对生产力理论的继承发展 生产力理论是马克思主义的重要内容。马克思主义认为，生产力是一切社会发展的最终决定力量，这一 论断深刻揭示了生产力发展对社会形态演进的推动作用。在社会生产力由低级阶段到高级阶段不断演变 的历史进程中，科学技术所扮演的角色愈加关键。从第一次产业革命中蒸汽机的发明应用，到第二次产 业革命使人类社会步入电气化时代，再到第三次产业革命掀起信息化浪潮，每一次社会生产力的飞跃都 源于科学技术的颠覆性创新。习近平总书记指出，"新质生产力是创新起主导作用，摆脱传统经济增长 方式、生产力发展路径，具有高科技、高效能、高质量特征，符合新发展理念的先进生产力质态"，强 调"科技创新和产业创新，是发展新质生产力的基本路径"。这些重要论述揭示了新时代社会生产力发展 特征和规律，丰富发展了马克思主义生产力理论。 回望历史，我们党对生产力发展规律的认识是在实践探索中不断深化的。新中国成立后，我们党不懈推 进社会主义经济建设，对我国经济发展问题进行探索，毛泽东同志把"解放生产力"确立为社会主义革命 的目的。改革开放后，邓小平同志提出"科学技术是第一生产力"，揭示了科学技术对经济社会发展的变 革作用。党的十八大以来，新一 ...

Core Concept - The concept of "Green Mountains and Clear Water are as Valuable as Mountains of Gold and Silver" emphasizes the unity of economic development and ecological protection, guiding China's ecological civilization construction towards a historic transformation [1][2][3]. Theoretical Value - The "Two Mountains" theory proposed by Xi Jinping in 2005 has been consistently emphasized by the Chinese leadership, highlighting its importance in ecological civilization construction and sustainable development [2][3]. - The theory integrates Marxist ecological views with traditional Chinese ecological wisdom, forming a unique ecological civilization theory rooted in China [3][4]. Economic and Ecological Relationship - The theory breaks the dichotomy between economic development and ecological protection, establishing a harmonious coexistence perspective that recognizes the intrinsic relationship between ecology and economy [4][5]. - It posits that ecological value is inherently linked to economic and social value, advocating for a system where ecological protection is integrated into economic growth [4][5]. Practical Transformations - The implementation of the theory has led to significant improvements in China's ecological environment, with air quality and water quality showing marked enhancements [7]. - By 2024, the number of cities meeting air quality standards increased to 222, and PM2.5 levels dropped from 46 µg/m³ in 2015 to 29.3 µg/m³ [7]. Modern Economic System - The theory promotes the idea that green ecology is a significant asset, leading to the development of a modern economic system that balances ecological and economic growth [8][9]. - It encourages the integration of ecological industry and industrial ecology, fostering a complete cycle where economic development supports ecological restoration [8]. Governance and Legal Framework - The establishment of strict legal frameworks and governance systems is crucial for ensuring the effective implementation of the ecological civilization principles [9]. - The Chinese government has focused on creating a comprehensive ecological governance system to support the realization of the "Two Mountains" theory [9]. International Influence - The theory has gained international recognition, providing a model for developing countries facing ecological constraints while pursuing economic growth [10][11]. - China's approach to ecological civilization has been highlighted in international forums, showcasing its potential as a global reference for sustainable development [10][12]. Innovative Practices - Various local initiatives have emerged under the guidance of the theory, demonstrating practical applications that balance ecological protection with economic development [13]. - Examples include the transformation of ecological resources into marketable assets, such as carbon credits from bamboo forests, showcasing innovative approaches to sustainable development [13]. New Civilizational Path - The theory guides humanity towards a new form of civilization that prioritizes ecological sustainability over traditional industrial growth models [14]. - It challenges the notion that modernization must follow Western paradigms, advocating for a development path that respects ecological integrity [14].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that high-quality development is essential for building a modern socialist country, with the development of new quality productivity being a key focus for achieving this goal [1][2] - New quality productivity is seen as an important requirement for promoting high-quality development, necessitating a balance between nurturing new momentum and updating old momentum [1][2] - Xi Jinping's discussions on new quality productivity provide fundamental guidance and direction for accelerating its development, highlighting the need for scientific understanding of its historical perspective and value orientation [1][2] Group 2 - New quality productivity enriches the Marxist theory of productivity, emphasizing that the liberation and development of productivity are fundamental standards for measuring social progress [2][3] - The emphasis on technological progress within the Marxist productivity theory indicates that technology has become an independent and significant means of production, reinforcing the idea that innovation is central to new quality productivity [3][4] - The relationship between productivity and production relations is highlighted, indicating that the development of new quality productivity requires innovative approaches in both technology and management [5][6] Group 3 - The concept of new quality productivity underscores the need for a new type of production relationship that aligns with its development, advocating for comprehensive reforms to adapt to the evolving economic landscape [5][6] - The focus on enhancing total factor productivity as a core indicator of new quality productivity reflects a commitment to improving social productivity levels and the efficiency of wealth production [7][8] - The integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation is crucial for advancing new quality productivity, which is characterized by a significant increase in total factor productivity [7][8] Group 4 - The advancement of new quality productivity is linked to the necessity of establishing a new type of production relationship that is compatible with its development, emphasizing the importance of systemic reforms [14][15] - The role of new-type laborers, including scientists and engineers, is essential in driving the innovations that contribute to new quality productivity [15][16] - The relationship between value creation and productivity is explored, asserting that while total factor productivity enhances production levels, it does not directly create value, which remains rooted in labor [15][16]