents in the vicinity of the targeted nuclear facilities are reported to be safe [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the escalating military conflict between the U.S. and Iran, particularly focusing on the recent attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities and the resulting casualties on both sides [1][2][5][6][7][11]. - U.S. President Trump claimed a "successful strike" on three Iranian nuclear facilities, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, with all military aircraft returning safely [2][4]. - The ongoing conflict has resulted in significant casualties, with reports indicating that Iranian attacks have led to 24 deaths and 1,272 injuries in Israel, while Israeli strikes have caused over 400 deaths and 3,056 injuries in Iran [5][6]. Group 2 - The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has warned that the attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities have severely deteriorated Iran's nuclear safety and security status, although no radioactive consequences have been reported from the recent strikes [7][10]. - Iranian President Raisi emphasized that Iran will not abandon its right to peaceful nuclear energy use and condemned Israeli military actions as violations of international norms [11][12]. - The conflict has drawn attention from regional actors, with the Houthi movement in Yemen threatening to attack U.S. naval vessels if the U.S. strikes Iran, indicating a broader regional implication of the conflict [13][14].

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian official news agency reported that the Iranian nuclear facility attacked by the United States contained no nuclear materials [1] Group 1 - The statement from the Iranian national television indicates a lack of nuclear materials at the targeted facility [1]

Core Points - The Isfahan nuclear facility in central Iran was attacked by Israel on June 21, with no reports of hazardous material leakage [1] - The Israeli Defense Forces announced a series of strikes targeting missile storage and launch infrastructure in central Iran [1] - There were no reported casualties, but the affected areas experienced some damage [1]

Group 1 - Israel Defense Forces reported a new round of missile attacks initiated by Iran, with air raid sirens sounding across Israel and residents advised to enter shelters [1][2] - Approximately 25 ballistic missiles were estimated to have been launched by Iran during this attack, with one missile hitting the northern city of Haifa, injuring two people [3][4] - Iran claimed to have used around 30 missiles in this round of attacks, targeting Tel Aviv [5] Group 2 - Israel's military is actively striking Iranian military facilities in central and western Iran, with no immediate response from Iran [6] - Israeli Defense Minister Katz indicated a directive to intensify attacks on Tehran's regime targets, aiming to destabilize the Iranian government and continue strikes on nuclear facilities and scientists [7] - The Israeli military successfully intercepted a drone using the "Barak" defense system, marking its first operational use in combat [8][9] Group 3 - Russia issued a warning to the United States against military intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict, citing potential unpredictable negative consequences and emphasizing the need for a ceasefire and peace restoration [10]

国际原子能机构：只要战争持续威胁该地点的核安全，扎波罗热核电站就无法重新启动运行。 ...