湖北日报讯（记者李朝霞、通讯员沈贸轩）海外设厂怎样用好原产地规则绕开关税壁垒？市场竞争如何从传统"价格博弈"向"规则博弈"转型？11月25日 至26日，湖北贸促大讲堂第二十四讲"国际经贸规则应用专场"在湖北荆门举办，五位国际经贸规则专家向全省200多家外向型企业传经送宝，为企业运 用国际经贸规则应对经贸摩擦支招。 省贸促会主任胡中海表示，国际经贸规则正经历前所未有的重构与变革，主动拥抱规则、熟练运用规则的企业，往往能在复杂博弈中占据主动，在国 际竞争中从容不迫、游刃有余，为我省开放支点建设注入源源不断的内生动力。省贸促会将持续把湖北贸促大讲堂逐步打造成为集政策辅导、经验交 流、资源对接于一体的综合性公共服务载体，促进开放要素加速聚集，合作机遇不断涌现，为我省高水平对外开放搭建桥梁。 湖北贸促大讲堂自创办以来，始终坚持以服务企业为立身之本，把市场主体的"需求清单"转变为"贸促特色公共服务清单"，围绕企业"急难愁盼"，帮助 专家与企业面对面交流、企业与企业手拉手合作、政府与市场心贴心沟通，目前线上线下培训企业已超万家。 为提升湖北企业运用国际经贸规则的能力，专家们以案说法，帮助企业从规则中寻找破局之道。针对国内出 ...

Core Viewpoint - The semiconductor industry is highly interconnected, and fluctuations can have widespread impacts on businesses and consumers globally. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has issued a stern response to the Netherlands regarding its actions against ASML, highlighting the broader implications for international trade rules and geopolitical dynamics [1][3]. Group 1: Netherlands' Actions and Responses - The Dutch government's recent measures, including attempts to interfere with ASML's internal affairs and potentially strip Chinese companies of their equity, challenge fundamental international business principles [1]. - ASML's announcement on October 26 to suspend supplies to "ASML China" has severely threatened the stability of the global semiconductor supply chain, raising concerns among European and American automakers about inventory issues and ongoing supply chain crises [1][5]. Group 2: China's Position and Strategy - The Chinese government has shown a shift from initial tolerance and communication to a more assertive stance, emphasizing a "responsibility red line" in its dealings with the Netherlands [3]. - The Ministry of Commerce's statement reflects a pragmatic and firm approach, indicating that if the Netherlands continues to ignore its responsibilities, it will face consequences [3][5]. Group 3: Global Supply Chain Implications - ASML, while primarily a producer of basic components, plays a crucial role in the functionality of high-tech products like modern automobiles. The Dutch government's actions have triggered significant concerns across the global supply chain [5]. - China's Dongguan factory accounts for 70% of ASML's global packaging and testing capacity, and any supply disruptions will not only affect Chinese companies but also pose direct threats to European and American industries [5]. Group 4: Future Considerations - The ongoing dispute between the Netherlands and China highlights a stark contrast between the Netherlands' hardline stance and China's rational approach. The Netherlands faces a critical decision on whether to maintain its position or to respect and rebuild its relationship with China [5][7]. - The stability and development of global supply chains have become a consensus that countries must address in economic cooperation, with China asserting its capability to protect its legitimate rights and maintain international market order [7].

国务院总理李强：推进治理改革，完善国际经贸规则体系。五年以后，中国的经济规模有望超过170万亿元。中国将坚定不移地推进高水平对外开放，稳步扩大制度性开放。助力更多外国优质商品和服务进入中国市场。将在电信、医疗等领域进一步开展对外开放试点。任何国家想实现稳定和可持续发展，都不能只取不予。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The G7 is reportedly planning to establish a critical minerals production alliance to counter China's dominance in the market, prompting a response from China regarding its export control measures [1] Group 1: China's Response - China is refining and improving its export control system, aligning with international practices to better maintain world peace and regional stability, as well as fulfilling international obligations related to non-proliferation [1] - The Chinese government urges the G7 to adhere to market economy principles and international trade rules, calling for an end to practices that disrupt the international economic order [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the importance of compliance and strategic frameworks for Chinese brands going global, particularly in the context of AI and international trade regulations [3][4][5] - The speech by Zhou Hanmin at the 19th China Brand Festival highlighted the need for companies to prioritize compliance in product design, addressing three major institutional hurdles: data cross-border flow, algorithm ethics review, and green supply chain due diligence [3] - Zhou proposed a "1+3" international narrative framework for brand globalization, focusing on innovation, green initiatives, and shared values to enhance China's brand image abroad [4] Group 2 - The role of think tanks, such as the Silk Road Think Tank, is crucial in amplifying policy feedback effects, facilitating the rapid communication of industry challenges to policymakers [5] - The collaboration between the think tank and various organizations aims to produce a compliance white paper for AI export, which will provide empirical data for improving regulations on data security and green trade incentives [5] - The essence of brand competition is framed as a competition of rules and institutional discourse power, with the potential for significant advantages for those who can effectively translate regulatory research into brand benefits [5]

Core Viewpoint - The company criticizes the Dutch government's decision to freeze global operations of Nexperia on the grounds of "national security," labeling it as an excessive intervention based on geopolitical bias rather than factual risk assessment [1] Group 1: Company Performance - The company asserts that after completing the 100% acquisition of Nexperia, it has significantly improved the operational quality of Nexperia, surpassing historical levels in financial performance, technological asset accumulation, operational resilience, and market position [1] Group 2: Regulatory Environment - The company argues that the Dutch government's actions violate the principles of market economy, fair competition, and international trade rules consistently advocated by the European Union [1] Group 3: Response to Discrimination - The company expresses strong protest against the discriminatory treatment of Chinese enterprises by the Dutch government [1]

Group 1 - Japan's Finance Minister, Kato Katsunobu, rejected the U.S. request to impose high tariffs on Russian oil imports from China and India, emphasizing Japan's commitment to World Trade Organization (WTO) rules [1] - Kato stated that raising tariffs to levels such as 50% solely based on a country's imports from Russia is not feasible for Japan [1] - The G7 had discussed potential sanctions against China and India for their continued purchase of Russian oil, with the U.S. suggesting tariffs as high as 100% [1] Group 2 - China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, defended China's legitimate energy cooperation with Russia and criticized the U.S. for its unilateral and coercive actions, which threaten global supply chain stability [2] - Lin reiterated China's consistent stance on the Ukraine crisis, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the only viable solution [2] - The Chinese government expressed strong opposition to illegal unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction" against China, stating that it would firmly counter any damage to its legitimate rights [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the U.S. request for G7 and NATO members to impose tariffs on China, citing it as unilateral bullying and economic coercion that undermines international trade rules and threatens global supply chain stability [3]. Group 1: China's Position on Trade and Energy Cooperation - China maintains that its trade and energy cooperation with countries, including Russia, is legitimate and justified [3]. - The Chinese government emphasizes that coercive measures from the U.S. are ineffective and do not resolve underlying issues [3]. Group 2: Stance on the Ukraine Crisis - China has a consistent and clear position regarding the Ukraine crisis, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the only viable solution [3]. - Since the onset of the crisis, China has upheld an objective and fair stance, promoting peace talks [3]. Group 3: Response to Sanctions and Economic Pressure - The Chinese government strongly opposes the imposition of illegal unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction" by other parties [3]. - If China's legitimate rights and interests are harmed, the government will take resolute countermeasures to protect its sovereignty, security, and development interests [3].

Group 1 - During the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, China established a competitive policy framework, transitioning from concept to institutionalization, emphasizing the need for stronger and more effective competition policies in the face of domestic and international challenges [1][2] - The importance of competition policy has been recognized at the highest levels of government, with significant legislative changes such as the 2022 revision of the Anti-Monopoly Law, which included the establishment of a fair competition review system [2][3] - The ongoing reforms in industries with natural monopolies, such as telecommunications and energy, have led to increased competition and market efficiency, with notable achievements like the 90% sharing rate of 5G base stations and the introduction of market-based pricing in the electricity sector [3] Group 2 - The phenomenon of "involution" in competition has emerged, characterized by insufficient competitive space and excessive subsidies, particularly in the solar and electric vehicle sectors, leading to unsustainable business practices [5][6] - The misalignment between industrial policy and competition policy has resulted in a proliferation of similar AI models and price wars, with government subsidies causing resource misallocation and inefficiencies in the market [6][7] - International trade rules, such as the EU's Foreign Subsidies Regulation and the US Inflation Reduction Act, pose significant challenges for Chinese companies, requiring them to adapt to stringent compliance measures and competitive pressures [8] Group 3 - The "15th Five-Year Plan" aims to elevate competition policy to a central role in macroeconomic governance, ensuring that it is integrated with other policies such as industrial, fiscal, and trade policies [9][10] - A robust legal framework for competition policy is essential to foster innovation and market efficiency, with recommendations for impact assessments and long-term accountability for government projects [11][12] - High-level alignment with international trade rules, such as the CPTPP, is crucial for China to enhance its competitive position globally, necessitating a deeper understanding of the underlying principles and values of these agreements [13][14]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the transition of China's competition policy from a basic framework to a more robust governance tool during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, highlighting the need for a shift from merely having competition policies to ensuring their strength and effectiveness [1][2][3]. - It outlines the systematic integration of the legal framework for competition policy, noting significant developments such as the first revision of the Anti-Monopoly Law in 2022, which included the establishment of a fair competition review system [3][4]. - The article discusses the ongoing reforms in industries with natural monopoly characteristics, such as telecommunications and energy, showcasing specific achievements like the 90% sharing rate of 5G base stations and the introduction of market mechanisms in electricity pricing [4][5]. Group 2 - The article identifies the challenges of "involutionary" competition, where excessive competition leads to price drops and reduced profitability, particularly in sectors like solar energy and new energy vehicles, where government subsidies have distorted market dynamics [6][7]. - It highlights the misalignment between industrial policies and competition policies, particularly in the AI sector, where aggressive subsidies have led to market saturation and reduced R&D investment among companies [8][9]. - The article warns of the implications of international trade rules, such as the EU's Foreign Subsidies Regulation and the US Inflation Reduction Act, which pose challenges for Chinese companies seeking to compete globally [9][10]. Group 3 - The article outlines the vision for the "15th Five-Year Plan," advocating for a stronger foundational role for competition policy in economic governance, emphasizing the need for coordination between competition and industrial policies [10][11]. - It suggests enhancing the implementation framework for competition policy, including mandatory competition impact assessments for industrial planning and fiscal policies [12][13]. - The article calls for a robust legal framework to support competition principles, particularly in emerging sectors like digital economy and AI, to ensure fair competition and innovation [14][15]. Group 4 - The article stresses the importance of aligning with high-standard international trade rules, such as the CPTPP, to enhance China's competitive position in the global market [15][16]. - It concludes that the focus of competition policy should shift from merely preventing monopolies to fostering a competitive environment that encourages innovation and sustainable growth [16].