多名消费者向大象新闻记者表达了对此案进展的关注。在柴氏珠宝花费6666元购买和田玉手镯的张女士说："希望当地相关部门公正处理。"消费金额达9.4 万元的何女士称，目前她仍有5375元未退款。因为肖某曾在直播间公开声称"有钱也不退"让她感到气愤，她得知"柴怼怼"及其妻子肖某被刑拘后"长出了一 口气"。 据媒体报道，近日，"柴怼怼"涉嫌生产、销售伪劣产品案有新进展，警方已完成对涉案首批玉石饰品的价格鉴定和真伪鉴定，结果显示，已鉴定的30多件玉 石产品中有15件玉石为"染色和田玉"；平阳县公安局鉴定意见通知书显示，柴怼怼直播间近4万玉石仅值3509元。柴怼怼与其妻子肖某分别于9月8日、9日被 刑拘。 | | 所有如此是一些地 | 平阳县小人类饮有限公司 | | --- | --- | --- | | 基本信息 | 行政处罚详情 | | | | 行政处罚相对人 | 平阳县小人类饮草赌公司 处罚单位 平阳县市场监督管理局 | | 字号 | | | | | 处罚金额(元) | 220,000.00 没收金额(元) | | | 外罚日期 | 2025-07-22 发布日期 | | | | 经查明,当事人平阳县小丫茶饮有限公 ...

抖音集团副总裁李亮9月15日发文称，过去一段时间，社交媒体平台出现了很多"字节离职员工"的帖 子，基本都是"月薪X万离开字节"这样的标题，再配上字节跳动的LOGO背景墙或者工卡照片。这些 帖子吸引了很多的流量，不知不觉似乎营造了一个社媒上的"字节离职赛道"。 做了一些调查后发 现，有很多类似的帖子，实际上作者从未在字节工作 ，背后是一些培训机构在借大厂名义引流卖 课。这当中，部分机构反复发布此类虚假帖子，无奈之下，公司起诉了其中比较猖獗的一家，最近获 得了法院的判决，认定这些行为属于引人误解的虚假宣传、构成不正当竞争。也提醒广大网友们，注 意对网上的信息加强鉴别，你看到的"大厂离职""大厂内幕"不一定是真的。 微信编辑 | 七三 第 一 财 经 持 续 追 踪 财 经 热 点 。 若 您 掌 握 公 司 动 态 、 行 业 趋 势 、 金 融 事 件 等 有 价 值 的 线 索 ， 欢 迎 提 供 。 专 用 邮 箱 ： bianjibu@yicai.com 2025.09. 16 （注：我们会对线索进行核实。您的隐私将严格保密。） 本文字数：436，阅读时长大约1分钟 浦发银行 SPDBANK p 推荐阅读 ...

抖音集团副总裁李亮9月15日发文表示，过去一段时间，社交媒体平台出现了很多"字节离职员工"的帖 子，基本都是"月薪X万离开字节"这样的标题，再配上字节跳动的LOGO背景墙或者工卡照片。这些帖 子吸引了很多的流量，不知不觉似乎营造了一个社媒上的"字节离职赛道"。做了一些调查后发现，有很 多类似的帖子，实际上作者从未在字节工作，背后是一些培训机构在借大厂名义引流卖课。这当中，部 分机构反复发布此类虚假帖子，无奈之下，公司起诉了其中比较猖獗的一家，最近获得了法院的判决， 认定这些行为属于引人误解的虚假宣传、构成不正当竞争。也提醒广大网友们，注意对网上的信息加强 鉴别，你看到的"大厂离职""大厂内幕"不一定是真的。 责任编辑：李思阳 ...

北京商报讯（记者 关子辰 牛清妍）9月15日，国务院办公厅发布关于进一步加强旅游市场综合监管的通 知。通知提出，督促在线旅游平台与旅游经营者加强个人信息保护，不得以"大数据杀熟"、虚假宣传、 捆绑销售等行为侵害游客权益。推动在线旅游平台良性竞争，依法保障平台内经营者合法权益，促进在 线旅游市场健康有序发展。压实旅游包车企业安全生产主体责任。督促购物场所、旅游景区等做到质价 相符，自觉抵制商业贿赂。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Ulike, a prominent hair removal device brand, has intensified its anti-corruption efforts, revealing significant internal actions against misconduct while facing ongoing controversies related to marketing practices and product quality issues [1][5][9]. Group 1: Anti-Corruption Measures - Ulike announced its anti-corruption achievements, reporting nine cases of violations and twelve individuals suspected of criminal activities referred to law enforcement [1]. - The company has established a comprehensive risk management system, ensuring immediate termination for any violations of corporate policies and active cooperation with judicial investigations for criminal offenses [1]. Group 2: Company Background - Founded in 2013, Ulike is a global brand under Hangzhou Youlai Technology Co., Ltd., focusing on optical skincare and hair removal devices [4]. - Ulike has achieved significant sales success, leading the hair removal device category from 2016 to 2023 with over 7 million units sold across 28 countries [4]. Group 3: Marketing Controversies - Ulike has faced backlash for marketing practices, including a controversial promotional event involving a cat giveaway that was criticized for ethical concerns [5][7]. - The company has a history of administrative penalties due to misleading advertising, including fines for content deemed vulgar or disrespectful to women [8]. Group 4: Product Quality Issues - Ulike has received numerous complaints regarding product quality, with a total of 1,838 complaints reported, primarily related to false advertising and poor customer service [11]. - Customers have reported adverse skin reactions after using Ulike products, leading to disputes over refunds and accountability [11].

Ulike官方反腐通报显示，2025年，由莱集团监察部门持续深化反腐行动，共查处违反企业"高压线"案件9起，涉嫌刑事犯罪的12人已被移送公安机关处 理。 通报还称，Ulike建立了全面且严格的风险管理体系，对任何触犯"企业高压线"的行为，一经发现并证实，公司将立即予以解聘，永不录用；涉嫌违法犯 罪的，公司将积极配合司法机关调查，追究其一切法律责任。具体来看，Ulike此次反腐行动覆盖了研发、品牌设计、达人直播、供应链采购、海外营销 等多个关键业务领域。 又有公司重拳反腐。 9月10日晚间，知名脱毛仪品牌Ulike在官方公众号上发文向社会公开其内部反腐成果。 最终，Ulike通过官方账号发布致歉声明称，由于电商运营人员认知不足，活动机制出现了"抽奖送猫"的错误表述，造成了不良影响，将对所有不当措辞 的宣传物料、文案、活动页面立即进行下架、删除。 但消费者对于这一声明并不"买账"，评论区质疑Ulike并非诚心道歉，选择用粉丝量最少的账号"UlikeMe"发声明而非官方"大号"。 Ulike品牌创立于2013年，隶属于杭州由莱科技有限公司。作为由莱旗下首个专研光学美肤领域的全球化品牌，Ulike专注于脱毛领域研究， ...

Group 1 - The internet celebrity "Chai Dui Dui" (real name Chai Xiangqian) and others are under investigation by the Pingyang County Public Security Bureau for allegedly producing and selling counterfeit products [1] - Chai Xiangqian is associated with over 20 companies, of which 7 have been canceled or revoked, including Wenzhou Chai's Liquor Co., Ltd. and Wuhan Chai's Jewelry Co., Ltd. [1] - In July of this year, a company associated with Chai's wife, Pingyang Xiaoya Tea Co., Ltd., was fined 220,000 yuan for false advertising regarding its health benefits [1] Group 2 - Wenzhou Chai's Liquor Co., Ltd. was fined 6,000 yuan for publishing advertisements containing false information about its products [4] - The company was found to have violated the Advertising Law of the People's Republic of China by making false claims about the health benefits of its liquor [4] - The administrative penalties imposed on the companies highlight issues related to product safety and advertising integrity within the industry [4][5]

Group 1 - The influencer "Chai Dui Dui" (real name Chai Xiangqian) and associates are under investigation by the Pingyang County Public Security Bureau for allegedly producing and selling counterfeit products [1] - Multiple consumers have reported issues, leading to the police investigation, confirming the situation [1] - A consumer named Ms. Zhang is involved in two civil lawsuits against companies associated with "Chai Dui Dui," with hearings scheduled for September 11 [2] Group 2 - Ms. Zhang claims to have spent 3,596 yuan on "Qi Shi Tea" based on false health claims, leading to health complications and hospitalization [2] - She also alleges that after paying 8,000 yuan to join a wine sales program, she faced issues with refunds and product delivery [2] - Ms. Zhang is seeking triple compensation and 3,000 yuan for emotional distress in her lawsuits [3] Group 3 - The Pingyang County Market Supervision Administration previously fined the company associated with "Chai Dui Dui" 220,000 yuan for false advertising and selling unlabelled products [3] - The company has faced multiple legal challenges, including a defamation lawsuit from a competitor, "Pang Dong Lai," for disparaging remarks made by "Chai Dui Dui" [3][5] - The company has been penalized for advertising containing false content, resulting in fines totaling 6,000 yuan [7]

Core Viewpoint - The Jilin Provincial Market Supervision Administration is actively conducting the "Guarding Consumption" and "Thunder 2025" enforcement actions to address violations related to consumer safety and rights protection, focusing on key products and industries. Group 1: Enforcement Actions - The Longcheng District Market Supervision Bureau in Changchun investigated a clothing studio for selling goods that infringed on trademark rights, resulting in the confiscation of infringing products and a fine [2] - The Nanguan District Market Supervision Bureau in Changchun also took action against a clothing store for selling goods that violated trademark rights, leading to similar penalties [3] - The Longtan District Market Supervision Bureau in Jilin City found a liquor store selling goods that infringed on trademark rights, resulting in confiscation and fines [4] - The Lishu County Market Supervision Bureau investigated an electric bicycle shop for selling products that did not meet national standards, leading to penalties [5] - The Yalu River City Market Supervision Bureau found a company using misleading packaging and branding that closely resembled a well-known brand, resulting in penalties for unfair competition [6][7] - The Baishan City Market Supervision Bureau penalized a trading company for false advertising regarding health benefits of a product, which was found to be a regular food item [8] - The Songyuan City Market Supervision Bureau penalized an electric bicycle shop for selling non-compliant products, including discrepancies in vehicle coding [9] - The Meihekou City Market Supervision Bureau investigated an automotive maintenance center for selling goods that infringed on trademark rights, resulting in confiscation and fines [10] Group 2: Future Actions - The provincial market supervision departments will continue to conduct special enforcement actions against various illegal activities in the consumer sector, maintaining a high-pressure stance to protect consumer and business rights [10]

Core Viewpoint - The automotive industry is facing issues of integrity and transparency, with some brands resorting to misleading marketing tactics such as fabricating order numbers to create a false sense of demand [1][2][4]. Group 1: Industry Practices - Some advertising companies are preparing "small orders over ten thousand" strategies months before product launches, which violates industry ethics and possibly legal regulations [1]. - The phenomenon of announcing over ten thousand orders shortly after the pre-order phase is prevalent across both mainstream and high-end electric vehicle markets, indicating a lack of confidence among brands in their products [2][4]. - The cost of fabricating small order numbers is low compared to the potential short-term attention it generates, leading some companies to prioritize this tactic over genuine marketing efforts [4]. Group 2: Consumer Behavior - Consumers are influenced by the "bandwagon effect," where the perception of high order numbers encourages them to follow suit in purchasing decisions [2]. - It is advised that consumers maintain rational thinking regarding promotional data and consider their personal preferences before making significant purchases [5]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape - The automotive industry has seen a rise in unethical practices as brands struggle to compete, leading to tactics such as price wars and misleading marketing [6][10]. - The emergence of "zero-kilometer used cars" is a tactic used by some dealers to artificially inflate sales figures, which ultimately disrupts both new and used car markets [7][9]. - Industry leaders have called for a shift away from harmful competition and towards a focus on technological advancement and value creation [10]. Group 4: Regulatory Environment - Regulatory bodies are beginning to address the rampant issues within the automotive sector, including exaggerated claims and deceptive pricing practices [11]. - Despite these efforts, the competitive nature of the market means that some brands may continue to engage in unethical practices to gain market share [11].