Workflow
数字市场法
icon
Search documents
消息人士:Meta Platforms(META.O)可能因其商业模式而在《数字市场法》下再次面临欧盟的新指控。Meta不太可能向欧盟提供关于“支付或同意”模式的额外变更。欧盟可能在未来几周内提出新的指控,随后可能会处以每日罚款。
news flash· 2025-07-11 13:16
Core Viewpoint - Meta Platforms may face new charges from the EU under the Digital Markets Act due to its business model [1] Summary by Relevant Categories Regulatory Environment - The EU is likely to propose new charges against Meta in the coming weeks, potentially leading to daily fines [1] - Meta is unlikely to make additional changes regarding its "pay or consent" model [1]
苹果上诉挑战欧盟42亿罚单:史无前例,称整改要求是“非法的”
Feng Huang Wang· 2025-07-07 12:55
Group 1 - The core issue revolves around Apple's appeal against a €500 million (approximately 4.2 billion RMB) fine imposed by the EU, which Apple claims is unprecedented and illegal [1][2] - The EU Commission's fine was based on Apple's violation of regulations that require developers to direct users to purchase outside of the App Store [1] - Apple has made adjustments to its App Store policies in June to comply with EU regulations, introducing a tiered commission structure of 5% or 13%, plus a 2% user acquisition fee [1] Group 2 - Apple has become more lenient in allowing developers to promote payment methods outside of its ecosystem, potentially reducing some of Apple's fees [2] - The EU's definition of "steering" has been expanded, allowing developers to guide users to other platforms for transactions in more scenarios [2] - Apple's ongoing regulatory challenges are highlighted by a recent ruling in California that requires Apple to allow U.S. developers to direct users to complete in-app purchases on the web, posing a risk of significant revenue loss [2]
刚刚!关税,重磅传来!美国、欧盟,大消息
券商中国· 2025-07-01 11:51
Group 1 - The EU is willing to accept a 10% general tariff from the US but seeks exemptions in key sectors such as pharmaceuticals, alcohol, semiconductors, and commercial aircraft [1][2] - The EU is also looking for the US to provide quotas and exemptions to significantly reduce the 25% tariff on cars and parts, as well as the 50% tariff on steel and aluminum products [2] - The EU has received a draft agreement proposal from the US and is actively engaging in discussions to reach a trade agreement before the July 9 deadline [3][5] Group 2 - The EU has outlined four potential scenarios before the July 9 deadline: reaching an acceptable asymmetric agreement, receiving an unbalanced proposal from the US, extending the deadline for negotiations, or Trump exiting negotiations and increasing tariffs [6] - If the fourth scenario occurs, the EU is likely to implement comprehensive retaliatory measures, including tariffs on US goods valued at €21 billion and an additional list worth €95 billion [6][7] - Currently, US tariffs cover products worth €3.8 trillion from the EU, accounting for approximately 70% of the EU's total exports to the US [7] Group 3 - The EU has clarified that its digital legislation, including the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act, is not part of the trade negotiation agenda with the US [8] - Despite concerns that the EU might relax regulations on US tech giants, the EU Commission has reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining its sovereignty in legislative matters [8][9] - The EU is still striving to finalize a trade agreement with the US by July 9, despite external pressures [8]
美欧关税谈判“大限将至”,欧盟列出哪四种可能?哪些领域绝不妥协?
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-07-01 10:18
Core Points - The article discusses the potential outcomes of the upcoming US-EU trade negotiations, highlighting four possible scenarios that could unfold before the July 9 deadline [1][3][4] - The EU has shown a willingness to accept a 10% tariff on various goods, while seeking commitments from the US to lower tariffs in key sectors such as pharmaceuticals, alcohol, semiconductors, and commercial aircraft [1][3] - The EU has made it clear that digital legislation will not be part of the trade negotiations, maintaining its sovereignty over regulatory decisions [5][6] Group 1: Potential Scenarios - Four potential scenarios outlined by EU officials include: reaching an acceptable but asymmetric agreement, the US proposing an unacceptable agreement, extending the deadline for negotiations, or the Trump administration exiting the talks and raising tariffs [1][3] - The most likely scenario involves the EU retaliating against the US if the Trump administration withdraws from negotiations and increases tariffs [4] Group 2: Tariff Discussions - The EU is pushing for the US to significantly reduce tariffs on automobiles and parts, which are currently at 25%, and on steel and aluminum products, which are at 50% [3][4] - The EU's acceptance of a 10% tariff marks a shift from its initial stance against such a rate, indicating a potential compromise in negotiations [3] Group 3: Digital Legislation - The EU has explicitly stated that its digital market and service laws will not be included in the trade talks, emphasizing its commitment to existing regulations [5][6] - The EU's digital market law aims to regulate major tech companies, predominantly US firms, and has already resulted in significant fines for companies like Apple and Meta [5][6] Group 4: Trade Data and Implications - The EU estimates that US tariffs currently cover approximately €380 billion worth of products, which constitutes about 70% of its total exports to the US [7] - In 2024, the EU exported $52.8 billion worth of automobiles and parts to the US, making it the largest export destination for these products [7]
苹果拟调整App Store规则向欧盟示好 避免因反垄断再遭处罚
Huan Qiu Wang· 2025-06-26 06:38
Core Viewpoint - Apple is planning to adjust its App Store rules in response to a €500 million fine imposed by EU regulators, aiming to demonstrate goodwill and prevent future penalties [1][3] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Apple is set to submit a new proposal to the EU by June 26, which will ease restrictions for third-party developers, allowing them to direct users outside of Apple's ecosystem for software purchases [1] - The proposal comes after weeks of intense negotiations between Apple and EU regulators, and it aims to help Apple avoid additional penalties for non-compliance with the Digital Markets Act [1][3] - In April, both Apple and Meta were found in violation of the Digital Markets Act, with Apple receiving a €500 million fine and Meta facing a €200 million fine for its "pay or agree" ad-free service on Instagram and Facebook [3] Group 2: Apple's Response and Legal Actions - Apple has expressed strong opposition to the EU's fine, claiming discrimination and an attempt to force the company to open its core technologies for free [3] - The company plans to appeal the €500 million fine in the Luxembourg court [1] - In the past, Apple has faced significant fines from the EU, including an €1.8 billion penalty for anti-competitive practices against music streaming competitors [3] Group 3: EU's Broader Regulatory Landscape - The EU has been actively enforcing antitrust regulations against major tech companies, with notable fines including over $8 billion against Alphabet and a demand for Apple to repay €13 billion in taxes to Ireland [3] - The EU has also compelled Amazon to modify its e-commerce platform rules and is investigating Microsoft's Teams software for potential antitrust violations [3]
宝洁、可口可乐,遭欧盟突击检查!
21世纪经济报道· 2025-04-10 11:00
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing antitrust investigations by the European Union (EU) against major tech companies, particularly Google and Apple, under the newly enacted Digital Markets Act (DMA), highlighting the implications for these companies and the broader tech landscape in Europe [1][3][4]. Group 1: Antitrust Investigations - The EU has initiated antitrust investigations against Google and Apple, with both companies facing scrutiny for potentially violating the DMA [1][4]. - Google is accused of favoring its own services in search results and restricting developers from directing users to alternative app download channels, which could lead to significant fines [4][5]. - Apple is being pressured to open its ecosystem to third-party devices, which could enhance interoperability but also raises concerns about user privacy and innovation [4][6]. Group 2: Regulatory Context - The DMA, effective since March 2022, aims to regulate "gatekeeper" companies, primarily targeting large US tech firms, with potential fines reaching up to 10% of global annual revenue for violations [3][4]. - The EU's actions against US tech giants are seen as a response to the lack of local internet champions in Europe, as the market is dominated by American companies [9][10]. Group 3: Market Implications - The dominance of US companies in the European digital market is significant, with Google holding nearly 90% market share in search engines and major players like Amazon and Microsoft controlling over two-thirds of the AI and cloud computing markets [10]. - The EU's push for digital sovereignty includes a €200 billion investment plan for AI, indicating a strategic move to reduce reliance on US technology and foster local competition [10].