美国白宫于当地时间4日晚发布特朗普政府的新版《国家安全战略》。这份文件共33页，阐述本届美国政府对其外交政策的调整。 00:00 / 00:00 倍速 据悉，该战略的核心是美国重新调整美国在西半球的军事存在，以应对移民、"毒品走私"等。文件概述了美国在该地区扩大海岸警卫队和海 军存在以及部署兵力，从而确保边境安全并打击"贩毒"集团，包括在必要时使用致命武力。该战略称，这是提出并实施针对门罗主义的所 谓"特朗普推论"。 "门罗主义"最早于1823年由时任美国总统门罗提出，名义上宣称"美洲是美洲人的美洲"，实质是为美国独霸美洲、推行强权政治开路，迫 使拉美国家按美国意志行事。 该战略还称，俄乌冲突产生了适得其反的效果，加剧了欧洲的对外依赖。 战略称，在俄乌冲突之下，欧洲与俄罗斯的关系恶化，很多欧洲人将 俄罗斯视为外部威胁。分析指出，战略同时指责欧洲官员阻挠美国支持结束俄乌冲突的努力。 另外，这份美国新国家安全战略称，自1979年以来，中美两国最初建立在一方为成熟富裕经济体、一方为全球最贫困国家之一的关系格 局，如今已经演变为近乎对等的关系。 战略还称，美国将调整与中国的经济关系，以互惠平等为原则，重振美国经济自主 ...

美国白宫于当地时间12月4日晚发布特朗普政府的新版《国家安全战略》。美国媒体12月5日报道称，这 份文件共33页，阐述本届美国政府对其外交政策的调整。在涉及中国的部分，这份美国新国家安全战略 称，自1979年以来，中美两国最初建立在一方为成熟富裕经济体、一方为全球最贫困国家之一的关系格 局，如今已经演变为近乎对等的关系。战略还称，美国将调整与中国的经济关系，以互惠平等为原则， 重振美国经济自主地位。（CCTV国际时讯） 美国白宫于当地时间12月4日晚发布特朗普政府的新版《国家安全战略》。美国媒体12月5日报道称，这 份文件共33页，阐述本届美国政府对其外交政策的调整。在涉及中国的部分，这份美国新国家安全战略 称，自1979年以来，中美两国最初建立在一方为成熟富裕经济体、一方为全球最贫困国家之一的关系格 局，如今已经演变为近乎对等的关系。战略还称，美国将调整与中国的经济关系，以互惠平等为原则， 重振美国经济自主地位。（CCTV国际时讯） ...

复旦大学美国研究中心教授张家栋对《环球时报》记者表示，过去几十年里打"台湾牌"成为美国对华政 策的基本思路，如今美国担心失去这张"牌"，因为整个台海形势正向着符合两岸人民共同利益的方向逐 渐推进，美国在其《国家安全战略》报告中的政策措辞透露出要"阻止"这种变化趋势的意思，正是因为 担心不能像过去一样可以任意打"牌"。 张家栋认为，"美2025《国家安全战略》报告中的涉台表述反而体现出台海态势力量的转变"。美国在表 明自身所谓担忧，而相关战略不会从根本上改变两岸关系，也不会在根本上改变台海的基本态势。 据台湾《经济日报》报道，新报告中，亚洲章节以"赢得经济未来、防止军事对抗"为主轴，台湾议题则 被纳入"威慑军事威胁"部分。《南华早报》称，报告中遏制台湾冲突是"优先事项"。 据统计，与2017年相比，今年报告对台湾问题提及的次数明显增多。报告宣称："外界对台湾的关注相 当高，部分原因是台湾在全球半导体生产中占据主导地位，但更主要的是，台湾可直接通往第二岛链， 并将东北亚与东南亚分隔成两个不同的战区。每年全球约1/3的海运通过南海，这对美国经济具有重大 影响。因此，最好通过维持军事优势来防止冲突。美国也将维持长期以 ...

【文/观察者网 熊超然】当地时间12月3日，美国"政客新闻网"（POLITICO）援引据三名知情人士独家报道称，由于美国财政部长贝森特坚持 修改有关中国的措辞，阐述特朗普政府全球安全战略的两份报告文件已被推迟数周发布。 美方的这两份文件——《国家安全战略》（National Security Strategy）和《国防战略》（National Defense Strategy），原本预计在今年秋季早 些时候发布。第一名知情人士称，目前这两份文件均已接近完成，可能在本月发布；另外两名知情人士也相继证实，《国家安全战略》和《国 防战略》即将发布。 这些要求匿名的消息人士透露，鉴于目前美中贸易谈判十分敏感，以及本届政府将西半球战略优先级提升至高于以往任何一届政府，贝森特希 望对有关中国的措辞进行更多"润色打磨"（work done），因此这两份战略文件经历了多轮修改。 报道称，《国家安全战略》被历届美国政府用来阐明其总体战略重点，涵盖经济领域、对盟友与对手的应对以及军事态势等各个方面，这一起 草过程要经过内阁官员的多轮审阅和意见征询，以求全面体现政府愿景，并确保整个政府在总统最重要议题上保持行动一致。 数月以来，特 ...

Core Points - The "C5+1" summit, involving the U.S. and five Central Asian countries, is a significant platform for deepening U.S.-Central Asia relations [1][2] - The mechanism, initiated in 2015, has led to enhanced cooperation in various sectors including economy, energy, ecology, and security [1] - The U.S. sees Central Asia as strategically valuable for addressing climate change, energy and food security, and transportation logistics [2] Group 1 - The "C5+1" mechanism has evolved to allow Central Asian countries to express a unified stance, enhancing their negotiating power with external partners [1] - The recent meeting between Kazakhstan's foreign minister and U.S. Secretary of State indicates a willingness to expand cooperation in security, technology, and key mineral resources [2] - Analysts suggest that U.S. interest in Central Asia is increasing, with a focus on high-tech, energy, and transportation infrastructure [2] Group 2 - Central Asia is rich in natural resources, including oil, gas, and rare earth minerals, which are prioritized by the U.S. government [2] - The region's rare earth metals are crucial for manufacturing a wide range of products, from smartphones to military aircraft [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for enhancing industrial resilience and shock resistance, ensuring food security and energy mineral safety as part of the national security strategy [1][2] - Multiple organizations are exploring new models for the coordinated development of agriculture and mining, aiming to integrate land reclamation in mining areas with modern agriculture to support rural revitalization and high-quality county economic development [1][2] - The collaboration between agriculture and mining is seen as a crucial path to implement national strategies, empower rural revitalization, and ensure sustainable development of county economies [2][3] Group 2 - Currently, there is a lack of effective collaborative development mechanisms between agriculture and mining, with both sectors having low interdependence despite their reliance on each other for resources and support [3] - The research group plans to focus on optimizing spatial layouts, resource efficiency, ecological co-construction, and deep integration of agriculture and mining, providing targeted and actionable policy recommendations [3][4] - New laws such as the Food Security Law and the Mineral Resources Law, along with policies on green mining and ecological protection, provide a solid legal and policy foundation for the coordinated development of county-level mining and agriculture [4]

Core Viewpoint - Intel has received a significant investment from SoftBank, which reflects confidence in the company's future in the semiconductor industry and potential government support [1][2]. Group 1: Investment Details - SoftBank will invest $2 billion in Intel by purchasing shares at $23 each, resulting in a 2% ownership stake, making SoftBank the sixth-largest shareholder of Intel [2]. - Following the announcement, Intel's stock price increased by 5.4%, reaching $24.93 per share in after-hours trading [1]. Group 2: Government Involvement - The U.S. government is reportedly considering acquiring a 10% stake in Intel, which would require approximately $10.5 billion, potentially funded by CHIPS Act resources [3]. - Intel has already received about $10.9 billion in grants from the CHIPS Act, indicating strong government support for the company [3]. Group 3: Market Implications - SoftBank's CEO, Masayoshi Son, emphasized the importance of advanced semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. and Intel's critical role in this sector [2]. - Analysts have mixed views on Intel's future; while some see potential due to government interest and strategic investments, others remain cautious due to the company's recent poor performance [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Embassy in the UK firmly opposes the UK government's speech and report that spread the notion of a "Chinese threat" and made unfounded accusations against China, asserting that China's development does not pose a challenge or threat to any country [1] Group 1: China's Position on Allegations - The embassy rejects allegations of espionage, cyberattacks, and transnational repression attributed to China, labeling them as baseless and malicious slander [1] - Issues related to Taiwan, Hong Kong, and human rights are deemed internal matters of China, with no external forces having the right to interfere [1] Group 2: Call for Improved Relations - China emphasizes its unwavering determination to safeguard national sovereignty and maritime rights, stating that it will not tolerate provocations from external forces [1] - The embassy advises the UK to recognize the situation, correct its mindset, and abandon Cold War thinking and ideological biases to facilitate smooth dialogue and cooperation between the two countries [1]