据报道，美国特朗普政府再次扬言通过贸易手段迫使中国与印度断绝与俄罗斯的能源合作，进一步加大 对俄罗斯的经济压力。美国要求七国集团及北约成员，对依然从俄罗斯进口能源的中国和印度征收 50%-100%的关税，企图通过经济胁迫改变两国在俄乌冲突中的立场。这一提议一经提出，便迅速引起 国际社会的广泛关注和讨论，尤其是日本的反应，更是成为了全球焦点。 然而，特朗普的这种"经济施压"方式却忽视了一个关键问题：全球化背景下，经济制裁不仅仅是简单的 单方行动，而是牵动全球经济链条的复杂博弈。中国和印度在能源领域对俄罗斯的依赖，决定了它们不 可能在短期内彻底断开与俄罗斯的能源合作。此外，特朗普的制裁方案若完全实行，也极有可能伤及自 身盟国的利益，特别是那些与俄罗斯有能源合作的欧洲国家。 为什么日本敢于在不到24小时内对美国的要求做出如此坚定的拒绝？其背后的原因不仅仅是对美国单边 主义的不满，更与日本的实际利益紧密相关。 首先，日本与中国的经济关系不容小觑。中国是日本的最大贸易伙伴，双方在制造业、汽车、电子、能 源等领域有着深厚的经济合作。日本的丰田、本田等跨国公司在中国有庞大的市场和生产基地。如果日 本支持美国对中国加税，势必 ...

Group 1 - Japan's Finance Minister, Kato Katsunobu, rejected the U.S. request to impose high tariffs on Russian oil imports from China and India, emphasizing Japan's commitment to World Trade Organization (WTO) rules [1] - Kato stated that raising tariffs to levels such as 50% solely based on a country's imports from Russia is not feasible for Japan [1] - The G7 had discussed potential sanctions against China and India for their continued purchase of Russian oil, with the U.S. suggesting tariffs as high as 100% [1] Group 2 - China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, defended China's legitimate energy cooperation with Russia and criticized the U.S. for its unilateral and coercive actions, which threaten global supply chain stability [2] - Lin reiterated China's consistent stance on the Ukraine crisis, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the only viable solution [2] - The Chinese government expressed strong opposition to illegal unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction" against China, stating that it would firmly counter any damage to its legitimate rights [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce opposes the U.S. request for imposing tariffs on China based on its imports of Russian oil, labeling it as unilateral bullying and economic coercion [1] Group 1: Economic Measures - The U.S. is seeking to impose tariffs ranging from 50% to 100% on China due to its purchase of Russian oil, aiming to pressure China to play a role in ending the Russia-Ukraine conflict [1] - The Chinese government asserts that such measures violate the consensus reached between the leaders of China and the U.S. [1] Group 2: Trade Relations - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce emphasizes the potential severe impact on global trade and supply chain stability if these tariffs are enacted [1] - China expresses a desire for the U.S. to engage in equal dialogue to resolve trade differences amicably [1] Group 3: Global Trade Order - The Chinese government calls for all parties to uphold principles that maintain the stability of the global trade order and supply chains [1] - There is a warning that if China's interests are harmed, it will take necessary measures to protect its legitimate rights [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the U.S. request for G7 and NATO members to impose tariffs on China, citing it as unilateral bullying and economic coercion that undermines international trade rules and threatens global supply chain stability [3]. Group 1: China's Position on Trade and Energy Cooperation - China maintains that its trade and energy cooperation with countries, including Russia, is legitimate and justified [3]. - The Chinese government emphasizes that coercive measures from the U.S. are ineffective and do not resolve underlying issues [3]. Group 2: Stance on the Ukraine Crisis - China has a consistent and clear position regarding the Ukraine crisis, advocating for dialogue and negotiation as the only viable solution [3]. - Since the onset of the crisis, China has upheld an objective and fair stance, promoting peace talks [3]. Group 3: Response to Sanctions and Economic Pressure - The Chinese government strongly opposes the imposition of illegal unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction" by other parties [3]. - If China's legitimate rights and interests are harmed, the government will take resolute countermeasures to protect its sovereignty, security, and development interests [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant shift in the U.S. geopolitical economic strategy under the Trump administration, characterized by unprecedented tariffs aimed at reshaping global supply chains, curbing China's influence, and re-establishing U.S. economic dominance [1][5]. Tariff Impact - The scale of the tariff measures is alarming, with proposed tariffs of 46% on Vietnamese exports, 49% on Cambodian goods, 36% on Thai products, 32% on Indonesian items, and 24% on Malaysian exports [2][4]. - Following the announcement, Southeast Asian currencies such as the Thai baht and Malaysian ringgit experienced sharp declines, leading to significant market volatility [4]. Trade Balance and Strategy - The U.S. claims these tariffs are a response to "unfair trade practices," yet many ASEAN countries are sources of substantial U.S. trade surpluses, with a total trade volume of $476.8 billion in 2024, including $352.3 billion in exports from ASEAN to the U.S. [4][5]. - Analysts suggest that the true aim of the tariffs is to economically compel Southeast Asian nations to decouple from China, making their ties with China less economically viable [5][6]. Political Leverage - The U.S. strategy is described as using international trade as a tool for political coercion, effectively weaponizing trade to achieve its geopolitical objectives [6]. - The uncertainty surrounding the implementation of these tariffs serves as a strategic weapon, creating confusion and anxiety among targeted nations and businesses, thereby maximizing U.S. leverage in negotiations [7]. ASEAN's Response - ASEAN's collective response to the U.S. tariffs has been weak, with member states unable to form a unified front against U.S. unilateralism, leading to a situation where individual countries seek bilateral negotiations with the U.S. [10][11]. - The establishment of a "Vietnam precedent," where Vietnam negotiated a reduction in tariffs from 46% to 20%, has shifted the focus of other ASEAN countries from collective resistance to individual negotiations, fostering competition among them [13][14].

Group 1 - The EU has agreed to a trade deal with the US, accepting a 15% tariff on goods exported to the US, which is seen as a capitulation under the threat of US tariffs [1][2] - The deal includes a commitment from the EU to increase investments in the US by $600 billion and to purchase $750 billion worth of US energy products [1] - French officials have expressed strong criticism of the agreement, labeling it as a "sombre day" and arguing that it undermines European unity and values [2][3] Group 2 - German Chancellor Merz acknowledged that while the agreement avoids a trade conflict that could severely impact Germany's export-driven economy, he expressed dissatisfaction with the 15% tariff [6] - Many EU countries share a similar sentiment, recognizing the deal as imbalanced but supporting it to avoid escalating trade tensions [6][7] - The agreement is expected to be finalized in a joint statement by August 1, with further negotiations to establish a comprehensive deal [7] Group 3 - European stock markets reacted positively to the news, with the Stoxx 600 index reaching a four-month high, indicating a mixed sentiment among European companies regarding the deal [7] - Economists noted that while the 15% tariff is better than expected, there are concerns about the long-term competitiveness of European exports and the costs that US customers will incur due to the tariffs [7]

Core Points - The European Union and the United States have reached a new trade agreement, with the U.S. imposing a 15% tariff on products imported from the EU [1] - French Prime Minister François Bérou criticized the agreement as a "surrender" by the EU, indicating dissatisfaction among French officials regarding the "imbalance" of the deal [1] - French officials express concerns that the current trade situation is unsustainable and highlights a structural change in U.S. trade policy, which they believe disregards World Trade Organization rules [1] Group 1 - The new trade agreement aims to provide temporary stability for economic participants threatened by U.S. tariff escalations [1] - French Minister for European Affairs Benjamin Haddad emphasized the need for a reevaluation of the trade relationship, stating that the current situation is not satisfactory and poses risks of being completely undermined [1] - Minister for Foreign Trade Laurent Saint-Martin pointed out the imbalance in trade, particularly in the digital services sector, and called for efforts to achieve a balance in trade relations [1] Group 2 - Saint-Martin advocates for a stronger and more assertive stance against the U.S., suggesting that the final agreement may differ if the EU demonstrates its counter-capacity [2]

欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩：欧盟将与日本更加紧密地合作，以应对经济胁迫并解决不公平贸易做法。 ...

"我们注意到了有关报道"，林剑表示，关于长和出售海外港口资产事，国家市场监督管理总局和相关部门 已多次发声，你可以查阅。作为原则，我想在这里强调，中方一贯坚决反对经济胁迫，霸道、霸凌。 林剑重申，关于有关国家船只通航问题，中方将一如既往尊重巴拿马对运河的主权，承认运河作为永久中 立国际水道的地位。我们支持巴拿马作为主权独立国家，坚持独立自主，坚定捍卫自身的合法权益。 来源：澎湃新闻 责编：王璐璐 6月11日，外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。有记者提问，据报道，巴拿马运河管理局负责人10日就香 港长江和记运河港口出售案称，目前交易结构或将导致港口所有权过于集中，损害巴市场竞争力，也不符 合中立原则。该负责人并称，不会允许美政府船只免费通航。中方对此有何评论？ 校对：高源 百万用户都在看 暴增超370%！A股，重磅信号！ 突发，美军出动！特朗普发声 任正非最新发声！ 重磅来袭！突然，跳涨94%！ 全面暂停！特朗普签了！ 违法和不良信息举报电话：0755-83514034 邮箱：bwb@stcn.com ...

外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。 中美经贸磋商有无下一步具体安排？外交部回应 在11日的外交部例行记者会上，有媒体提问称，6月9日到10日，中美双方在伦敦举行中美经贸磋商机制 首次会议。您能否介绍这次会议的详细内容和成果？中美经贸磋商有无下一步具体安排？对此，中国外交 部发言人林剑表示，中方代表在伦敦就磋商的情况作出了回应，目前我没有可以进一步提供的信息。 外交部回应香港长和出售海外港口资产：中方一贯反对经济胁迫 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体 法律责任的权利。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理，微信ID：SecuritiesTimes END 点击关键字可查看 潜望系列深度报道丨 股事会专栏 丨 投资小红书 丨 e公司调查 丨 时报会客厅 丨 十大明星私募访谈 丨 商务部国际贸易谈判代表：中美原则上达成协议框架 丨 午盘，异动拉升！ 丨 美股，全线上涨！ 道指创阶段新高 丨 凌晨，比亚迪重大宣布！ 丨 车圈大事件！多家车企宣布→ 丨 见证历史！激增 80%，这一产品狂飙，规模突破3100亿元！ 丨 深圳，重磅利好！中办、国办发文 丨 A股，午后 ...