Group 1 - Ganfeng Lithium has completed the acquisition of 100% equity in Mali Lithium, marking a significant step in its lithium resource layout in Africa [1] - The Goulamina lithium spodumene project, with an annual production capacity of 506,000 tons of lithium concentrate, has officially commenced production, indicating a transition to substantial output [1] - This acquisition strengthens Ganfeng Lithium's position in the global lithium market and lays a solid foundation for future growth, contributing to the stability of its global lithium supply chain [1] Group 2 - Tianci Materials' subsidiary has filed a lawsuit for trade secret infringement against several companies, with an expected economic loss of 887 million yuan and legal fees of 1.15 million yuan [2] - The lawsuit is anticipated to have no direct negative impact on the company's current profits, but the case's outcome will be determined by the court [2] - The significant amount involved in the lawsuit may affect investor sentiment, and the market will closely monitor the case's progress and its long-term implications for the company [2] Group 3 - Fulian Precision has signed a cooperation framework agreement with Sichuan Development Longmang to establish a joint venture for high-pressure dense lithium iron phosphate cathode materials and precursor projects [3] - The joint venture aims to build a 100,000 tons/year high-pressure lithium iron phosphate project and a 100,000 tons/year lithium dihydrogen phosphate precursor project, enhancing Fulian Precision's capacity in the lithium battery materials sector [3] - This collaboration reinforces Fulian Precision's position in the core supply chain of new energy vehicle components and is expected to contribute to regional economic development [3]

本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 1、各方主体 九江天赐成立于2007年10月30日，拥有液体六氟磷酸锂生产工业化技术，为保护公司的商业秘密，九江 天赐建立了完善的保密管理制度和保密措施。 被告九李胜于2017年8月23日进入原告九江天赐工作，与九江天赐签订了《劳动合同》《商业保密、竞 业限制协议》等，于2021年5月20日从九江天赐离职。其在九江天赐工作期间先后担任电池生产部工艺 技术总监、总工程师等职务。为了获取非法利益，被告九李胜违反保密义务，伙同被告人七郑飞龙与被 告一浙江永太科技股份有限公司、被告三何人宝达成合作协议后，被告一至被告五将其通过收买的不正 当手段非法获取的原告液体六氟磷酸锂工艺技术资料运用于被告二邵武永太高新材料有限公司年产13.4 万吨液体锂盐产业化项目中。该项目由被告四王国超、被告五邵鸿鸣具体负责，并由被告十浙江美阳国 际工程设计有限公司进行项目产线设计，并由被告六上海桦置工程科技有限公司（该公司由郑飞龙、被 告八姜存华与何人宝成立，实控人为何人宝）承接项目部分。 特别提示： 3、涉案金额：预期经济损失人民币88,71 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal dispute between Tianqi Materials and Yongtai Technology regarding the infringement of trade secrets, highlighting the implications for the involved companies and the lithium industry as a whole [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Tianqi Materials has officially filed a civil lawsuit against Yongtai Technology, claiming economic losses of 887 million yuan and legal fees of 1.15 million yuan [2]. - The lawsuit involves multiple defendants, including Yongtai Technology and its subsidiaries, with allegations of intentional infringement of trade secrets [2][4]. - The court proceedings are still pending, and the actual impact on the companies will depend on the court's final judgment [2][4]. Group 2: Background of the Dispute - The conflict traces back to a meeting arranged by Zhejiang Yanyi over four years ago, involving former Tianqi engineer Li Sheng, who allegedly provided proprietary technology to Yanyi [5][6]. - Li Sheng's actions included sharing sensitive production process information with Yanyi, which he obtained while still employed at Tianqi [6][8]. - The technology in question pertains to the production of liquid lithium salts, a critical component in the lithium battery industry [6][7]. Group 3: Industry Context - The lithium salt market has seen significant fluctuations, with prices rising sharply due to increased demand from the electric vehicle sector [24][26]. - Tianqi Materials claims to be the only company in China with industrialized production technology for liquid dual fluorine and liquid hexafluorophosphate lithium [6][24]. - The ongoing legal disputes reflect broader trends in the lithium industry, where intellectual property rights are increasingly contested amid rapid technological advancements [25][26]. Group 4: Financial Implications - Yongtai Technology's liquid lithium salt project is projected to generate significant revenue, with estimates of 5.4 billion yuan in annual income and 670 million yuan in net profit once fully operational [19]. - However, the ongoing legal issues and market conditions have raised concerns about Yongtai's financial performance, with reports of consecutive losses [19][24]. - The outcome of the lawsuit could have substantial financial repercussions for both Tianqi and Yongtai, particularly if damages are awarded [16][17].

Core Viewpoint - Tianqi Materials has filed a civil lawsuit against Yongtai Technology and others for commercial secret infringement, claiming an expected economic loss of 887 million yuan and legal fees of 1.15 million yuan [2][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Tianqi Materials' subsidiary, Jiujiang Tianqi High-tech Materials Co., Ltd., is the plaintiff in the lawsuit filed in Jiangxi Province [2]. - The defendants include Yongtai Technology, Shaowu Yongtai High-tech Materials Co., Ltd., and several individuals, with claims of intentional infringement [2][3]. - The lawsuit seeks to destroy production line equipment and technical documents used in the production of 134,000 tons of liquid lithium salt, which allegedly utilized Tianqi's trade secrets [3][12]. Group 2: Background of the Dispute - The dispute traces back to a meeting arranged by Zhejiang Yan Yi, where former Tianqi engineer Li Sheng was allegedly offered high consulting fees and equity incentives to share proprietary technology [6][10]. - Li Sheng, after leaving Tianqi, is accused of illegally transferring proprietary technology to Zhejiang Yan Yi and Yongtai Technology [7][10]. - The technology in question includes processes for producing liquid lithium hexafluorophosphate and liquid dual fluorine, which are critical in the lithium battery industry [7][25]. Group 3: Financial Implications - The expected economic loss claimed by Tianqi Materials amounts to 887 million yuan, reflecting the significant financial stakes involved in the case [2][16]. - Yongtai Technology's 134,000 tons liquid lithium salt project is projected to generate annual revenues of 5.4 billion yuan and net profits of 670 million yuan once fully operational [19][20]. - The ongoing legal issues may impact Yongtai Technology's financial performance, as it has reported consecutive losses despite expanding production capacity [19][20]. Group 4: Industry Context - The lithium salt market has seen significant fluctuations, with prices for lithium hexafluorophosphate rising sharply due to increased demand from the electric vehicle sector [25][26]. - The case highlights the growing trend of intellectual property disputes within the lithium battery industry, reflecting the competitive landscape and the importance of proprietary technology [26][27]. - Recent judicial interpretations have increased penalties for commercial secret infringements, indicating a stricter enforcement environment for intellectual property rights [26][27].

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ● 案件所处的诉讼阶段：一审判决后提起上诉（已提交上诉状） 二、诉讼的进展情况 截至本公告披露日，该案件一审已判决。公司对一审判决不服，向江苏省高级人民法院提起上诉。公司 上诉请求如下： 1、请求法院撤销一审判决，依法改判支持上诉人的全部诉讼请求。 2、判令一审、二审受理费由被上诉人全部承担。 ● 上市公司所处的当事人地位：上诉人（一审原告） ● 涉案的金额：诉请金额为人民币5,000万元 ● 一审判决结果：1、被告苏州盛芯精密科技有限公司、王成才、李佳立即停止涉案侵害原告苏州昀冢 电子科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"昀冢科技"）技术秘密的行为，具体方式、内容、范围包括 但不限于：销毁载有涉案技术秘密的图纸、技术资料等载体，停止使用并销毁使用涉案技术秘密所制造 的冲切模具、裁切设备及注塑模具并停止继续制造或允许他人制造前述设备、模具，停止实施或许可他 人实施涉案三项专利技术方案，不得转让或以其他方式处分涉 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Suzhou Yunzhu Technology Co., Ltd., has filed an appeal against the first-instance judgment regarding the infringement of its trade secrets by Suzhou Shengxin Precision Technology Co., Ltd. and others, seeking to stop the infringement and claiming compensation of 4,785,000 yuan [1][2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Overview - The lawsuit involves allegations of trade secret infringement against Suzhou Shengxin Precision Technology Co., Ltd. and several individuals, with the company requesting the cessation of all infringing activities and compensation for economic losses [2][3]. - The first-instance judgment ordered the defendants to cease the infringement, destroy related technical documents, and pay compensation of 4,785,000 yuan within ten days [1][2]. Group 2: Appeal and Impact - The company has filed an appeal to the Jiangsu Provincial High People's Court, expressing dissatisfaction with the first-instance ruling [2][3]. - The lawsuit's progress is not expected to have a significant adverse impact on the company's daily operations, although the final financial impact remains uncertain pending the court's final ruling [2][3].