征求意见稿指出，监督委员会重点对大型网络平台的个人信息保护合规制度体系建设情况、敏感个人信 息保护情况、落实监管机构提出的整改要求情况等事项进行监督。监督委员会应当建立与大型网络平台 用户常态化沟通机制，听取用户意见建议，回应用户关切。 根据征求意见稿，监督委员会及其成员在履行职责过程中，不得干预大型网络平台正常运营，对在履行 职责过程中知悉的个人信息、商业秘密、保密商务信息等应当依法予以保密，不得泄露或者非法向他人 提供。（完） 新华社北京9月12日电 为指导规范大型网络平台设立、运行个人信息保护监督委员会，对个人信息保 护情况进行监督，保护个人信息权益，国家互联网信息办公室12日就《大型网络平台设立个人信息保护 监督委员会规定（征求意见稿）》向社会公开征求意见。意见反馈截止时间为2025年10月12日。 征求意见稿提出，个人信息保护监督委员会是指由大型网络平台服务提供者成立的，主要由外部成员组 成的，对大型网络平台个人信息保护情况进行监督的独立机构。外部成员是指具备个人信息保护专业知 识和技能，不在受聘大型网络平台担任除监督委员会成员外的其他职务的人员。 ...

Macro Dynamics - The 14th China-UK Economic and Trade Joint Committee meeting was successfully held, co-chaired by Chinese Minister of Commerce Wang Wentao and UK Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch, focusing on trade, investment, and multilateral cooperation [2][3] - Wang Wentao emphasized the importance of economic cooperation as a stabilizing factor in China-UK relations, highlighting the significant bilateral trade scale and investment opportunities [2] - Both parties agreed to enhance cooperation in various sectors, including new energy, pharmaceuticals, advanced manufacturing, and finance, and signed memorandums for establishing working groups on trade remedies and WTO cooperation [3] Financial Institutions - The Ministry of Finance announced the issuance of 500 billion yuan in special government bonds this year, expected to leverage approximately 6 trillion yuan in credit [4][5] - The issuance aims to inject capital into large commercial banks, aligning fiscal and monetary policies for better economic outcomes [5] Market Data - In August, the weighted average interest rate for new corporate loans remained at a historical low of approximately 3.1%, down about 40 basis points year-on-year [10] Company Dynamics - Chery Jaguar Land Rover announced a recall of over 100,000 domestic vehicles, including 37,492 units of the 2020 Land Rover Discovery Sport and Range Rover Evoque, and 64,731 units of the 2020-2023 Jaguar XEL and XFL models [15] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission is taking serious action against Beijing Orient Technology Co., Ltd. for significant financial fraud, proposing fines totaling 2.29 billion yuan and initiating delisting procedures [16][17] - Zhu Yan has been approved to serve as the chairman of Beijing Hyundai Automotive Finance Co., Ltd., with a requirement to comply with regulatory standards [18]

(本文来自第一财经) 为指导规范大型网络平台设立、运行个人信息保护监督委员会，对个人信息保护情况进行监督，保护个 人信息权益，根据《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》、《网络数据安全管理条例》等法律、行政法 规，国家互联网信息办公室起草了《大型网络平台设立个人信息保护监督委员会规定（征求意见 稿）》，现向社会公开征求意见。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of cybersecurity in the digital age, highlighting the need for a robust legal framework to protect against various cyber threats and ensure the safety of critical information infrastructure [3][12]. Legal Framework - The "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China" was enacted on June 1, 2017, as the first comprehensive law regulating cybersecurity management in China [5]. - The "Regulations on the Security Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure" came into effect on September 1, 2021, focusing on the protection of critical information infrastructure [6]. - The "Data Security Law" was implemented on September 1, 2021, serving as a foundational law in the data sector [7]. - The "Personal Information Protection Law" took effect on November 1, 2021, aimed at protecting personal information rights and regulating data processing activities [9]. - The "Generative Artificial Intelligence Service Management Interim Measures" were approved on May 23, 2023, to regulate the development and application of generative AI services [11]. Critical Information Infrastructure - Critical information infrastructure includes essential sectors such as energy, transportation, water resources, finance, and national defense, where damage or data breaches could severely threaten national security and public interest [15]. - The identification of critical information infrastructure is managed by relevant supervisory departments, which develop rules based on industry-specific conditions [16]. Cybersecurity Incidents - Notable cybersecurity incidents include the 2015 Ukraine power grid attack, the 2016 Dyn DNS attack, and the 2021 Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack, all of which highlight the vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure [19]. Security Measures - The "Regulations on the Security Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure" aim to establish a national security protection system, ensuring the safety of critical infrastructure [20]. - Key measures include comprehensive coordination, defined responsibilities, proactive defense, and continuous monitoring and assessment of cybersecurity risks [20]. Data Security - Data security threats encompass data theft, loss, and unauthorized use, necessitating strict data handling protocols [23]. - The "Data Security Law" categorizes data into general, important, and core data levels based on the potential harm from breaches [25]. Cyber Fraud - Cyber fraud techniques include phishing emails, investment scams, and AI-based scams, which exploit personal information and trust to deceive victims [30][32]. - Preventive measures include safeguarding personal information, verifying requests through multiple channels, and using secure platforms for transactions [30]. Collective Responsibility - Cybersecurity is portrayed as a collective mission, requiring collaboration across society to build a secure digital environment [34].

个人信息保护监督委员会成员人数应与大型网络平台业务规模、用户数量等相匹配，一般不得少于7 人。 据"网信中国"微信公众号消息，为指导规范大型网络平台设立、运行个人信息保护监督委员会，对个人 信息保护情况进行监督，保护个人信息权益，根据《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》、《网络数据安 全管理条例》等法律、行政法规，国家互联网信息办公室起草了《大型网络平台设立个人信息保护监督 委员会规定(征求意见稿)》，现向社会公开征求意见。详情如下： 大型网络平台设立个人信息保护监督委员会规定 （征求意见稿） 第一条为指导规范大型网络平台设立、运行个人信息保护监督委员会，对个人信息保护情况进行监督， 促进大型网络平台个人信息保护合规水平提升，保护个人信息权益，根据《中华人民共和国个人信息保 护法》、《网络数据安全管理条例》等法律、行政法规和国家有关规定，制定本规定。 第二条中华人民共和国境内提供重要互联网平台服务、用户数量巨大、业务类型复杂的个人信息处理者 （以下称为大型网络平台服务提供者）设立、运行个人信息保护监督委员会，适用本规定。 本规定所称个人信息保护监督委员会，是指由大型网络平台服务提供者成立的，主要由外部成员组成 的 ...

1.登录中国网信网（www.cac.gov.cn），进入首页"网信要闻"查看文稿。 2.通过电子邮件方式将意见发送至：shujuju@cac.gov.cn。 央视网消息：9月12日，国家互联网信息办公室发布关于《大型网络平台设立个人信息保护监督委 员会规定（征求意见稿）》公开征求意见的通知。通知如下： 为指导规范大型网络平台设立、运行个人信息保护监督委员会，对个人信息保护情况进行监督，保 护个人信息权益，根据《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》《网络数据安全管理条例》等法律、行政法 规，国家互联网信息办公室起草了《大型网络平台设立个人信息保护监督委员会规定（征求意见 稿）》，现向社会公开征求意见。公众可以通过以下途径和方式提出反馈意见： 3.通过信函方式将意见寄至：北京市海淀区阜成路15号国家互联网信息办公室网络数据管理局，邮 编100048，并在信封上注明"大型网络平台设立个人信息保护监督委员会规定征求意见"。 意见反馈截止时间为2025年10月12日。 大型网络平台设立个人信息保护监督委员会规定 （征求意见稿） 第一条 为指导规范大型网络平台设立、运行个人信息保护监督委员会，对个人信息保护情况进行监 督，促进 ...

人民财讯9月12日电，国家互联网信息办公室起草了《大型网络平台设立个人信息保护监督委员会规定 （征求意见稿）》，现向社会公开征求意见。征求意见稿提出，个人信息保护监督委员会（以下称为监 督委员会）成员人数应与大型网络平台业务规模、用户数量等相匹配，一般不得少于7人，外部成员占 比不低于三分之二。大型网络平台服务提供者组织提名外部成员时，应当充分了解被提名人职业、学 历、职称、工作经历、兼职情况、有无违法犯罪和重大失信记录等，并对其符合独立性和担任外部成员 的其他条件提出意见。被提名人应当就其符合独立性和担任外部成员的其他条件作出说明。被提名人同 时受聘的大型网络平台不得超过三家。外部成员聘任决定应当由大型网络平台服务提供者董事会等决策 机构或其授权的董事长、执行董事等高级管理人员作出。 ...

海南：28款App违法违规收集使用个人信息被责令限期整改 中新网海口9月11日电 (记者 张茜翼)海南省互联网信息办公室11日举办新闻通气会介绍，2025年第三季 度，该办对移动应用程序违法违规收集使用个人信息等突出问题进行集中采集检测，结果显示28款App 均存在不同程度的违法违规收集使用个人信息行为。当前，海南省网信办集中向社会通报并责令相关运 营单位限期整改。 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：郭晋嘉 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 据介绍，海南省互联网信息办公室结合"清朗·2025年暑期未成年人网络环境整治"工作，紧密关注未成 年人使用频次较高的网络游戏、实用工具类、学习教育类等领域移动应用程序进行专项巡查，结果显示 猫咪冒险、钱途满满、生存战争沙盒、恐怖奶奶：迷雾、荒野冒险3D、甜瓜游乐场沙盒、好事连连、 天降黄金、福运亨通、年富一年、公主日记、美好生活模拟、天生有财、财运大富翁、天降恒财、百万 金曲、AI ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released its first specialized guiding cases on data rights protection, addressing societal concerns regarding data ownership, utilization of data products, personal information protection, and the delivery of online platform accounts [1][8]. Group 1: Data Rights and Legal Cases - The number of data-related cases in courts has significantly increased, with the number of first-instance cases in 2024 being double that of 2021 [1]. - The guiding cases aim to unify the adjudication standards for similar cases, reflecting the complexity and legal challenges associated with data-related disputes [1][8]. Group 2: Personal Information Protection - A case involving an APP operator was highlighted, where the operator was found to have excessively collected personal information without consent, leading to a ruling in favor of the plaintiff [2]. - The court ruled that the APP's requirement for users to provide extensive personal information without an option to skip or refuse constituted an infringement of personal information rights [2]. Group 3: Data Utilization and Business Competition - The court confirmed that data processing entities have the right to utilize data they lawfully collect, as long as it does not infringe on the rights of other businesses [8]. - A case of unfair competition was noted, where one APP operator was found to have copied a significant number of short videos from another operator, leading to a ruling against the infringing party [6]. Group 4: Regulatory Framework and Future Implications - The guiding cases are part of the implementation of the "Data Twenty Articles," which aim to establish a foundational system for data rights and promote the lawful and effective use of data [8]. - The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of protecting data processors' rights to ensure the free flow of data and support the healthy development of the digital economy [9].

Core Viewpoint - The National Cybersecurity Incident Response Center has identified 69 mobile applications that illegally collect and use personal information, including Datong Securities and Xinda Futures [1] Group 1: Violations by Datong Securities - Datong Securities failed to clearly list the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection in its privacy policy, including third-party involvement [2] - The company did not inform users about the recipients of their personal information, nor did it obtain explicit consent for sharing this information with third parties [2][3] Group 2: Violations by Xinda Futures - Similar to Datong Securities, Xinda Futures also did not adequately disclose the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection in its privacy policy [3] Group 3: Legal Framework - The violations are in accordance with the Cybersecurity Law and the Personal Information Protection Law, as well as the announcement regarding the 2025 personal information protection initiative [4] Group 4: Specific Violations Identified - 24 applications failed to provide clear prompts for users to read privacy policies upon first use [4] - 31 applications did not list the purposes and methods of personal information collection in their privacy policies [5] - 17 applications shared personal information with third parties without user consent [7] - 3 applications began collecting personal information without user consent [8] - 41 applications did not implement adequate security measures for personal information [11] - 3 applications lacked a privacy policy altogether [12]