Core Points - The establishment of the International Mediation Institute is an innovative move in the field of international law, showcasing China's commitment to contributing public goods for global development using Eastern wisdom [1][2] - The International Mediation Institute aims to fill a gap in international dispute resolution by providing a neutral platform for mediation, complementing existing mechanisms like litigation and arbitration [1][3] - The initiative has received widespread support from the international community, reflecting a growing demand for effective conflict resolution and stable cooperation among nations [2][3] Summary by Sections Establishment and Significance - The International Mediation Institute was inaugurated in Hong Kong on May 30, with representatives from 85 countries and nearly 20 international organizations attending, and 33 countries signing the convention as founding members [1] - This initiative is seen as a crucial step in enhancing global governance and aligns with the principles of the United Nations Charter, particularly in promoting peaceful resolution of international disputes [1][3] Role of China - China's active role in mediating international conflicts, such as the reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and its involvement in various geopolitical issues, underscores its commitment to fostering dialogue and cooperation [2] - The establishment of the International Mediation Institute reflects China's broader strategy of using dialogue to resolve conflicts and promote mutual understanding among nations [2][3] Global South's Contribution - The International Mediation Institute is positioned as a public good contributed by Global South countries, emphasizing their role in maintaining international justice and fairness [3] - The initiative aims to enhance the representation and voice of developing countries in global governance, promoting a more equitable international dispute resolution mechanism [3]

Group 1 - The establishment of the International Mediation Institute marks a historic breakthrough in international dispute resolution, providing a new platform for resolving disputes between nations, as well as between nations and foreign investors [2] - The mediation approach respects the parties' intentions and allows for win-win solutions through neutral third-party assistance, which is particularly valuable in resolving complex international conflicts [2][4] - The current global landscape, characterized by intertwined conflicts and a demand for peaceful dispute resolution, highlights the urgency for dialogue and mediation as alternatives to unilateral sanctions and traditional judicial mechanisms [3][5] Group 2 - The International Mediation Institute aims to promote harmonious international relations and offers a flexible, economical, and efficient alternative to existing dispute resolution methods, complementing litigation and arbitration [4] - Hong Kong has been chosen as the headquarters for the International Mediation Institute, reflecting international recognition of its legal system and its role as a successful example of peaceful dispute resolution [4] - The mission of the International Mediation Institute is to foster dialogue and cooperation among nations, moving beyond zero-sum thinking to promote friendly resolutions to disputes [5]

2025年5月30日，国际调解院公约签署仪式在香港举行。中共中央政治局委员、外交部长王毅出席并致 辞。来自亚洲、非洲、拉美和欧洲85个国家和近20个国际组织的高级别代表约400人出席。其中，32个 国家现场签署公约，成为创始成员国。王毅表示，联合国宪章序言强调各国应和睦相处，维护国际和平 与安全。中方始终主张以互谅互让的精神处理分歧，以对话协商方式凝聚共识，以合作共赢态度促进发 展，以面向未来眼光解决问题，积极探索中国特色热点问题解决之道。3年前，中国同志同道合的国家 共同倡议建立国际调解院，经过不懈努力，终于达成公约，得到了国际社会的广泛支持和积极响应。国 际调解院作为国际法治领域的创新之举，在国际关系史上具有重要意义。(外交部) ...

Core Viewpoint - The necessity to revitalize the "two-state solution" as the only viable path to resolve the Palestinian issue is emphasized by China's permanent representative to the UN, Fu Cong [1] Group 1: International Law and Principles - The prolonged and destructive nature of the current Gaza conflict is attributed to the arbitrary violation of fundamental principles of international law [1] - The full implementation of Security Council resolutions is mandated by the UN Charter, leaving no room for distorted interpretations [1] - Compliance with international humanitarian law is an obligation that cannot be negotiated, and should not be used as a bargaining chip [1] Group 2: Call to Action - China urges Israel to fulfill its international legal obligations and adhere to basic principles of international relations [1] - The United States, as a major influential power, is called upon to abandon geopolitical self-interests and adopt a fair and responsible approach to contribute to regional peace and stability [1]