Group 1 - The article discusses the dynamics of public criticism and the economic principles behind it, highlighting that those with less fame tend to gain more from criticizing others due to lower costs and higher perceived benefits [5][6][8] - It emphasizes that ignoring criticism can be a strategic choice, as responding may increase the critic's visibility while incurring higher costs for the individual being criticized [9] - The article also touches on the concept of "cost and benefit" in the context of reputation management, suggesting that companies should consider legal action against defamation to impose costs on those spreading false information [16][17] Group 2 - The discussion includes the implications of media behavior, where sensationalism and fabricated stories can lead to legal consequences for the creators, thereby increasing the costs associated with spreading false information [18] - The article references the "prisoner's dilemma" to illustrate how understanding costs and benefits can lead to better decision-making in competitive situations, which can be applied to corporate strategies [20][21] - It concludes by encouraging continuous learning and application of knowledge in real-life scenarios, suggesting that companies should remain vigilant and adaptive in their strategies [22]