王文涛指出，商务部高度重视中资企业在美发展，将按照中央决策部署，努力稳定中美经贸合作，坚定 维护中国企业正当权益，为两国企业互利合作营造良好环境。 本文编选自：商务部官网；智通财经编辑：陈筱亦。 智通财经APP获悉，据商务部官网发布，9月23日，商务部部长王文涛在美国纽约召开部分在美中资企 业圆桌会。金融、物流、跨境电商、石化、电信、轨道交通、汽车零部件、新能源、医药等领域的十多 家在美中资企业及美国中国总商会负责人参加会议，介绍在美业务情况，并就维护企业利益、拓展务实 合作等提出具体诉求和建议。 王文涛表示，两国元首战略引领为中美经贸关系发展指明了原则和方向，前期双方经过多轮经贸磋商达 成了一系列重要共识成果，有力推动两国经贸关系回稳。在美中资企业克服困难，取得发展成绩，殊为 不易。当前全球贸易格局和规则正遭受单边主义、保护主义的严重冲击。希望企业把握形势，积极应 对，重视多元布局和合规经营，在不确定性中寻求确定性，既要抱团出海，也要抱团取暖，通力协作， 反对内卷外化。 ...

(经济观察)以行动捍卫多边贸易 中国作出重要承诺 中新社北京9月24日电 (记者 尹倩芸)当地时间9月23日，中国国务院总理李强在纽约出席第80届联合国 大会相关活动时宣布，中国作为负责任的发展中大国，在世贸组织当前和未来谈判中将不寻求新的特殊 和差别待遇。 此间学者认为，这一郑重承诺不仅是中国坚定支持多边主义的实质性举措，也是对维护以世界贸易组织 为核心的多边贸易体制的重要贡献。 特殊和差别待遇反映在世贸组织各项协定之中，是发展中成员的重要制度性权利，也是多边贸易体制的 重要基础。自2001年以发展中成员身份加入世贸组织以来，中国在合理行使该权利的同时，始终积极承 担与自身发展水平相适应的义务。 中国商务部国际贸易谈判代表兼副部长李成钢提到，中方在享受特殊和差别待遇的同时，积极参与多边 贸易谈判，结合自身发展水平和能力，自主务实处理具体议题谈判中涉及的特殊和差别待遇问题，为达 成多项世贸组织谈判成果、促进全球贸易更自由更便利作出重要贡献。 从对所有建交的最不发达国家100%税目产品实施零关税，到对53个非洲建交国实施100%税目产品零关 税举措，对外经济贸易大学国际经贸学院教授崔凡称，作为最大的发展中国家， ...

Group 1 - The forum "Phoenix Bay Area Financial Forum 2025" was held in Guangzhou, focusing on the theme "New Pattern, New Path" to explore development opportunities and challenges in the changing global landscape [1] - Wei Jianguo, former Vice Minister of Commerce, emphasized the need to repair and enhance the existing global governance system, which has been in place since World War II, rather than completely overturning it [3] - Wei highlighted the contrasting approaches of China and the United States towards international cooperation, with China advocating for mutual respect and win-win cooperation, while the U.S. adopts unilateralism and prioritizes its own interests [3] Group 2 - The upcoming Canton Fair is expected to attract more countries and enterprises, showcasing China's market openness and appeal, particularly benefiting small and medium-sized enterprises [4] - Wei noted that the Canton Fair has served as a vital platform for international trade and cooperation, reflecting China's commitment to mutual benefit and win-win principles [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes its unwavering commitment to its status as a developing member in the WTO, the protection of the legitimate rights of developing members, and the promotion of global trade and investment liberalization [1] Group 1: Commitment to WTO Principles - China firmly opposes unilateralism and protectionism, aiming to uphold the fundamental principles and rules of the WTO, such as non-discrimination [1] - The country is dedicated to maintaining the multilateral trading system and enhancing communication and cooperation with all parties to contribute to an open world economy [1] Group 2: Advancing WTO Rules - China advocates for the modernization of WTO rules, pushing for the early inclusion of investment facilitation agreements and e-commerce agreements into the WTO legal framework [1] Group 3: Focus on Development - The focus is on development dimensions, with efforts directed towards achieving pragmatic outcomes at the 14th WTO Ministerial Conference scheduled for March 2026 [1]

Core Points - The global governance initiative proposed by President Xi Jinping aims to build a more just and reasonable global governance system, emphasizing the importance of multilateralism and equal sovereignty among nations [1][4][6] - The initiative is a response to the changing international power dynamics and the increasing global challenges, advocating for the representation and voice of emerging markets and developing countries in global economic governance [2][4][14] - The concept of "consultation, construction, and sharing" is central to the initiative, promoting collaborative efforts among nations to address global issues and enhance mutual benefits [3][4][12] Summary by Sections Global Governance Initiative - The initiative is presented as a significant international public good from China, following previous initiatives on development, security, and civilization [1][2] - It focuses on reforming and improving the global governance system to align with the principles of the UN Charter and the needs of the current global landscape [1][2][4] Principles of the Initiative - Key principles include respect for sovereignty, adherence to international law, promotion of multilateralism, a people-centered approach, and action-oriented solutions [4][10] - The initiative has received positive responses from various countries, indicating its alignment with global expectations for improved governance [4][5] Historical Context and Future Directions - The initiative is rooted in historical lessons and aims to address the current challenges posed by unilateralism and protectionism [11][12] - China emphasizes its role as a major player in global governance, advocating for the provision of global public goods and the responsibility of large nations [12][14] Collaborative Efforts and Global Challenges - The initiative seeks to mobilize resources to tackle common challenges faced by humanity, such as climate change and digital governance [14][18] - China is actively engaging in international cooperation to fill governance gaps in emerging fields like artificial intelligence and cybersecurity [18][19]

Group 1 - The 80th anniversary of the United Nations is being commemorated, emphasizing China's commitment to the UN's ideals and its role in maintaining international order and contributing to global peace and development [1] - The significance of the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression is highlighted as a crucial part of the global anti-fascist struggle, showcasing China's sacrifices for humanity and world peace [1] - The establishment of the United Nations post-World War II is recognized as a pivotal decision by the international community, with China being a founding member and the first signatory of the UN Charter [1] Group 2 - The current international landscape is described as turbulent, necessitating a reflection on history and a commitment to multilateralism and cooperation [2] - China, in collaboration with the UN and other member states, has organized various commemorative activities to enhance global understanding of its contributions to World War II [2] - The importance of the UN as a platform for multilateralism and global governance is emphasized, with a call to strengthen its role amidst rising unilateralism and hegemony [2] Group 3 - A global governance initiative proposed by China aims to address the increasing governance deficit, promoting principles such as sovereign equality, adherence to international law, and a people-centered approach [3] - This initiative is seen as a significant contribution to global governance reform, aligning with the UN Charter's principles and reflecting China's commitment to multilateralism [3] - China expresses willingness to collaborate with other nations to implement various global initiatives, reinforcing the vision of building a community with a shared future for humanity [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around Trump's pressure on China and India to impose high tariffs due to their continued purchase of Russian oil, aiming to weaken Russia's economy and expedite peace negotiations in Ukraine [1][3][5] - Japan's finance minister publicly rejected the U.S. request, emphasizing that Japan would not raise tariffs based on another country's oil imports from Russia, showcasing Japan's independent stance in global economic interests [5][6] - The European Union's response to Trump's pressure has been mixed, with many member states opposing the high tariff policy, fearing negative impacts on their economies, particularly in relation to trade with China [6][8] Group 2 - The EU, particularly Germany and France, has expressed that relying solely on sanctions is not a viable solution to international disputes, advocating for a gradual reduction of energy dependence on Russia instead [8] - China's response to U.S. sanctions has been firm, asserting that its trade with Russia is legitimate and criticizing the U.S. for unilateral bullying and economic coercion, which threatens global supply chain security [6][8]

近期，日本做出了一个值得关注的决定：拒绝了美国要求对中国加征关税的请求。美国在施压盟友时，提出了一个极具挑战性 的问题：要求对中国加征高达100%的关税，理由是中国继续购买俄罗斯石油。然而，日本并未屈从这一压力，选择坚持自己 的立场，给出了非常有力的理由。 面对美国的施压，日本为何拒绝对华加税？ 近期，美国对中国的经济施压愈加严厉，特别是通过联合欧盟和G7国家要求对中国加征"惩罚性关税"。特朗普政府认为，中 国继续从俄罗斯进口石油，不仅支持俄罗斯的经济，还间接影响俄乌冲突的走向。因此，要求G7国家联合对中国加征关税， 幅度最高可达100%。其中，墨西哥也在考虑对中国加税50%。 这种立场也体现了日本在国际经济格局中的谨慎与智慧。在当前全球经济动荡的背景下，任何过于激进的决策都可能带来不可 预测的风险。日本的决策不仅是对经济利益的保护，也是对全球经济稳定的贡献。 日本的这一决定，实际上也有着深远的意义。美国要求对中国加征关税的做法，如果得以实施，不仅会加剧中美之间的经济摩 擦，还会给全球经济带来严重的不确定性。特别是在全球供应链的相互依赖日益加深的背景下，任何单边主义的贸易政策都会 破坏全球经济的稳定。日本的拒 ...

Group 1 - The core argument of the articles revolves around President Trump's proposal to impose a 100% tariff on China and India due to their continued oil purchases from Russia, which the U.S. views as support for Russia's war efforts, particularly against Ukraine [1][3][5] - The proposal has faced significant opposition from key allies, including Japan and the European Union, who prioritize their economic relationships with China and India over U.S. demands [3][5][7] - Japan's Finance Minister expressed that imposing tariffs solely based on oil purchases from Russia is unacceptable, highlighting Japan's economic dependence on trade with China and the potential negative impact on its own economy [3][5] Group 2 - The European Union has shown reluctance to support the U.S. tariff proposal, citing the importance of maintaining economic ties with China and India, particularly in sectors like automotive and electronics [5][7] - The unilateral pressure from the U.S. is seen as ineffective, as countries like Japan, the EU, and India are making decisions based on their own economic interests rather than following U.S. directives [7] - Future U.S.-China relations may hinge on the ability of both parties to engage in equal dialogue, with potential for cooperation in areas such as technology, agriculture, and energy, rather than escalating tensions through unilateral actions [8]

Core Points - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-4 that the global tariff policy implemented by the Trump administration was an overreach of authority, labeling it illegal [1][3][5] - The ruling signifies a significant setback for Trump's trade strategy, which relied heavily on tariffs as a tool for economic gain and international negotiation [1][9] Group 1: Legal Implications - The court's decision indicates that the President does not have the unilateral authority to adjust tariffs, rendering Trump's executive orders invalid [3][5] - The ruling highlights the legal vulnerabilities of Trump's tariff policies, which were based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law that does not explicitly grant the President the power to modify tariff rates unilaterally [5][9] Group 2: Economic Consequences - If the tariffs are deemed illegal, the federal government could face up to $90 billion in refunds, potentially exceeding $1 trillion when considering the entirety of Trump's first term [7] - The removal of tariff protections may expose U.S. manufacturing and agriculture to increased global competition, impacting their competitiveness [7][9] Group 3: Political Reactions - In response to the ruling, Trump has launched a media campaign criticizing the decision and has mobilized supporters to seek impeachment of the judges who voted in favor [9] - The situation underscores the independence of the U.S. judicial system, as lower court rulings prioritize legal principles over political affiliations [9]