近期，针对日本首相高市早苗近期错误言论，斯洛伐克和美国学者表示：一个中国原则是国际社会普遍共识，高市言论是军国主义、法西斯思想的复辟，是 对二战后国际秩序的公然挑衅。 斯洛伐克哲学家、翻译家、汉学家 黑山女士：一个中国原则是国际社会普遍共识，中华人民共和国政府是代表全中国的唯一合法政府，台湾是中国的一部 分。日本首相高市早苗如今竟然还敢说出那种话，完全是军国主义、法西斯思想的复辟，是对二战后国际秩序的公然挑衅。日本人应该比谁都清楚，他们是 世界上唯一被原子弹轰炸过的国家，更应该致力于维护和平，确保核武器永不再使用，因为这关乎全人类的生存。 三大洲社会研究所执行主任 普拉萨德：重要的是要记住，她（高市早苗）是一个极右翼政客，在极右翼有很长的历史，长期以来她都为日本在包括中国在 内的亚洲国家犯下的罪行辩护。日本需要反思自己的历史，现在一位为日本战争罪行以及日本军国主义辩护的首相却上台，在台湾问题上大放厥词，从未对 历史上日本对台湾作出的行径进行道歉或者反思。联合国应该采取行动，因为（高市的言论）违反了联合国宪章，她的表态是对一个国家的直接威胁。 ...

日本首相高市早苗近期在国会答辩时公然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，粗暴干涉中国内政，且不思悔改，拒不撤回错误言论。日本政府还频频为其错误言论强行 辩解。 非洲青年企业家协会南非负责人 伊姆拉姆：事实上（高市早苗）这样的言论是在无视二战后的相关承诺，这是令人担忧的事情。作为年轻一代，我们必须 对此保持高度关注，因为二战后国际秩序为世界带来稳定与自由，所以我们应该坚决反对任何带有军国主义色彩的或具有挑衅性的言论。我个人认为，应当 撤回相关言论。 科摩罗总统政治顾问 姆赛义迪：台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分，这是国际社会的普遍共识，并得到所有与中国建交的国家的支持。高市早苗的言论干 涉中国内政，这种干涉行为尤其是来自一个此前已就此问题作出明确承诺的国家，有可能加剧需要对话与稳定的地区的紧张局势。 南非学者 谭哲理：谈到日本在台湾问题上的行径，作为南非人，作为非洲人，我们都坚定奉行一个中国原则。 国际人士表示，这暴露了日本右翼势力的持续抬头和军国主义的阴魂不散，国际社会坚决不能允许日本军国主义死灰复燃。台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部 分，这是铁的事实，不容歪曲篡改。 白俄罗斯国民会议代表院人权、民族关系和新闻媒体委员会主席 布 ...

轻描淡写所谓涉台"立场未变""不再提及"行不通。"日本国政府承认中华人民共和国政府是中国的唯一合法政府"，《中日联合声明》"是两 国间和平友好关系的基础，联合声明所表明的各项原则应予严格遵守"，日方承诺"继续遵守日本在中日联合声明中表明的关于台湾问题的立 场，重申中国只有一个"……日本政府在中日四个政治文件中就台湾问题作出的郑重承诺，具有国际法效力，没有任何模糊、曲解的空间。 无论日本哪个党派、哪个人执政，都必须坚持和恪守。然而，高市上台不久，就狂妄叫嚣可能武力介入台海局势，公然侵害中国核心利益、 严重伤害中国人民感情。如果日方在台湾问题上的立场没有改变，就应诚实、准确、完整地讲清其所谓"一贯立场"，坦坦荡荡公开承认台湾 问题纯属中国内政，而不是像现在这样轻描淡写一笔带过，只提概念回避实质，妄图蒙混过关；或者以一句轻飘飘的"不再提及"淡化搪塞掩 盖高市早苗的严重错误言论。这种掩耳盗铃、自说自话的做法，中方绝不接受。日方如果真心想发展中日战略互惠关系，构建契合新时代要 求的建设性、稳定的中日关系，就应该恪守中日四个政治文件精神和所作政治承诺，立即收回错误言论，切实把对华承诺体现在实际行动 上，而不是倒打一耙要求 ...

11月29日，台湾联合报刊发社论《赖清德连串表态，丝毫不尊重台湾人民》，在北平锋看来，赖清德不 仅不尊重台湾人民，更急火火地配合高市早苗复活军国主义，在彻头彻尾地卖台毁台。他先向《华盛顿 邮报》投书，高调宣布要砸一兆两千五百亿新台币买美国军火，隔天才开记者会告诉台湾老百姓，我刚 决定花你们的血汗钱买武器。这不是民主，而是对台湾民意的羞辱；这不是"国防自主"，而是把台湾命 脉列入了美国军火商的订单清单。更荒唐的是，他一边说"要防2027武统"，一边又把"准备"二字悄悄抹 掉，硬生生把政治臆测变成战争倒计时，仿佛他是美军太平洋司令部的编外"作战参谋"。这种把台湾安 危当政治秀、把民众恐慌当投票筹码，早已不是简单的政治算计，而是军国主义阴魂附体，对台湾社会 最根本、最彻底的背叛。 更可悲的是，他高喊"民主"，炫耀台湾人权自由，却在岛内编织信息茧房，让民众沦为信息盲区，压迫 媒体成为他对外表演的传声筒。他不是捍卫民主，而是践踏民主。决定台湾命运前途的事先告诉外国媒 体，再回头通知岛内民众，这已经不是政治失当，是彻底的底线沦丧。他不是在守护台湾，而是出卖台 湾。 赖清德恐惧的不是战争，是失去美日依附；追求的不是和平，而 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent provocative remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked strong criticism domestically and raised concerns about Japan's historical awareness and potential shift towards militarism [1][5][7]. Group 1: Political Context - Takaichi's statements are seen as a blatant interference in China's internal affairs, reflecting a lack of historical understanding and potentially leading Japan down a dangerous path [1][5]. - The Japanese constitution, particularly Article 9, emphasizes Japan as a "non-war state" and prohibits the maintenance of military forces, which has historically allowed Japan to be viewed as a trustworthy nation by China [3][7]. Group 2: Economic Implications - Scholars warn that antagonism towards China could directly push Japan's economy into a crisis, emphasizing the need for the government to prioritize economic stability and the well-being of its citizens over military concerns [7][8]. - The potential loss of economic ties with China is highlighted as a critical risk, with warnings that Japan's economy could collapse without these relations, leading to severe consequences for the nation [8].

Core Viewpoint - Japanese citizens held protests demanding Prime Minister Kishi's retraction of controversial remarks regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a violation of Japan's pacifist constitution and a challenge to international norms [1][2] Group 1: Public Response - Thousands of Japanese citizens gathered in front of the Prime Minister's residence in Tokyo, calling for the retraction of Kishi's statements, which they believe undermine regional stability and violate Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution [1] - Protesters expressed concerns over the government's recent military spending increases and attempts to amend security regulations, emphasizing the importance of maintaining Japan's pacifist stance [1][2] Group 2: Academic and International Perspectives - Japanese economist Hironobu Maedomari criticized Kishi's remarks as contrary to Japan's peace constitution, warning that constitutional amendments could lead Japan towards a dangerous path [2] - Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov expressed concern over Kishi's statements, supporting China's stance on national interests and urging responsible behavior from U.S. allies regarding Taiwan [2] - Jeffrey Sachs, a professor at Columbia University, noted that Kishi's comments have heightened tensions between China and Japan, advocating for a cautious and peace-oriented approach in Japan's foreign policy [2]

Core Viewpoint - Recent provocative remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked strong criticism domestically and raised concerns about Japan's historical awareness and potential shift towards militarism [1][3]. Group 1: Historical Awareness and Political Implications - Takaichi's comments reflect a significant lack of historical understanding, which could lead Japan down a dangerous path [1][3]. - The Japanese constitution, particularly Article 9, emphasizes Japan as a "non-war state," prohibiting military forces and the use of force in international disputes, which has historically fostered trust with China [1]. - There is a growing concern that the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) aims to amend the constitution to allow Japan to become a nation capable of waging war, reminiscent of its militaristic past [3]. Group 2: Economic Consequences - Scholars warn that antagonism towards China could directly push Japan's economy into a crisis, emphasizing the need for the Prime Minister to prioritize economic welfare over military concerns [3][4]. - The potential loss of economic ties with China could lead to a complete economic collapse for Japan, highlighting the importance of placing economic stability and the well-being of citizens at the forefront of political decisions [4].

新华社北京11月27日电 日本首相高市早苗近期在国会答辩时公然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，粗暴干涉中 国内政，且不思悔改，拒不撤回错误言论。日本政府还频频为其错误言论强行辩解。如此顽固立场，暴 露了日本右翼势力的持续抬头和军国主义的阴魂不散。 25日，日本政府内阁决议通过答辩书，称高市关于"台湾有事"可能构成"存亡危机事态"的国会答辩"不 改变日本政府的一贯立场"。日方所谓"一贯立场"的具体内容到底是什么？日方能不能完整公开地表述 这个"一贯立场"？日方一再重复所谓"立场未变"的概念，却始终没有触及问题实质。答辩书老调重弹， 看似在"找补"高市言论的恶劣影响，实则仍在为错误观点遮掩、背书，反复变奏"台湾有事就是日本有 事"等谬论。这种只提概念回避实质的政治伎俩，对中方关于收回错误言论的正当要求刻意闪躲、企图 蒙混过关，让人不得不质疑，日方到底包藏着什么样的心思？ 日本常驻联合国代表还致函联合国，称"日本政府防卫的基本方针是专守防卫这一被动防卫战略"。这不 过是日方欲盖弥彰的谎言。事实胜于雄辩。日本政府近年来在军事安全领域的一系列动作，早已将"专 守防卫"原则这一"和平宪法"的核心要义架空虚化。近期日方一系列危险举动 ...

Group 1 - Japan is deploying offensive weapons on the southwestern islands near Taiwan, intentionally creating regional tensions and provoking military confrontation [1] - The Chinese Ministry of Defense warned Japan that the People's Liberation Army has the capability and means to defeat any invading enemy, and any provocation will lead to severe consequences [1] - Russia's Foreign Ministry spokesperson stated that Japan's actions are escalating regional security tensions and pose significant risks to neighboring countries, reserving the right to respond firmly [2] Group 2 - Russia is closely monitoring Japan's militarization efforts and has repeatedly warned Japan against deploying U.S. intermediate-range missiles under any pretext [5] - The spokesperson emphasized that Japan's military actions are transforming surrounding islands into military bases, which further exacerbates regional security tensions and threatens neighboring countries [5] - The historical context of conflicts on these islands is highlighted, with a warning that Japan is choosing an aggressive militaristic path again [6] Group 3 - Japan's Prime Minister's remarks about potentially revising the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" are seen as provocative, with potential irreversible consequences for global strategic security [6]

政治上的挑衅与军事上的躁动互为表里。高市之所以对错误言论拒不悔改，甚至借题发挥，其背后的算 计就是通过渲染所谓"外部威胁"为日本彻底松绑军事限制寻找借口。回顾历史不难发现，以所谓"存亡 危机"和"自卫"为名发动对外侵略，是日本军国主义的惯用手段。日本曾多次以夸大外部威胁、捏造"存 亡危机"为借口，为其发动侵略战争、破坏地区和平的行为进行辩护和动员。对此，国际社会特别是地 区国家都有深切而惨痛的共同记忆。高市妄图再次将这一危险概念具象化，复活军国主义的险恶用心昭 然若揭。 日本首相高市早苗近期在国会答辩时公然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，粗暴干涉中国内政，且不思悔改，拒 不撤回错误言论。日本政府还频频为其错误言论强行辩解。如此顽固立场，暴露了日本右翼势力的持续 抬头和军国主义的阴魂不散。 25日，日本政府内阁决议通过答辩书，称高市关于"台湾有事"可能构成"存亡危机事态"的国会答辩"不 改变日本政府的一贯立场"。日方所谓"一贯立场"的具体内容到底是什么？日方能不能完整公开地表述 这个"一贯立场"？日方一再重复所谓"立场未变"的概念，却始终没有触及问题实质。答辩书老调重弹， 看似在"找补"高市言论的恶劣影响，实则仍在为错误 ...