Core Viewpoint - The report highlights the performance of various market factors and investment strategies, indicating positive returns in several areas while noting the mixed performance of different factors across industries [4][5][6]. Group 1: Market Factor Performance - The momentum factor achieved a positive return of 0.70%, indicating a momentum effect in the market; profitability and Beta factors also showed positive returns of 0.34% and 0.28% respectively, while the market capitalization factor had a negative return of -0.58%, reflecting a small-cap style [4]. - In the CSI 300 stock pool, the best-performing factors included quarterly operating profit growth rate (1.25%), quarterly ROE (1.07%), and early session return factor (0.95%), while the worst performers were the standard deviation of 6-day trading volume (-0.91%), standardized unexpected income (-0.89%), and quarterly EPS (-0.83%) [5]. - In the CSI 500 stock pool, the top factors were post-early session return factor (1.24%), standard deviation of 5-day trading volume (1.05%), and standard deviation of 6-day trading volume (0.82%), with the weakest factors being ROE stability (-0.96%), 5-minute return skewness (-0.84%), and ROA stability (-0.83%) [5]. Group 2: Industry Factor Performance - Fundamental factors showed varied performance across industries, with net asset growth rate, net profit growth rate, earnings per share, and TTM operating profit factors yielding consistent positive returns in the utilities and leisure services sectors [6]. - Valuation factors, particularly the BP factor, demonstrated significant positive returns in the construction materials, banking, and media sectors, while the EP factor showed notable positive returns in the coal industry [6]. - Residual volatility and liquidity factors yielded consistent positive returns in the defense, oil and petrochemical, and automotive industries, with a significant large-cap style observed in the coal and banking sectors [6]. Group 3: Investment Strategy Performance - The PB-ROE-50 combination achieved positive excess returns in the overall market stock pool, with a negative excess return of -0.40% in the CSI 500 stock pool and a positive excess return of 0.44% in the CSI 800 stock pool [7]. - Public fund research stock selection strategy and private fund research tracking strategy both achieved positive excess returns, with the public fund strategy outperforming the CSI 800 by 3.21% and the private fund strategy by 0.16% [8]. - The block trading combination achieved a positive excess return of 3.61% relative to the CSI All Index [9]. - The targeted issuance combination also achieved a positive excess return of 0.77% relative to the CSI All Index [10].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the performance of various market factors, indicating a mixed performance across different stock pools with specific factors yielding positive or negative returns [2][3][5]. Group 2 - In the overall market, the profitability factor achieved a positive return of 0.54%, while the residual volatility and beta factors gained 0.28% and 0.23% respectively, indicating a small-cap style market performance [2]. - In the CSI 300 stock pool, the best-performing factors included the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio (2.85%) and the TTM inverse P/E ratio (2.32%), while the worst performers were the 5-minute return skew (-1.53%) and gross profit margin TTM (-1.03%) [3]. - The CSI 500 stock pool saw the ROIC enhancement factor perform well with a return of 1.46%, while the worst performers included the 5-day reversal (-1.25%) [3]. - The liquidity 1500 stock pool had the TTM inverse P/E ratio as the best performer (1.30%), while early morning return factors showed negative performance [3]. Group 3 - The fundamental factors showed varied performance across industries, with net asset growth rate and net profit growth rate factors performing consistently well in the telecommunications, beauty care, and commercial trade sectors [5]. - Valuation factors, particularly the earnings yield (EP) factor, performed well in the telecommunications, oil and petrochemical, and steel industries [5]. - The small-cap style was notably significant in the beauty care, media, and computer industries this week [5]. Group 4 - The PB-ROE-50 combination achieved positive excess returns across stock pools, with the CSI 500 pool gaining 1.34% and the CSI 800 pool gaining 1.37% [6]. - The public fund research selection strategy and private fund research tracking strategy both recorded negative excess returns relative to the CSI 800, with losses of -1.58% and -1.45% respectively [7]. - The block trading combination underperformed relative to the CSI All Index, with an excess return of -0.62% [8]. - The targeted issuance combination achieved positive excess returns relative to the CSI All Index, with a gain of 1.17% [9].

点击注册小程序 特别申明： 本订阅号中所涉及的证券研究信息由光大证券研究所编写，仅面向光大证券专业投资者客户，用作新媒体形势下研究 信息和研究观点的沟通交流。非光大证券专业投资者客户，请勿订阅、接收或使用本订阅号中的任何信息。本订阅号 难以设置访问权限，若给您造成不便，敬请谅解。光大证券研究所不会因关注、收到或阅读本订阅号推送内容而视相 关人员为光大证券的客户。 报告摘要 市场情绪追踪 截至2025年5月30日，沪深300上涨家数占比指标最近一个月环比上月上升，上涨家数占比指标高于50%， 市场情绪较高；从动量情绪指标走势来看，近一月快线、慢线向下，快线处于慢线下方，预计在未来一段 时间内将维持谨慎观点；从均线情绪指标来看，短期内沪深300指数处于情绪非景气区间。 机构调研策略跟踪 2025年5月，私募调研跟踪策略获取正超额收益。公募调研选股策略相对中证800获取超额收益-0.44%，私 募调研跟踪策略相对中证800获取超额收益2.57%。 负面清单 截至2025年5月30日，宽松有息负债率排名前30的股票中，中毅达、指南针、现代投资、春兴精工、奥飞 数据、华映科技、和辉光电、思创医惠、泉峰汽车在传统口径下排 ...

- The PB-ROE-50 portfolio achieved an excess return of 1.15% in the CSI 500 stock pool, 0.29% in the CSI 800 stock pool, and -0.30% in the entire market stock pool[23][24] - The public research stock selection strategy achieved an excess return of 0.54% relative to the CSI 800, while the private research tracking strategy achieved an excess return of 2.61% relative to the CSI 800[25][26] - The block trading portfolio achieved an excess return of -0.61% relative to the CSI All Share Index[29][30] - The directed issuance portfolio achieved an excess return of 0.12% relative to the CSI All Share Index[35][36] - The momentum factor and growth factor achieved positive returns of 0.12% and 0.04% respectively, while the liquidity factor, beta factor, and size factor achieved significant negative returns of -0.56%, -0.52%, and -0.40% respectively[18][20] - In the CSI 500 stock pool, the best-performing factors this week were gross profit margin TTM (1.65%), single-quarter ROA (1.40%), and single-quarter total asset gross profit margin (1.26%)[14][15] - In the liquidity 1500 stock pool, the best-performing factors this week were 5-day average turnover rate (0.45%), 5-minute return skewness (0.36%), and downside volatility ratio (0.33%)[16][17] - In the CSI 500 stock pool, the worst-performing factors this week were single-quarter net profit year-on-year growth rate (-0.42%), 5-day reversal (-0.49%), and post-morning return factor (-0.64%)[14][15] - In the liquidity 1500 stock pool, the worst-performing factors this week were momentum spring factor (-1.07%), 5-day reversal (-1.11%), and single-quarter net profit year-on-year growth rate (-1.19%)[16][17] - In the CSI 300 stock pool, the best-performing factors this week were net profit gap (1.30%), 5-day exponential moving average of trading volume (1.15%), and total asset gross profit margin TTM (1.02%)[12][13] - In the CSI 300 stock pool, the worst-performing factors this week were logarithmic market value factor (-1.02%), momentum spring factor (-1.12%), and post-morning return factor (-1.29%)[12][13] - The net asset growth rate factor performed well in the comprehensive industry, and the net profit growth rate factor performed well in the steel industry[21][22] - The BP factor performed well in the beauty and personal care industry, and the EP factor performed well in the coal industry[21][22]