俄罗斯政治分析师谢尔盖·米赫耶夫最近在国家电视台节目上抛出重磅言论，说如果搞全民公投，大部分俄罗斯人会同意对欧洲和乌克兰来场核打击。这事 儿发生在2025年12月底，正好赶上美国那边特朗普和泽连斯基在海湖庄园碰头谈和平的事。米赫耶夫这家伙一向是克里姆林宫的忠实拥护者，他的表态听起 来像在给西方施压，提醒大家别太乐观。节目里他直言不讳，说这种极端想法其实代表了大多数民众的看法，还建议通过制造恐惧来拆散欧盟的团结。主持 人索洛维约夫在一旁点头附和，让整个讨论氛围更显激进。 这个言论一出，马上在国际上炸锅了。西方媒体争相报道，称这是俄罗斯宣传机器的又一出恐吓戏码。米赫耶夫的背景是典型的强硬派，他经常在电视上抨 击北约和乌克兰，声称西方在低估俄罗斯的决心。节目播出后，俄罗斯媒体监测组织赶紧翻译并扩散出去，让全球都听到这个警告。想想看，就在特朗普推 动的和平谈判有点苗头时，这种核威胁跳出来，明显是想搅局。乌克兰官员直接回击，说这是赤裸裸的宣传，目的是阻挠援助。 实际情况呢，俄罗斯国内的民意调查完全不买账。列瓦达中心去年底的数据显示，只有25%的俄罗斯人还支持继续打仗，而赞成谈判的达到了66%，这是历 史高点。核武器的支 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolving public opinion on nuclear weapons, particularly in the United States, highlighting a significant shift towards opposition against their use, as well as the efforts of the Japan Atomic Bomb Survivors Association to advocate for nuclear disarmament and recognition of the suffering caused by nuclear warfare [2][8]. Group 1: Public Opinion on Nuclear Weapons - In 1945, 53% of Americans supported the use of atomic bombs on multiple cities, a sentiment strongly defended by then-President Truman [7]. - Recent surveys indicate a dramatic change, with only 19% of Americans supporting the use of atomic bombs in 2024, and 36% believing that no atomic bomb should ever be used, marking a 32 percentage point increase from 1945 [8]. - The shift in opinion is particularly pronounced among younger generations, who are increasingly vocal against the use of nuclear weapons [8]. Group 2: Advocacy for Nuclear Disarmament - The Japan Atomic Bomb Survivors Association is intensifying its efforts to gain international recognition and support for nuclear disarmament, aiming for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2024 [4]. - During a recent event, representatives from the association emphasized the inhumanity of nuclear weapons and called for global discussions on their elimination [4][5]. - The association's advocacy is supported by a growing international sentiment against nuclear weapons, with surveys showing that 40-50% of respondents in several countries believe nuclear weapons should be abolished [9]. Group 3: Media and Historical Context - The reporting on nuclear bombings has evolved over the years, with increasing depth and quality in coverage, reflecting a persistent global concern about nuclear warfare [10]. - Research indicates that the number of survivors and their testimonies is dwindling, raising concerns about the future of nuclear disarmament advocacy and the transmission of historical memory [10].

Group 1 - The article discusses the recent nuclear threats made by former President Trump in response to provocative statements from Russian official Dmitry Medvedev, highlighting the tension between the U.S. and Russia [1][2] - Trump's order to redeploy two U.S. nuclear submarines is seen as a reaction to Medvedev's comments, although the actual impact on U.S. nuclear capabilities is minimal given the existing presence of numerous submarines armed with nuclear warheads [2] - The timing of these actions is crucial, as Trump's Middle East envoy is set to engage with Russian leadership regarding the Ukraine peace agreement, while the Kremlin remains steadfast in its military objectives [3] Group 2 - The article suggests that Trump's nuclear rhetoric may serve as a distraction from domestic political issues, potentially overshadowing scandals and other concerns [3] - Despite the heightened nuclear rhetoric, the overall relationship between Washington and Moscow is tense but not at a level of nuclear confrontation [3]

Core Viewpoint - The United States has officially deployed several B61-12 tactical nuclear bombs to the RAF Lakenheath base in Suffolk, UK, marking the first redeployment of nuclear weapons in the UK since 2008, in response to ongoing geopolitical tensions, particularly the Russia-Ukraine conflict [1] Group 1 - The deployment is a direct response to the escalating nuclear threats from Russia amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict [1] - This move aims to reinforce the United States' leadership position within NATO [1] - The deployment establishes a clearer nuclear threshold for potential conflicts on the Eastern European front [1]

Group 1 - The Kremlin has observed an escalation in tensions, including nuclear threats [1]

Group 1 - The core issue is the status of Iran's enriched uranium reserves, which are reportedly intact and under Iranian control, posing a significant challenge to preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons [1][2] - Iran possesses enough material to potentially manufacture approximately 10 nuclear weapons, raising concerns about its nuclear capabilities [1] - U.S. officials, including Vice President JD Vance and Senator Markwayne Mullin, assert that intelligence indicates Iran did not transfer nuclear materials prior to U.S. airstrikes on the Fordo facility, contradicting claims from Israel and Iran [2] Group 2 - The Fordo facility, located 300 feet underground in the southwestern mountains of Tehran, was targeted in a recent U.S. airstrike, which President Trump claimed had "completely destroyed" Iran's main uranium enrichment facilities [2] - Senator Mullin emphasized that even if the facilities were not entirely destroyed, the U.S. has significantly impaired Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons, indicating a high level of confidence in the intelligence regarding the targets [2] - There are indications that the U.S. may engage in more sustained military actions against Iran, potentially in collaboration with allies like Israel, to ensure the complete dismantling of Iran's nuclear capabilities [2]

Group 1 - The core point of the news is that the United States has conducted a large-scale precision strike on three key Iranian nuclear facilities to eliminate Iran's nuclear capabilities and threats [2][7][9] - President Trump announced that the military successfully targeted the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities, claiming that the uranium enrichment facilities have been completely destroyed [2][9] - Trump warned Iran of further attacks if they do not pursue peace, stating that the consequences would be more severe than what has been witnessed in the past eight days [2][9] Group 2 - Following the U.S. strikes, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu expressed gratitude towards President Trump for the military action against Iran's nuclear facilities [3][6] - The Israeli Defense Forces announced an upgrade in national alert status, prohibiting educational activities and gatherings due to the current situation [4][5] - An American official indicated that if the U.S. were to join Israel in a war against Iran, Iran is prepared to target U.S. military bases and personnel in the Middle East [7] Group 3 - The U.S. military reportedly dropped six bunker-buster bombs on the Fordow nuclear facility during the strikes [7][9] - Iran has a total of 25 to 30 facilities related to its nuclear program, with six being primary targets, including Natanz and Fordow [11] - The Fordow facility is designed to be deeply buried to withstand potential airstrikes, while the Natanz facility has underground production workshops protected by concrete walls [11]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses President Trump's announcement regarding the complete destruction of Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities, emphasizing the U.S. goal to eliminate Iran's uranium enrichment capabilities and curb the nuclear threat posed by Iran [1][2]. Group 1 - Trump stated that if Iran "cannot achieve peace," the U.S. will continue its attacks [2]. - The U.S. and Israel have closely collaborated as a team in this operation [2]. - A press conference is scheduled for the following morning, led by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the U.S. Secretary of Defense [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Russian Foreign Ministry has expressed concerns about nuclear threats in the Caspian Sea and is making efforts to bring the Iran issue back to the negotiation table [1] Group 1 - The Caspian Sea is facing nuclear threats, indicating a potential geopolitical risk in the region [1] - Russia is actively working to address the Iran issue, suggesting a focus on diplomatic solutions [1]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran is escalating, with both sides engaging in military actions and threats, impacting regional stability and international relations. Group 1: Military Actions and Statements - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu claims Israel has the capability to destroy all of Iran's nuclear facilities, including those in mountainous regions [1][3] - Netanyahu states that the Israeli military has already destroyed over half of Iran's missile launchers and emphasizes that Israel can eliminate all targets in Iran, regardless of U.S. involvement [3] - Iran's Supreme National Security Council warns that retaliatory actions against Israel will continue until it pays the necessary price, and any third-party intervention will be met with immediate response [5] - The Israeli military reports intercepting over 480 Iranian drones since initiating military actions against Iran [17] Group 2: International Reactions and Implications - The U.S. White House announces that President Trump will decide within two weeks whether to attack Iran, while communications with Iran are ongoing [6][8] - Following the escalation, U.S. airlines have suspended flights to the Middle East due to safety concerns, with United Airlines and American Airlines adjusting their operations accordingly [19] - Czech and Australian embassies in Iran have temporarily closed due to the heightened conflict [20][21] Group 3: Economic Impact - The conflict has led to a rise in international oil prices, with Brent crude oil futures increasing by over 2.80% to $78.85, nearing levels not seen since July 2024 [25] - Gold prices have continued to decline, while silver prices have seen significant increases, marking the highest monthly growth since March 2012 [26][27]