信息披露违规
Search documents
“客药第一股”突遭立案, 嘉应制药被指关联交易信披违规
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-05-29 13:42
Core Viewpoint - Guangdong Jiaying Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is under investigation by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, leading to a significant drop in its stock price following the announcement of the investigation [1][2]. Group 1: Company Background - Jiaying Pharmaceutical is an established pharmaceutical company known for its research, production, and sales of traditional Chinese medicine, with key products including throat and cold medications [3]. - The company experienced a major shareholder restructuring in 2024 when Hunan Yantianhe Pharmacy acquired 7% of Jiaying's shares for a total of 355 million yuan [1]. Group 2: Recent Developments - The company faced regulatory scrutiny after its independent director, Li Shanwei, was found to have violated disclosure regulations by selling shares during a sensitive period without proper notice [2]. - Jiaying disclosed that it had engaged in non-compliant related party transactions, with a total of approximately 235 million yuan transferred to related parties, including 170 million yuan to a subsidiary of Yantianhe [2][3]. - In the fourth quarter of 2024, Jiaying reported a revenue decline of 25.3%, with total annual revenue falling to 376 million yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 29.46% [3].
公司快评|信披违规被立案,股价大跌,嘉应制药如何赢回市场信任
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-05-29 04:42
此外,独立董事李善伟的违规行为也令人咋舌。2024年12月,李善伟因隐瞒持股信息并在内幕信息敏感 期违规减持股票,被广东证监局采取责令购回违规减持股份的行政监管措施。其行为严重违反了信息披 露相关规定,损害了市场的公平性和投资者的利益。 嘉应制药此前还出现了多名高管职务异动,无疑给公司带来了更大的不确定性。 关联交易不规范是嘉应制药的一大问题。2024年第四季度,公司与养天和大药房股份有限公司及其关联 公司发生多笔关联交易,涉及金额高达1039.94万元,却未及时履行审议程序和披露,直至2025年4月才 补充披露。这种不规范操作严重损害了信息披露的及时性和准确性,让投资者难以及时了解公司的真实 经营状况。 资金管理漏洞同样严重。2024年9月至2025年1月期间,嘉应制药被关联方湖南药聚能医药有限公司非经 营性占用资金2.35亿元,且通过"月初转出、月末前转回"的方式粉饰痕迹,直至2025年1月23日才全部 归还。这种行为不仅违反了资金管理规定,也暴露了公司内部治理的混乱。 每经评论员 杜宇 5月28日晚间,嘉应制药(SZ002198,前收盘价:6.70元,市值:34亿元)公告因涉嫌信息披露违法违 规被证监会 ...
金花股份董事长再遭立案背后:主业造血枯竭,净利润被非经常性损益“操控”
Hua Xia Shi Bao· 2025-05-28 00:20
Core Viewpoint - Jin Hua Co., Ltd. is facing unprecedented challenges due to the investigation of its chairman, Xing Yajiang, for violations related to stock disclosure, which has raised concerns about the company's governance and operational stability [3][4][5]. Group 1: Governance Issues - Xing Yajiang has been investigated twice within six months for information disclosure violations, indicating systemic governance flaws within the company [5][6]. - The company has reported over 20 instances of disciplinary violations from 2020 to 2025, highlighting ongoing compliance issues [5]. - The chairman's repeated legal troubles may damage investor trust and lead to stricter regulatory scrutiny, potentially resulting in administrative penalties and increased legal risks [6]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Jin Hua Co., Ltd. has exhibited significant fluctuations in its financial performance, with net profits alternating between gains and losses from 2020 to 2024, reflecting a lack of stable revenue generation capabilities [7][10]. - In 2024, the company reported a revenue of 585.46 million yuan, a 3.55% increase year-on-year, and a net profit of 74.61 million yuan, marking a return to profitability [9]. - The profit increase was largely driven by asset disposal gains, specifically the sale of a hotel, which contributed 34.33 million yuan to net profit, masking the underlying issues in core business performance [7][8]. Group 3: Recent Trends - In the first quarter of 2025, the company experienced a revenue decline of 7.31% year-on-year, with net profit dropping by 94.93%, indicating ongoing struggles despite a 151.79% increase in net profit after excluding non-recurring items [13][14]. - The core pharmaceutical business showed a slight revenue increase of 4.43%, primarily driven by a 9.11% growth in orthopedic products, while the hotel segment saw a drastic revenue drop due to the earlier asset disposal [14].
金花股份董事长再被处罚并立案,曾多次因信披违规被警示
Bei Ke Cai Jing· 2025-05-26 13:17
中国证监会陕西监管局认为,邢雅江的上述行为涉嫌违反《中华人民共和国证券法》第七十八条第一款 规定,构成《中华人民共和国证券法》第一百九十七条第一款所述的"信息披露义务人未按照本法规定 报送有关报告或者履行信息披露义务"的行为,对邢雅江给予警告,并处以350万元罚款。 中国证监会此次对邢雅江立案的原因则是涉嫌金花股份持股变动信息披露等违法违规。对此,金花股份 表示,本次立案仅针对董事长个人,不会对公司日常生产经营活动产生影响,目前,公司日常经营运作 正常。 这不是邢雅江第一次被中国证监会立案,去年12月21日,金花股份就曾公告,公司董事长邢雅江收到中 国证监会下发的《立案告知书》,遭立案的原因同样为涉嫌信息披露违法违规。 去年靠处置子公司扭亏 金花企业(集团)股份有限公司(简称:"金花股份")董事长邢雅江近日收到中国证监会陕西监管局 《行政处罚事先告知书》。因涉嫌信披违规,中国证监会陕西监管局对邢雅江给予警告,并处以350万 元罚款。同日,中国证监会决定对邢雅江进行立案,原因也是信披违规。 董事长再次被证监会立案 公告显示,邢雅江因涉嫌犯罪于2024年4月至7月被公安机关采取取保候审,作为公司董事长,未及时将 ...
未披露与宜宾听花关联关系,*ST春天收到青海证监局警示函
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-05-23 11:57
Core Viewpoint - *ST Chuntian received a warning letter from the Qinghai Securities Regulatory Bureau for failing to disclose its relationship with Yibin Tinghua and related transactions, violating information disclosure regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The company was ordered to correct its actions due to non-disclosure of its relationship with Yibin Tinghua Wine Industry Development Co., Ltd. and related transactions [1][2]. - Four senior executives, including Chairman Zhang Xuefeng and actual controller Xiao Rong, received warning letters for their roles in the violations [1][2]. Group 2: Relationship with Yibin Tinghua - Yibin Tinghua is identified as a related entity to *ST Chuntian, as it is the producer of the company's alcoholic products, and the company has made advance payments to Yibin Tinghua for product procurement [2]. - The company failed to disclose the related party transactions and did not follow the necessary approval procedures, violating multiple provisions of the Information Disclosure Management Measures [2]. Group 3: Previous Concerns and Responses - There were previous concerns regarding potential benefit transfers to Yibin Tinghua, which the company denied in a response to the Shanghai Stock Exchange [4]. - The company stated that its collaboration with Yibin Tinghua was based on resource complementarity within the industry chain, and it emphasized that the advance payments were reasonable and related to its main business operations [5].
华纺股份及董事长盛守祥等人因未按规定披露年报预告被警示
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-23 09:26
处 5月23日,华纺股份(证券代码:600448)发布公告,宣布公司及相关责任人收到中国证券监督管理委员会山东监管局出具的警示函。警示函指出,华纺股 份在2024年年度报告中未按规定披露年度业绩预告,违反了《上市公司信息披露管理办法》的相关规定。公司董事长盛守祥、总经理闫英山、财务负责人刘 水超及董事会秘书丁泽涛对此违规行为承担主要责任。 在业绩方面,公司2022年至2024年营业收入分别为34.89亿元、27.98亿元和29.34亿元,同比分别增长-3.66%、-19.81%和4.89%。归母净利润分别为-8580.81 万元、944.07万元和-5551.55万元,归母净利润同比增长分别为-49.82%、111.00%和-688.05%。同期,公司资产负债率分别为66.10%、63.94%和66.94%。 山东证监局决定对华纺股份及上述责任人采取出具警示函的行政监管措施,并要求公司在收到决定书之日起30日内提交书面报告。公司表示将严格按照山东 证监局的要求,深刻反思并吸取教训,加强法律法规的学习,提高信息披露质量,并确保在规定期限内提交书面报告。此次行政监管措施不会影响公司正常 的生产经营活动。 在风险方 ...
华瑞股份(300626.SZ)收到宁波证监局行政监管措施决定书
智通财经网· 2025-05-23 09:03
Core Points - The company received regulatory measures from the Ningbo Securities Regulatory Bureau regarding inaccurate disclosures related to shareholding [1][2] - The original controlling shareholder, Sun Ruiliang, was found to have improperly issued a shareholding certificate for 3 million shares to Chen Genhui, which later increased to 5.4 million shares after a capital reserve conversion [1] - As of February 24, 2025, 1.8 million shares were still held in trust by Sun Ruiliang, leading to discrepancies in the company's IPO prospectus and periodic reports since its listing [1] Regulatory Actions - The Ningbo Securities Regulatory Bureau decided to impose corrective measures on the company and record this in the securities and futures market integrity archive [2] - The actions were based on violations of multiple regulations, including the Measures for the Administration of Initial Public Offerings and Listings and the Measures for the Administration of Information Disclosure by Listed Companies [1][2]
董事长指示代理商隐匿排名?汉仪股份回应“未达披露标准”
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-05-22 12:50
Core Viewpoint - The relationship between Han Yi Co., Ltd. and its agent Shanghai Lu Men has come to light due to a lawsuit, revealing issues in the company's business model and governance [1] Group 1: Company Background - Han Yi Co., Ltd. was established in 1993 and is a leading company in the font design industry in China, having launched on the Growth Enterprise Market in August 2022 as the first font library listed company in A-shares [2] - The company's revenue from font software licensing accounted for over half of its income, with 2019 figures showing 123 million yuan from this segment, representing 58.02% of its main business revenue [5] Group 2: Legal Issues and Governance - A court ruling revealed that former sales director Xu Jiangang set up a company with his extramarital partner to act as an agent for Han Yi's font library, leading to allegations of misconduct and regulatory violations [1][9] - Han Yi's chairman, Xie Li Qun, allegedly instructed Xu to manipulate the ranking of the agent's business to avoid scrutiny during the IPO process, which could constitute a violation of securities laws [9][10] - The company did not disclose the relationship with Shanghai Lu Men in its IPO prospectus, which may represent a significant omission and could lead to administrative penalties [9][10] Group 3: Financial Implications - In 2019, Han Yi's total main business revenue was 212 million yuan, with over 93 million yuan coming from font licensing services, indicating a reliance on external agents for revenue generation [15][16] - The company faced a lawsuit from Shanghai Lu Men for overdue payments and damages, with the court ruling in favor of the agent, which Han Yi is appealing [15][20] Group 4: Regulatory Scrutiny - Regulatory bodies, including the Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, have inquired about the relationship between Han Yi, Xu Jiangang, and the individual service providers, highlighting concerns over compliance and disclosure practices [20][22] - Han Yi claims that it was unaware of the hidden relationships until the lawsuit emerged, raising questions about its internal controls and governance practices [20][22]
富创精密财务总监离职 叠加业绩疲弱与信披违规带来股价压力
Xin Lang Zheng Quan· 2025-05-22 10:31
Core Viewpoint - The resignation of CFO Cui Jing from Fuchuang Precision poses challenges for the company's financial management and strategic planning, raising concerns about the stability of its financial team [1][2]. Financial Performance - In Q1 2025, Fuchuang Precision reported a revenue of 762 million yuan, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 8.62%, but incurred a net loss of 22.16 million yuan, compared to a profit of 60.43 million yuan in the same period last year [2]. - The company faced regulatory penalties for failing to disclose related party transactions, which has further pressured its stock performance [2]. Management Transition - Following Cui Jing's departure, General Manager Zhang Xuan will temporarily assume the CFO responsibilities, despite lacking financial experience, which raises concerns about the continuity of financial management [1][2]. - The company emphasizes the need to quickly appoint a suitable CFO to ensure stability in financial management and to maintain investor confidence [3]. Investor Relations - Fuchuang Precision must enhance communication with investors and provide timely updates on its operational and financial status to rebuild trust and confidence in the company's future prospects [3].
从被动信披滞后到主动对抗监管,四次被立案的*ST紫天违规升级
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-05-22 08:56
财务报告方面,2022年年报中8.97亿元预付账款存在异常,其中子公司福州缘笙科技对福建省海峡星云 信息科技有限公司的8.12亿元预付款,对方截至当年12月31日未收到;2023年年报将该款项转列存货, 但缺乏原始单据、进项税发票等凭证。2022-2023年,公司通过无实质短信发送业务、核算方式错误的 互联网广告业务、提前确认收入的"云计算服务"业务虚增营业收入。此外,公司(含子公司)涉及超3 亿元合同纠纷、民间借贷纠纷诉讼及仲裁案件,未依法及时披露。 2025年5月7日,福建紫天传媒科技股份有限公司(以下简称"*ST紫天",300280)于2025年5月6日收到 中国证券监督管理委员会(以下简称"中国证监会")下发的《立案告知书》(证监立案字0262025004 号),因公司未按规定期限披露定期报告,根据《中华人民共和国证券法》《中华人民共和国行政处罚 法》等法律法规,中国证监会决定对公司进行立案。 随后,*ST紫天于2025年2月14日收到中国证券监督管理委员会福建监管局(以下简称"福建证监局") 出具的《关于对福建紫天传媒科技股份有限公司采取责令改正措施的决定》。因公司财务会计报告存在 虚假记载,福建证 ...