Core Viewpoint - The book "What is Science: What Science Is and What It Is Not" addresses the urgent need for a new scientific worldview that acknowledges human experience, which has been overlooked in contemporary scientific discourse [4][5][14]. Group 1: Scientific Blind Spots - The authors argue that the current scientific worldview is in crisis, failing to account for human experience, subjectivity, and meaning, which are essential for understanding our place in the world [6][10]. - The concept of "blind spots" refers to the neglect of direct human experience in scientific understanding, leading to a significant meaning crisis in science [7][9]. - The book identifies several key philosophical positions that contribute to these blind spots, including dualism, reductionism, objectivism, and physicalism, which shape the prevailing scientific worldview [9][10]. Group 2: Urgency of Change - The authors express deep concern over the implications of scientific blind spots, particularly in the context of global crises such as climate change and pandemics, which are exacerbated by scientific advancements [5][6][14]. - They emphasize the need for a revolutionary scientific worldview that integrates human experience as a fundamental component of scientific inquiry, rather than treating it as an afterthought [14][19]. - The book critiques three common responses to the meaning crisis in science: scientific triumphalism, scientific denialism, and the New Age movement, all of which fail to address the underlying issues [11][12]. Group 3: Structure of the Book - The book is divided into four main parts, each addressing different aspects of the scientific blind spots: the origins of the blind spot concept, the implications for physics, life sciences, and the broader societal impacts, including climate change and ecological crises [15][16]. - The first part discusses the philosophical roots of the blind spot, while subsequent sections explore its manifestations in various scientific fields and the resulting societal challenges [15][16]. - The authors aim to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding how these blind spots have developed and how they can be addressed to foster a more inclusive scientific narrative [17][18].

Core Viewpoint - ASEAN countries possess abundant natural resources, a growing market, a youthful demographic structure, and a shared development destiny, which necessitates enhanced cooperation to accelerate regional green transformation and collectively address the climate crisis while building a low-carbon future [1] Group 1 - ASEAN countries are encouraged to strengthen collaboration to tackle climate challenges [1] - The region's rich natural resources and young population present opportunities for sustainable development [1] - The emphasis is on a collective approach to achieve a low-carbon future [1]

Core Viewpoint - The burden of the climate crisis will primarily fall on the younger generation rather than the older generation, highlighting the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to mitigate climate change impacts on youth [1] Summary by Relevant Categories Climate Impact - In a 1.5℃ warming scenario, approximately 52% of individuals born in 2020 will face unprecedented heatwave risks, compared to only 16% of those born in 1960 [1] Urgency of Action - The findings emphasize the critical importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to alleviate the effects of climate change on the younger generation [1]