据报道，司法部律师已向相关方发出传票，以调查库克是否在房贷申请中存在欺诈行为。 美国司法部已对美联储理事库克涉嫌房贷欺诈展开刑事调查。此举发生在库克就特朗普总统对其罢免行 为提起诉讼、案件正在法院审理之际，进一步加剧了白宫与美联储之间的紧张关系。 一些专家认为，这种行为是一种"法律战"，特朗普及其盟友正利用职权打击政敌，进一步扰乱政治和金 融体系的平衡。 责任编辑：栎树 库克由拜登总统于2022年任命，任期长达14年，至2038年结束。她是美联储历史上首位非裔女性理事。 案件目前由美国联邦地区法官Jia Cobb审理，预计将加速审理进程，最终可能提交至最高法院裁决。 特朗普对白宫与美联储的关系一直持对抗态度，试图削弱央行的独立性。今年早些时候，特朗普曾威胁 罢免美联储主席鲍威尔，理由是其未能及时降息，但在投资者强烈反对后暂时收回此举。 特朗普还曾指控鲍威尔在美联储总部翻新工程中存在"欺诈行为"，该项目成本超出预期，引发市场争 议。 此次对库克的调查，是司法部今年第三次针对民主党或民主党任命官员发起的房贷欺诈调查。此前，美 国司法部长邦迪已任命特别检察官，调查白宫对白加州参议员Adam Schiff和纽约州总检 ...

（原标题：罢免事件持续发酵 美司法部对美联储理事库克展开刑事调查） 智通财经APP获悉，美国司法部已对美联储理事库克涉嫌房贷欺诈展开刑事调查。此举发生在库克就特 朗普总统对其罢免行为提起诉讼、案件正在法院审理之际，进一步加剧了白宫与美联储之间的紧张关 系。 据报道，司法部律师已向相关方发出传票，以调查库克是否在房贷申请中存在欺诈行为。 文件中还透露，房贷记录中的差异可能源于"文书错误"，并不构成欺诈行为。 库克由拜登总统于2022年任命，任期长达14年，至2038年结束。她是美联储历史上首位非裔女性理事。 案件目前由美国联邦地区法官Jia Cobb审理，预计将加速审理进程，最终可能提交至最高法院裁决。 特朗普对白宫与美联储的关系一直持对抗态度，试图削弱央行的独立性。今年早些时候，特朗普曾威胁 罢免美联储主席鲍威尔，理由是其未能及时降息，但在投资者强烈反对后暂时收回此举。 特朗普还曾指控鲍威尔在美联储总部翻新工程中存在"欺诈行为"，该项目成本超出预期，引发市场争 议。 此次对库克的调查，是司法部今年第三次针对民主党或民主党任命官员发起的房贷欺诈调查。此前，美 国司法部长邦迪已任命特别检察官，调查白宫对白加州参议 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the unprecedented legal battle initiated by Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook against former President Donald Trump, aiming to prevent his attempt to remove her from office, which could escalate to the Supreme Court [4]. Group 1: Legal Action - Lisa Cook filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, and the Federal Reserve Board, challenging Trump's attempt to remove her from her position [4]. - The lawsuit claims that Trump's actions are illegal and violate the Federal Reserve Act, which requires "just cause" for the removal of a board member [4][8]. - Cook's attorney argues that the allegations against her do not constitute "just cause" as defined by the law, which includes inefficiency, neglect of duty, or misconduct [4][8]. Group 2: Background and Context - Trump's attempt to remove Cook follows months of complaints about her and other Federal Reserve officials not lowering interest rates as he desired [5]. - The allegations against Cook originated from Bill Pulte, a supporter of Trump, who has referred the matter to the Department of Justice for investigation [6]. - Cook has not been charged with any crime or convicted of mortgage fraud, and her commitment to serve the economy remains strong despite the allegations [6]. Group 3: Implications and Significance - The case hinges on whether the court will recognize Trump's justification for Cook's removal as "just cause" under U.S. law, which has not been clearly defined [8]. - Trump's actions are seen as part of a broader strategy to exert pressure on the Federal Reserve, which he has criticized for its policies [9]. - Cook's appointment as the first Black woman on the Federal Reserve Board was contentious, facing significant opposition from Republican senators during her confirmation process [9].

据路透社、《纽约时报》等媒体报道，当地时间8月25日，美联储理事库克表示，特朗普无权将她从美联储解雇， 她也不会辞职。 据悉，库克通过律师向媒体发表声明回应称，特朗普"在法律上既无依据也无权力"解除其职务——该职位由时任总 统拜登于2022年任命，其任期将持续至2038年。 库克强调："我将继续履行稳定美国经济的职责。"其律师指出，特朗普的要求"缺乏正当程序、事实依据和法律授 权，库克方面将采取一切必要法律行动予以抵制"。 库克是美联储首名非洲裔女性理事，任期至2038年。她2022年5月就任美联储理事，先前是密歇根州立大学经济学 教授，曾在民主党人奥巴马任总统期间任职于经济顾问委员会。 特朗普宣布撤销库克职务 当天稍早前，美国总统特朗普在其社交媒体"真实社交"上公开了一封致美联储理事莉萨·库克的信件，宣布即刻将其 免职。 据了解，特朗普在信中援引的《联邦储备法》确实规定总统可"基于正当理由"撤换美联储理事。不过自上世纪70年 代以来，历任美国总统为保持货币政策公信力，均避免干预美联储事务。 特朗普政府多次喊话库克辞职 这场风波始于上周美国联邦住房金融署署长普尔特对库克抵押贷款问题的质疑。对此，有美国专家指出 ...

Core Viewpoint - Former Brazilian President Bolsonaro claims that the accusations against him are part of a "legal war" and are clearly politically motivated, expressing gratitude for support from former U.S. President Trump [1] Group 1 - Trump criticized Brazil's handling of the situation regarding Bolsonaro, stating that Bolsonaro has committed no wrongdoing and is a strong leader who loves his country [1] - Trump emphasized that Bolsonaro is a tough negotiator in trade matters and noted that the election results were very close, with Bolsonaro currently leading in polls [1] - Trump described the actions against Bolsonaro as attacks from political opponents, drawing parallels to his own experiences with similar situations [1]

Group 1 - India announced retaliatory tariffs of up to $725 million on certain U.S. goods, disrupting the negotiation pace set by the Trump administration [1][3] - The retaliatory action came just before the expiration of a 90-day grace period for countries to negotiate trade agreements with the U.S. [3] - India firmly opposes opening its agricultural market, particularly in agriculture and dairy sectors, which are considered "red lines" [5][14] Group 2 - India's exports to the U.S. account for only about 18% of its total exports, indicating limited impact from U.S. tariffs [10] - The Indian government is focused on reducing reliance on U.S. technology through initiatives like "Make in India 2.0" [12] - Modi's government is committed to protecting farmers' rights, recalling past protests against agricultural reforms [17] Group 3 - Modi's recent participation in the BRICS summit indicates a strategic shift towards strengthening ties with emerging economies [19] - BRICS countries are collaborating on reducing dependence on the U.S. dollar, which aligns with India's economic strategy [21] - The U.S. is facing challenges in its negotiation tactics, as seen in stalled talks with the EU, Japan, and Canada [24] Group 4 - India is leveraging the WTO to challenge U.S. actions, indicating a shift from bilateral to multilateral negotiations [26] - India's strong stance against U.S. pressure serves as a signal to other nations that resistance is possible [28]