Core Viewpoint - Japan's recent plans to modify the Self-Defense Forces' rank names, including the restoration of terms like "Colonel," have raised concerns about a potential revival of militarism, which could be seen as a provocation to nations affected by Japan's colonial history [3]. Group 1: Japan's Military Policy Changes - Japan's military security movements are under scrutiny due to its colonial and invasion history, with significant adjustments to security policies and an increase in defense budgets noted in recent years [3]. - The country is seeking to develop offensive weapons and is moving away from its "no nuclear" principles, which raises alarms among neighboring countries and the international community [3]. - The resurgence of right-wing forces in Japan is pushing for a departure from the constraints of the "Peace Constitution," indicating a shift towards militarization [3]. Group 2: Territorial Disputes - The Diaoyu Islands, claimed by China, are highlighted as an area of contention, with Chinese Coast Guard vessels conducting lawful patrols in the region, which Japan has protested [3]. - China firmly rejects Japan's diplomatic protests regarding its patrols, asserting its territorial sovereignty and calling for Japan to respect the four-point consensus between China and Japan [3]. Group 3: U.S.-Japan Relations - Comments made by the U.S. Ambassador to Japan regarding China are characterized as politically motivated and contrary to the responsibilities of a diplomat, emphasizing that the U.S.-Japan alliance should not target third parties [4].

针对美国驻日本大使格拉斯在社交平台上的有关涉华言论，毛宁表示，美国这位大使的有关表态，纯属 别有用心的政治作秀，有违外交官的身份和职责。美日同盟是冷战产物，不应针对第三方，更不应肆意 干涉他国内政，损害他国核心利益。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 11月18日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。 ...

毛宁对此表示，美国这位大使的有关表态，纯属别有用心的政治作秀，有违外交官的身份和职责。美日 同盟是冷战产物，不应针对第三方，更不应肆意干涉他国内政，损害他国核心利益。 【环球时报-环球网 报道 记者 邢晓婧】18日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。环球时报-环球网记 者提问称，据报道，美国驻日本大使格拉斯在X上称，感谢中国驻日外交官帮助加强美日之间的联系。 中方对此有何评论？ ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of remembering historical events, particularly Japan's wartime actions during World War II, to prevent repeating past mistakes and to cherish peace achieved after the war [1][3]. Group 1: Historical Context - The article highlights that Japan's militaristic actions during World War II caused immense suffering, particularly in China, where over 35 million people were casualties of the war [1]. - It notes that August 15, 1945, marks Japan's unconditional surrender, symbolizing the victory of the Chinese people in the Anti-Japanese War and the global anti-fascist struggle [1]. Group 2: Current Political Climate - The article discusses Japan's current political landscape, where some politicians and right-wing groups are attempting to downplay Japan's wartime responsibilities and distort historical facts, such as the Nanjing Massacre and the "comfort women" issue [3][4]. - It mentions Japan's recent shift in historical discourse, where the government has moved away from established practices of addressing historical issues, leading to criticism of Japan's regression on historical matters [3]. Group 3: Military and Strategic Developments - The article outlines Japan's increasing military budget and its efforts to amend its pacifist constitution, which raises concerns about a resurgence of militarism [3][4]. - It points out that Japan's defense strategy is evolving, with the upcoming 2024 upgrade of the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty shifting the alliance's focus from defense to a more offensive posture, which could embolden Japan's military ambitions [4]. Group 4: International Reactions - The article notes that there is growing international criticism of Japan's attempts to whitewash its wartime history and its military expansion, with voices from various countries expressing concern over Japan's actions [5]. - It highlights that some Japanese citizens are becoming aware of the true historical events, leading to shock and disillusionment regarding the government's narrative [5].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement by China's General Administration of Customs to conditionally resume imports of seafood from certain regions of Japan, excluding ten high-risk prefectures, reflects a significant geopolitical maneuver amidst rising tensions between the U.S. and Japan [1][3]. Group 1: Trade Policy Changes - China has resumed imports of Japanese seafood from regions other than Fukushima and nine other high-risk prefectures based on scientific monitoring and Japan's safety assurances [1][4]. - All Japanese seafood exported to China must include official health certificates, radioactive material testing results, and proof of origin [4]. Group 2: Economic Implications - The reopening of the Chinese market is crucial for Japan's seafood industry, which saw exports worth 1.4148 trillion yen in 2022, with over 25% of that coming from China [5]. - Japan's automotive industry, which constitutes 20% of its GDP and supports millions of jobs, faces severe challenges due to the U.S. imposing a 25% tariff on Japanese goods [3][5]. Group 3: Geopolitical Context - The timing of China's decision coincides with a period of strained U.S.-Japan relations, as the U.S. has increased tariffs on Japanese goods, putting additional pressure on Japan's economy [3][8]. - The announcement has been interpreted as a strategic move by China to exploit the rift between the U.S. and Japan, potentially strengthening its influence in East Asia [8][10]. Group 4: Regional Cooperation - There are signs of a strategic shift in Japan, with discussions within the ruling party about reducing reliance on the U.S. and adjusting its stance on automotive tariff negotiations [8][10]. - Former Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama has called for closer economic cooperation among China, Japan, and South Korea to counter U.S. tariffs, highlighting the potential for a united East Asian economic front [8][10].

Group 1 - Japan's net investment in the US for 2024 is projected to reach 11.7 trillion yen, marking a historical high, while investments in China have not increased [1][2] - Japanese companies are accelerating investments in the US, with net foreign direct investment reaching 31.6325 trillion yen, a 17.1% increase from the previous year, the highest since 1996 [2][4] - Japanese investments in ASEAN are also rising significantly, with an estimated 4.4 trillion yen in 2024, a 36% increase from the previous year [4] Group 2 - Japanese investment in China is projected to be only 493.1 billion yen in 2024, remaining stable compared to 2023, and down nearly 60% from ten years ago [4][11] - The depreciation of the yen by 7.8% against the dollar in 2024 has not deterred Japanese companies from increasing foreign investments [6] - Japanese companies are focusing on high-tech investments in the US, with 70% of investments concentrated in AI, biomedicine, and new energy vehicles [10] Group 3 - The US market's appeal is driven by its large consumer base of 330 million people and high per capita consumption, prompting companies like Toyota to invest significantly in the US [9][10] - Japan's investment in the US has increased from 29% in 2014 to 39% in 2024, while investment in China has decreased from 22% to 7% [13] - Japan plans to increase high-tech investments in the US to 8 trillion yen annually by 2030, focusing on quantum computing and space economy [13]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the trade negotiations between the US and Japan, with Trump pressuring Japan to eliminate its trade deficit with the US and expand imports of American products [2][5] - Japan's response to US pressure includes seeking diplomatic solutions with China, as evidenced by the visit of Katsuhiro Yoshida, the leader of the Komeito party, to China [5][10] - Japan's GDP is projected to decline by 0.2% due to the high tariffs imposed by the US on key industries such as automobiles and steel, prompting Japan to strengthen its economic ties with China [5][10] Group 2 - Japan aims to deepen economic cooperation with China in critical sectors like semiconductors and renewable energy to reduce reliance on the US [8][10] - The visit by Katsuhiro Yoshida is seen as a signal to the US that Japan may pivot towards China for economic collaboration if US pressure continues [10][11] - China has expressed a cautious but welcoming attitude towards Japan's outreach, emphasizing the importance of mutual respect and cooperation while maintaining strategic vigilance [10][13]