日媒称，日方有意将高市的首次访美时间安排在3月，早于特朗普可能于4月进行的对华访问，意在对外展示"坚如磐石的日美同盟关系"。这一安 排也被一些外媒视为日本提前与美方"统一立场"，防止即将访华的特朗普在对华政策上采取缓和姿态。 然而，此次通话表面上的"热络互动"难掩日本当前所面临的外交困境。外交学院国际关系研究所教授周永生3日在接受《环球时报》记者采访时表 示，高市早苗近期在台湾问题上的一系列错误言论，已将中日关系推入高度僵化与对立状态，这是其急于与特朗普通话的现实背景。在中日关系 紧张的当下，韩国、俄罗斯、朝鲜及东南亚多国与中国保持着良好关系，日本在地区外交中的孤立感不断上升。 周永生认为，高市频频释放访美意愿，本质上是希望借助美国"背书"为自身政府解困。不过，美方此次仅表示"推进协调"，并未敲定具体访美时 间安排，反而进一步暴露出日本在同盟关系中的被动地位。即便如此，仅凭一通电话本身，高市政府仍可在国内营造"得到美方支持"的政治效 果，这种"拉大旗作虎皮"的操作，恰恰反映出其内心极度不安与缺乏战略自信。 【环球时报驻日本特派记者 刘文璋 环球时报记者 李迅典】日本首相高市早苗1月2日与美国总统特朗普举行电话 ...

【文/观察者网 齐倩】 中日关系紧张后，日本"苦求"良久，终于和美国总统特朗普再次通话。 当地时间1月2日，日本首相高市早苗难掩兴奋，通话结束后火速召开记者会，广而告之。同时，日本媒体也一副"便宜"模样，纷纷将此消息放在头版头条。 不过，据香港《南华早报》3日报道，特朗普2日与高市早苗通话结束后，又要在自家佛州海湖庄园会见美国驻华大使庞德伟（David Perdue），随后结束一 天的外交行程。 据日本外务省网站消息，2日晚，高市早苗与特朗普通话后，召开记者会亲自介绍通话情况。现场视频显示，记者会上，高市早苗全程保持笑容，"脸都笑裂 了"。 高市2日晚召开记者会 共同社 《南华早报》认为，特朗普此前表示将在今年初访华，预计庞德伟将在此期间发挥关键作用。 日本首相高市早苗，甫一上任便疯言疯语，她狂言台海冲突可被视为日本"存亡危机事态"，暗示武力介入的可能性，引发中方强烈不满，更导致中日之间的 紧张关系急剧升级。 去年11月，中美元首通话后，不到12个小时内，特朗普主动给高市早苗打了一通电话。对于通话内容，高市早苗一直三缄其口，仅表示"细节不便透露"，日 本政府官方表态也是支支吾吾、装傻充愣。 但多家媒体援引消息 ...

本月2日，特朗普曾点名对日本表达不满。他在内阁会议上称，一些自己"不准备点名"的国家，比如日 本和韩国，多年来一直都在"剥削美国"。据英国《金融时报》此前报道，日本政府因美国没有公开声称 支持日本，而感到"沮丧"。美国《华尔街日报》和日本《周刊文春》杂志报道称，特朗普要求高市早苗 克制对台言论，且措辞相当严厉，"似乎还说了相当于'不要插手台湾问题'这样的话。"《金融时报》 称，日本政府对美国的"冷漠"感到非常沮丧和失望。 忧虑美日同盟不稳？高市早苗试探明年3月访美。 向歆悦 据日本共同社24日引述日本政府相关人士消息称，日本首相高市早苗已就明年3月访美的可能性向美国 发出试探性意见。报道称，日方希望向美方确认"日美同盟的团结"。 报道披露，由于日本国内对特朗普的立场感到担忧，日方最初提议高市早苗在明年1月访美，但最终未 达成一致。日方认为，若是在2026年3月日本2026财年的预算案顺利通过，则高市早苗可利用国会开会 间隙访美。不过访问时间仍有可能推迟到4月或更晚，具体取决于美方的安排。 ...

众院预算委员会会议高市早苗求见特朗普无果，参议院的预算委员会会议，日议员因对美80万亿投资怒斥首相"卖国弃民"，两场会议产生两场难堪，高市早 苗的首相之位似乎真要坐不稳了。 80万亿投资是怎么一回事？特朗普高调访日的10月份，高市早苗那句"希望开启日美同盟新黄金时代"并非戏言，为表日方诚意，明明日本经济已因特朗普糟 糕的关税政策走下坡，高市还是拿出80万亿日元对美国的半导体、能源等领域投资，此支出相当于日本GDP的10%，为了强化日美同盟，高市早苗真是下了 血本，至此，高市政府近期所为就都说得通了。 结合日媒爆料，日前特朗普致电高市早苗时就已警告她别乱来，但看后续高市政府做法，还是疯狂在拉美国下水，甚至在众院预算委员会会议上公开求见特 朗普，看似无理眼下看却有不让80万亿打水漂的用意，花了这么大的一笔钱，日本肯定想从美国处得到些什么，毕竟在美日安全合作框架中，美方一直充当 的就是"保护伞"，特朗普此次撇清关系的毫不犹豫和坚决，着实出乎高市意料，故而她才会公开求见，而美方的拒不回应，带给高市早苗的其实是两重打 击。 首先，高市早苗制定不出行而有效的经济政策，她的心思并不在发展经济之上，其次，日本内部自省于她而言 ...

面对中国的愤怒，美国为何不救日本呢？高市早苗若遭清算，石破茂会东山再起吗？ 中日关系已经闹到今天这种地步，即便是日本在安全、经济和外交等层面上已经付出了巨大代价，但高市早苗至今仍没有悔改之心。相反，她通过避实就 虚、偷梁换柱、颠倒黑白等手段，不断为其涉台错误言论进行狡辩，旨在歪曲事实、混淆视听，为日本突破战后体制、谋求军事松绑，染指台海局势臆 造"灰色空间"制造借口，其心可诛！ 所以，美国这时候没有在中日之间站队，并且还派出两架B-52轰炸机在远离中国航母编队的日本海"走个过场"，其实就是给足了日本面子。毕竟，对美国 而言，日本虽说"听话"，但包藏祸心，这种有着斑斑劣迹历史的国家，美国惯不得！相比之下，中国是全球最有可能帮特朗普实现"让美国再次伟大起 来"的大国，特朗普有求于中国的事情多着呢。因此，如果不是因为有美日同盟这层关系，特朗普可能早就站在中国这边一起"抗日"了。 美国不想救日本，高市病急乱投医赴美向特朗普求援，结果换不来美国公开支持也就算了，弄不好，日本可能还会因此被特朗普多剪一遍羊毛。中日关系 持续恶化，中俄联手收拾日本，而美国则在边上摩拳擦掌瞅准时机继续从日本身上抽血。从某种意义上来讲，日本当前 ...

Group 1 - Japan feels frustrated with the insufficient public support from the US for Prime Minister Kishi's comments regarding Taiwan, urging for more explicit backing from the Trump administration [1][12][15] - Following a diplomatic dispute between China and Japan, the US has expressed limited support, with only a statement from the US Ambassador to Japan, while other forms of public backing have been absent [1][5][16] - Reports indicate that the US has paused plans to impose sanctions on China related to alleged cyberattacks to maintain the trade truce established in late October [1][13] Group 2 - US officials have indicated that there will be no new significant export controls on China after the recent summit, aiming to avoid disrupting the improving US-China relations [2][13] - Despite the lack of public support from the US, Japan does not believe that the US will waver in its commitment to Japan, although disappointment over the absence of high-level backing persists [4][15] - Former US officials argue that the US should have welcomed Kishi's statements about Japan's potential support in the event of a conflict over Taiwan, highlighting the irony of the current lack of support [4][5][15] Group 3 - Japan's Defense Ministry reported that Chinese naval activities, including the Liaoning aircraft carrier's operations, have led to increased tensions, with Japan claiming radar lock incidents involving its aircraft [8][19] - The Chinese military has responded to Japan's claims, asserting that their training exercises were conducted within designated areas and accusing Japan of misrepresenting the situation [11][23] - The ongoing tensions have prompted China to issue travel warnings and suspend imports of Japanese seafood, which some Japanese media view as retaliatory measures [7][18]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's recent plans to modify the Self-Defense Forces' rank names, including the restoration of terms like "Colonel," have raised concerns about a potential revival of militarism, which could be seen as a provocation to nations affected by Japan's colonial history [3]. Group 1: Japan's Military Policy Changes - Japan's military security movements are under scrutiny due to its colonial and invasion history, with significant adjustments to security policies and an increase in defense budgets noted in recent years [3]. - The country is seeking to develop offensive weapons and is moving away from its "no nuclear" principles, which raises alarms among neighboring countries and the international community [3]. - The resurgence of right-wing forces in Japan is pushing for a departure from the constraints of the "Peace Constitution," indicating a shift towards militarization [3]. Group 2: Territorial Disputes - The Diaoyu Islands, claimed by China, are highlighted as an area of contention, with Chinese Coast Guard vessels conducting lawful patrols in the region, which Japan has protested [3]. - China firmly rejects Japan's diplomatic protests regarding its patrols, asserting its territorial sovereignty and calling for Japan to respect the four-point consensus between China and Japan [3]. Group 3: U.S.-Japan Relations - Comments made by the U.S. Ambassador to Japan regarding China are characterized as politically motivated and contrary to the responsibilities of a diplomat, emphasizing that the U.S.-Japan alliance should not target third parties [4].

针对美国驻日本大使格拉斯在社交平台上的有关涉华言论，毛宁表示，美国这位大使的有关表态，纯属 别有用心的政治作秀，有违外交官的身份和职责。美日同盟是冷战产物，不应针对第三方，更不应肆意 干涉他国内政，损害他国核心利益。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 11月18日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。 ...

毛宁对此表示，美国这位大使的有关表态，纯属别有用心的政治作秀，有违外交官的身份和职责。美日 同盟是冷战产物，不应针对第三方，更不应肆意干涉他国内政，损害他国核心利益。 【环球时报-环球网 报道 记者 邢晓婧】18日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。环球时报-环球网记 者提问称，据报道，美国驻日本大使格拉斯在X上称，感谢中国驻日外交官帮助加强美日之间的联系。 中方对此有何评论？ ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of remembering historical events, particularly Japan's wartime actions during World War II, to prevent repeating past mistakes and to cherish peace achieved after the war [1][3]. Group 1: Historical Context - The article highlights that Japan's militaristic actions during World War II caused immense suffering, particularly in China, where over 35 million people were casualties of the war [1]. - It notes that August 15, 1945, marks Japan's unconditional surrender, symbolizing the victory of the Chinese people in the Anti-Japanese War and the global anti-fascist struggle [1]. Group 2: Current Political Climate - The article discusses Japan's current political landscape, where some politicians and right-wing groups are attempting to downplay Japan's wartime responsibilities and distort historical facts, such as the Nanjing Massacre and the "comfort women" issue [3][4]. - It mentions Japan's recent shift in historical discourse, where the government has moved away from established practices of addressing historical issues, leading to criticism of Japan's regression on historical matters [3]. Group 3: Military and Strategic Developments - The article outlines Japan's increasing military budget and its efforts to amend its pacifist constitution, which raises concerns about a resurgence of militarism [3][4]. - It points out that Japan's defense strategy is evolving, with the upcoming 2024 upgrade of the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty shifting the alliance's focus from defense to a more offensive posture, which could embolden Japan's military ambitions [4]. Group 4: International Reactions - The article notes that there is growing international criticism of Japan's attempts to whitewash its wartime history and its military expansion, with voices from various countries expressing concern over Japan's actions [5]. - It highlights that some Japanese citizens are becoming aware of the true historical events, leading to shock and disillusionment regarding the government's narrative [5].