英国媒体报道说，这场反移民抗议是"英国数十年来规模最大的极右翼集会之一"，据称有15万人参 与；而与此同时，反对右翼的群体也举行示威活动。反移民抗议示威者打出"阻止难民的偷渡小船、保 护我们的孩子"等口号；而在不远处，反右翼的抗议群体则高举"欢迎难民""抵制法西斯主义"的标语。 9月13日，在英国首都伦敦，对移民持不同观点的人们在抗议活动现场争辩。新华社记者高文成摄 抗议现场部署了大批执勤警察，负责分隔持对立立场的抗议人群。记者看到，有抗议者向警察投掷 啤酒瓶。伦敦警方事后通报说，部分警员在分隔人群时遭到袭击，数十人受伤，其中4人伤势严重，另 有24名抗议者被逮捕。 9月13日，在英国首都伦敦，英国警方维护现场秩序。新华社记者高文成摄 此次抗议活动将英国近期紧张的反移民氛围推向了高潮。其导火索可追溯至今年7月：一名移民男 子因性侵14岁女孩被捕后，英国多地针对移民安置酒店的抗议活动便接连爆发。有网友在社交媒体上发 问："英国为何一直接纳通过非法小船偷渡来的难民，却对合法求职、希望留在英国的移民如此苛刻?" 对这场反移民抗议活动，支持者将其誉为"英国历史性的爱国行动"；反对者则严正警告，这本质上 是"极右翼势力 ...

此次抗议活动将英国近期紧张的反移民氛围推向了高潮。其导火索可追溯至今年7月：一名移民男 子因性侵14岁女孩被捕后，英国多地针对移民安置酒店的抗议活动便接连爆发。有网友在社交媒体上发 问："英国为何一直接纳通过非法小船偷渡来的难民，却对合法求职、希望留在英国的移民如此苛刻?" 对这场反移民抗议活动，支持者将其誉为"英国历史性的爱国行动"；反对者则严正警告，这本质上 是"极右翼势力的最大化示威"。 新华社伦敦9月15日电 记者手记｜在伦敦抗议活动现场 感受西方社会民意撕裂 新华社记者高文成 于艾岑 13日下午，在英国首都伦敦市中心的特拉法加广场，记者目睹了激烈对抗的一幕：一名黑人男子正 与两名白人男子围绕"反对移民是否属于种族主义"辩论得面红耳赤，双方情绪激动，险些拳脚相向，最 终被围观者拉开。 英国媒体报道说，这场反移民抗议是"英国数十年来规模最大的极右翼集会之一"，据称有15万人参 与；而与此同时，反对右翼的群体也举行示威活动。反移民抗议示威者打出"阻止难民的偷渡小船、保 护我们的孩子"等口号；而在不远处，反右翼的抗议群体则高举"欢迎难民""抵制法西斯主义"的标语。 抗议现场部署了大批执勤警察，负责分隔持对立 ...

【环球时报综合报道】8月31日，澳大利亚悉尼爆发反移民游行示威活动。据澳大利亚广播公司 （ABC）9月1日报道，由于游行队伍中出现了民粹主义政客、阴谋论者，甚至包含"新纳粹"人士，这引 发了当地社会对于极右翼势力在澳常态化活动的广泛焦虑。对于这场抗议，澳大利亚联邦政府明确表达 反对意见，谴责该类活动传播仇恨和歧视，并与"新纳粹"组织相关联。 据ABC报道，"为澳大利亚前行"是一个旗帜鲜明的反移民团体，其支持者包含澳大利亚极右翼政客，比 如"一国党"（昆士兰州极右翼政党）党魁保琳·汉森以及昆士兰州参议员马尔科姆·罗伯茨等。除了民粹 政客的积极参与，"新纳粹"团体也在多地现身，澳大利亚新纳粹领袖托马斯·塞维尔还进行了讲话。不 仅如此，英、美多名极右翼人士在网上发声支持。连美国企业家马斯克也参与声援，但马斯克在社交媒 体转发的消息夸大了参与游行活动的人数。英国《卫报》称，游行队伍中充满各类"白人至上"元素的宣 传图案。 澳总理阿尔巴尼斯称，"新纳粹"人士的演讲"不可接受"。麦克里大学安全研究专家表示，澳反移民情绪 已被煽动起来，31日的游行示威活动就是为澳政府敲响的警钟。澳大利亚"对话"新闻网对多国极右翼人 士的支 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent increase in seats for the far-right party in Japan's House of Councillors election has raised concerns about the potential rightward shift in Japanese politics and its implications for social cohesion and foreign relations [1][5]. Election Results - In the July 20 election, the ruling coalition of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and Komeito suffered significant losses, losing their majority [2]. - The far-right party, established in 2020, increased its seats from 1 to 15, surpassing the threshold needed to independently propose non-budget-related legislation [2]. - The party's rise is characterized by its "Japan First" slogan, opposition to globalization, and strong nationalist rhetoric, positioning it as an extreme right-wing entity [2]. Voter Sentiment and Economic Context - Discontent among voters, particularly among conservative supporters of the LDP, has been linked to economic challenges, including rising food prices and dissatisfaction with the government's response [3]. - The party's proposals to enhance food self-sufficiency and reduce taxes resonate with voters facing economic pressures [3]. - The stark contrast between the economic struggles of Japanese citizens and the spending power of foreign tourists has fueled resentment, contributing to the party's appeal [3]. Information Dissemination and Social Media Influence - The shift in information consumption from traditional media to social media has allowed the far-right party to amplify negative sentiments and attract disillusioned voters [4]. - The party's strategy mirrors that of far-right movements in Europe, leveraging social media to exploit public dissatisfaction with traditional parties [4]. Political Implications and Future Outlook - The rise of the far-right party may signal a shift in Japan's political landscape, with potential implications for social dynamics and policy direction [5]. - The party's influence has already prompted the ruling LDP to address foreigner-related policies more directly, indicating its growing impact on political discourse [6]. - Analysts warn that if the far-right continues to gain traction, it could lead to a more aggressive foreign policy stance and strained relations with neighboring countries [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution in Germany has officially classified the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party as an "extreme right organization," indicating significant concerns about its activities against the democratic order of Germany [1][2]. Group 1: Official Classification and Evidence - The AfD has been under surveillance since 2021 and was previously labeled as an "extreme right suspect." The recent classification is based on over 1,000 pages of detailed reports that document the party's activities and statements, suggesting a systematic deviation from legitimate political conduct [2][3]. - The evidence cited includes violations of human dignity, undermining the rule of law, and challenging democratic principles [2]. Group 2: Legal and Political Implications - The classification allows intelligence agencies to employ broader surveillance methods against the AfD, including human intelligence, financial investigations, and communication monitoring [3]. - There is ongoing public debate regarding whether this classification will lead to a formal ban on the AfD, although initiating such a process requires a complex legal procedure involving the Bundestag, Bundesrat, or federal government [4][5].