Core Viewpoint - The company "Origin" (奥拉丁) is heavily criticized for its questionable legitimacy, operating model, and marketing tactics, which resemble a Ponzi scheme [2][12][14]. Group 1: Company Operations and Marketing - Origin claims to have a mysterious background and emphasizes its "dark web origins" as a selling point, which raises significant doubts about its legitimacy [2]. - The company has rapidly gained over 500,000 users within six months, boasting daily trading volumes exceeding 10 million and unrealistic returns of 0.9% daily and 30% monthly [3]. - The marketing strategy includes promoting "137 smart contracts," which are essentially automated systems designed to exploit investors [3][14]. Group 2: Financial Practices and Risks - The company's financial practices are characterized by high returns that are unsustainable, relying on new investors' funds to pay returns to earlier investors [16]. - There have been significant drops in token prices, with the price of LGNS falling from $24 to $16, and a large amount of tokens being controlled by a small number of addresses [16]. - The company has implemented a 99.99% sell fee on smart contracts, effectively trapping investors' funds [16]. Group 3: Investor Behavior and Community Response - Many investors are drawn into the scheme through promises of high returns and are encouraged to recruit others, creating a classic pyramid structure [16]. - The community has seen leaders disappear after cashing out, leaving many investors in distress [16]. - There is a strong warning against engaging with such schemes, emphasizing that legitimate projects do not require aggressive recruitment or promise guaranteed returns [17].

Group 1 - The article highlights a potential financial scam involving a platform named "Haitong Huizhi," which is accused of operating a stock trading scheme that restricts withdrawals unless users recruit new participants [2][4] - The platform claims to have over 5 million users and promotes unrealistic returns, such as a monthly yield of 60%, which raises red flags about its legitimacy [4] - Three warning signs of an impending collapse are identified: restrictions on withdrawals, mandatory recruitment of new users to unlock funds, and reports of team leaders withdrawing from the platform [6] Group 2 - Recommendations for users include stopping further investments, preserving evidence of transactions and promises made by the platform, withdrawing as much as possible, and reporting to local authorities [6] - The article encourages sharing the information to raise awareness about the deceptive practices of "Haitong Huizhi" [7]