Core Viewpoint - The "Xin Kang Jia" platform is suspected to be a Ponzi scheme combined with a multi-level marketing structure, leading to significant financial losses for investors, with estimates of around 13 billion yuan involved and approximately 2 million investors affected [3][19][24]. Group 1: Platform Structure and Operations - "Xin Kang Jia" was initially presented as a platform for oil and commodity trading, later claiming to engage in futures trading linked to the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange (DGCX), promising high returns of up to 0.2% daily [4][10]. - The platform utilized a nine-level hierarchical structure to incentivize recruitment, with varying rewards based on the number of direct referrals, creating a system that heavily relied on new investor contributions to pay returns to earlier investors [10][11]. - The platform's operations involved the use of stablecoins like USDT for transactions, complicating the process for new investors who often transferred funds to higher-level members for conversion, thus bypassing direct investment [15][16]. Group 2: Regulatory Warnings and Risks - Regulatory bodies had issued multiple warnings regarding the risks associated with "Xin Kang Jia," highlighting its illegal fundraising activities and the lack of legitimate investment projects [17][18][24]. - The DGCX publicly denied any affiliation with "Xin Kang Jia," emphasizing that the platform had no authorization to operate under its name, further indicating the fraudulent nature of the claims made by the platform [6][19]. - The rise of stablecoins has led to a resurgence of similar schemes, with many platforms adopting these digital currencies to evade financial regulations, posing significant risks to investors [20][24]. Group 3: Investor Experiences and Consequences - Many investors were lured into the scheme by promises of high returns and the belief that the investment was legitimate, often encouraged by friends or acquaintances [14][23]. - Once the platform collapsed, investors found themselves unable to withdraw their funds, leading to widespread panic and the dissolution of investor groups [14][22]. - The investigation revealed that the platform's associated company had a registered capital of 30 million yuan but had not actually contributed any capital, raising further red flags about its legitimacy [14].

Core Viewpoint - AIDAv2 aims to rebuild trust in the blockchain industry by focusing on transparency, verifiable actions, and a solid product ecosystem rather than relying on high-yield promises or narratives [1][3][6] Group 1: Trust and Transparency - AIDAv2 does not rely on "stories" for survival but builds a real ecosystem with verifiable products and a global partnership network [3] - The platform emphasizes that it has never made any promises of capital preservation or high returns, instead highlighting that "volatility equals risk, transparency equals security" [3][4] - All user data, transaction paths, and profit distribution logic are traceable on the blockchain, ensuring accountability and transparency [3][4] Group 2: Product Ecosystem - AIDAv2's approach is to create a clear product value chain that incentivizes long-term builders rather than attracting users through inflated illusions [4] - The ecosystem includes various functionalities such as data analysis (AIDData), social networking (AIDSocialFi), and trading and strategy execution (AIDEx and AID BOT) [4] Group 3: Public Engagement - The AIDAv2 team actively engages in public discussions and industry dialogues, addressing skepticism and promoting transparency [3][6] - CEO Jason participates in significant industry events to foster open communication and public oversight [3][6] Group 4: Fundamental Philosophy - AIDAv2 does not attempt to persuade anyone to believe in it; instead, it focuses on demonstrating its value through actions and a robust ecosystem [6] - True trust in the industry is built through actions rather than words [6]

Core Viewpoint - The company "Origin" (奥拉丁) is heavily criticized for its questionable legitimacy, operating model, and marketing tactics, which resemble a Ponzi scheme [2][12][14]. Group 1: Company Operations and Marketing - Origin claims to have a mysterious background and emphasizes its "dark web origins" as a selling point, which raises significant doubts about its legitimacy [2]. - The company has rapidly gained over 500,000 users within six months, boasting daily trading volumes exceeding 10 million and unrealistic returns of 0.9% daily and 30% monthly [3]. - The marketing strategy includes promoting "137 smart contracts," which are essentially automated systems designed to exploit investors [3][14]. Group 2: Financial Practices and Risks - The company's financial practices are characterized by high returns that are unsustainable, relying on new investors' funds to pay returns to earlier investors [16]. - There have been significant drops in token prices, with the price of LGNS falling from $24 to $16, and a large amount of tokens being controlled by a small number of addresses [16]. - The company has implemented a 99.99% sell fee on smart contracts, effectively trapping investors' funds [16]. Group 3: Investor Behavior and Community Response - Many investors are drawn into the scheme through promises of high returns and are encouraged to recruit others, creating a classic pyramid structure [16]. - The community has seen leaders disappear after cashing out, leaving many investors in distress [16]. - There is a strong warning against engaging with such schemes, emphasizing that legitimate projects do not require aggressive recruitment or promise guaranteed returns [17].

Group 1 - The article highlights a potential financial scam involving a platform named "Haitong Huizhi," which is accused of operating a stock trading scheme that restricts withdrawals unless users recruit new participants [2][4] - The platform claims to have over 5 million users and promotes unrealistic returns, such as a monthly yield of 60%, which raises red flags about its legitimacy [4] - Three warning signs of an impending collapse are identified: restrictions on withdrawals, mandatory recruitment of new users to unlock funds, and reports of team leaders withdrawing from the platform [6] Group 2 - Recommendations for users include stopping further investments, preserving evidence of transactions and promises made by the platform, withdrawing as much as possible, and reporting to local authorities [6] - The article encourages sharing the information to raise awareness about the deceptive practices of "Haitong Huizhi" [7]