专题： 2025分析师大会：资本市场"奥斯卡"！机构称A股迎全球资本涌入的大牛市 11月28日，2025分析师大会重磅启幕，百位行研首席、公私募掌舵人、权威学者齐聚一堂，共寻穿越周 期的投资真谛。国泰海通证券研究与机构业务委员会副总裁、研究所所长路颖出席2025分析师大会暨第 七届新浪财经金麒麟分析师盛典并担任颁奖嘉宾。 路颖 国泰海通证券研究 与机构业务委员会副总裁、研究所所长 图 左一 为国泰海通证 券研究与机构业务委员会副总裁、研究所所长路颖 与机构业务委员会副总裁、研究所所长 责任编辑：石秀珍 SF183 专题： 2025分析师大会：资本市场"奥斯卡"！机构称A股迎全球资本涌入的大牛市 图 左一 为国泰海通证 11月28日，2025分析师大会重磅启幕，百位行研首席、公私募掌舵人、权威学者齐聚一堂，共寻穿越周 期的投资真谛。国泰海通证券研究与机构业务委员会副总裁、研究所所长路颖出席2025分析师大会暨第 七届新浪财经金麒麟分析师盛典并担任颁奖嘉宾。 路颖 国泰海通证券研究 券研究与机构业务委员会副总裁、研究所所长路颖 责任编辑：石秀珍 SF183 ...

Core Insights - The 2025 Analyst Conference highlighted the potential for a bull market in A-shares, driven by global capital inflows [1] Group 1: Market Conditions - Historical bubbles require three key conditions: a low interest rate environment, a market with profit-making effects, and a lack of investment opportunities in major global markets [1] - The example of the 2006-2007 A-share market surge illustrates how external factors, such as the collapse of the US real estate market, can create favorable conditions for domestic markets to thrive [1]

Core Insights - The 2025 Analyst Conference highlighted expectations for a significant influx of global capital into the A-share market, suggesting a potential bull market in China [1] Group 1: Economic Outlook - By 2025, China's economy is expected to have rebounded, with a likely recovery in Return on Equity (ROE) [1] - Following supply-side adjustments, Chinese companies are anticipated to demonstrate improved profitability and resilience [1] Group 2: Global Investment Trends - It is projected that AI investments in the United States will likely slow down, coinciding with unsustainable high fiscal deficits [1] - The anticipated economic conditions may trigger a new wave of global asset reallocation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is expected to experience a significant bull market driven by global capital inflows, with bank stocks emerging as the star sector in 2025 [1] Group 1: Bank Sector Performance - The four major banks have repeatedly set historical highs, with several joint-stock banks, city commercial banks, and rural commercial banks also achieving record performances [1] Group 2: Analyst Awards - The results of the 7th Sina Finance Golden Unicorn Best Analyst Awards were announced, highlighting top research teams in the banking sector: - 1st: Zheshang Securities Research Team led by Liang Fengjie - 2nd: Zhongtai Securities Research Team led by Dai Zhifeng - 3rd: Dongfang Securities Research Team led by Qu Jun - 4th: Changjiang Securities Research Team led by Ma Xiangyun - 5th: Guosen Securities Research Team led by Wang Jian - 6th: China Merchants Securities Research Team led by Wang Xianshuang [1]

Core Conclusion - The current A-share bull market shows no clear signs of bubble formation, characterized by "new high in volume, moderate enthusiasm, uneven driving forces, and distinct structural features" [1] Market Overview - The total market capitalization and circulating market value of A-shares have reached historical highs, indicating a significant expansion compared to previous bull markets, but the ratios of circulating market value to GDP and M2 remain in the mid-low range [4][23] - The current PE ratio of the CSI 300 is approximately 12.84, significantly lower than the historical peaks of 27.88 in 2007 and 19.42 in 2015, suggesting that the current market is more reliant on valuation recovery driven by interest rate declines and policy expectations rather than fundamental earnings growth [20][22] Trading Activity - Trading activity is gradually increasing, with the turnover rate and the proportion of rising days not reaching historical highs, indicating that the market is not in an overheated state [4][19] - The proportion of stocks reaching historical highs is only about 10%, which is significantly lower than the levels seen during previous bull market peaks [49] Fund Inflows - The enthusiasm of retail investors remains limited, as evidenced by the lower number of new accounts and fund issuances compared to previous bull markets [23][21] - The financing balance has surpassed the 2015 high but still represents a low proportion of circulating market value, indicating a cautious risk appetite without excessive leverage [46][21] Sector Rotation - The TMT sector has seen increased trading concentration, with its transaction volume exceeding 40%, reflecting a crowded trading environment [51] - The current market breadth is healthy, with no clear signals of divergence between index performance and the number of stocks participating in the rally [4][5] Future Outlook - The market is expected to maintain a "strong oscillation" state around the National Day holiday, with potential transitions from liquidity-driven growth to fundamental-driven growth anticipated in November [5][1] - Historical data suggests that style rotation is not prominent immediately after the National Day, but significant shifts are often observed between Q3 and Q4 [5][2]

Group 1 - The report emphasizes that the current A-share bull market is characterized by a "slow bull" trend, with the Shanghai Composite Index having risen over 40% since September 24, and over 23% since the "407 Golden Pit" [1][11] - The report outlines a three-phase transition for the bull market: liquidity-driven bull, fundamental bull, and a transition from old to new momentum, indicating that significant upward movement in the index requires these phases to be validated [1][11] - The report identifies that the current market is not in a state of irrational overheating, with high market capitalization but moderate trading heat and uneven driving forces [2][3] Group 2 - The report compares the current bull market with historical bull markets, noting that the current rise is significantly lower than previous bull markets, with the Shanghai Composite Index's rise of 42% being much less than the 430% in 2007 and 146% in 2015 [20][22] - It highlights that the current bull market's trading volume and turnover rates are lower than historical highs, indicating a more moderate market environment [20][24] - The report states that the current average PE ratio for the CSI 300 is approximately 12.84, which is significantly lower than the extreme levels seen in previous bull markets, suggesting that the current market is more reliant on policy expectations and liquidity rather than fundamental earnings growth [24][25] Group 3 - The report discusses the liquidity and funding aspects of the current bull market, noting that the total market capitalization and circulating market value have reached historical highs, but the ratio of circulating market value to GDP remains low at 59% [26][24] - It mentions that the number of new accounts and fund issuances is weaker compared to previous bull markets, indicating limited enthusiasm from retail investors [26][24] - The report also highlights that the current financing balance has surpassed the previous high in 2015, but the proportion of financing balance to circulating market value is still low, suggesting that the market is not excessively leveraged [26][49] Group 4 - The report outlines ten core monitoring indicators for the bull market, including macro positioning indicators like market capitalization ratios and deposit securitization rates, which indicate the market's relative valuation [40][41] - It emphasizes trading heat indicators such as market activity based on turnover rates and the number of stocks reaching new highs, which are currently lower than historical peaks, suggesting a more cautious market environment [48][52] - The report also discusses industry rotation indicators, highlighting that the current market breadth is supported by a diverse range of stocks rather than being driven by a few large-cap stocks [5][61]

Core Insights - The report discusses the historical patterns of A-share bull markets, highlighting that each bull market typically experiences two significant waves of volatility, with an average duration of 20-40 trading days and a pullback range of 10%-20% [1][7] - The adjustments during these bull markets are primarily influenced by liquidity and sentiment rather than fundamentals, with concerns over market overheating, regulatory tightening, and external risks temporarily interrupting the bull market progression [1][7] - The report categorizes bull market volatility into four types based on their driving factors: institutional dividend and profit-driven bull, policy-driven recovery bull, liquidity and leverage bull, and liquidity-driven bull transitioning to fundamental bull [1][11][25][39] Group 1: Institutional Dividend and Profit-Driven Bull (2005-2007) - This bull market was characterized by stock reform and macroeconomic prosperity, leading to a "Davis Double Play" effect, with volatility primarily stemming from concerns over market bubbles and monetary tightening [11][19] - The first wave of volatility was triggered by fears of excessive "hot money" and rising inflation, leading to a rotation from large-cap value stocks to small-cap growth stocks [11][19] - The second wave of volatility, known as the "530 Stock Disaster," resulted in a shift towards defensive sectors and large-cap stocks after a significant tax increase on stock transactions [19][20] Group 2: Policy-Driven Recovery Bull (2008-2009) - This bull market was fueled by a massive stimulus plan, with volatility arising from skepticism about policy effectiveness and external economic factors [25][29] - The first wave of volatility was marked by doubts regarding the impact of the "Four Trillion" plan and the ongoing global financial crisis, yet there was no significant style rotation during this period [25][29] - The second wave of volatility was influenced by a downturn in overseas markets, but the dominant sectors remained cyclical and manufacturing without major style shifts [29][35] Group 3: Liquidity and Leverage Bull (2014-2015) - This bull market lacked fundamental support, relying heavily on leverage and reform expectations, with volatility driven by regulatory actions on margin trading [39][43] - The first wave of volatility was initiated by the China Securities Regulatory Commission's crackdown on margin trading, leading to a shift from large financial stocks to growth sectors [39][43] - The second wave of volatility saw renewed regulatory focus on curbing excessive leverage, prompting a rotation back to growth stocks from value stocks [39][51] Group 4: Liquidity-Driven Bull Transitioning to Fundamental Bull (1999-2001) - This period began with a technology-driven bull market fueled by internet speculation and increased liquidity, followed by a transition to a fundamental bull market supported by rising energy prices [55][60] - The initial liquidity-driven phase faced economic slowdowns and deflationary pressures, leading to concerns about growth sustainability [55][60] - The transition to a fundamental bull market was marked by a gradual recovery in economic indicators and a shift in market focus towards cyclical sectors as the economy stabilized [60][62]