Core Points - The eighth round of China-Germany diplomatic and security strategic dialogue was held in Berlin, emphasizing the importance of the relationship between the two countries as they enter a new decade of partnership [1][2] - Both sides acknowledged the need for enhanced strategic communication and cooperation to address global challenges such as protectionism and unilateralism, aiming to provide more certainty to the world [1][2] Group 1 - Wang Yi highlighted that 2025 marks the 50th anniversary of China-Europe diplomatic relations, indicating a critical juncture for China-Germany relations [1] - The dialogue reaffirmed the commitment to mutual respect, seeking common ground while reserving differences, and the principle of win-win cooperation as the foundation for sustained development [2] - Both parties agreed to continue close communication and coordination on various international issues, including the Ukraine crisis and the Iran nuclear issue, to contribute to peace and conflict resolution [2] Group 2 - Wang Yi expressed appreciation for Germany's positive and rational approach towards developing relations with China, urging Germany to support China's efforts for national reunification [2] - The German Foreign Minister, Baerbock, reiterated Germany's commitment to the One China policy and the importance of maintaining a reliable and predictable partnership with China [2] - The dialogue underscored the historical and cultural ties between China and Germany, emphasizing the need for constructive engagement to manage differences [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and China, particularly focusing on the impending expiration of a 90-day tariff suspension and the potential for increased tariffs from the U.S. on various countries, including China [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Strategy - The U.S. government has initiated a policy of imposing high tariffs globally under the guise of "reciprocity," with a 90-day negotiation window that is nearing its end [1][3]. - President Trump has indicated that he does not plan to extend the 90-day suspension and will soon communicate new tariff rates, which could range from 10% to 50% [3]. - The U.S. aims to leverage high tariffs to address its long-standing trade deficit and is pressuring other countries to reduce trade with China as a condition for tariff exemptions [3]. Group 2: China's Response - China has firmly opposed the U.S. unilateral actions, labeling them as bullying tactics that undermine the multilateral trade system [3][8]. - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has stated that any country attempting to sacrifice China's interests for U.S. tariff relief will face strong countermeasures from China [3][8]. - China has demonstrated its resolve in past trade negotiations, achieving certain agreements through strategic positioning and firm stances [3]. Group 3: Other Countries' Positions - Japan is struggling to reach a consensus with the U.S. on auto tariffs, with some factions suggesting sacrificing Chinese interests to gain leverage in negotiations [6][7]. - The EU has temporarily suspended high-level economic dialogues with China to focus on U.S. negotiations, with some politicians advocating for a united front against China [7]. - India has taken steps that appear to align with U.S. interests, such as imposing tariffs on Chinese steel, raising questions about its commitment to its strategic partnership with China [8]. Group 4: Potential Consequences - The article highlights the risks for countries that align with U.S. interests at the expense of China, particularly in sectors like rare earths, where China holds significant leverage [8][10]. - The U.S. faces challenges in managing simultaneous trade negotiations with multiple countries, raising doubts about the effectiveness of its tariff strategy [10]. - The article concludes that the ongoing trade tensions could lead to broader instability in the global economy, emphasizing the interconnectedness of nations in a globalized world [10].

Group 1 - The Chinese government firmly opposes sacrificing its interests for U.S. tariff reductions and will retaliate if such situations arise [1] - The U.S. has been pressuring other countries to agree to its terms in trade negotiations, with a deadline approaching on July 9 [1] - Countries like India and Japan are hesitant to make concessions, particularly regarding tariffs, as these issues are critical to their economies [1] Group 2 - Canada has implemented a digital services tax targeting U.S. tech companies, which has led to a breakdown in trade negotiations with the U.S. [3] - The Canadian government is also seeking to diversify trade relationships, evidenced by its new strategic partnership agreement with the EU [3] - The EU is preparing substantial countermeasures to protect its interests amid ongoing trade tensions with the U.S. [3] Group 3 - The U.S. is considering extending the tariff exemption period due to difficulties in reaching agreements with multiple countries before the deadline [5] - There is a temporary compromise among G7 countries regarding tariffs, which reflects a mutual exchange of interests rather than a resolution of underlying conflicts [5] - The U.S. aims to repair relationships with allies to coordinate pressure on China, but this may not be sustainable in the long term [8] Group 4 - China has made it clear that it will not accept any agreements that compromise its interests and will respond firmly to any such actions [10] - The international trade landscape is shifting, with an emphasis on equal negotiations and adherence to multilateral trade rules for mutual benefit [10] - Countries considering sacrificing their interests for U.S. tariff reductions should weigh the potential consequences of China's retaliation [10]

Group 1 - The Trump administration is reportedly pressuring other countries to limit trade with China in exchange for tariff exemptions, showcasing a unilateral approach to trade negotiations [1] - The U.S. has imposed tariffs under the guise of "reciprocity," which has been criticized as a form of economic coercion and unilateral bullying [1][4] - The U.S. military is heavily reliant on Chinese exports for critical materials, such as gallium and germanium, which are essential for advanced military technology like the F-35 fighter jet [3] Group 2 - China's response to U.S. tariffs has included significant retaliatory measures, impacting U.S. agricultural markets, particularly with a 25% tariff on soybeans leading to an 18% drop in prices [3] - The Chinese government has issued strong statements regarding the need for equal dialogue with the U.S. and has set clear conditions for negotiations, including respect for China's sovereignty [6] - There is a growing sentiment within the U.S. political landscape questioning the importance of Taiwan, indicating a potential shift in U.S. foreign policy towards the region [8]

当地时间4月28日上午，中国常驻联合国副代表耿爽在安理会听取联合国难民高专通报时发言指出，当 前，国际形势复杂动荡，地缘政治高度紧张，单边霸凌持续不断，世界经济遭受冲击。在此背景下，全 球难民形势日益严峻、挑战愈加突出。有关国家应放弃在国际上制造对立、挑起冲突，放弃单边主义作 法和霸道霸凌行径。(CCTV国际时讯) ...

215 | 国务院常务会议: 漫定股市 Financial Weekly 母周金融评论 . . 重大事件 EVENTS ◎ 特朗普称可立即让美联储主席走人 Financial Weekly 每周金融评论 | 目录 CONTENTS 热点聚焦 OCUS ◎ 国务院常务会议·要持续稳定股市、持续推动房地产市场 平稳健康发展 ◎ 商务部:坚决反对任何一方以牺牲中方利益为代价达成交易, 将坚决对等反制 MEETINGS ◎ 国家发改委主任郑栅洁主持召开推动低空经济发展工作会议 重大政策 POLICES ◎ 欧洲央行下调三大关键利率25个基点 重要数字 DATA ◎ 美国股汇双杀，美元指数暴跌1％，美国股指期货走低 © 现货黄金史上首次站上3300美元/盎司 JP/UI 1-12 热点聚 焦 国务院常务会议：要持续稳定股市，持续推动房地产市场平稳健康发展 4月18日，国务院总理李强主持召开国务院常务会议。会议指出，面对复杂严峻的外部环境，要深入贯彻中央经济工作会议部 署，加力落实《政府工作报告》明确的政策措施，锚定经济社会发展目标，加大逆周期调节力度，着力稳就业稳外贸，着力促消 费扩内需，着力优结构提质量，做强国内大循 ...

据央视新闻报道，2 0 2 5年4月2日，美国政府宣布对中国输美商品征收"对等关税"。美方做法 不符合国际贸易规则，严重损害中方的正当合法权益，是典型的单边霸凌做法。 根据《中华人民共和国关税法》、《中华人民共和国海关法》、《中华人民共和国对外贸易 法》等法律法规和国际法基本原则，经国务院批准，自2 0 2 5年4月1 0日1 2时0 1分起，国务院 关税税则委员会对原产于美国的进口商品加征关税。有关事项如下： 一、对原产于美国的所有进口商品， 在现行适用关税税率基础上加征3 4%关税。 商务部将斯凯迪奥公司等11家美国企业列入不可靠实体清单 据央视新闻报道，商务部今日（4日）发布不可靠实体清单工作机制关于将斯凯迪奥公司等11 家美国企业列入不可靠实体清单的公告。为维护国家主权、安全和发展利益，根据《中华人民 共和国对外贸易法》《中华人民共和国国家安全法》《中华人民共和国反外国制裁法》等有关 法律，不可靠实体清单工作机制依据《不可靠实体清单规定》第二条、第八条和第十条等有关 规定，决定将斯凯迪奥公司等11家实体列入不可靠实体清单，并采取以下处理措施： 一、禁止上述企业从事与中国有关的进出口活动； 二、现行保税 ...