Workflow
国际政治博弈
icon
Search documents
痛心!特朗普政策致美印信任受损,印度何去何从
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-16 23:37
对此,美国前国家安全事务助理博尔顿在接受印度《经济时报》采访时,毫不留情地批评了特朗普的这 一政策。博尔顿表示,特朗普的政策实在是太随意了,他的风格就是喜欢搞交易,缺乏长远的规划。博 尔顿指出,特朗普对俄罗斯和中国都没有实施制裁,巴基斯坦、土耳其等国家也逃过了这一劫,却偏偏 针对印度,这不仅损害了美印关系,还让美国在国际上丢了脸。他还强调,特朗普的关税政策已经严重 伤害了美印双边的信任,即使提名塞尔吉奥·戈尔担任驻印大使,也难以弥补这个"窟窿"。 那么,面对特朗普的这种"特殊关照",印度该怎么办呢?博尔顿给印度提出了一个建议。他说:"如果 你上钩,公开与他交锋,事情不会好起来。"这句话可谓是博尔顿建议的核心。他认为,特朗普这个人 喜欢即时反应,一旦印度公开与他对抗,他就会"上钩",然后拉着印度打嘴仗,这样只会让局面变得更 乱。所以,博尔顿建议印度不要急着公开硬刚特朗普,而是要保持沉默,通过秘密外交渠道来沟通。比 如,可以通过大使馆或者高层私下热线,向美国国务院传话,避免媒体的放大。博尔顿觉得,这种方式 最能对付特朗普这种反复无常的人,因为特朗普注重表面表演,私下操作可以绕过他的冲动决策。而印 度到目前为止的回 ...
专家:“北溪”爆炸事件关注度上升与当前俄乌局势密切相关
Group 1 - The investigation into the "Nord Stream" gas pipeline explosion has seen limited progress over the past three years, with Germany being the primary victim yet not actively pursuing the investigation [1][2] - The explosion has exacerbated the Russia-Ukraine conflict and further strained energy ties between Europe and Russia, with Denmark and Sweden terminating their investigations while Germany continues [1][2] - The complexity of the investigation is heightened by its ties to international politics, with various parties using the incident as a diplomatic tool, leading to a lack of transparency in the investigation process [2] Group 2 - Recent developments have brought renewed attention to the "Nord Stream" explosion, particularly following the arrest of a Ukrainian suspect in Italy, who was subsequently extradited to Germany [3] - The identification of a Ukrainian action group as responsible for the explosion has emerged, although the number of suspects apprehended remains low [3] - The ongoing geopolitical dynamics surrounding the Russia-Ukraine conflict are influencing the investigation, with the U.S. potentially using the exposure of details as leverage against Ukraine [3]
欧洲干了件以前不敢干的事,让美财长很是恼火,却在中国意料之中
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-20 09:27
Group 1 - European countries have shown a significant shift in their stance towards U.S. proposals, particularly regarding tariffs on China, indicating a newfound assertiveness in international trade discussions [1][3] - The automotive industry in Europe heavily relies on the Chinese market, with over 10% of exports linked to it, highlighting the economic interdependence between Europe and China [9] - Europe's refusal to support U.S. tariffs against China is driven by self-interest, as aligning with U.S. policies could harm European businesses and economic interests [9] Group 2 - The U.S. is attempting to shift domestic economic blame onto China, using tariffs as a political tool to distract from its own economic challenges [5] - China's proactive measures, such as expanding domestic demand and diversifying trade partnerships, have positioned it to withstand external pressures, including U.S. tariffs [13] - The recent developments signal a potential shift in international relations, with countries increasingly recognizing their interconnected interests and moving away from U.S. hegemony [13]
北约秘书长称美俄峰会“考验普京”,博尔顿猛批:特朗普已经犯错了
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-08-11 13:07
【文/观察者网 柳白】美国总统特朗普宣布将于8月15日与俄罗斯总统普京会晤后,北约秘书长马克·吕 特10日接受美国广播公司(ABC)采访时称,本次峰会旨在"考验"普京的停战意愿,而美国前总统国家 安全顾问博尔顿则强烈反对此次会晤,抨击特朗普"已经犯错了"。 "下周五(15日)很重要,这是一次考验普京的机会,考验他是否真的有意结束这场冲突。"吕特对ABC 《本周》节目主持人乔纳森·卡尔称,"至于全面谈判,希望周五能成为这一进程中的重要一步…… " 他说,谈判将涉及领土问题和安全保障,但还涉及一个核心问题:必须承认乌克兰有权决定自己的未 来, 这位北约领导人坚称,"乌克兰作为主权国家,有权决定自身的地缘政治未来,军事力量水平当然不应 受到限制。对北约而言,我们在东翼的存在也不应受到限制"。 吕特接受ABC采 访画面 他还称,在领土问题上,如果未来的某个协议承认俄罗斯事实上控制了乌克兰的一些土地,"这种承认 必须是基于实际情况的,而非具有政治意义的法理承认"。 吕特不忘吹捧,"总统(特朗普)想结束这场战争,他想结束这种可怕的生命损失"。 尽管吕特力挺特朗普参加"特普会",但博尔顿在同一节目中直接对特朗普提出批评。 ...
时间不多了,印尼“缴械投降”,未料刚向美国下跪,又迎灭顶之灾
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-07-25 09:23
Group 1 - The trade agreement between Indonesia and the United States requires Indonesia to open its market for U.S. industrial technology and agricultural products, eliminating 99% of tariff barriers, while Indonesian goods face a 19% tariff in the U.S. [1][3] - The agreement includes a large procurement deal worth billions, including purchases of Boeing aircraft, agricultural products, and energy, raising concerns about the unequal terms of the deal [1][3][12] - Indonesia's economic situation makes it difficult to absorb the expected influx of U.S. products, leading to speculation that Indonesia may act as a middleman to resell these products to other markets [5][9] Group 2 - The U.S. threatened to impose a 32% tariff on Indonesian goods if the agreement was not reached, making the 19% tariff seem more acceptable to Indonesia [5][12] - The influx of U.S. agricultural products could threaten local farmers and food security in Indonesia, as the country has a fragile agricultural sector [7][12] - The U.S. aims to showcase its international influence and secure mineral resources from Indonesia, particularly rare earth elements, which are crucial for high-tech industries [9][12] Group 3 - The projected $50 billion market access opportunity is unrealistic given Indonesia's annual import total and its limited capacity to absorb U.S. agricultural and high-tech products [12][13] - The agreement reflects a political maneuver rather than a genuine economic partnership, with both parties having their own agendas [13] - Historical patterns suggest that such unequal agreements often disadvantage the weaker party, in this case, Indonesia [13]
美国又找中国求援,伊朗掐住石油命脉,谁在暗地偷笑?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-28 20:20
Group 1 - The U.S. is seeking China's assistance to persuade Iran not to block the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting a shift in roles where China is now being asked to intervene rather than being the proactive party in dealings with Iran [1][3] - A potential blockade of the Strait of Hormuz could lead to skyrocketing global oil prices, significantly impacting countries like China and Japan that rely on this shipping route for oil imports [1][3] - China's dependence on Iranian oil has decreased, with Russia now being the primary supplier, as Iran accounts for less than 10% of China's energy imports [1][3] Group 2 - Iran faces a dilemma as it relies on oil exports for its economy, and blocking the Strait could lead to severe economic consequences for itself [3][5] - Countries like India are under pressure from rising oil prices and must seek alternative oil sources, while shipping companies in Southeast Asia are anxious about potential disruptions [3][5] - China is in a difficult position, needing to balance its relationship with Iran while also managing U.S. expectations, having diversified its energy sources in recent years [3][5] Group 3 - Russia is benefiting from the situation, as U.S. sanctions on Iran have led to increased cooperation between Iran and Russia, allowing Russia to raise oil prices significantly [5][6] - The general public is feeling the impact of rising oil prices, leading to increased costs of living and potential job losses due to higher operational costs for businesses [5][6] - The U.S. government is caught in a dilemma, recognizing the limited effectiveness of sanctions on Iran while facing domestic opposition to military escalation in the region [5][6]