Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of developing new quality productivity to achieve high-quality economic growth and technological self-reliance [1][4] Group 1: New Quality Productivity Theory - New quality productivity theory redefines the elements of productivity, including laborers, labor materials, and labor objects, reflecting the profound changes in production relations [2][3] - It calls for a new type of laborer who is knowledge-based, skilled, and innovative, aligning with the characteristics of high-tech, high-efficiency, and high-quality production [2][6] Group 2: Innovation as a Driving Force - The theory highlights the leading role of innovation, encompassing technological, institutional, and managerial innovations, as essential for productivity development [4][6] - There is a strong emphasis on the integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation to foster new industries and business models [4][7] Group 3: People-Centric Development - The development of new quality productivity aims to enhance the living standards of the people, addressing the imbalance in development and ensuring equitable benefits from economic growth [5][6] - It stresses the importance of cultivating high-quality laborers to meet the demands of new quality productivity [6][7] Group 4: Green Transformation - The article asserts that green development is fundamental to high-quality growth, with new quality productivity being inherently linked to green productivity [7] - It advocates for a shift from traditional high-input, high-pollution models to resource-saving and environmentally friendly development practices [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of promoting high-quality development through accelerating technological self-reliance and innovation, as well as fostering new productive forces in the context of significant global changes and challenges [1]. Group 1: New Productive Forces - The concept of "new productive forces" transcends traditional definitions of productivity, incorporating laborers, labor materials, labor objects, and their optimized combinations [2]. - There is a call for a new type of laborer who is not only an executor but also plays a crucial role in the innovative allocation and efficient use of production factors [2]. - Labor materials are evolving through technological innovation, particularly with the application of cutting-edge technologies like AI and big data in production processes [2]. Group 2: Expanding Labor Objects - Labor objects have been redefined to include non-physical forms such as data, reflecting the evolution of production levels throughout human history [3]. Group 3: Driving Forces of Productivity Development - The new productive forces theory highlights the leading role of innovation, which encompasses technological, institutional, and managerial innovations [4]. - There is an urgent need for the integration of technological and industrial innovation to achieve high-level self-reliance and development of new productive forces [4]. - The relationship between production relations and productivity development must be adapted, necessitating comprehensive reforms to support the new productive forces [4]. Group 4: People-Centric Development - The development of new productive forces aims to enhance the living standards of the people, addressing the imbalance between growing needs and insufficient development [5]. - The focus is on cultivating high-quality laborers who meet the demands of new productive forces, emphasizing the importance of education and talent development [6]. Group 5: Green Transformation of Development - Green development is identified as a fundamental aspect of high-quality development, with new productive forces being inherently linked to green productivity [7]. - The transition to a green development model is essential to achieve resource conservation and environmentally friendly growth, moving away from traditional high-input, high-pollution practices [7]. - The promotion of green technologies and the development of a low-carbon economy are crucial for enhancing the quality and sustainability of economic growth [7].

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the acceleration of significant changes in the world, driven by disruptive technologies such as artificial intelligence and synthetic biology, which present both opportunities and challenges for China's economic development [1] - Xi Jinping's concept of "new quality productivity" is introduced, highlighting its importance for high-quality economic development and modernization in China [1][4] - The evolution of productivity theory is discussed, tracing its roots in Marxism and emphasizing the role of technological innovation in advancing productivity [2][3] Group 2 - The article outlines the historical context of productivity development in China, noting key figures like Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, who contributed to the understanding of productivity's role in economic transformation [3] - It highlights the necessity of adapting production relations to meet the demands of new quality productivity, as stated in the recent decisions made by the 20th Central Committee [7] - The need for comprehensive reforms to eliminate systemic barriers and create a conducive environment for new quality productivity is emphasized, including market reforms and talent integration [8]

Core Concept - The concept of "Green Mountains and Clear Water are as Valuable as Mountains of Gold and Silver" emphasizes the unity of economic development and ecological protection, guiding China's ecological civilization construction towards a historic transformation [1][2][3]. Theoretical Value - The "Two Mountains" theory proposed by Xi Jinping in 2005 has been consistently emphasized by the Chinese leadership, highlighting its importance in ecological civilization construction and sustainable development [2][3]. - The theory integrates Marxist ecological views with traditional Chinese ecological wisdom, forming a unique ecological civilization theory rooted in China [3][4]. Economic and Ecological Relationship - The theory breaks the dichotomy between economic development and ecological protection, establishing a harmonious coexistence perspective that recognizes the intrinsic relationship between ecology and economy [4][5]. - It posits that ecological value is inherently linked to economic and social value, advocating for a system where ecological protection is integrated into economic growth [4][5]. Practical Transformations - The implementation of the theory has led to significant improvements in China's ecological environment, with air quality and water quality showing marked enhancements [7]. - By 2024, the number of cities meeting air quality standards increased to 222, and PM2.5 levels dropped from 46 µg/m³ in 2015 to 29.3 µg/m³ [7]. Modern Economic System - The theory promotes the idea that green ecology is a significant asset, leading to the development of a modern economic system that balances ecological and economic growth [8][9]. - It encourages the integration of ecological industry and industrial ecology, fostering a complete cycle where economic development supports ecological restoration [8]. Governance and Legal Framework - The establishment of strict legal frameworks and governance systems is crucial for ensuring the effective implementation of the ecological civilization principles [9]. - The Chinese government has focused on creating a comprehensive ecological governance system to support the realization of the "Two Mountains" theory [9]. International Influence - The theory has gained international recognition, providing a model for developing countries facing ecological constraints while pursuing economic growth [10][11]. - China's approach to ecological civilization has been highlighted in international forums, showcasing its potential as a global reference for sustainable development [10][12]. Innovative Practices - Various local initiatives have emerged under the guidance of the theory, demonstrating practical applications that balance ecological protection with economic development [13]. - Examples include the transformation of ecological resources into marketable assets, such as carbon credits from bamboo forests, showcasing innovative approaches to sustainable development [13]. New Civilizational Path - The theory guides humanity towards a new form of civilization that prioritizes ecological sustainability over traditional industrial growth models [14]. - It challenges the notion that modernization must follow Western paradigms, advocating for a development path that respects ecological integrity [14].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that high-quality development is essential for building a modern socialist country, with the development of new quality productivity being a key focus for achieving this goal [1][2] - New quality productivity is seen as an important requirement for promoting high-quality development, necessitating a balance between nurturing new momentum and updating old momentum [1][2] - Xi Jinping's discussions on new quality productivity provide fundamental guidance and direction for accelerating its development, highlighting the need for scientific understanding of its historical perspective and value orientation [1][2] Group 2 - New quality productivity enriches the Marxist theory of productivity, emphasizing that the liberation and development of productivity are fundamental standards for measuring social progress [2][3] - The emphasis on technological progress within the Marxist productivity theory indicates that technology has become an independent and significant means of production, reinforcing the idea that innovation is central to new quality productivity [3][4] - The relationship between productivity and production relations is highlighted, indicating that the development of new quality productivity requires innovative approaches in both technology and management [5][6] Group 3 - The concept of new quality productivity underscores the need for a new type of production relationship that aligns with its development, advocating for comprehensive reforms to adapt to the evolving economic landscape [5][6] - The focus on enhancing total factor productivity as a core indicator of new quality productivity reflects a commitment to improving social productivity levels and the efficiency of wealth production [7][8] - The integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation is crucial for advancing new quality productivity, which is characterized by a significant increase in total factor productivity [7][8] Group 4 - The advancement of new quality productivity is linked to the necessity of establishing a new type of production relationship that is compatible with its development, emphasizing the importance of systemic reforms [14][15] - The role of new-type laborers, including scientists and engineers, is essential in driving the innovations that contribute to new quality productivity [15][16] - The relationship between value creation and productivity is explored, asserting that while total factor productivity enhances production levels, it does not directly create value, which remains rooted in labor [15][16]