ZKsync is leading the RWA revolution among Ethereum L2s, and this is just the beginning. Stay tuned as we continue shaping the future of tokenized assets. ...

RWA Market - ZKsync 的平均 RWA 价值在过去一个月达到约 24 亿美元，成为推动以太坊 RWA 增长的领先 L2 网络 [1]

register nowTokkaLabs (@TokkaLabs):We’re excited to unveil our flagship DeFi x RWA event, happening at @token2049 Singapore 🏦Co-hosted with our friends at @PythNetwork, @wallet, and @1inch, we're bringing together key leaders shaping the future of onchain liquidity for RWAs.Hear from industry voices at ...

Company Overview - Jiuzhou Group was founded in 1993, focusing on smart distribution networks and energy sectors, and is a leading provider of new power and energy infrastructure [2] - The company is a national key high-tech enterprise and was successfully listed on the Chinese Growth Enterprise Market in 2010 (stock code: 300040) [2] - Jiuzhou Group has established three core business segments: smart distribution networks, new energy, and comprehensive energy services, managed by three business groups with over 40 subsidiaries across various provinces [3] Financial Performance - In the first half of 2025, the company achieved a revenue of 6.85 billion yuan and a net profit of 4281.5 million yuan, marking a 65.6% increase compared to the same period last year [4] - The comprehensive smart energy segment turned profitable due to operational improvements in biomass cogeneration assets [4] - The company received over 1 billion yuan in national subsidies this year, with a significant acceleration in the collection speed [4] Business Development - The company has a total installed capacity of over 2.7 GW in new energy projects, with an additional 1 GW in construction and development [3][8] - The smart distribution network equipment orders are distributed approximately 1/3 within the grid and 2/3 outside, with a gross margin of about 20% and a net margin of around 3% [6] - The company aims for a 20% revenue growth in the smart distribution network segment and a 10% growth in both new energy and comprehensive smart energy segments for 2025 [9] Market Outlook - The management holds an optimistic view on the future of the distribution and transmission industry, anticipating a new growth cycle due to increased investment in the power grid and rising demand from AI and data centers [5] - The potential market for decentralized wind and clean energy heating in Northeast China is substantial, with nearly 300 county-level administrative units and over 3000 townships [7] Strategic Initiatives - The company is focusing on enhancing its manufacturing capabilities and market presence by establishing a new sales team targeting large clients and expanding overseas sales efforts [5] - Plans to utilize asset securitization tools like REITs and ABS for future asset monetization are under consideration [4] - The company is actively exploring overseas business opportunities, particularly in Belt and Road Initiative countries and ASEAN nations [11]

Market Trends & Token Performance - $MNT reached All-Time High (ATH) [1] - OKX, MNT, and BNB are experiencing price increases, but with different strategies [1] Team & Leadership - The core team seems to have been replaced by Bybit executives [1] Token Utility & Ecosystem - $MNT is starting to be utilized within its ecosystem [1] - Holding MNT and participating in Bybit's VIP activities can yield daily returns of 1/100 (1%) [1] - Bybit denies that MNT is a platform token, but it functions like one, being used for new token offerings, trading, and contracts [1] Strategy & Focus - The core keywords for MNT are Real World Assets (RWA) and payments [1] - The effort being put into promoting MNT suggests ambitions beyond just being a platform token [1]

Stablecoin is one of the few crypto narratives to achieve true product–market fit, driving the fastest adoption for TradeFi and institutions.@stbl_official is here to define the next phase of stablecoin narrative$STBL is the next evolution of stablecoins, separating yield and principal so users can enjoy utility without giving up their earnings.🔎 Key Highlights:➡️ Reeve Collins, the mind behind Tether, the first stablecoin that reshaped crypto, is back with a new creation: $STBL.➡️ Stablecoins haven’t reall ...

exotic RWAsAJC (@AvgJoesCrypto):Great read, thanks for the shout @andrebeganski! https://t.co/vST9xYbvYT ...

RT Xeer (@Xeer)the @MavrykNetwork leaderboard on kaito is easily one of the most competitive ones.but apart from the supposed $10b+ RWA deal with @multibank_io, do yappers actually know why they needed to launch an L1 with its own token $MVRK?whether or not that matters, we will know in 8 days once the TGE happens. ...

Group 1 - The core argument is that the legalization of stablecoins does not guarantee their acceptance or success in all payment scenarios, as they are not legal tender and have specific application contexts [1][2][7] - The recent legislation in the US, Hong Kong, and the EU aims to regulate stablecoins, but existing stablecoins may not comply with the new rules, necessitating a transition period for issuers [2][4] - Stablecoins are primarily seen as payment intermediaries rather than currencies themselves, and their use is contingent on the existence of a transaction need [2][7] Group 2 - The article outlines four potential strategies for stablecoins post-legalization: maintaining existing markets while exploring new ones, reducing gray areas, integrating mainstream transactions on-chain, and identifying unique payment scenarios [8][10] - Current stablecoin applications are categorized into four types: virtual world payments, cross-border transactions to evade sanctions, usage in countries with unstable currencies, and illegal activities [8][9][10] - The main challenge for stablecoins in mainstream payment scenarios is that they do not offer advantages over legal tender in environments where the latter is readily available [10][11][13] Group 3 - Retail payment scenarios for stablecoins include general retail transactions and merchant-issued stablecoins, which face limitations in acceptance across different platforms [12][11] - In domestic and cross-border trade payments, stablecoins have not demonstrated significant advantages, as traditional currencies remain the preferred method for transactions [13][14] - The potential for stablecoins to serve as a transitional tool for companies navigating foreign exchange regulations is highlighted, particularly for businesses operating in multiple jurisdictions [15][16] Group 4 - The article discusses the concept of tokenized financial instruments, such as bills of exchange, which may be more appealing than stablecoins due to their dual function of payment and financing [19][20] - The idea of deposit tokenization is presented as a more advantageous alternative to stablecoins, as it directly links to bank deposits and offers seamless integration with existing banking systems [20] - The regulatory landscape in the US is characterized by a balance between maintaining financial order and allowing space for innovation in the cryptocurrency sector [21][22]

Core Concept - The article discusses the distinction between RWA (Real World Asset) and RDA (Revenue Generating Digital Asset), emphasizing the importance of understanding these concepts for making informed decisions in the context of blockchain integration with real-world assets [1][3]. Group 1: Definitions - RWA refers to the tokenization of tangible or intangible assets in the real world, representing ownership or a share of the asset itself [6]. - RDA represents the rights to future cash flows or revenues generated by an asset, without conferring ownership of the asset [6][4]. Group 2: Key Differences - The fundamental difference lies in ownership: RWA involves the transfer or division of ownership, while RDA does not change ownership, allowing the asset holder to retain full ownership [10]. - RWA is more complex due to legal structures, compliance, and asset custody, whereas RDA is simpler and focuses on cash flow rights [10]. - RWA is suitable for asset restructuring and financing, while RDA is ideal for short-term liquidity without losing ownership [10][11]. Group 3: Implications for Asset Holders - The choice between RWA and RDA depends on the asset holder's goals: RWA is better for deep asset restructuring and global liquidity, while RDA is more flexible for short-term financing needs [9][11]. - Understanding the differences between RWA and RDA can help asset holders communicate effectively with technology and project partners, ensuring their needs are accurately expressed [11].