可美方此前对于自己能战胜中国的那种盲目自信，又是从何而来的呢？ 这篇文章的观点很简单也很直白：大量证据表明，中国不会像一些美国人宣扬的"陷入困境"，——而美 国，应该放弃"战胜中国"的想法。 这篇由彭博社记者克里斯托弗·比姆（Christopher Beam）撰写的文章，先是以今年全球最关注的中美贸 易博弈为切入点，指出今年4月的时候美方曾信心满满地认为中国会输，但在随后的几个月里，人们却 发现"虚张声势"的其实是美方自己，而中方则在这场较量之中，充分地展现了自己的实力。 有学者还认为，这场较量同时也证明，在中国不同于美国的体制下，同样能孕育出一套既可行又可持续 的发展模式。 随着2026年的临近，美国媒体《彭博商业周刊》于近日刊登了一篇回顾2025年中美关系的文章。 根据比姆的介绍，美国一些人长期以来一直存在着一种对中国的"惯性思维"，认为经济快速发展的中 国，会在一定时期"陷入困境"，甚至"崩溃"。 "这种观点愈发站不住脚了，因为中国在诸多领域的表现实在太过亮眼"，比姆写道，"那些一心想看到 中国受挫的势力，必须接受一个现实：中国是一个强大的竞争对手 —— 而且会不断发展其已然可观的 优势，在电动汽车、清 ...

Group 1 - The International Monetary Fund (IMF) projects that by 2025, China's economy will surpass 40 trillion international dollars in purchasing power parity (PPP), while the US will remain just above 30 trillion, highlighting a significant gap of over 10 trillion [1][3] - This gap reflects not just numerical differences but also the depth of industry and policy stability between the two nations, indicating a fundamental competition in development models rather than mere rhetoric [3][4] - China's advantages include a robust industrial supply chain, a resilient domestic market with 1.4 billion consumers, and a service sector that is improving in quality and efficiency [4][6] Group 2 - China's economy is expected to experience a turning point in 2025, driven by the simultaneous growth of technology, consumption, and trade, marking a significant moment of resonance among these sectors [6][7] - The automotive sector, particularly in new energy vehicles, has seen substantial growth, with nearly 7 million units sold in the first half of the year, accounting for 44% of total vehicle sales [6] - Consumer spending is recovering without excessive monetary stimulus, as evidenced by a 5% increase in retail sales, with consumption contributing over half to economic growth [7][9] Group 3 - China's trade landscape is diversifying, with increasing exports to ASEAN, Central Asia, and Africa, and trade with Belt and Road Initiative countries surpassing 50% of total trade [10][12] - The country is transitioning from merely selling products to building partnerships and shared standards with its trading partners, indicating a shift towards collaborative development [12][14] - The challenges China faces include ongoing adjustments in the real estate sector and the need for faster service industry reforms, as evidenced by a slowdown in economic growth to 4.8% in the third quarter [9][10] Group 4 - The ability to convert engineering efficiency into affordable products for the public, transform the domestic market into a launchpad for international expansion, and foster regional cooperation into long-term alliances is crucial for China's future [16] - The sustainability of China's fiscal structure, free from the burden of massive interest payments, allows for more investment in education, research, and infrastructure [12][14] - The competition between China and the US is not merely about technological advancement but also about addressing underlying economic challenges, with the potential for significant shifts in the global economic landscape by 2025 [15][16]

Core Insights - The speech by Peter Walker highlights the significant achievements of China in poverty alleviation, infrastructure development, and manufacturing capabilities, particularly in advanced fields, which challenges the United States to acknowledge China's remarkable progress [1] Group 1: Cultural and Ideological Differences - The discussion begins with an exploration of the fundamental cultural and ideological differences between the East and West, setting the stage for a deeper analysis of the development models of China and the United States [1] Group 2: China's Development Achievements - Walker emphasizes China's large-scale poverty reduction efforts, the construction of world-class infrastructure, and the establishment of a leading manufacturing sector, which collectively represent a substantial shift in global economic dynamics [1] - He points out that China's breakthroughs in cutting-edge fields further solidify its position on the world stage, necessitating a reevaluation of the U.S. perspective on China [1]

Group 1 - The article discusses the misguided belief among some developing countries, including India, that they can replicate China's development model to become global powers, which often leads to disappointment due to their relatively weaker capabilities [1] - India announced retaliatory tariffs against the US on July 4, 2023, in response to a 25% increase in tariffs on various Indian goods by the US, significantly impacting India's exports [1][5] - The trade dynamics between India and the US show a significant imbalance, with India's exports to the US projected at $874 billion and imports at $418 billion for 2024, resulting in a trade surplus of approximately $400 billion for India [1] Group 2 - India's exports to the US primarily consist of generic drugs, petroleum products, solar panels, telecom equipment, garments, and precious stones, which account for about 40% of total exports, while the US exports high-end products like weapons, chips, and machinery to India [3] - Indian officials often exhibit a sense of entitlement, believing they are a central player on the world stage, which leads to a dismissive attitude towards US pressure [3] - The ongoing trade negotiations between India and the US have faced significant challenges, leading to a perception that India's responses are more bluster than substance, particularly in the context of domestic crises [5][6] Group 3 - Modi's government is under pressure to respond to the US with equivalent countermeasures, even if they are merely symbolic, indicating India's willingness to stand up to the US alongside China [8] - The friction between the US and India presents opportunities for China, allowing it to observe and prepare for potential shifts in the geopolitical landscape [8] - The article suggests that if the US continues its current approach, it may inadvertently push India and other countries closer to China, potentially altering the balance of power in the region [8]

Group 1 - The recent high-level economic talks between China and the U.S. in Geneva resulted in substantial progress on tariff policies [2] - The trade imbalance between China and the U.S. is a reflection of their differing development models, with the U.S. adopting a strong dollar and high consumption approach leading to long-term trade deficits, while China maintains a weak yuan and high savings resulting in trade surpluses [3] - The previous U.S. administration's tariffs were aimed at addressing structural economic issues domestically, rather than being a direct critique of China's performance [3] Group 2 - Chinese enterprises need to expand globally and explore becoming true multinational companies, with local and central government policies supporting this initiative [4] - Current macroeconomic policies are correctly focused on encouraging consumption, but there is a need for greater emphasis on increasing residents' income and wealth to change expectations fundamentally [5]