美国突然对委内瑞拉动武，强行控制委总统马杜罗和夫人，声称将"管理"这一南美国家。美国学者和媒 体指出，美国这次连"民主"外衣都不披了。 （来源：新华日报） "先前曾有一些时期，如越南和伊拉克（战争）……那时的美国领导人对外传达信息还以民主为遮 掩。"美国印第安纳波利斯大学历史学家爱德华·弗朗茨说，"而特朗普现在的表达方式是我们长久以来 未曾见过的"，让人想起"炮舰外交"。 （据新华社电） ...

美国突然对委内瑞拉动武，强行控制委总统马杜罗和夫人，声称将"管理"这一南美国家。美国学者和媒 体指出，美国这次连"民主"外衣都不披了。 在5日召开的联合国安理会委内瑞拉局势紧急会议上，俄罗斯常驻联合国代表涅边贾发言说，俄方强烈 谴责美国对委内瑞拉的武装侵略，美国此举意味着"无法无天时代的回归"；哥伦比亚常驻联合国代表莱 昂诺尔·扎拉巴塔·托雷斯说，这唤起了对"我们这个地区遭受过的最恶劣干涉"的回忆，"民主不能以暴力 和胁迫来捍卫或推动"；南非常驻联合国代理副代表乔纳森·帕斯摩尔指出，美方此举再次强化"强权即 公理"的错误逻辑，国际关系面临陷入无序的风险。 特朗普政府这次动武在美国国内也遭到反对。民主、共和两党一些议员说，这是"非法战争"，是美国对 外"霸凌"。5日，抗议者聚集在纽约南区联邦地区法院外，抗议军事干涉委内瑞拉，要求释放马杜罗。 5日，美国国务院官员称，一些美国外交官已经表示，如果特朗普政府决定重新开放美国驻委内瑞拉大 使馆，他们坚决不会受命前往，因为被派驻当地如同成为"占领军"的代表。 美联社5日在报道中评论，特朗普政府对委内瑞拉的军事行动及相关言论，让人想起19世纪末至20世纪 初美国为夺取土地 ...

来源：新华网 新华社北京1月6日电 美国突然对委内瑞拉动武，强行控制委总统马杜罗和夫人，声称将"管理"这一南 美国家。美国学者和媒体指出，美国这次连"民主"外衣都不披了。 美联社5日在报道中评论，特朗普政府对委内瑞拉的军事行动及相关言论，让人想起19世纪末至20世纪 初美国为夺取土地和资源对拉美地区发动军事行动。特朗普政府以"门罗主义"为军事干涉委内瑞拉正 名，以保护美国安全和利益为名威胁该地区其他国家。 国际社会对美国这一行径予以强烈反对和谴责。联合国秘书长古特雷斯说，美国对委内瑞拉采取的行 动"构成了危险的先例"；巴西总统卢拉直斥这是"将强权凌驾于多边主义之上"；古巴国家主席迪亚斯- 卡内尔指出，这是"针对美洲的国家恐怖主义行径"。 在5日召开的联合国安理会委内瑞拉局势紧急会议上，俄罗斯常驻联合国代表涅边贾发言说，俄方强烈 谴责美国对委内瑞拉的武装侵略，美国此举意味着"无法无天时代的回归"；哥伦比亚常驻联合国代表莱 昂诺尔·扎拉巴塔·托雷斯说，这唤起了对"我们这个地区遭受过的最恶劣干涉"的回忆，"民主不能以暴力 和胁迫来捍卫或推动"；南非常驻联合国代理副代表乔纳森·帕斯摩尔指出，美方此举再次强化"强权即 ...

【环球时报驻美国特约记者 萧达 环球时报特约记者 王逸】美国政府对委内瑞拉实施军事打击并强行控制委内瑞拉总统马杜罗及其夫人引起了国际社会的强 烈谴责。当地时间5日上午，联合国安理会在纽约联合国总部举行紧急会议，讨论委内瑞拉问题。同一天在同一个城市，马杜罗被荷枪实弹的美国军警带入 纽约南区联邦地区法院"出庭"。面对美国总统特朗普发出的新威胁，委内瑞拉代理总统罗德里格斯一方面发表致世界及美国的公开信，邀请美国"在主权平 等和互不干涉的基础上"商讨合作，另一方面她在全国电视讲话中强调，"我们永远不会再沦为他国的殖民地"。对于目前错综复杂的局势，哥伦比亚、巴 西、智利、墨西哥、乌拉圭等6国发表联合声明指出，对委实施单边军事行动为地区和平与安全开创了"极其危险的先例"，6国对此深表关切并予以反对，呼 吁通过对话和谈判和平解决危机。 特朗普发出新威胁 据美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）报道，当地时间5日上午约9时，载着被美国强行控制的委内瑞拉总统马杜罗的车队抵达纽约南区联邦地区法院。CNN拍摄 的视频显示，马杜罗戴着手铐，周围簇拥着荷枪实弹的警察。报道称，纽约南区联邦地区法院4日发布通知称，马杜罗于5日12时"出庭"。此前， ...

Core Points - The article discusses a recent phone call between U.S. President Trump and Venezuelan President Maduro, exploring the possibility of a meeting in the U.S. [1][2] - There are currently no specific plans for a meeting, and discussions are still in the planning stage [2][3] - Trump has indicated a shift from military action to direct negotiations with Maduro, marking a significant change in U.S. policy towards Venezuela [3] Group 1: U.S.-Venezuela Relations - Trump has expressed a willingness to engage in direct talks with Maduro, moving away from military intervention as the primary strategy [3] - The U.S. is expanding its anti-drug operations against Venezuelan drug trafficking groups, transitioning from naval to land-based actions [4][5] - Recent military deployments in the Caribbean represent the largest U.S. military presence in the region in decades, raising concerns about potential military action against Venezuela [5] Group 2: Military and Strategic Developments - The U.S. military has reportedly intercepted 85% of drug shipments from Venezuela via sea routes and plans to enhance land operations [4] - The Venezuelan government has accused the U.S. of using military threats to instigate regime change, while also emphasizing the need for military readiness against external threats [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela, highlighting the potential for military action while also indicating a willingness for dialogue between President Trump and President Maduro [3][4][5]. Group 1: Military Actions and Strategies - The U.S. has recently sunk over 20 vessels allegedly involved in drug trafficking, resulting in over 80 deaths, and has increased its military presence around Venezuela, deploying advanced naval assets including the USS Ford aircraft carrier [5]. - Trump has authorized the CIA to conduct covert operations within Venezuela, with potential military actions including sabotage, cyber warfare, and psychological operations being considered [5]. - The U.S. has designated the Venezuelan "Sun Group" as a "foreign terrorist organization," claiming it is led by Maduro, which may provide a pretext for further military actions [7]. Group 2: Diplomatic Efforts - Reports indicate that Trump is planning to engage in direct dialogue with Maduro, although the specifics of the discussions remain unclear and are still in the planning stages [4]. - The U.S. military's recent activities in the Caribbean, including visits by military leaders, suggest a dual approach of military readiness alongside diplomatic overtures [7]. Group 3: Impact on Aviation and International Relations - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration has warned airlines about the risks of flying in Venezuelan airspace due to increased military activities, leading to several airlines from Brazil, Colombia, Portugal, and Spain canceling flights to Venezuela [8]. - Venezuela has demanded that airlines that canceled flights resume operations within 48 hours or face restrictions on entering its airspace [9].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the speculation of potential U.S. military action against Venezuela, with recent developments indicating a shift towards dialogue between President Trump and President Maduro [1][2][3] - The U.S. has designated a Venezuelan drug trafficking group as a "foreign terrorist organization," claiming it is led by Maduro, which may provide a pretext for further military action [3][2] - The U.S. military has increased its presence in the Caribbean, deploying advanced naval assets, including the aircraft carrier USS Ford, while simultaneously conducting operations against alleged drug trafficking vessels [2][3] Group 2 - The U.S. government has been applying pressure on Venezuela while signaling a willingness to engage in dialogue, indicating a potential shift in strategy [2][3] - The U.S. military's recent activities include the sinking of over 20 alleged drug trafficking vessels, resulting in significant casualties, and the ongoing military buildup in the region [2][3] - The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned airlines about the risks of flying in Venezuelan airspace due to increased military activity, leading to cancellations of flights by several international airlines [4][5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the recent increase in U.S. military presence in the Caribbean under the guise of combating drug trafficking has escalated tensions in the region, particularly drawing strong opposition from countries like Venezuela [1][3][5] - The scale of U.S. military operations in Latin America has significantly increased, with the deployment of an aircraft carrier carrying over 5,000 soldiers and numerous aircraft, indicating a show of force rather than a genuine anti-drug effort [3][5] - The U.S. military actions are perceived as ineffective against local drug trade and may serve to distract from domestic issues or to undermine leftist leaders in Latin America, potentially exacerbating regional instability [5][7] Group 2 - There are multiple risks associated with potential U.S. ground actions against Venezuela, including legal, political, and geopolitical challenges, as military action requires congressional authorization and could lead to unintended consequences [7][9] - Venezuela has accused the U.S. of orchestrating "false flag" operations to justify military intervention, while the U.S. aims to reshape regional dominance through military means, which may further polarize Latin American countries [9] - The ongoing military actions could lead to increased conflict and instability in Latin America, making the region a potential battleground for geopolitical rivalries [9]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Venezuela is facing unprecedented military threats from the United States, with President Maduro emphasizing the country's preparedness to defend its sovereignty against these actions [1][2]. - Maduro claims that the U.S. military deployment near Venezuela, which includes 8 warships carrying 1200 missiles and a nuclear submarine, represents the largest threat the country has faced in nearly a century [1]. - The Venezuelan government has accused the U.S. of engaging in "gunboat diplomacy," a term that refers to the use of military force to influence other nations, which Maduro argues is a desperate move following the failure of U.S. sanctions and isolation strategies against Venezuela [2]. Group 2 - In response to the perceived threat, Venezuela has mobilized troops to its borders and called on citizens to join militia organizations to protect the nation [3]. - Maduro has expressed a desire to maintain communication with the U.S., but he notes that the bilateral channels have deteriorated significantly, indicating a breakdown in diplomatic relations [2].

Group 1: Trade Relations - The U.S. has postponed the significant increase in tariffs on Chinese goods for an additional 90 days, indicating a strategic maneuver to address trade negotiations with other countries before refocusing on China [1] - Trump has urged China to significantly increase its purchases of U.S. soybeans, aiming to reduce the trade deficit, despite the fact that U.S. soybean sales to China have plummeted to a 20-year low [3] - Brazil has become the dominant supplier of soybeans to China, capturing nearly 70% of China's imports due to zero tariffs and price advantages, while U.S. soybeans struggle under a 23% punitive tariff [3] Group 2: Military Tensions - Following the tariff extension, the U.S. Navy's "Higgins" destroyer entered Chinese territorial waters, escalating military tensions in the South China Sea [5] - The timing of the U.S. military actions appears to be a calculated move to disrupt ongoing negotiations between China and ASEAN regarding the South China Sea Code of Conduct [5] - The U.S. military's provocative actions are increasingly viewed as ineffective, with allies like Japan and Australia showing reluctance to engage in joint military operations in the region [6] Group 3: Regional Dynamics - The Philippines seems to miscalculate its reliance on U.S. military support, overlooking its geographical proximity to China, which could leave it vulnerable in the event of escalated tensions [7]