11月9日，中国国家计算机病毒应急处理中心发布了《LuBian矿池遭黑客攻击被窃取巨额比特币事件技术溯源分析报告》，揭示了美国如何操作这件事。报 告称，美国利用国家级黑客团队，历时四年，最终将本应归还诈骗受害者的比特币转移到美国国库。 要理清这件事，我们得从头说起。陈志，1987年出生，福建连江人。2002年，他在高中未完成学业时开始搭建《传奇》私服，凭此赚到了第一个100万。随 后，他转行做私服发布站，出售广告位，收取保护费，几年的时间就积累了千万财富。随着国内对私服的打击越来越严厉，陈志转而开始从事电信诈骗业 务，最初与台湾的犯罪团伙合作，做一些"猜猜我是谁"或"恭喜中奖"等骗局。 到了2015年左右，国内的打击力度加大，他便跑到了柬埔寨西哈努克港，在那里与洪森政府建立了关系，获得了柬埔寨国籍，并创办了"太子集团"。表面 上，太子集团的业务涉及地产、金融、酒店等领域，但实际上，它是一个披着跨国集团外衣的电信诈骗窝点。从2015年起，太子集团在柬埔寨、老挝、缅甸 等地建立了至少10个诈骗园区。 美国出动国家级黑客，花费了四年时间，最终把柬埔寨太子电诈集团的上百亿资金偷进了美国国库。这件事可能不少人听说过，柬 ...

Core Viewpoint - A U.S. cybersecurity provider claims to have been attacked by hackers supported by the Chinese government, prompting a response from the Chinese Foreign Ministry, which denies the allegations and criticizes the lack of evidence [1]. Group 1: Company Response - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, stated that they are unaware of the specific situation mentioned by the U.S. cybersecurity provider [1]. - The Ministry reiterated its consistent opposition to hacking activities and emphasized the importance of combating such actions legally [1]. Group 2: Political Context - The Chinese government opposes the dissemination of false information for political purposes, highlighting a broader context of geopolitical tensions surrounding cybersecurity issues [1].

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident of fraudulent transactions involving the SPDB Mastercard Red Sand Credit Card has raised significant concerns among cardholders, with many sharing their experiences on social media [1] Group 1: Incident Overview - A growing number of cardholders have reported unauthorized transactions, prompting SPDB and Mastercard to conduct investigations [1] - Industry experts suggest that the concentrated fraud incidents may be linked to organized hacking activities [1] Group 2: Financial Responsibility - Some cardholders have had their bills cleared, and affected credit cards have been frozen or reported lost [1] - Multiple cardholders have indicated that the bank has assured them they will not bear the losses from the fraudulent transactions [1] Group 3: Institutional Response - SPDB's credit card center has issued a statement committing to protect customers from undue losses and to uphold their legal rights [1] - Mastercard has initiated an emergency investigation in collaboration with SPDB, forming a special team to trace the source of the risk and prevent potential threats, while also ensuring the financial protection of affected cardholders [1]

智通财经7月29日电，据央视新闻报道，俄罗斯莫斯科所有"首都药店"门店因系统疑似遭黑客攻击暂停 营业。门店收银系统与库存管理系统全面瘫痪，员工被迫临时休假。该连锁药店计划在未来几天内修复 故障，但具体恢复时间尚未明确。药店官方网站证实了此次故障，但并未称其为黑客攻击。 莫斯科多家药店疑似遭黑客攻击 系统严重瘫痪 ...

Core Viewpoint - The hacking incident at the Iranian cryptocurrency exchange Nobitex, which resulted in an estimated theft of $100 million, is believed to be politically motivated, potentially linked to the ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - Nobitex reported that the total estimated stolen assets amount to approximately $100 million, but the situation is under control, and user assets are protected by a reserve fund, ensuring no user financial loss [1]. - The hacker group Gonjeshke Darande, allegedly linked to Israel, claimed responsibility for the theft and previously announced the destruction of data from Iran's state-owned bank Sepah [1][2]. - Elliptic indicated that the stolen funds were rendered inaccessible by being stored in vanity addresses without corresponding keys, making recovery virtually impossible with current technology [1]. Group 2: Political Context - The hacker group is suspected to have ties to Israel, although no official confirmation of its identity or nationality exists [2]. - The hacking incident may be related to the recent escalation of tensions between Israel and Iran, as suggested by cybersecurity experts [2]. - The actions of the hacker group align with Israel's regional priorities, targeting Iranian digital sectors and strategic entities [2]. Group 3: Industry Impact - The incident adds to the growing list of victims of hacking in the cryptocurrency industry, with over $2.1 billion in digital assets stolen in 2025 alone, according to blockchain security firm CertiK [2].

Core Viewpoint - Major cryptocurrency exchanges Binance and Kraken have reportedly become targets of hacking attacks similar to those recently disclosed by Coinbase, but their internal policies and technologies have successfully mitigated these attacks [1]. Group 1: Hacking Incidents - Binance and Kraken faced hacking attempts that mirrored the recent attack on Coinbase, but their defenses were effective [1]. - Binance identified that scammers attempted to bribe customer service personnel and provided a Telegram account to contact the criminals [1]. - The security teams of several competing exchanges became aware of hackers specifically targeting large holders on Coinbase as early as December of the previous year [1]. Group 2: Coinbase Data Breach - Coinbase publicly disclosed a significant data breach where hackers bribed overseas customer service outsourcing personnel to obtain sensitive information of approximately 97,000 users [1]. - The hackers demanded a ransom of $20 million in Bitcoin, threatening to release the data if not paid [1]. - Coinbase refused to pay the ransom and instead offered a reward of the same amount for information leading to the resolution of the case [1]. Group 3: Industry Context - The cryptocurrency industry has been a target for cybercriminals since its inception over a decade ago, with numerous exchanges like Bybit, Bitfinex, and FTX suffering losses amounting to billions due to hacking incidents [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent hacking incident involving the infamous online forum 4chan, detailing the methods used by the hacker to gain access and the subsequent impact on the platform [17][38]. Group 1: Overview of 4chan - 4chan is described as a highly controversial and unregulated forum with a monthly active user base of 20 million and peak concurrent users reaching 200,000 [6][7]. - The forum is known for its extreme and often offensive content, including a section dedicated to "politically incorrect" discussions [8][12]. - It has been a source of various internet memes and cultural phenomena, but also a platform for misinformation, with 12% of fake news on Reddit traced back to 4chan [10][12]. Group 2: Hacking Incident - On April 14, 4chan became inaccessible due to a hacking incident, which was later confirmed to be a result of a successful attack by a hacker who claimed responsibility on a rival forum [17][18]. - The hacker released 120 GB of sensitive data, including source code, moderator information, and user IP addresses, demonstrating the severity of the breach [20][21]. Group 3: Method of Attack - The hacker exploited a vulnerability by uploading a malicious file disguised as a PDF, which was actually a PostScript file, taking advantage of 4chan's lack of file validation [29][30]. - The attack was facilitated by an outdated version of Ghostscript used by 4chan, which allowed the hacker to execute commands and gain server access [35][36]. - Following the breach, 4chan has updated its security measures, including replacing affected servers and disabling the PDF upload feature temporarily [38][39]. Group 4: Implications and Reactions - The incident highlights a shift in hacking techniques, moving away from social engineering to exploiting technical vulnerabilities, which has surprised many in the cybersecurity community [41][42]. - After two weeks of downtime, 4chan resumed operations, continuing to attract attention for its controversial content [42].

Group 1: Trump's Family Involvement in Cryptocurrency - The Trump family has gained significant attention in the cryptocurrency space, particularly with the launch of "Trump Coin," which saw its price surge nearly 60% to a peak of $14.7 following an announcement of a dinner event with top holders [3][4] - Melania Trump also launched "Melania Coin," which experienced a buying frenzy before its official release, resulting in traders making nearly $100 million in profits shortly after [3][4] - Trump's family controls a significant portion of the "Trump Coin," with estimates suggesting they hold 80% of the total supply, and Trump himself has reportedly earned $350 million from these ventures [4] Group 2: Regulatory Changes in Cryptocurrency - The Federal Reserve has recently retracted several documents urging banks to exercise caution in cryptocurrency activities, signaling a more favorable regulatory stance towards the crypto industry [5] - The Fed's withdrawal of previous regulatory guidance indicates that banks are no longer required to report crypto-related activities, which could lead to increased participation in the market [5] - This shift in regulatory approach is seen as a boost for the cryptocurrency sector, potentially encouraging more institutional involvement [5] Group 3: Security Concerns in Cryptocurrency - A significant security breach occurred on the Binance Smart Chain, where hackers stole approximately 2 million Binance Coins, equating to an estimated $100 million loss [8] - This incident highlights the ongoing security risks within the cryptocurrency market, emphasizing the need for investors to choose reliable trading platforms and implement robust asset protection measures [8] - The combination of high-profile scams, regulatory changes, and security threats creates a complex environment for investors in the cryptocurrency space [8]