义乌出海特展。 作者 / theodore熙少 来源 / 旅界 （ID：tourismzonenews） 01 以下文章来源于旅界 ，作者theodore熙少 旅界 . 跟踪时代浪潮，讲述文旅商业好故事。 平安夜前，我带孩子逛了巴黎杜伊勒里花园圣诞集市，这里人声鼎沸，空气中弥漫着热红酒和华夫饼的味道。 在那些亮着暖黄色灯光的木屋间穿行没多久后，孩子被一家卖工艺品的摊位吸引住了，她指着一个晶莹剔透的雪花球，眼里全是光。 我被迫接过那个沉甸甸的球，2 5欧元，翻转底座，毫不意外，三个熟悉字母跳进眼里：Ma d e i n Ch i n a。 然后，我做了个快速心算，这玩意在义乌出厂价可能不到2 0块钱人民币，但在巴黎浪漫滤镜下，它的身价翻了1 0倍。 法国巴黎杜伊勒里圣诞市场/旅界实拍 买下后，我们又走到集市边缘另一个手工摊位前，摊主是个皮肤红润的法国老先生，他正熟练地包装一些彩绘胡桃夹子玩具。 我指着其中一个士兵摆件，问他，这些是不是来自当地手工作坊。 老先生抬头看了我一眼，露出一种看透世俗的微笑，摆了摆手说，"Ev e r y t h i n g is fr om Ch i n a , i n c l u d ...

以下文章来源于旅界 ，作者theodore熙少 当欧洲圣诞集市，逛成义乌出海特展。 文 ｜ 旅界 来源｜ 旅界（ID：tourismzonenews） 封面来源 ｜ IC photo 平安夜前，我带孩子逛了巴黎杜伊勒里花园圣诞集市，这里人声鼎沸，空气中弥漫着热红酒和华夫饼的味道。 在那些亮着暖黄色灯光的木屋间穿行没多久后，孩子被一家卖工艺品的摊位吸引住了，她指着一个晶莹剔透的雪花球，眼里全是光。 我被迫接过那个沉甸甸的球，25欧元，翻转底座，毫不意外，三个熟悉字母跳进眼里：Made in China。 然后，我做了个快速心算，这玩意在义乌出厂价可能不到20块钱人民币，但在巴黎浪漫滤镜下，它的身价翻了10倍。 旅界 . 跟踪时代浪潮，讲述文旅商业好故事。 买下后，我们又走到集市边缘另一个手工摊位前，摊主是个皮肤红润的法国老先生，他正熟练地包装一些彩绘胡桃夹子玩具。 我指着其中一个士兵摆件，问他，这些是不是来自当地手工作坊。 老先生抬头看了我一眼，露出一种看透世俗的微笑，摆了摆手说，"Everything is from China, including me"。 然后，他用并不流利的英文解释，今年杜伊勒里圣诞集 ...

"内卷式"竞争作为一种低效率的不公平竞争，已成为制约我国经济高质量发展的瓶颈。党的二十届四中全会明确 提出，"坚决破除阻碍全国统一大市场建设卡点堵点"，"综合整治'内卷式'竞争"。刚刚召开的中央经济工作会议 把"深入整治'内卷式'竞争"作为明年经济工作的重点任务。深入整治"内卷式"竞争，先要厘清其理论渊源与运行逻 辑。 经济学中"内卷"一词来源于美国人类学家克利福德·格尔茨的著作《农业的内卷化》，作者通过实证研究发现，爪 哇岛在荷兰殖民者主导下不断地进行农业的精密化生产，虽然填充了大量劳动力，但人均产出并没有增加，人民 生活水平长期停滞。今天我们讲的"内卷式"竞争，指的是经营主体为了维持市场地位或争夺有限市场，不断投入 大量精力和资源，却没有带来整体收益增长的恶性竞争现象。"内卷式"竞争给一国经济发展带来的是资源配置的 扭曲与效率的损失。 "内卷式"竞争有其理论根源。从博弈论的角度看，"内卷式"竞争可以被视为一种"囚徒困境"，即由于缺乏信任， 即使合作是总收益最优化的策略，合作也难以实现，最终参与竞争的各方都受到伤害。在无序竞争中，每个企业 都作出了看似理性的选择，不断压低价格，期望通过低价占领更多市场份额、 ...

Core Viewpoint - The new national standard for food delivery platforms aims to regulate service management behaviors and improve service quality, addressing issues arising from the subsidy wars among platforms [1] Group 1: Consumer Impact - While low prices attract consumers, consistently pricing below cost raises concerns about the sustainability and quality of food delivery services [2] - The intense competition has led to a significant drop in the average dining price for restaurants, reverting to levels seen a decade ago, which negatively impacts merchant profits [2] Group 2: Merchant Impact - Merchants are compelled to offer discounts due to the subsidy wars, resulting in increased orders but not necessarily higher profits, leading to a situation where they either struggle to survive or cut costs in less visible areas [2] Group 3: Platform Financials - Major platforms like Alibaba, Meituan, and JD have collectively spent an additional 61.4 billion yuan in the third quarter compared to the same period in 2024, averaging a daily expenditure of approximately 680 million yuan [2] - The platforms acknowledge that the price wars have not generated incremental value for the industry and are unsustainable [2] Group 4: New Regulations - The new standard mandates that platforms cannot force merchants into price promotions, ensuring that promotional activities are voluntary [3][4] - It requires platforms to verify the legitimacy of merchants, including their business licenses and food operation permits, to eliminate "ghost kitchens" that lack physical storefronts [5][6] - The regulations also provide delivery personnel with rights to reasonable working hours and breaks, aiming to reduce the risks associated with overwork [7][8] Group 5: Industry Outlook - The introduction of the new national standard is seen as a pathway for the food delivery industry to transition from a model driven by cash burn and competition to one focused on service quality and sustainable growth [9]

Group 1 - Faraday Future's founder Jia Yueting has established a second debt repayment trust to expedite the repayment of debts in China, amidst a backdrop of significant financial distress [1][6] - Zhang Jindong, the former richest man in Jiangsu, plans to set up a bankruptcy reorganization trust to manage the equity of Suning Group and his personal assets for debt repayment, highlighting a trend among indebted companies to utilize similar trusts for financial recovery [1][6] - The demand for bankruptcy service trusts has surged as more companies in debt seek to resolve their financial issues through these mechanisms [1] Group 2 - Debt repayment trusts operate by placing valuable assets of the company or its owners into a trust specifically established for debt repayment, thereby enhancing creditors' confidence in recovering their debts [1][4] - Creditors become beneficiaries of the trust, with the proceeds from asset disposal and operational income directed towards debt repayment [1][4] - The trust is typically managed by a trustee, and in some cases, a trust asset management company is established to oversee the operation and disposal of the underlying assets [1][4] Group 3 - The assets in the proposed Suning bankruptcy reorganization trust are categorized into operational retention and disposal for liquidation, with the new Suning Group and Nanjing Zhongcheng Asset Management Co. set to manage these assets [3] - The original management team usually continues to oversee daily operations, although they are subject to strict supervision, ensuring that the company remains operational while addressing debt issues [3][4] - Two primary models of risk disposal service trusts exist: the ongoing reorganization model, where creditors become beneficiaries, and the sale reorganization model, which involves selling quality assets to restore operations quickly [3][4] Group 4 - To protect creditors' interests, trusts implement mechanisms such as asset independence, converting uncertain debts into clear trust beneficiary rights, and establishing governance structures to oversee trustee operations [4][5] - A beneficiary assembly, composed of all creditors, serves as the highest decision-making body for the trust, with a management committee to oversee operations and ensure accountability [4][5] - The amount creditors ultimately receive depends on the execution of the trust plan, the quality of underlying assets, the trustee's management capabilities, and the rationality of the trust scheme design [5] Group 5 - Jia Yueting's establishment of a second debt repayment trust follows his first trust set up in 2019, which was approved by a California bankruptcy court, indicating a strategic approach to managing his financial obligations [6][7] - The new trust includes assets from both Faraday Future and AIXC, with significant debt pressures highlighted by Suning's liabilities exceeding 230 billion yuan, necessitating a comprehensive restructuring plan [6][7] - The creation of such trusts helps alleviate the "prisoner's dilemma" faced by debtors, allowing for a more stable operational environment and the potential for new investments to revitalize distressed assets [7]

然而，理想主义的"海报同盟"未能经受住销售数据的考验。 项目亮相初期，中建智地操盘的紫京宸园凭借一场精彩绝伦的产品发布会先声夺人，以创新的产品理念赢得市场瞩目，在声势上占得先机。面对合作方制造 的声量压力，操盘璞樾的越秀地产却选择了一条不同的路径。 当9月开盘后，两个项目的网签数据（均仅百余套）远不及预期时，平衡被彻底打破。根据北京兴鼎房地产开发有限公司（中建智地子公司）向广州国资委 发出的举报信，越秀地产被指控"暗中调价"，未遵守股东方约定的统一定价标准。 在北京楼市的聚光灯下，朝阳黄衫木店板块上演了一幕跌宕起伏的商战剧。中建智地、金茂、越秀三大房企联手打造的"璞樾-紫京宸园"双子项目，在短短 数月内经历了从联合造势到公开决裂的戏剧性转变。这场从"携手共举"到"拔刀相向"的蜕变，不仅是一起商业合作的破裂案例，更成为观测当前楼市心态与 规则的显微镜。 就在这个秋天，地产人的朋友圈曾为一张海报刷屏。毗邻而居的璞樾与紫京宸园共同推出联合宣传，摒弃了楼市常见的"唯我独尊"话术，共同抬出"星河湾 豪宅生活区"的价值主张。这张由两个项目、三家开发商共同背书的海报，被业内誉为"一股清流"，彰显着北京地产圈久违的格局——竞 ...

Core Insights - The article reflects on the evolution of the e-commerce landscape in China from 2015 to 2025, highlighting the shift from a booming growth phase to a more competitive and saturated market environment [1][2][4][52]. Group 1: Historical Context - In 2015, the e-commerce environment was characterized by rapid growth, with Alibaba dominating the market, holding nearly 80% of the e-commerce share [22]. - The number of internet users in China increased from 668 million in 2015 to approximately 1.108 billion in 2025, indicating a significant expansion of the digital consumer base [11][15]. - The excitement surrounding events like "Double Eleven" was palpable, with consumers actively engaging in shopping sprees during promotional events [2][3]. Group 2: Current Market Dynamics - The current e-commerce landscape is marked by intense competition, with platforms like Pinduoduo and Douyin emerging as significant players, disrupting traditional market dynamics [20][23][28]. - The competition has shifted from merely attracting users to retaining their attention, leading to a focus on innovative marketing strategies such as live streaming and extended promotional periods [34][36]. - The concept of "Double Eleven" has evolved from a unique shopping event to a more normalized promotional period, losing some of its initial excitement and urgency [50][52]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The article suggests that the e-commerce sector is approaching a saturation point, where the growth of internet users will stabilize, and competition will become increasingly challenging [41][42]. - Future strategies will likely involve more sophisticated methods of attracting consumer attention, such as integrating short dramas and other engaging content into shopping experiences [46]. - The competitive landscape will continue to evolve, with companies needing to adapt to changing consumer behaviors and preferences to maintain relevance in the market [54][55].

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI reported a significant loss of $11.5 billion in the last quarter, which was disclosed by Microsoft, its largest investor, indicating potential financial instability despite the company's high valuation expectations for an IPO [1][22]. Group 1: Financial Performance - Microsoft reported a net profit of $27.747 billion for Q3 2025, a 12% increase year-over-year, but faced a $3.1 billion reduction in net income due to losses from its investment in OpenAI [6][8]. - The losses from OpenAI investments accounted for a $31 billion impact on Microsoft's financials, affecting earnings per share by $0.41 [8][9]. - OpenAI's revenue for the first seven months of the year reportedly doubled, reaching an annual recurring revenue (ARR) of $12 billion, suggesting that the company is generating substantial income despite the reported losses [26][27]. Group 2: Accounting Methodology - Microsoft uses the equity method for accounting its investment in OpenAI, meaning that the company's financial performance directly affects Microsoft's income statement [11][15]. - Under this method, Microsoft cannot adjust the book value of its investment based on market valuations, which means that OpenAI's operational performance is crucial for Microsoft's financial results [13][14]. Group 3: Industry Context - The AI industry is facing a "prisoner's dilemma," where companies like OpenAI must continuously invest in R&D to maintain their competitive edge against open-source models [24][35]. - OpenAI's significant losses are primarily attributed to high R&D expenditures, which are necessary to ensure its models remain state-of-the-art [30][32]. - The competitive landscape has shifted from merely developing the best models to sustaining operations while managing high costs, indicating a change in the rules of the AI game [49]. Group 4: Strategic Implications - Microsoft is more focused on ensuring that OpenAI remains a leader in AI technology rather than on immediate profitability, viewing its investment as a strategic subsidy [45][42]. - OpenAI's operational costs, including substantial cloud service purchases from Microsoft Azure, indicate a symbiotic relationship where losses may ultimately benefit Microsoft [48][47]. - The ongoing financial dynamics suggest that as OpenAI incurs losses, companies like NVIDIA may benefit from the increased demand for AI infrastructure and services [50][51].

Core Insights - The real estate market in Tianjin is experiencing an oversupply crisis, leading to intense competition among developers and a significant drop in buyer confidence [2][5][7] - New projects are flooding the market, with developers launching multiple new properties simultaneously, resulting in price wars and increased pressure on existing inventory [3][5] - The concept of "commercial to residential" conversions is becoming prevalent, further exacerbating the supply issue and leading to unpredictable pricing strategies [2][5] Group 1: Market Dynamics - The supply of new properties is overwhelming, with developers rushing to launch projects even before previous ones are sold, creating a chaotic market environment [2][3] - The East Liyu area is seeing aggressive pricing strategies, with new developments priced significantly high, indicating a competitive yet unstable market [3] - The oversupply has led to a paradox where developers are inadvertently discouraging potential buyers, as the market becomes saturated with options [5][7] Group 2: Buyer Behavior - Buyer sentiment is shifting towards caution, with many potential purchasers opting to wait for better deals rather than engaging in the current market [5][9] - The expectation of lower prices and improved product offerings is causing buyers to adopt a wait-and-see approach, further stalling market activity [5][7] - The current market conditions have created a scenario where buyers hold unprecedented negotiating power, altering the traditional dynamics of real estate transactions [9][10]

Group 1 - The U.S. is escalating trade tensions with China, threatening to raise tariffs to 155% if a fair trade agreement is not reached, but this could harm the U.S. more than China due to changes in trade structure [2] - The U.S. is attempting to build a rare earth supply chain with Australia, investing billions, but the timeline and feasibility of achieving independence from China in this sector are questioned [4][7] - The U.S. reliance on China for aircraft parts is significant, with over 1,800 Boeing planes in China, and any supply cuts could backfire on U.S. companies like Boeing [5] Group 2 - Singapore's advice to China to avoid a self-sufficient development path suggests a bias, as it benefits from its own self-sufficiency initiatives while advising China against similar strategies [8] - The concept of the U.S. using a "financial nuclear option" against China is challenged by the reality of the U.S. financial system's vulnerabilities, including a downgraded credit rating and increasing national debt [9][10] - China's industrial system is robust, making complete decoupling unrealistic, and it is advancing in key technology sectors, which positions it well against U.S. pressures [11]