欧洲的反应同样强烈。过去几十年，欧洲一直处于美国的安全保护伞下，习惯了做被保护者。然而，当前的安全焦虑使得欧盟推动联合军备、增加防务预 算、强化军工合作，试图从被动接受保护转变为主动提供安全保障。结果是，双方在政策和预算上的反应形成了镜像效应。欧洲认为俄罗斯是长期威胁，因 此俄罗斯增加国防开支予以回应；而欧洲因此更加焦虑，进而加大安全投入。 这已不仅仅是简单的情感对抗，更是制度和结构上固化的表现。从邻居到对 手，从合作到防范，当这种变化深刻影响到双方长期战略框架时，它便不再受一次会议或一份声明的左右。俄罗斯与欧洲，正通过实际行动，书写着他们关 系决裂的新篇章。 中国还在过大年，而欧洲却迎来了一份来自俄罗斯的强硬警告。俄罗斯公开向欧方发出通牒，声明不排除采取报复措施。节日的喜庆氛围与风暴几乎同时来 临。问题在于，这份警告到底是俄罗斯的姿态性施压，还是在为后续行动做铺垫？ 最近，俄罗斯政坛的强硬派再度迈出了新的一步。尼古拉·帕特鲁舍夫17 日公开表示，如果欧洲国家继续扣押俄罗斯的船只，俄罗斯将不排除出动海军，甚至可能对欧洲的船只进行报复行动。近年来，西方国家多次通过经济制裁 削弱俄罗斯经济，特别是在能源运输方面， ...

本届美国政府上台以来，不断采取单边主义行动。近期，美国不仅对委内瑞拉发动突然袭击，强行控制 委内瑞拉总统马杜罗夫妇，扣押委内瑞拉石油资产，还声称将动用一切手段获得丹麦自治领地格陵兰 岛。美国《外交事务》杂志近日刊发美国国际法学者的文章《一个没有规则的世界》，从国际法的角度 分析了美国政府种种行为给国际秩序带来的危害。 美国《外交事务》网站截图 作者指出，如今陷入危机的已不只是现行的国际法律体系，还有规则的存续及其对国家权力行使的约 束。 文章说，美国政府的言行令人不安之处不仅在于其违法行为。更甚的是，美国官员彻底抛弃了法律约 束。本届美国政府的行事逻辑仿佛是，单靠武力威胁或动用武力，就能为自身攫取法律赋予的权力。曾 在战争被明令禁止后遭到彻底摒弃的炮舰外交，如今再度死灰复燃。美国正凭借石油封锁、强制性扣押 以及军事威胁等手段，逼迫其他国家做出政治和经济上的让步。此举意在宣扬一套荒谬主张：强权即公 理，实力本身就能凭空催生权力，全然无需任何正当理由。 作者批评道，本届美国政府对《联合国宪章》所确立的禁止使用武力这一国际准则的公然无视，可能会 导致这一准则彻底崩塌。 文章说，过去一年来，美国政府一直在攻击和瓦解现 ...

美国突然对委内瑞拉动武，强行控制委总统马杜罗和夫人，声称将"管理"这一南美国家。美国学者和媒 体指出，美国这次连"民主"外衣都不披了。 （来源：新华日报） "先前曾有一些时期，如越南和伊拉克（战争）……那时的美国领导人对外传达信息还以民主为遮 掩。"美国印第安纳波利斯大学历史学家爱德华·弗朗茨说，"而特朗普现在的表达方式是我们长久以来 未曾见过的"，让人想起"炮舰外交"。 （据新华社电） ...

美国突然对委内瑞拉动武，强行控制委总统马杜罗和夫人，声称将"管理"这一南美国家。美国学者和媒 体指出，美国这次连"民主"外衣都不披了。 在5日召开的联合国安理会委内瑞拉局势紧急会议上，俄罗斯常驻联合国代表涅边贾发言说，俄方强烈 谴责美国对委内瑞拉的武装侵略，美国此举意味着"无法无天时代的回归"；哥伦比亚常驻联合国代表莱 昂诺尔·扎拉巴塔·托雷斯说，这唤起了对"我们这个地区遭受过的最恶劣干涉"的回忆，"民主不能以暴力 和胁迫来捍卫或推动"；南非常驻联合国代理副代表乔纳森·帕斯摩尔指出，美方此举再次强化"强权即 公理"的错误逻辑，国际关系面临陷入无序的风险。 特朗普政府这次动武在美国国内也遭到反对。民主、共和两党一些议员说，这是"非法战争"，是美国对 外"霸凌"。5日，抗议者聚集在纽约南区联邦地区法院外，抗议军事干涉委内瑞拉，要求释放马杜罗。 5日，美国国务院官员称，一些美国外交官已经表示，如果特朗普政府决定重新开放美国驻委内瑞拉大 使馆，他们坚决不会受命前往，因为被派驻当地如同成为"占领军"的代表。 美联社5日在报道中评论，特朗普政府对委内瑞拉的军事行动及相关言论，让人想起19世纪末至20世纪 初美国为夺取土地 ...

来源：新华网 新华社北京1月6日电 美国突然对委内瑞拉动武，强行控制委总统马杜罗和夫人，声称将"管理"这一南 美国家。美国学者和媒体指出，美国这次连"民主"外衣都不披了。 美联社5日在报道中评论，特朗普政府对委内瑞拉的军事行动及相关言论，让人想起19世纪末至20世纪 初美国为夺取土地和资源对拉美地区发动军事行动。特朗普政府以"门罗主义"为军事干涉委内瑞拉正 名，以保护美国安全和利益为名威胁该地区其他国家。 国际社会对美国这一行径予以强烈反对和谴责。联合国秘书长古特雷斯说，美国对委内瑞拉采取的行 动"构成了危险的先例"；巴西总统卢拉直斥这是"将强权凌驾于多边主义之上"；古巴国家主席迪亚斯- 卡内尔指出，这是"针对美洲的国家恐怖主义行径"。 在5日召开的联合国安理会委内瑞拉局势紧急会议上，俄罗斯常驻联合国代表涅边贾发言说，俄方强烈 谴责美国对委内瑞拉的武装侵略，美国此举意味着"无法无天时代的回归"；哥伦比亚常驻联合国代表莱 昂诺尔·扎拉巴塔·托雷斯说，这唤起了对"我们这个地区遭受过的最恶劣干涉"的回忆，"民主不能以暴力 和胁迫来捍卫或推动"；南非常驻联合国代理副代表乔纳森·帕斯摩尔指出，美方此举再次强化"强权即 ...

【环球时报驻美国特约记者 萧达 环球时报特约记者 王逸】美国政府对委内瑞拉实施军事打击并强行控制委内瑞拉总统马杜罗及其夫人引起了国际社会的强 烈谴责。当地时间5日上午，联合国安理会在纽约联合国总部举行紧急会议，讨论委内瑞拉问题。同一天在同一个城市，马杜罗被荷枪实弹的美国军警带入 纽约南区联邦地区法院"出庭"。面对美国总统特朗普发出的新威胁，委内瑞拉代理总统罗德里格斯一方面发表致世界及美国的公开信，邀请美国"在主权平 等和互不干涉的基础上"商讨合作，另一方面她在全国电视讲话中强调，"我们永远不会再沦为他国的殖民地"。对于目前错综复杂的局势，哥伦比亚、巴 西、智利、墨西哥、乌拉圭等6国发表联合声明指出，对委实施单边军事行动为地区和平与安全开创了"极其危险的先例"，6国对此深表关切并予以反对，呼 吁通过对话和谈判和平解决危机。 特朗普发出新威胁 据美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）报道，当地时间5日上午约9时，载着被美国强行控制的委内瑞拉总统马杜罗的车队抵达纽约南区联邦地区法院。CNN拍摄 的视频显示，马杜罗戴着手铐，周围簇拥着荷枪实弹的警察。报道称，纽约南区联邦地区法院4日发布通知称，马杜罗于5日12时"出庭"。此前， ...

Core Points - The article discusses a recent phone call between U.S. President Trump and Venezuelan President Maduro, exploring the possibility of a meeting in the U.S. [1][2] - There are currently no specific plans for a meeting, and discussions are still in the planning stage [2][3] - Trump has indicated a shift from military action to direct negotiations with Maduro, marking a significant change in U.S. policy towards Venezuela [3] Group 1: U.S.-Venezuela Relations - Trump has expressed a willingness to engage in direct talks with Maduro, moving away from military intervention as the primary strategy [3] - The U.S. is expanding its anti-drug operations against Venezuelan drug trafficking groups, transitioning from naval to land-based actions [4][5] - Recent military deployments in the Caribbean represent the largest U.S. military presence in the region in decades, raising concerns about potential military action against Venezuela [5] Group 2: Military and Strategic Developments - The U.S. military has reportedly intercepted 85% of drug shipments from Venezuela via sea routes and plans to enhance land operations [4] - The Venezuelan government has accused the U.S. of using military threats to instigate regime change, while also emphasizing the need for military readiness against external threats [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions between the United States and Venezuela, highlighting the potential for military action while also indicating a willingness for dialogue between President Trump and President Maduro [3][4][5]. Group 1: Military Actions and Strategies - The U.S. has recently sunk over 20 vessels allegedly involved in drug trafficking, resulting in over 80 deaths, and has increased its military presence around Venezuela, deploying advanced naval assets including the USS Ford aircraft carrier [5]. - Trump has authorized the CIA to conduct covert operations within Venezuela, with potential military actions including sabotage, cyber warfare, and psychological operations being considered [5]. - The U.S. has designated the Venezuelan "Sun Group" as a "foreign terrorist organization," claiming it is led by Maduro, which may provide a pretext for further military actions [7]. Group 2: Diplomatic Efforts - Reports indicate that Trump is planning to engage in direct dialogue with Maduro, although the specifics of the discussions remain unclear and are still in the planning stages [4]. - The U.S. military's recent activities in the Caribbean, including visits by military leaders, suggest a dual approach of military readiness alongside diplomatic overtures [7]. Group 3: Impact on Aviation and International Relations - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration has warned airlines about the risks of flying in Venezuelan airspace due to increased military activities, leading to several airlines from Brazil, Colombia, Portugal, and Spain canceling flights to Venezuela [8]. - Venezuela has demanded that airlines that canceled flights resume operations within 48 hours or face restrictions on entering its airspace [9].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the speculation of potential U.S. military action against Venezuela, with recent developments indicating a shift towards dialogue between President Trump and President Maduro [1][2][3] - The U.S. has designated a Venezuelan drug trafficking group as a "foreign terrorist organization," claiming it is led by Maduro, which may provide a pretext for further military action [3][2] - The U.S. military has increased its presence in the Caribbean, deploying advanced naval assets, including the aircraft carrier USS Ford, while simultaneously conducting operations against alleged drug trafficking vessels [2][3] Group 2 - The U.S. government has been applying pressure on Venezuela while signaling a willingness to engage in dialogue, indicating a potential shift in strategy [2][3] - The U.S. military's recent activities include the sinking of over 20 alleged drug trafficking vessels, resulting in significant casualties, and the ongoing military buildup in the region [2][3] - The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has warned airlines about the risks of flying in Venezuelan airspace due to increased military activity, leading to cancellations of flights by several international airlines [4][5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the recent increase in U.S. military presence in the Caribbean under the guise of combating drug trafficking has escalated tensions in the region, particularly drawing strong opposition from countries like Venezuela [1][3][5] - The scale of U.S. military operations in Latin America has significantly increased, with the deployment of an aircraft carrier carrying over 5,000 soldiers and numerous aircraft, indicating a show of force rather than a genuine anti-drug effort [3][5] - The U.S. military actions are perceived as ineffective against local drug trade and may serve to distract from domestic issues or to undermine leftist leaders in Latin America, potentially exacerbating regional instability [5][7] Group 2 - There are multiple risks associated with potential U.S. ground actions against Venezuela, including legal, political, and geopolitical challenges, as military action requires congressional authorization and could lead to unintended consequences [7][9] - Venezuela has accused the U.S. of orchestrating "false flag" operations to justify military intervention, while the U.S. aims to reshape regional dominance through military means, which may further polarize Latin American countries [9] - The ongoing military actions could lead to increased conflict and instability in Latin America, making the region a potential battleground for geopolitical rivalries [9]