Core Viewpoint - Unilumin Technology has issued a stern statement regarding the crackdown on counterfeit use of its trademarks, emphasizing the legal implications of unauthorized use of its registered trademarks [1] Trademark Protection - The trademarks "Unilumin" and "洲明" are registered and recognized brands in the LED industry [1] - Unauthorized actions include manufacturing, selling, promising to sell, importing, purchasing, or using products bearing the company's trademarks without prior written authorization [1] - The company warns that such violations may constitute a criminal offense and will take legal action against any entities or individuals involved [1] Legal Consequences - The company will pursue legal responsibility for serious infringements that include impersonating authorized distributors in dealings with customers or forging trademark authorization documents [1] - The statement highlights the seriousness of these violations and the company's commitment to protecting its intellectual property rights [1]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing OLED trade secret dispute between Samsung and BOE has escalated, with the ITC preliminarily ruling in favor of Samsung, indicating that BOE infringed on Samsung's trade secrets and violated unfair trade practices under Section 337 of the Tariff Act [1][2] Group 1: Legal Developments - Samsung Display filed a lawsuit against BOE for OLED technology infringement, leading to a preliminary ruling by the ITC that BOE and its affiliates violated trade secrets [1] - The ITC plans to issue a "limited exclusion order" to prevent the infringing products from entering the U.S. market and a "cease and desist order" to halt the use and production of these products [1] - BOE has expressed intentions to appeal the ITC's preliminary ruling and has previously been found not in violation of Section 337 in a separate patent investigation [1] Group 2: Competitive Landscape - The relationship between Samsung and BOE has deteriorated due to increased collaboration between BOE and Apple, leading to Samsung's removal of BOE from its supplier list [2][3] - Both companies have engaged in a series of lawsuits against each other, with BOE filing a patent infringement lawsuit against Samsung in China, and Samsung counter-suing in the U.S. [3][4] Group 3: Market Position and Growth - BOE has significantly increased its market share in the semiconductor display sector, achieving a 25.2% share in the LCD market and a 15.7% share in the OLED market, making it the second-largest globally [6][8] - In the first half of 2023, BOE led the smartphone panel market with a 28.0% share, while Samsung held a 15% share in OLED smartphone panels [8] - By 2024, BOE is projected to maintain its leadership in the global smartphone OLED display market, with an expected shipment of approximately 5.7 billion units, surpassing Samsung's 3.7 billion units [8][9] Group 4: Future Outlook - The competition between Samsung and BOE is expected to intensify as BOE secures a primary supply position for Apple's iPhone 16e series, supplying over 15 million OLED displays [10] - The ongoing legal battles and market competition reflect a broader trend of technological advancement in the semiconductor display industry, with Chinese companies pushing for innovation and market share [10]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing frequency of intellectual property theft in the global semiconductor industry, highlighting significant legal cases involving companies like Huawei and TSMC, and the implications for innovation and competition in the tech sector [2][3][19]. Group 1: Legal Cases and Their Implications - In mid-2025, a landmark ruling by the Shanghai Third Intermediate Court sentenced 14 individuals from Zunpai Technology for stealing Huawei's chip intellectual property, with total fines amounting to 13.5 million yuan and nearly 100 million yuan in company funds frozen [2]. - Concurrently, TSMC filed a lawsuit against a former employee for leaking over 400 confidential 2nm process technologies to Tokyo Electron and Rapidus, indicating a broader trend of IP theft in the semiconductor sector [2][3]. - The frequency of patent infringement lawsuits in the semiconductor field reached 193 in Q4 2024, with 26 cases involving companies from mainland China, reflecting a shift in the landscape of IP disputes as China's semiconductor industry rises [3]. Group 2: Zunpai Technology's Case Study - Zunpai Technology's rise in the Wi-Fi 6 chip sector was marred by illegal practices, including systematic poaching of Huawei employees and blatant IP theft, which ultimately led to its downfall [6][7]. - The founder, Zhang Kun, previously a senior technical director at Huawei, orchestrated a talent acquisition strategy that resulted in over 60% of Zunpai's initial team being former Huawei employees, raising legal and ethical concerns [8][9]. - Judicial findings revealed that 40 technical points in Zunpai's technology had over 90% similarity to Huawei's trade secrets, a level of overlap deemed extraordinary in the semiconductor industry [9][10]. Group 3: Industry-Wide Trends and Consequences - The article highlights that the trend of IP theft is not limited to the semiconductor industry but is prevalent across various tech sectors, including autonomous driving and AI, where companies often resort to poaching talent and stealing technology to accelerate their market entry [14][15]. - The allure of quick success in high-stakes industries leads some companies to bypass traditional R&D processes, opting instead for shortcuts that undermine innovation and ethical standards [16][17]. - The Zunpai case serves as a critical example of the need for robust legal frameworks to deter IP theft and protect the integrity of innovation within the tech industry [19][25]. Group 4: Legal and Regulatory Developments - Huawei's extensive investment in R&D, amounting to 179.7 billion yuan in 2024, underscores the importance of a strong IP protection system, which has been pivotal in safeguarding its innovations [20][21]. - The court's ruling in the Zunpai case is significant for its deterrent effect, with 14 individuals receiving prison sentences, a departure from the typical outcomes of similar cases that often result in mere financial penalties [22][23]. - The innovative approach to loss assessment in this case, which considered R&D costs and expected returns rather than just direct losses, marks a shift in how IP infringement is evaluated legally [23].

Core Points - Hangzhou Xingshuai Electric Co., Ltd. has recently obtained several patents from the National Intellectual Property Administration, including an invention patent and two utility model patents [1] - The patents include a height for heating wire in thermal protectors, a measurement device and method for maximum load current in thermal protectors, and a device for assembling core components [1] - The acquisition of these patents is not expected to have a significant impact on the company's recent production and operations, but it will enhance the company's intellectual property protection system and maintain its technological leadership [1] Patent Details - Patent Type: Invention Patent; Patent Name: Height for Heating Wire in Thermal Protectors; Patent Number: ZL202211267031.4; Application Date: October 17, 2022; Validity: 20 years; Certificate Number: 8151529; Patent Holder: Xingshuai [1] - Patent Type: Utility Model; Patent Name: Measurement Device and Method for Maximum Load Current in Thermal Protectors; Patent Number: ZL202421503489.X; Application Date: June 27, 2024; Validity: 10 years; Certificate Number: 23197565; Patent Holder: Xingshuai [1] - Patent Type: Utility Model; Patent Name: Device for Assembling Core Components in Heavy Hammer Starting Thermal Protectors; Patent Number: ZL202422262612.X; Application Date: September 13, 2024; Validity: 10 years; Certificate Number: 23197514; Patent Holder: Xingshuai [1]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal battles initiated by Corning Inc. against leading Chinese display companies represent a significant confrontation in the global display industry, particularly focusing on the glass substrate market, which is crucial for the entire display supply chain [2][4][10]. Group 1: Industry Overview - China's display panel output accounts for approximately half of the global market, with over 70% of shipments originating from the country [3]. - The Chinese display industry has invested over 1.5 trillion yuan, establishing more than 60 production lines with an annual capacity of about 250 million square meters, making it the largest display industry hub globally [3][16]. - Despite this growth, around 90% of the glass substrate market is dominated by Corning and two Japanese companies, with only Rainbow Optoelectronics recently breaking through the 8.5-generation production line technology [3][11]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Investigations - Corning has initiated multiple "337 investigations" against Chinese companies, including Rainbow Optoelectronics, TCL Huaxing, and others, alleging patent and trade secret infringements related to glass substrates [5][6][10]. - The "337 investigation" process is critical, involving evidence disclosure and hearings, which can significantly impact the outcomes of these legal disputes [2][8]. - As of mid-August 2025, Corning has filed a total of 13 lawsuits against Rainbow Optoelectronics across various regions, including the U.S., EU, and India, focusing on patent and intellectual property issues [2][7]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Implications - The glass substrate is a foundational material in the display supply chain, and the ongoing patent disputes are pivotal for the future of the Chinese display industry [4][14]. - Corning's dominance in the glass substrate market, holding over 50% market share, poses a significant threat to Chinese companies that are beginning to gain market share [10][19]. - The legal actions taken by Corning are seen as attempts to limit the production capacity of Chinese firms, thereby maintaining its market position and preventing price reductions in glass substrates [11][12]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The outcome of these legal battles will have profound implications for the Chinese display industry's ability to secure its supply chain and maintain competitive pricing [11][12]. - Experts emphasize the need for China to develop its own intellectual property in the glass substrate sector to ensure the industry's long-term sustainability and independence [17][18].

Core Viewpoint - The KK Group is suing Miniso and its affiliates for trademark infringement and unfair competition regarding its brand "THE COLORIST," with the trial set for September 1, which could significantly impact intellectual property protection in the beauty retail industry [2][3]. Company Dynamics - KK Group, established in 2015, operates multiple brands including "THE COLORIST," "KKV," and X11, and has expanded to over 1,000 stores across more than 200 cities globally, including locations in Singapore, Thailand, and Malaysia [7]. - The company has been actively pursuing legal actions against trademark infringement since 2019, achieving partial victories in previous cases [3][6]. - KK Group has submitted its IPO application to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange four times since November 2021, with the latest application now expired, but the company states that the IPO process is progressing as planned [7]. Industry Overview - The beauty retail sector in China has seen explosive growth, with the market size reaching 130 billion yuan in 2021 and projected to exceed 400 billion yuan by 2025 [5]. - The rapid expansion has led to increased competition and a rise in trademark disputes due to the high degree of similarity among brands, making it difficult for consumers to distinguish between them [5][6]. - The industry has experienced a slowdown in growth, with many brands closing stores or exiting the market, including the closure of 18 stores by Sa Sa International in mainland China by June 2025 [6].

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen Blue Ocean Huateng Technology Co., Ltd. has recently received two invention patents from the National Intellectual Property Administration of the People's Republic of China, which will enhance the company's intellectual property protection and strengthen its technological leadership in the industry [1][2]. Group 1: Patent Details - The first patent is titled "Current Zero Position Determination Method, Device and Storage Medium," with patent number ZL202011336146.5, applied on November 25, 2020. This invention relates to motor control technology and provides a method to accurately determine the zero position of three-phase motor currents [1]. - The second patent is titled "Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Control Method and Device," with patent number ZL202011375799.4, applied on November 30, 2020. This method allows for the determination of rotor position and speed without the need for physical rotor position sensors, enabling stable and reliable operation of permanent magnet synchronous motors across their full speed range [2]. Group 2: Impact on Company - The acquisition of these patents is not expected to have a significant immediate impact on the company's production and operations. However, it is beneficial for the company to further enhance its intellectual property protection system and consolidate its leading technological advantages [2]. - The continuous innovation mechanism driven by these patents is anticipated to improve the company's core competitiveness in the market [2].

Core Viewpoint - The company Yi Tang Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against Applied Materials, Inc. for allegedly illegally obtaining and using its core technology related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, which constitutes a violation of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China [1][4][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit amount is set at RMB 99.99 million, which includes punitive damages calculated at three times the standard compensation [4][7]. - The lawsuit is based on the claim that Applied Materials unlawfully acquired and disclosed Yi Tang's trade secrets by submitting a patent application in China, naming two former employees of Yi Tang as the main inventors [1][4]. - The case has been accepted by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court but has not yet gone to trial [5][7]. Group 2: Company Background and Financial Performance - Yi Tang was established at the end of 2015 and went public on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Sci-Tech Innovation Board in July 2023, focusing on semiconductor equipment [7]. - The company reported impressive financial performance, with revenues of RMB 4.763 billion, RMB 3.931 billion, and RMB 4.633 billion for the years 2022 to 2024, and a compound annual growth rate of 18.9% in net profit [7]. - For the first half of 2025, Yi Tang expects revenue between RMB 2.3 billion and RMB 2.5 billion, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 10.06% to 19.63%, with net profit projected between RMB 308 million and RMB 340 million, indicating a growth of 24.19% to 37.09% [7].

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by Yitang Co., Ltd. against Applied Materials Inc. (AMAT) is aimed at protecting intellectual property rights and addressing the alleged illegal acquisition and use of core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment [2][5][7]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Yitang Co., Ltd. has initiated legal proceedings against AMAT for allegedly obtaining and using its core technology secrets without authorization, which were subsequently disclosed through a patent application in China [2][5]. - The company is seeking a court order to stop AMAT from using its technology secrets and is claiming economic damages totaling 99.99 million yuan [2][5]. Group 2: Technology and Innovation - The technology in question involves high-concentration, stable, and uniform plasma used for wafer surface treatment, which is critical for various semiconductor processing equipment [5]. - Yitang Co., Ltd. claims to possess leading original technology capabilities in this field and has relevant trade secrets [5]. Group 3: Employee Recruitment and Confidentiality - AMAT allegedly recruited two employees from Yitang's subsidiary, Mattson Technology, Inc. (MTI), who had access to the core technology secrets and had signed confidentiality agreements [5][7]. - Evidence suggests that after their recruitment, these employees contributed to a patent application that disclosed the technology secrets shared between Yitang and MTI [5][7]. Group 4: Impact on Business - The lawsuit is positioned as a measure to protect the company's intellectual property and is not expected to have a significant adverse impact on its operations, with the final outcome dependent on the court's ruling [5]. - The alleged actions of AMAT are said to have caused serious damage to Yitang's intellectual property and economic interests, including promoting and selling products using the disputed technology in China [7]. Group 5: Industry Context - Applied Materials Inc. is a major player in the semiconductor equipment industry, with 2024 revenues projected to exceed $25 billion, making it the second-largest supplier globally, following ASML [7].

Core Viewpoint - The importance of intellectual property (IP) protection in driving innovation and enhancing new productivity is emphasized, highlighting its dual role as a shield for innovation and a guide for technological advancement [2][3]. Group 1: Intellectual Property Statistics - As of June this year, Jiangsu Province has 671,900 effective invention patents, with a per capita ownership of 78.81 patents, maintaining the top position in the country for nine consecutive years [2]. - In the first half of the year, enterprise patent authorization accounted for 89.82% of the total authorization in the province, exceeding the national average by 15.42 percentage points [2]. - The province's "1650" modern industrial system saw 34,300 invention patents authorized, ranking third nationally, with leading positions in high-end textiles, semiconductors, and high-end equipment [2]. Group 2: Role of Intellectual Property in Innovation - Intellectual property serves as a "shield" to incentivize innovation and a "navigator" to guide technological development, providing both institutional and technical support for new productivity [2][3]. - The patent system allows innovators to recover costs and gain economic benefits through exclusive rights for a limited time, encouraging investment in research and development [3]. - Utilizing patent literature can shorten research cycles by 60% and save 40% of research funding, highlighting its role in enhancing innovation efficiency [3]. Group 3: Technology Transfer and Financial Leverage - Intellectual property acts as a bridge for technology transfer and a lever for funding, playing a crucial role in the integration of technological and industrial innovation [4]. - The Jiangsu Provincial Intellectual Property Office has initiated actions to revitalize patents held by universities and research institutions, facilitating the conversion and industrialization of patented technologies [4]. - The establishment of a comprehensive financial ecosystem for intellectual property aims to enhance the conversion of intellectual property into assets for enterprises [4]. Group 4: Addressing Competitive Challenges - The shift from price competition to patent competition in strategic emerging industries is noted, with efforts to enhance awareness and capabilities in intellectual property management among startups [5]. - The provincial intellectual property office supports leading enterprises in exploring new technologies and services to build competitive advantages, steering the industry towards high-quality development [5]. Group 5: Rapid Protection System - Jiangsu has established a "1+13+N" rapid collaborative protection system for intellectual property, significantly reducing patent authorization times [6]. - The average authorization period for invention patents has been shortened from 22 months to 3 months, and for utility model patents from 12 months to 6 months [6]. - The provincial protection centers are expected to handle over 10,000 intellectual property cases in 2024, with an average processing time of less than 2 weeks [6]. Group 6: International Intellectual Property Protection - Jiangsu Province has over 7,000 enterprises holding international patents, with efforts to strengthen overseas intellectual property protection through various support networks [7]. - The provincial intellectual property office collaborates with local courts to enhance the handling of complex technical cases, improving the efficiency of enforcement [7]. Group 7: Ongoing Challenges and Initiatives - Challenges in the intellectual property protection system, enforcement, and coordination are acknowledged, prompting the launch of the "Ten Actions for Enhancing Intellectual Property Protection" [8]. - These actions aim to create a fair, just, and efficient environment for intellectual property, supporting innovation and development [8].