近日，美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）以所谓"国家安全"为由，将所有外国生产的无人机系统及其关键零 部件列入"不可信供应商清单"，并将中国大疆公司纳入其中，限制其产品在美进口和销售。该决定一经 公布，立即在美国业界和国际市场引发强烈反响。事实再次表明，美方正不断泛化"国家安全"概念，将 其异化为打压他国企业、干扰市场运行的工具。这种做法缺乏事实基础，也走不长远。 无人机产业是全球化程度极高的新兴产业，其研发、制造和应用高度依赖国际分工与开放合作。长期以 来，正是通过充分竞争与技术交流，该产业才得以快速迭代、持续创新。美方却无视产业发展规律，不 顾企业和消费者的现实需求，以行政命令强行破坏市场选择空间，将所有非美制造的无人机"一刀切"贴 上"风险"标签。这种以国别划线、以出身定性的做法，实质上是否定市场机制、否定竞争规则、否定基 本常识。 美方寄希望于通过构建贸易壁垒和行政限制，扶持本土无人机产业、提升其竞争力，这一思路违背了科 技发展规律。无人机等前沿技术的发展，需要的是标准互认、规则协同和良性竞争，而不是人为割裂市 场、制造对立。事实已经反复证明，封锁和打压不仅无法阻挡技术进步，反而会抬高成本、降低效率， 最终 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly opposes the U.S. decision to include all foreign-produced drone systems and their key components in the "untrusted suppliers list," arguing that it distorts the market and represents unilateral bullying by the U.S. [1] Group 1 - The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced the inclusion of foreign-produced drone systems in the "untrusted suppliers list" citing "national security" concerns [1] - The Chinese government criticizes the U.S. for disregarding normal business transactions and trade relations between Chinese and American companies [1] - China urges the U.S. to stop its erroneous actions and withdraw the related measures, warning that it will take necessary actions to protect the legitimate rights of Chinese enterprises if the U.S. persists [1]

有记者问：近日，美国联邦通信委员会(FCC)发布公告，宣布将所有外国生产的无人机系统及其关键零 部件等列入"不可信供应商清单"(Covered List)，请问中方对此有何回应? 答：美方以所谓"国家安全"为由，将所有外国生产的无人机系统及其关键零部件等列入"不可信供应商 清单"，中方对此坚决反对。近年来，美方不顾中美两国企业开展正常商业交易和贸易往来，不顾中美 两国业界的强烈呼声，一再泛化国家安全概念，动用国家力量打击包括中国企业在内的他国企业，这是 典型的市场扭曲和单边霸凌做法。 中方敦促美方停止错误做法，立即撤销有关措施。若美方继续一意孤行，中方将坚决采取必要措施，坚 定维护中国企业的正当权益。 本文编选自"商务部"官网，智通财经编辑：蒋远华。 智通财经APP获悉，商务部新闻发言人就美针对无人机领域增列"不可信供应商清单"事答记者问时表 示，美方以所谓"国家安全"为由，将所有外国生产的无人机系统及其关键零部件等列入"不可信供应商 清单"，中方对此坚决反对。近年来，美方一再泛化国家安全概念，动用国家力量打击包括中国企业在 内的他国企业，这是典型的市场扭曲和单边霸凌做法。中方敦促美方停止错误做法，立即撤销有 ...

Core Insights - Despite ongoing pressure from the United States, Russia remains China's largest crude oil supplier as of September 2023, with imports increasing by 4.3% month-on-month to 8.287 million tons, valued at $4.066 billion [1] - China has halted crude oil purchases from the U.S. since June, although the U.S. share in China's total imports was already minimal [1] - The progress of the China-Russia cross-border pipeline project is enhancing cooperation between the two nations, with a slight year-on-year increase of 1.9% in liquefied natural gas imports from Russia in September [1] - China's crude oil imports from Indonesia surged approximately 73 times year-on-year in September, while imports from Brazil increased by 156%, diversifying China's energy supply sources [1] Geopolitical Context - The increase in crude oil purchases from Russia is seen as a defiant stance by China ahead of further negotiations with the U.S. [3] - Former U.S. President Trump has intensified efforts to curb Russian energy revenues, urging India to stop purchasing Russian crude and suggesting that China should follow suit [3] - U.S. Treasury Secretary has also warned Japan to terminate energy imports from Russia, indicating a broader strategy to isolate Russian energy sources [3] China's Position - The Chinese Foreign Ministry has reiterated that its energy cooperation with Russia is legitimate and normal, criticizing U.S. actions as unilateral bullying and economic coercion [4] - China maintains a neutral stance on the Ukraine crisis and opposes U.S. sanctions, asserting that it will take necessary measures to protect its legitimate rights and interests if harmed [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent escalation in trade tensions between the U.S. and China, highlighting Trump's contradictory stance on tariffs and the subsequent Chinese countermeasures, which could have significant implications for the shipping industry and broader economic relations [2] Group 1: Tariff Policies - Trump acknowledged that his tariff policies could harm the U.S. economy, yet he imposed a new port fee of $50 per net ton on Chinese ships, amounting to $5 million for a 100,000-ton vessel [2] - In response, China introduced a special port fee of 400 RMB per net ton, with exemptions for certain situations, effectively countering the U.S. move [2] Group 2: Economic Impact - The U.S. shipping assets are valued at over $116.4 billion, with Wall Street controlling 40% of the fleet, indicating a significant financial burden from the new fees [2] - The article notes that inflation could rise, costing consumers an additional $30 billion annually due to these tariffs [2] Group 3: Industry Dynamics - The U.S. shipbuilding capacity is only 1/230th of China's, raising questions about the feasibility of the U.S. maintaining its aggressive stance [2] - China's countermeasures not only serve as a lesson to the U.S. but also attract global shipowners to consider Chinese shipbuilding options [2] Group 4: Political Context - The article suggests that Trump's actions may be influenced by electoral pressures, questioning whether his acknowledgment of tariff failures is genuine or a strategic move for future negotiations [2]

Group 1 - Japan's Finance Minister, Kato Katsunobu, rejected the U.S. request to impose high tariffs on Russian oil imports from China and India, emphasizing Japan's commitment to World Trade Organization (WTO) rules [1] - Kato stated that raising tariffs to levels such as 50% solely based on a country's imports from Russia is not feasible for Japan [1] - The G7 had discussed potential sanctions against China and India for their continued purchase of Russian oil, with the U.S. suggesting tariffs as high as 100% [1] Group 2 - China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, defended China's legitimate energy cooperation with Russia and criticized the U.S. for its unilateral and coercive actions, which threaten global supply chain stability [2] - Lin reiterated China's consistent stance on the Ukraine crisis, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the only viable solution [2] - The Chinese government expressed strong opposition to illegal unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction" against China, stating that it would firmly counter any damage to its legitimate rights [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce opposes the U.S. request for imposing tariffs on China based on its imports of Russian oil, labeling it as unilateral bullying and economic coercion [1] Group 1: Economic Measures - The U.S. is seeking to impose tariffs ranging from 50% to 100% on China due to its purchase of Russian oil, aiming to pressure China to play a role in ending the Russia-Ukraine conflict [1] - The Chinese government asserts that such measures violate the consensus reached between the leaders of China and the U.S. [1] Group 2: Trade Relations - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce emphasizes the potential severe impact on global trade and supply chain stability if these tariffs are enacted [1] - China expresses a desire for the U.S. to engage in equal dialogue to resolve trade differences amicably [1] Group 3: Global Trade Order - The Chinese government calls for all parties to uphold principles that maintain the stability of the global trade order and supply chains [1] - There is a warning that if China's interests are harmed, it will take necessary measures to protect its legitimate rights [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government criticizes the U.S. for its unilateral actions and sanctions related to China's imports of Russian oil, emphasizing that dialogue and negotiation are the only viable solutions to the Ukraine crisis [1] Group 1: China's Position on the Ukraine Crisis - China maintains a consistent and clear stance on the Ukraine crisis, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the sole feasible path to resolution [1] - Since the onset of the crisis, China has upheld an objective and impartial position, promoting peace and talks [1] Group 2: Response to U.S. Actions - The Chinese government condemns the U.S. for what it describes as typical unilateral bullying, particularly regarding the imposition of tariffs on China [1] - China firmly opposes the illegal unilateral sanctions and extraterritorial jurisdiction imposed by the U.S. [1] - Should China's legitimate rights and interests be harmed, the government asserts it will take resolute countermeasures to protect its sovereignty, security, and development interests [1]

Group 1 - The Chinese government has invited U.S. President Trump to visit China this year, but the U.S. has not responded due to disagreements over trade and fentanyl issues [2][3] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry criticized the U.S. for its unilateral approach, particularly regarding the request for NATO to impose tariffs on China based on the import of Russian oil [3] - China maintains a consistent and clear stance on the Ukraine crisis, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the only viable solution [3] Group 2 - The Chinese government firmly opposes illegal unilateral sanctions and extraterritorial jurisdiction imposed by the U.S., stating that it will take resolute countermeasures if its legitimate rights and interests are harmed [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the U.S. request for G7 and NATO members to impose tariffs on China, citing it as unilateral bullying and economic coercion that undermines international trade rules and threatens global supply chain stability [3]. Group 1: China's Position on Trade and Energy Cooperation - China maintains that its trade and energy cooperation with countries, including Russia, is legitimate and justified [3]. - The Chinese government emphasizes that coercive measures from the U.S. are ineffective and do not resolve underlying issues [3]. Group 2: Stance on the Ukraine Crisis - China has a consistent and clear position regarding the Ukraine crisis, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the only viable solution [3]. - Since the onset of the crisis, China has upheld an objective and fair stance, promoting peace talks [3]. Group 3: Response to Sanctions and Economic Pressure - The Chinese government strongly opposes the imposition of illegal unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction" by other parties [3]. - If China's legitimate rights and interests are harmed, the government will take resolute countermeasures to protect its sovereignty, security, and development interests [3].