2025年9月26日，在白宫的一场记者会上，一场针对科技巨头的政治清算正在发酵，特朗普看似针对联邦调查局前局长科米的表态，实则拉 开了美国政坛对科技巨头微软"秋后算账" 的序幕。 莉萨·莫纳科的职业生涯与特朗普的政治命运交织已久。1968年出生于波士顿精英家庭的她，父亲是哈佛医学院资深教授，母亲在公共政策 领域颇具影响力。 这种家庭背景使她自幼便跻身美国东北部学术与政治圈层。奥巴马执政时期，她历任助理司法部长、总统首席反恐顾问，直接参与《外国 情报监视法》的执行。 政治清算的延续：从司法系统到科技巨头 拜登任内，莫纳科重返司法部担任副部长，主导了对特朗普"通俄门""国会山骚乱"等案件的调查，还推动起诉苹果公司垄断、调查丹麦银 行洗钱案，这些行动均被特朗普视为"政治迫害"。 2025年2月，特朗普重返白宫后立即撤销了莫纳科的安全许可，禁止其接触机密信息和进入联邦设施。此次施压微软解雇莫纳科，不过是这 一政治清算的延续。特朗普在记者会上声称，莫纳科在微软担任国际商务领导人期间，可能利用其接触的政府合同信息危害国家安全。 但分析人士指出，这一指控缺乏实质性证据，更多是特朗普对政敌的个人报复。 特朗普的政治清算不仅针 ...

当地时间 10 月 1 日零时，美国联邦政府近 7 年以来首次停摆，约 75 万联邦雇员被迫无薪休假。这原本是一场令历任总统焦头烂额的政治危机，却被特朗普 玩成了 "精准打击" 的棋局。他不仅在停摆前高调打高尔夫，还借机签署行政令打击政敌、清洗军队高层，甚至公开宣称政府关门 "好处很多"。这位白宫主 人究竟在下一盘怎样的棋？ 美国政府停摆的本质是两党预算博弈破裂。民主党要求特朗普撤走国民警卫队、尊重预算分配权，否则拒绝通过拨款法案。但特朗普的反应堪称 "教科书级 搅局"：9 月 25 日签署备忘录打击左翼政治暴力，点名威胁民主党金主索罗斯；27 日宣布派兵进驻民主党控制的波特兰市；30 日要求各部门准备永久裁员 名单，直言要 "摆脱民主党的东西"。 更微妙的是时间线。9 月 17 日美联储在白宫偿还大部分债务后才降息 25 基点，被指故意加剧财政压力。而特朗普在停摆前密集会见 800 多名美军将领，宣 布 2026 年军费上调至 1 万亿美元，同时威胁 "不认同就辞职"。这一系列操作显示，他早已将停摆视为政治清算的工具。 2025 年美国面临 9.2 万亿美元国债到期，全年利息支出预计达 1.2 万亿美元，远 ...

Core Viewpoint - The unprecedented decision by former President Donald Trump to dismiss Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook has sparked significant political and financial turmoil, challenging the century-old tradition of the Federal Reserve's independence [1][4]. Group 1: Impact on Federal Reserve Independence - Trump's action represents a direct challenge to the Federal Reserve's independence, which has been a cornerstone of the U.S. financial system since its establishment in 1913 [3][4]. - The Federal Reserve's governance structure, designed to ensure diverse and balanced monetary policy decisions, is at risk as Trump aims to replace dissenting members with allies [3][4]. Group 2: Legal and Political Repercussions - Lisa Cook's immediate response includes plans to file a lawsuit against the dismissal, asserting that the President lacks the authority to unilaterally remove a Federal Reserve Governor [3][4]. - The legal framework established by the Federal Reserve Act protects the independence of the Fed, requiring "just cause" for any dismissal, a safeguard that Trump has seemingly breached [4]. Group 3: Economic Context and Implications - The backdrop of this political maneuvering includes a slowing U.S. economy and high debt levels, with Trump seeking to pressure the Fed into lowering interest rates to stimulate growth [6]. - Experts warn that if the President can manipulate the Federal Reserve, it could lead to detrimental effects on the dollar's status as a global reserve currency, echoing issues faced by developing nations [6]. Group 4: Broader Political Landscape - Trump's actions are part of a broader strategy to retaliate against perceived political adversaries, indicating a systematic approach to consolidate power within the government [7]. - The political polarization in the U.S. is exacerbated by these events, with significant legislative changes occurring under Republican control, further entrenching party divisions [9].

Group 1 - Tesla's stock price has seen a cumulative decline of over 22% by the end of July 2023, leading to a significant loss in market value as Elon Musk's ambitious plans for autonomous taxi services are met with skepticism from the market [1][3] - The California regulatory body has not approved Tesla's application for autonomous taxi operation, contrasting with Waymo's completion of over 100 million miles of real-world testing, highlighting a significant technological and regulatory gap [3] - Musk's political ambitions with the formation of the "American Party" could potentially disrupt the Republican Party's voter base, as a recent Marquette University Law School poll indicates that 40% of Republicans might support candidates from this new party [1][5] Group 2 - The political landscape is becoming increasingly complex, with Musk's actions potentially undermining the Republican Party while simultaneously providing ammunition for the Democrats, especially in light of Trump's recent attacks on Obama [5][7] - The Republican Party is facing internal strife, with Musk's focus on criticizing "Republican fiscal irresponsibility" striking at the party's vulnerabilities, while Trump's accusations against Obama serve as a distraction from pressing issues like the Epstein case [5][7] - The interplay between Musk's business challenges and political maneuvers suggests a new era of political dynamics, where traditional party lines may be blurred and the outcomes remain unpredictable [7]

Group 1 - The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on July 8 allows the Trump administration to proceed with a plan to reduce the federal workforce by approximately 260,000 employees, marking a significant victory for Trump [1] - The White House has declared this decision a decisive victory, claiming it will enhance government efficiency, leading to the revocation of several key policies from the Biden administration [1] - Trump's team is actively pursuing various actions, including the repeal of birthright citizenship protections and the reimplementation of travel bans for certain Muslim-majority countries, indicating a shift towards political retribution under the guise of reform [5] Group 2 - A federal judge in New Hampshire issued a temporary nationwide injunction halting Trump's birthright citizenship restrictions, which were set to take effect on July 27, indicating potential legal challenges ahead [7] - The injunction provides a buffer period for the Trump administration to appeal, potentially escalating the issue to the Supreme Court, which may have to reassess its previous rulings on national injunctions and the constitutionality of Trump's policies [7] - Civil rights lawyers warn that if implemented, the birthright citizenship policy could lead to a significant identity crisis in the U.S., affecting thousands of children born in the country [7] Group 3 - The Trump administration is restructuring the power dynamics through the judicial system, with a focus on appointing conservative judges, which raises concerns about the balance of power among the three branches of government [10] - The ongoing reforms are being scrutinized for their potential to either improve efficiency or undermine democratic institutions, highlighting the contentious nature of these changes [10]