作者 | 蓝血创作组 投稿 | lanxueziben（微信） 培训咨询顾问招募 | lanxueziben（微信） 2011年，在英国兰开斯特大学管理学院的一次学术交流中，一位教授对华为的评价引发了深刻的思考。当中国人民大学商学院EMBA学生们自豪地谈论华 为的成就时，这位研究过华为的英国教授平静地说："华为的成功不过是走在西方公司走过的路上。"这句话后来传达给任正非，令人意外的是，这位华为 的创始人并没有反驳，反而赞同地说："这个教授很有洞察力，他看得很准，华为的成功就是这样，就是因为走上了西方公司走过的成功之路。" 这个看似简单的对话，实际上蕴含着深刻的历史观和哲学观。它不仅揭示了华为成功的真正密码，更反映了一个后发企业、一个发展中国家的企业如何在 全球化浪潮中找到自己的发展道路。从历史的维度来看，华为向西方学习的历程体现了人类文明发展的普遍规律；从哲学的角度来审视，这一过程展现了 认识与实践、继承与创新、民族性与世界性的辩证统一。 01 后发企业的追赶逻辑 理性认识阶段的标志是华为系统性地引入西方管理理论和工具。通过与IBM、PwC、Hay等国际顶级咨询公司的深度合作，华为不仅学习了具体的管理方 法， ...

原标题：舞剧《龟兹》全球首演定档上海国际艺术节 中国国家话剧院一级演出监督、制作人李东从主创团队的采风、创作、排练到舞台合成，一直都在 吸收新的知识和挑战既往的经验，向新的合作者学习，并与主创团队不断探讨和研究如何提高作品的质 量和市场竞争力，实现从剧本到舞台的转化。他表示："舞剧《龟兹》是我作为制作人的第一部舞剧， 龟兹题材的独特性和具有东西方文化融合多元性的特质，使我有信心借助于自己多年积累的实践经验， 全力推动好此剧的文化交流、推广和演出，提升在全国和国际的影响力。11月份，这部剧将应邀参加第 二十四届中国上海国际艺术节并进行首演，期待世界各国艺术家和观众们的检验。"（记者 祖薇薇） 舞剧《龟兹》通过玄奘的第三视角，观鸠摩罗什一生历经磨难、自强不息的传奇经历，折射出东西 方文明在丝绸之路上的交流融合，最后汇入中华文明的大河，丰富了人们的精神世界。舞台上，完整的 剧情结构、合理的叙事逻辑和演员们精彩的表演，尤其是舞蹈语汇以克孜尔石窟壁画龟兹舞姿为基础， 融入多种舞蹈元素，经过大胆创新所呈现舞蹈艺术的独特魅力，人物思想境界的不断升华，以及龟兹文 化为丰富和发展中华文明所作出的贡献，赢得现场文艺界专家和工作者 ...

Core Viewpoint - Nike's lawsuit against Edison Chen, founder of CLOT, initially reported as a claim for $126.6 million, was later corrected to approximately $12,661.5, highlighting a clerical error but raising questions about the relationship between the two parties [1][2][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, naming Edison Chen and his company Juice Los Angeles LLC as defendants [3]. - The corrected claim amount of $12,661.5 pertains to unpaid "goods and services" during Juice Los Angeles LLC's role as a distributor for Nike [6]. - Chen is personally liable as he is the guarantor for Juice's account with Nike, indicating a direct financial responsibility [6]. Group 2: Implications of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit signifies a notable shift in the long-standing partnership, as Nike's decision to publicly sue a partner of nearly 20 years over a relatively small amount is unusual for a company with annual revenues in the billions [2][4]. - Speculation arose regarding potential breaches of non-compete agreements or intellectual property disputes, especially following Chen's recent partnership with Adidas after ending his collaboration with Nike [4][7]. - The incident has led to discussions about the deterioration of the relationship between Nike and Chen, contrasting with the previously perceived amicable conclusion of their contract [7][25]. Group 3: Background on CLOT and Edison Chen - CLOT was founded in 2003 by Edison Chen and Kevin Poon, aiming to bridge Eastern and Western cultures through fashion [10]. - The brand has collaborated with multiple companies, including Nike, leveraging Chen's celebrity status to penetrate the Asia-Pacific market [11]. - CLOT's designs often incorporate Chinese cultural elements, with notable collaborations like the Air Max1 "Kiss of Death," which reflects traditional Chinese philosophy [13][18]. Group 4: Market Context and Trends - The lawsuit occurs against a backdrop of Nike's aggressive legal strategies to protect its brand, as seen in previous lawsuits against other companies [31][32]. - The retail landscape for CLOT's Juice stores has been challenging, with a significant reduction in physical locations and sales impacted by market dynamics and consumer behavior [33][35]. - The shift in Chen's partnership from Nike to Adidas may reflect broader trends in brand positioning and consumer perception within the sneaker and streetwear markets [38].