日前，网上流传出一则东风奕派007发生碰撞事故，后座车门打不开的视频，再次让汽车门把手安全问题成为外界关注焦点问题。 网传视频显示，一辆奕派007撞车后偏离道路撞向路边护网，车身未见明显变形，车辆在碰撞停止后约20秒开始冒黑烟。期间，主驾驶位司机自行打开驾 驶门下车，并多次尝试从外部打开左侧后排车门皆失败。在车辆火势极速蔓延的情况下，该司机与另一名跑来的男子用路边石头砸开前、后车窗，先后从 后排玻璃窗口拉出三名乘客。 根据报道，事故最终造成一人死亡，三人受伤。 2月5日，东风奕派发布声明称，经核实，视频记录的事故发生于2025年3月19日中午。团队在事故发生后立即赶赴现场，全力配合事故处置工作，并对涉 及的人员及家庭表达了关怀与慰问。根据调查认定，本次事故是车辆与货车高速碰撞后引发。 不过，针对外界关心的"车门打不开"问题，东风奕派目前尚未对外作出说明。 事实上，汽车门把手安全问题的频发，已引发相关主管部门的高度关注，并制定强制性标准。 《技术要求》明确，每个车门（不包括背门）应配备机械释放车门外把手，车辆的安全设计应为当发生不可逆约束装置展开或动力电池热扩散等事件后， 能够通过机械释放车门外把手，开启车门。 ...

每经记者｜李星 每经编辑｜何小桃 裴健如 日前，网上流传出一则东风奕派007发生碰撞事故，后座车门打不开的视频，再次让汽车门把手安全问题成为外界关注焦点问题。 网传视频显示，一辆奕派007撞车后偏离道路撞向路边护网，车身未见明显变形，车辆在碰撞停止后约20秒开始冒黑烟。期间，主驾驶位司机自行打开驾 驶门下车，并多次尝试从外部打开左侧后排车门皆失败。在车辆火势极速蔓延的情况下，该司机与另一名跑来的男子用路边石头砸开前、后车窗，先后从 后排玻璃窗口拉出三名乘客。 根据报道，事故最终造成一人死亡，三人受伤。 2月5日，东风奕派发布声明称，经核实，视频记录的事故发生于2025年3月19日中午。团队在事故发生后立即赶赴现场，全力配合事故处置工作，并对涉 及的人员及家庭表达了关怀与慰问。根据调查认定，本次事故是车辆与货车高速碰撞后引发。 不过，针对外界关心的"车门打不开"问题，东风奕派目前尚未对外作出说明。 事实上，汽车门把手安全问题的频发，已引发相关主管部门的高度关注，并制定强制性标准。 图片来源：工信部官网 2026年1月28日，工业和信息化部组织制定的强制性国家标准《汽车车门把手安全技术要求》（GB 48001-2 ...

日前，网上流传出一则东风奕派007发生碰撞事故，后座车门打不开的视频，再次让汽车门把手安全问题成为外界关注焦点问题。 网传视频显示，一辆奕派007撞车后偏离道路撞向路边护网，车身未见明显变形，车辆在碰撞停止后约20秒开始冒黑烟。期间，主驾驶位司机自行打开驾驶 门下车，并多次尝试从外部打开左侧后排车门皆失败。在车辆火势极速蔓延的情况下，该司机与另一名跑来的男子用路边石头砸开前、后车窗，先后从后排 玻璃窗口拉出三名乘客。 2月5日，东风奕派发布声明称，经核实，视频记录的事故发生于2025年3月19日中午。团队在事故发生后立即赶赴现场，全力配合事故处置工作，并对涉及 的人员及家庭表达了关怀与慰问。根据调查认定，本次事故是车辆与货车高速碰撞后引发。 不过，针对外界关心的"车门打不开"问题，东风奕派目前尚未对外作出说明。 事实上，汽车门把手安全问题的频发，已引发相关主管部门的高度关注，并制定强制性标准。 每经记者｜李星 每经编辑｜裴健如 图片来源：工信部 为了车内人员能够在紧急情况下打开车门，《技术要求》对车门内把手标志提出要求要求：根据车门开启方式，选用对应图形，图形尺寸至少为10 mmx7 mm；位于无任何遮挡的位 ...

近日，工业和信息化部组织制定的强制性国家标准《汽车车门把手安全技术要求》(GB 48001-2026)由 国家市场监督管理总局、国家标准化管理委员会批准发布，将于2027年1月1日起开始实施。 该强标提到，每个车门（不包括背门）应配备机械释放车门外把手，车辆的安全设计应为当发生不可逆 约束装置展开或动力电池热扩散等事件后，能够通过机械释放车门外把手，开启车门。机械释放车门内 把手要求每个车门（不包括背门）应配备至少一个机械释放车门内把手，且独立操作，任一车门内把手 应能够开启对应车门。 汽车门把手的安全问题再次引发公众关注。近日，网络平台上一则视频掀起热议。视频中，一辆2024款 的东风奕派007在撞车后偏离道路并处于静止状态，车辆在碰撞后约20秒开始冒出黑烟，随后出现明 火。期间，司机自行打开主驾驶门下车，并尝试从外部拉开后排左侧车门，但未能拉开。随后，司机和 另一名男子轮流用石头砸开后排车窗，在火势蔓延的危急情况下，先后从后排车窗中拉出三名乘客。 2月5日，东风奕派发布了《关于网络流传的eπ007事故视频的声明》。其中提到，上述事故发生于2025 年3月19日中午，团队在事故发生后立即赶赴现场，全力配合事 ...

2月5日，东风奕派发布了《关于网络流传的eπ007事故视频的声明》。其中提到，上述事故发生于2025 年3月19日中午，团队在事故发生后立即赶赴现场，全力配合事故处置工作，并对涉及的人员及家庭表 达了关怀与慰问。根据调查认定，本次事故是车辆与货车高速碰撞后引发。 尽管如此，车门把手为什么打不开仍是公众关注的焦点，东风奕派尚未对此做出回应。 在近年的交通事故中，隐藏式门把手带来的安全隐患层出不穷。比如：2024年，山西运城一问界M7车 辆高速追尾后，隐藏式门把手无法打开；2025年，小米SU7高速碰撞事故中，隐藏式门把手未被打开也 成为外界的关注点之一。 隐藏式门把手潜在的安全风险，增加了汽车碰撞、起火事故中潜在的逃生与救援风险。比如：断电情况 下，电动式外门把手和车门内把手失效；无明显、统一标志，增加紧急情况下的操作难度。 车门把手再引争议。 近日，工业和信息化部组织制定的强制性国家标准《汽车车门把手安全技术要求》(GB 48001-2026)由 国家市场监督管理总局、国家标准化管理委员会批准发布，将于2027年1月1日起开始实施。 汽车门把手的安全问题再次引发公众关注。近日，网络平台上一则视频掀起热议。视频 ...

Core Viewpoint - The potential safety hazards associated with hidden door handles have sparked global discussions and legal actions against Tesla due to a fatal accident involving a Model S vehicle [2][5]. Group 1: Legal and Regulatory Actions - Tesla is facing lawsuits and investigations from regulatory bodies in the U.S. due to safety concerns related to hidden door handles, particularly following a fatal accident where passengers were trapped in a burning vehicle [2]. - The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has initiated an investigation into Tesla's door handle design after receiving multiple complaints from Model Y owners regarding failures of the door handles due to low-voltage battery issues [3]. - NHTSA has requested Tesla to submit records related to the door handle systems of specific Model Y and Model 3 vehicles by December 10, with potential fines of up to $140 million for non-compliance [3]. Group 2: Design Changes and Industry Response - Tesla's design chief has indicated that the company will modify the design of the door handles in response to safety concerns [4]. - Competitors, including Rivian, are reconsidering their hidden door handle designs, with Volkswagen's CEO emphasizing that functionality should take precedence over aesthetics based on customer feedback [6]. - New regulations from Chinese authorities require that electric vehicles have sufficient space for hand operation of door handles and must include mechanical release features to ensure safety in emergencies [6].

Core Points - Tesla is facing lawsuits and investigations in the U.S. due to safety concerns related to its hidden door handle design, which may have contributed to a fatal accident where five passengers were trapped in a burning vehicle [2] - The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has initiated an investigation into the safety defects of Tesla's hidden door handles, following multiple complaints from Model Y owners regarding door handle failures [3] - Competitors, including Rivian, are reconsidering their designs for hidden door handles in light of these safety concerns [5] - New regulations in China require that electric vehicles have sufficient space for hand operation of door handles and mechanical release features to ensure safety in emergencies [6] Summary by Sections Lawsuits and Investigations - A lawsuit has been filed in Wisconsin regarding a fatal accident involving a Tesla Model S, where passengers could not escape due to the door lock system after a collision [2] - The lawsuit accuses Tesla of negligence, claiming the company was aware of the safety risks associated with its door handle design and failed to implement improvements [2] NHTSA Investigation - NHTSA has received 16 complaints about the 2021 Model Y, primarily related to low-voltage battery failures causing door handle malfunctions [3] - The agency has requested Tesla to submit records related to the door system design and customer complaints by December 10, with potential fines for non-compliance [3] Industry Response - The safety concerns surrounding hidden door handles have sparked discussions globally, with competitors like Rivian reassessing their designs [4][5] - Volkswagen's CEO emphasized the importance of functionality over aesthetics in door handle design, reflecting customer feedback [6] Regulatory Changes - New regulations in China mandate that electric vehicles must have adequate hand operation space for door handles and mechanical release features to enhance safety [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights safety concerns regarding the design of the Xiaomi SU7's door handles, particularly the absence of mechanical external handles, which complicates emergency access during accidents [3][4][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On October 13, a Xiaomi SU7 caught fire after a collision in Chengdu, and rescuers struggled to open the doors, ultimately requiring firefighters to use a cutting tool [3]. - This incident occurred 198 days after a previous fire incident involving the same model, raising alarms about the vehicle's safety features [3]. Group 2: Design Flaws - The Xiaomi SU7 lacks a mechanical external handle, relying solely on an internal micro-switch for electronic unlocking, which poses risks in emergencies [4][6]. - The internal emergency handle, while present, may be difficult for unconscious occupants to locate and use quickly, especially in a rapidly deteriorating situation [6][11]. Group 3: Industry Standards and Reactions - Industry experts criticize the design choice of the Xiaomi SU7, noting that most vehicles with hidden handles include safety redundancies to ensure accessibility during power failures [6][10]. - New regulations are being proposed to mandate mechanical handles for vehicle doors to enhance safety, reflecting a shift in industry standards [10][11]. Group 4: Cost Implications - Transitioning from hidden handles to traditional mechanical designs involves significant costs, including redesigning electrical systems and molds, which may deter manufacturers from making changes [13][14]. - The potential need for recalls to upgrade existing vehicles with hidden handles is complicated by the large number of such models on the market and the associated costs [14].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the safety concerns and design flaws associated with hidden door handles in vehicles, highlighting the need for new safety standards and alternative designs to enhance emergency accessibility and reduce risks during accidents [1][2][3]. Group 1: Safety Concerns - Hidden door handles have been linked to multiple safety issues, including insufficient strength, potential safety risks in control logic, and difficulties in operation during emergencies [1][2]. - The lack of clear and uniform markings on hidden door handles increases the difficulty of operation in urgent situations, such as collisions or fires [2]. - Incidents like the Xiaomi SU7 high-speed collision have brought attention to the safety hazards posed by hidden door handles, particularly in terms of escape and rescue challenges [2]. Group 2: Industry Response - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) has initiated a public consultation for revising mandatory national standards for automotive door handles, focusing on emergency access and safety requirements [1][5]. - Some automotive companies are exploring alternative safety solutions, such as integrating mechanical door handles within hidden designs to ensure accessibility during emergencies [4][5]. - There is a growing trend among manufacturers to reconsider the use of hidden door handles due to their complex structure and higher maintenance costs compared to traditional designs [3][4].