Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the food safety issue related to the transportation of edible oil has escalated into a legal battle involving former Hubei billionaire Lan Shili and the company behind Jinlongyu, Yihai Kerry. The situation has raised significant public concern and led to legal actions over defamation and claims of improper gains [1][5]. Group 1: Incident Background - The incident began in July 2024 when multiple media outlets reported on the "chaotic transportation of edible oil by tankers," which included allegations that tankers had previously transported non-food substances [6][7]. - On July 9, 2024, Lan Shili released a video claiming that a tanker transported edible oil to Jinlongyu's factory without proper cleaning, leading to a significant drop in the company's stock value [7][8]. - The video gained substantial traction on social media, amassing 46,000 likes and over 20,000 shares on Douyin by July 30, 2024 [8]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Yihai Kerry filed a lawsuit against Lan Shili for defamation on October 21, 2024, claiming that his statements were false and damaging to the company's reputation [11][12]. - The Shanghai court ruled in favor of Yihai Kerry, ordering Lan Shili to publicly apologize and pay a total of 30,000 yuan (approximately 4,600 USD) in damages [13]. - Lan Shili appealed the decision, arguing that he was exercising his right to express concerns about public safety [14]. Group 3: Escalation of Disputes - Following the court's decision, a new dispute arose when Lan Shili mistakenly transferred 100,000 yuan (approximately 15,400 USD) instead of the ordered 10,000 yuan to Yihai Kerry [17][18]. - Lan Shili claimed that Yihai Kerry did not inform the court about receiving the payment and instead sought to freeze his bank account, causing him significant distress [18]. - The legal conflict has now expanded to include claims of unjust enrichment, with Lan Shili seeking the return of the excess payment and additional damages [19].

| 食品监督抽检合格信息表（2025年第27期） | 任 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 务 | 抽 | 标称生 | 来 | 检 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 产企业/ | 标称生产企业地址/进 | 源/ | 序 | 查 | 被抽样单 | 规格型 | 生产日 | 分 | 公告 | 验 | 抽样编号 | 被抽样单位地址 | 食品名称 | 公告号 | 期/批号 | 号 | 领 | 进货来 | 货来源地址 | 位名称 | 号 | 类 | 日期 | 项 | 机 | | 域 | 源名称 | 目 | 构 | 名 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ...

(责编：牛镛、袁勃) 本报上海9月17日电 （记者季觉苏）15日，上海市人民政府公布新一批食品安全社会监督员，其中有12 名网约配送员。此外，还有新闻工作者、专业技术人员等，也有来自食品行业协会、食品企业、高校科 研单位等的热心人士，将从不同视角守护食品安全。 截至目前，上海市有食品安全社会监督员125名。社会监督员围绕食品领域新模式新业态等人民群众关 心的热点问题，深入基层一线参与调查研究，积极向食品安全管理部门建言献策，努力构建"监督—反 馈—改进"工作闭环。 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年09月18日 13 版） ...

Core Viewpoint - The initiative to appoint delivery workers as food safety supervisors in Hubei reflects a growing consensus across various regions in China to enhance food safety oversight in the booming food delivery market [1][2]. Group 1: Market Growth and Challenges - The food delivery market in China is experiencing explosive growth, with an estimated market size of approximately 1.5 trillion yuan (around 224 billion USD) by 2024 and a user base of 592 million, accounting for 53% of the total internet users [1]. - Despite the growth, issues such as "ghost kitchens" and unsanitary conditions in delivery restaurants pose significant food safety risks that need to be addressed [1]. Group 2: Role of Delivery Workers - Delivery workers are seen as effective food safety supervisors due to their direct interaction with restaurants and visibility into kitchen environments during food pickup [2]. - The appointment of delivery workers as food safety supervisors can help compel restaurants to adhere to regulations and fill gaps in existing oversight mechanisms [2]. Group 3: Implementation and Challenges - While the initiative to employ delivery workers as food safety supervisors is necessary, regular training and communication are essential to ensure the effectiveness of their oversight [2]. - There are concerns that restaurants may implement countermeasures, such as restricting delivery workers' access to kitchens, which could hinder their ability to perform their supervisory roles effectively [2][3]. Group 4: Encouragement and Incentives - The government has introduced measures to encourage reporting of food safety issues, including financial rewards for whistleblowers, which may enhance the effectiveness of delivery workers as food safety monitors [3]. - The collaboration between delivery workers, restaurant staff, and regulatory bodies is crucial for maintaining food safety standards in the rapidly evolving food delivery landscape [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region's Wusu City Market Supervision Bureau is enhancing food safety supervision for online food delivery platforms to ensure public health and safety [1]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The bureau is implementing a "penetrating inspection" approach, utilizing random sampling, data comparison, and on-site verification to monitor food safety compliance among online food delivery operators [3]. - Key areas of focus include the establishment of food safety management structures, the appointment of responsible personnel, and the adherence to food safety protocols by both platforms and delivery operators [3][4]. Group 2: Compliance Checks - Inspections will verify the authenticity of business operation scenarios, the accuracy of food and ingredient listings, and the implementation of "Internet + Open Kitchen" initiatives [4]. - The bureau will also assess compliance in procurement, transportation, and storage of food products, ensuring that there are no cross-contamination risks and that hygiene standards are maintained [4]. Group 3: Future Plans - The bureau plans to intensify inspections in key areas such as urban-rural junctions and alleys, focusing on businesses with a history of complaints or poor ratings [4]. - There will be an increase in inspection frequency and innovative measures to strengthen food safety defenses [4].